, an ontology for discovery on the web
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network

Share, an ontology for discovery on the web



Quick overview of presented at UK Ontology Network meeting, Edinburgh 11 Apr 2013.

Quick overview of presented at UK Ontology Network meeting, Edinburgh 11 Apr 2013.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



2 Embeds 27 15 12



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment, an ontology for discovery on the web Presentation Transcript

  • 1., an ontology for discovery on the web Phil Barker, Heriot-Watt University @philbarker
  • 2. Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards Supporting innovation and interoperability in educational technology Learning Resource Metadata InitiativeMake it easier to find educational resources by developing acommon metadata framework (within to describe theireducational characteristics
  • 3. is a joint effort, in the spirit of, toimprove the web by creating a structured data markup schemasupported by major search engines. On-page markup helpssearch engines understand the information on web pages andprovide richer search results. A shared markup vocabularymakes easier for webmasters to decide on a markup schemaand get the maximum benefit for their efforts. Search engineswant to make it easier for people to find relevant informationon the web. Markup can also enable new tools andapplications that make use of the structure. FAQ (June 2011)
  • 4. Screenshot of MIT OCW page licence CC:BY-NC-SA
  • 5. Resource Title Creators Educational level URI Publisher Subject Keywords Goals Pre-requisites Resource Type Description Adapted screenshot of MIT OCW page licence CC:BY-NC-SA
  • 6. = ontology + syntax Hierarchy of types, each with own Microdata or RDFa properties in HTML
  • 7. <h3>Instructor(s)</h3><p itemprop="author">Prof. Arthur Mattuck</p><p itemprop="author">Prof. Haynes Miller</p><p itemprop="author">Dr. Jeremy Orloff</p><p itemprop="author">Dr. John Lewis</p><h3>Level</h3><p itemprop="typicalAgeRange" content="18-21">Undergraduate</p>
  • 8. (some) types
  • 9. (some) types
  • 10. (some) types
  • 11. properties for ThingThing additionalType (a URL) description (text) (Expected type for property) image (a URL) name (text) url (a URL)
  • 12. (some) propertiesCreative Work about (a Thing) author (a Person or Organization) copyrightHolder (a Person or Organization) dateCreated (a Date) publisher (a Organization) and many, many more....Plus, from Thing additionalType, description, image, name, url
  • 13. Emphasis on simplicity and search<p itemprop="author">Prof. Arthur Mattuck</p>Should be<p itemprop="author" itemscope itemtype=""> <span itemprop="honorificPrefix">Prof.</span> <span itemprop="givenname">Arthur</span> <span itemprop="familyname">Mattuck</span></p> But even the former helps Google
  • 14. Other observations The ontology is growing (discussion at Being implemented by web sites See Implementation by Google?  Not much obvious use yet  Difficult to know what Google does in background  Can use to build “niche” searches via Google CSE
  • 15. Conclusion Consider using to help build more sophisticated search services by disambiguating information exposed in web pages.
  • 16. Licence and attribution By Phil Barker <>, JISC CETIS <>This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution 3.0 Unported licence.To view a copy of this licence, visit or send aletter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.