Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Social media analysis for toronto 2010 mayoral election

1,396

Published on

Published in: News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,396
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Social Media Analysis 2010 Toronto Mayoral Race Patrick Gladney @pgladney October 22, 2010
  • 2. Background and Objectives  This report builds on earlier studies examining social media activity involving the principal candidates in the 2010 Toronto Mayoral election: Rob Ford, Joe Pantalone and George Smitherman.  It reviews conversations taking place on social networks and reports on propensity of each candidate to be mentioned online as well as the accompanying sentiment from September 20 to October 21  This report offers a final effort to understand which candidate is winning the “word of mouth” war online, and will serve as the final reference for the relationship between online chatter and actual voting results come election day October 25.
  • 3. About Social Media Social media is conversation or interaction between people online. Unlike traditional news media, which tries to maintain objectivity and fairness in reporting the news, social media is a domain of unfettered subjectivity and bias. It’s an environment where innuendo assumes equal prominence alongside fact, and where special interests are forever seeking to leverage the channel’s potential to influence opinion and alter outcomes in their favour. It truly is a new and wild frontier. Traditional polling asks voters who they plan to vote for. Social media provides a broader perspective. The volume and tone of discussion provides a real-time indication of voter engagement and intentions, possibly foretelling the fortune of the candidates based on the response and potential influence of the medium.
  • 4. Trended Mention Activity – Final 3 Candidates  In adding together all of the mentions of the 3 candidates during the last 30 days, 65,543 posts emerged 3807 2444 2499 2093 1019 714 3410 3300 2203 1240 1055 881 1374 1163 2133 2361 1384 2031 982 956 713 1921 2682 2171 1740 913 1912 2706 4188 3453 2837 3258 20/09/2010 21/09/2010 22/09/2010 23/09/2010 24/09/2010 25/09/2010 26/09/2010 27/09/2010 28/09/2010 29/09/2010 30/09/2010 01/10/2010 02/10/2010 03/10/2010 04/10/2010 05/10/2010 06/10/2010 07/10/2010 08/10/2010 09/10/2010 10/10/2010 11/10/2010 12/10/2010 13/10/2010 14/10/2010 15/10/2010 16/10/2010 17/10/2010 18/10/2010 19/10/2010 20/10/2010 21/10/2010 Daily Average: 2009
  • 5. Trended Mention Activity: Ford  There’s been a downward trend in Ford mentions, with peaks in activity attributable to televised debates, controversial policy announcements and polls challenging Ford’s front- runner status 2894 1587 1482 1393 645 472 2200 1848 1219 612 549 696 868 700 1170 1018 730 1350 724 568 393 1155 1439 921 810 525 875 1235 1811 1493 1070 1245 20/09/2010 21/09/2010 22/09/2010 23/09/2010 24/09/2010 25/09/2010 26/09/2010 27/09/2010 28/09/2010 29/09/2010 30/09/2010 01/10/2010 02/10/2010 03/10/2010 04/10/2010 05/10/2010 06/10/2010 07/10/2010 08/10/2010 09/10/2010 10/10/2010 11/10/2010 12/10/2010 13/10/2010 14/10/2010 15/10/2010 16/10/2010 17/10/2010 18/10/2010 19/10/2010 20/10/2010 21/10/2010 Poll compels Rossi to exit race Ford unveils fiscal plan Marathon ban, “Two Horse” race poll released Rossi attacks Ford at televised debate Final CP24 Debate Daily Average: 1058 N= 35033
  • 6. 467 362 478 439 241 166 812 1233 534 432427 134 315293 553 622 459 531 187170 210 473 828 676 599 211 729 861 1337 12041227 1458 2 0 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 1 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 2 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 3 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 4 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 5 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 6 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 7 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 8 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 2 9 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 3 0 /0 9 /2 0 1 0 0 1 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 2 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 3 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 4 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 5 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 6 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 7 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 8 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 0 9 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 0 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 1 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 2 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 3 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 4 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 5 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 6 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 7 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 8 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 1 9 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 2 0 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 2 1 /1 0 /2 0 1 0 Trended Mention Activity: Smitherman  Smitherman is the only candidate whose average mentions have increased (by 8%) since Thomson departed the race on September 27, highlighted by a noticeable climb in activity since the last televised debate. Thomson drops out, throws support to Smitherman Final CP24 Debate Poll compels Rossi to exit race Daily Average: 583 n= 18668
  • 7. 446 495 539 261 133 76 398 219 450 196 79 51 191 170 410 721 195 150 71 218 110 293 415 574 331 177 308 610 1040 756 540 232 20/0 9/2 0102 2/0 9 /2 0 102 4/0 9 /20 1026/0 9/2 0 102 8/0 9 /2 0 103 0/0 9/2 0 1002/1 0/2 01004/1 0 /2 0100 6/1 0 /20 100 8/1 0/2 0 101 0/1 0 /2 0101 2/1 0/2 0 101 4/1 0/20 1016/1 0 /2 01018/10 /2 01020/1 0/2 010 Trended Mention Activity: Pantalone  While exhibiting an upward trend overall, conversation activity for Pantalone has been sporadic Daily Average: 340 Miller endorses Pantalone Pantalone fiscal plan announcedToronto Star column urging Pantalone to quit Final CP24 Debate n=11178
  • 8. Trended Mention Activity – All Candidates  For the first time in the past 30 days, on October 20 Smitherman overtook Ford in terms of absolute mentions n=65543 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 20/9/1021/9/1022/9/1023/9/1024/9/1025/9/1026/9/1027/9/1028/9/1029/9/1030/9/101/10/102/10/103/10/104/10/105/10/106/10/107/10/108/10/109/10/1010/10/1011/10/1012/10/1013/10/1014/10/1015/10/1016/10/1017/10/1018/10/1019/10/1020/10/1021/10/10 Ford Smitherman Pantalone
  • 9. Candidate Share of Voice Ford 54% Smitherman 28% Pantalone 17%  Share of Voice is a proxy for online presence. It’s a relative measure of proportion of instances where a candidate is mentioned during the specified time frame.  For the period measured, Rob Ford has a larger share of mentions than the other candidates combined. n=65543
  • 10. Trended Share of Voice  In the last week of the campaign, Smitherman’s share of voice has eclipsed Ford and pulled away significantly from Pantalone 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 20/9/1021/9/1022/9/1023/9/1024/9/1025/9/1026/9/1027/9/1028/9/1029/9/1030/9/101/10/102/10/103/10/104/10/105/10/106/10/107/10/108/10/109/10/1010/10/1011/10/1012/10/1013/10/1014/10/1015/10/1016/10/1017/10/1018/10/1019/10/1020/10/1021/10/10 Ford Smitherman Pantalone % n=65543
  • 11. Sentiment – All Candidates  Sentiment analysis compares the percentage of opinionated (i.e. non-neutral) posts  Ford has the highest proportion of negative comments and Pantalone has the highest proportion of positive remarks 68% 74% 68% 62% 32% 26% 32% 38% Overall Ford Smitherman Pantalone Positive Negative N= 8582 N=4695 N=2538 N=1349
  • 12. Trended Sentiment: Ford  The week following October 10 had the highest proportion of positive comments, two days after he released his fiscal plan and the week Rossi dropped out of the race. 75 78 75 69 74 74 25 22 25 31 26 26 Sept 20 to 25 Sept 26 to Oct 2 Oct 3 to 9 Oct 10 to 16 Oct 16 to 22 Total Positive Negative N=1355 N=515 N=902 n=927 N=996 N=4695
  • 13. Trended Sentiment: Smitherman  Smitherman received a boost in positive support following Thomson’s exit from the race, which has softened slightly heading into the last week of the campaign. . 74 70 65 62 70 68 26 30 35 38 30 32 Sept 20 to 25 Sept 26 to Oct 2 Oct 3 to 9 Oct 10 to 16 Oct 16 to 22 Total Positive Negative N=320 N=228 N=517 N=570 N=903 N=2538
  • 14. Trended Sentiment: Pantalone  Pantalone has consistently enjoyed the highest proportion of positive comments online, albeit with significantly lower volumes than the other candidates. 67 57 59 59 66 62 33 43 41 41 34 38 Sept 20 to 25 Sept 26 to Oct 2 Oct 3 to 9 Oct 10 to 16 Oct 16 to 22 Total Positive Negative N=212 N=138 N=291 N=280 N=428 N=1349
  • 15. Media Source  All candidates share a similar mix of comments on the various social media types, with Twitter being the dominant medium of conversation. Twitter, 73% Blogs, 18% Social Networks, 4% Message Boards, 4%Mainstream Media, 3% Forums, 1% n=65543
  • 16. Social Network Profiles  Pantalone gained the largest number of Facebook fans during the past month, while Smitherman attracted the most followers. Ford actually lost followers towards the end of the campaign. 1913 2087 2487 1934 2166 2598 1896 2416 3273 Ford Smitherman Pantalone 1617 2087 1931 2594 2869 3309 1494 1621 2081 Facebook Fans Twitter Followers Sep-24 Oct-01 Oct-20 Sep-24 Oct-01 Oct-20
  • 17. Summary  Elections are often characterized by momentum. As this particular campaign comes to a close, it would appear as if George Smitherman has momentum on his side, at least in terms of the being the candidate that people are talking about. For the first time in the past month, and in any of the social media studies done on this election, Smitherman has surpassed Ford as the most discussed candidate.  Sentiment towards each of the candidates has remained relatively constant. Ford has always been a controversial, polarizing figure which is supported by the fact the he’s consistently fostered the most negativity. Then again, one might expect that the campaign front-runner would be subject to the most criticism, particularly in social media where his opponents strive to knock him off of his pedestal. Smitherman has maintained his positive sentiment scores, even during the last crucial week when his volume of mentions have increased.  There are a couple of bright spots with the Pantalone campaign. While hasn’t really engendered as much chatter as his opponents, he’s consistently achieved the most positive sentiment scores, and has done remarkably well on the social networks, having more Facebook friends than both of his opponents and more Twitter followers than Ford.
  • 18. Appendix
  • 19. Search Terms Used  Rob Ford  Rob Ford  Robford  robfordteam  “Ford” and “voteto” or “mayor”  Slobford  Exclusionary terms  Fiesta, mustang, crown, lincoln, focus, motor, co  George Smitherman  George Smitherman  G_Smitherman  “Smitherman” and “voteto” or “mayor” and not “carole” or “birmingham”  “George” and “voteto”  “slitherman”  Joe Pantalone  Pantalone  jpantalone  Joey Pants and not “movie” or “festival” or “pantoliano”  “Joe” and “voteto”
  • 20. Methodology  We used specialized social media software to aggregate English language mentions of the three remaining candidates in the race from September 20 through October 21th . The software collected information from social media sources like blogs, discussion forums, Twitter, mainstream media articles and comments. Data from image sites like YouTube and Flickr was not included. Data from Facebook was limited to publicly available content only, meaning any private conversations between friends that are protected by passwords and user privacy settings were not collected. Essentially, anything that is considered part of the public domain was considered for the analysis.  The system looks for mentions based on a query consisting of key words. The complete list of key words and exclusions is contained in the appendix. In general we used a combination of the candidates formal names (e.g George Smitherman) in addition to naming conventions commonly used as part of the online vernacular (e.g. Joey Pants).  Sentiment was calculated using an automated sentiment engine, which essentially looks for overtly positive or negative words that modify the subject, i.e. the candidates names
  • 21. About Patrick Gladney (@pgladney)  Patrick Gladney was one of the first marketers in Canada to specialize in the area of social media research. He pioneered Social Currency™, a social media practice for Northstar Research Partners. His approach utilizes traditional research practices and principles to derive true insight from social media, a process that differs considerably from basic brand monitoring that’s become commonplace today. His experience working with clients such as BMW, Fairmont Hotels, RBC and The Toronto Star affords him a keen understanding of both how and why consumers engage in social media and how to accurately measure and understand consumer opinion. And because he has also worked for over 15 years in the advertising and communications industry, Patrick can advise on online and offline marketing solutions that respect the challenges confronting businesses in this new age of communications.

×