• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
GE372 Week Two
 

GE372 Week Two

on

  • 1,062 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,062
Views on SlideShare
1,018
Embed Views
44

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

3 Embeds 44

http://writtenanalysisclass.blogspot.com 33
http://www.writtenanalysisclass.blogspot.com 10
http://www.slideshare.net 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    GE372 Week Two GE372 Week Two Presentation Transcript

    • GE372 Week Two:Developing Thinking Skills
      “Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world.”
      --Arthur Schopenhauer
    • Quiz On Assigned Reading
      In general terms, why were some of Bill Dembski’s peers upset with him?
      What was the intended purpose of the Michael Polanyi Center. Be general and brief.
      Who said the following, Bill Dembski or Pat Shipman: “Do not mistake my objection. If my neighbors and their children wish to believe in Intelligent Design as a matter of faith, that is fine with me. What I object to most strenuously is the presentation of a religious belief as a scientific theory in a science class.”
    • Like, what’s happening today, man?
      Lecture
      Video—Plato’s allegory of the cave
      More lecture
      Group activity
    • Stuff to think about during the lecture:
      What is Truth?
      How would you define “Truth”?
      What is “Knowledge”?
      How do you know what you know?
    • Epistemology:
      Epistemology: the process of gaining knowledge.
      The ideas you have about free will, truth, knowledge, opinion, and the debating of moral issues will make a difference in your development as a thinker. Some ideas will enhance your thinking; others will hinder it. Still others may paralyze it altogether.
    • Epistemology:Plato’s allegory of the cave
      Plato’s cave: Can someone provide a brief summary of Plato’s allegory of the cave?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69F7GhASOdM
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ei7LqbYb8M
    • Epistemology and the search for truth
      Truth is what is so about something, the reality of the matter, as distinguished from what people wish were so, believe to be so, or assert to be so.
      I.e., “Truth is the view that is fated to be ultimately agreed to all by all who investigate,” Israel Scheffler
      Look at some examples of bad epistemology pp23-24
      Why, that’s just bad epistemology…
    • The quest for Truth
      Do people create truth? No.
      As truth seekers, we reach out to apprehend it and construct expressions that hope to represent it faithfully—sometimes they succeed, and sometimes they fail.
      Does truth ever change? No. It might seem to, but it doesn’t. Nice try. Close only counts in horseshoes and grenades. Eg. P24.
    • Ways of knowing
      We can obtain authentic knowledge in any one of the three ways:
      Personal
      Observation
      Report from others
      The first is most reliable, but as we will see, even that one is far from perfect.
    • Personal
      What are some advantages of experiential knowledge?
      Disadvantages?
      Because our perceptions are not passively received but are influenced by our emotional states and mental processes, they seldom mirror reality precisely. At times, in fact, they seriously distort reality.
    • Observation
      What are some advantages of observational knowledge?
      Disadvantages?
      It is certainly possible to observe accurately, but we often fail short of doing so. We usually see the world through glasses colored by our experiences and beliefs. We are told about the world before we see it. We imagine most things before we experience them. These preconceptions, unless educated correctly, govern deeply the whole process of perception.
      Do you realize that most, if not all, of our prejudices are irrational? Anyone want to share? I do—I’ll never buy another Seagate drive again.
    • Report from others
      This source of knowledge covers most of what we are taught by our parents and teachers, what we hear reported in the news, and what we read in books and magazines.
      What are some advantages of second-hand knowledge?
      Disadvantages?
    • The problem of remembering
      All three ways of knowing are subject to another problem—inaccurate remembering.
      Memory is malleable. Even eyewitness testimony is subject to distortion.
      One report states “that witnesses have a tendency both to perceive and to remember things, first, according to their expectations, second, according to their emotional bias, and third, according to their private notions as to what would be natural or reasonable way for things to happen.
      Sometimes we remember stuff wrong. Was that a memory, or did I see that on TV?
    • Opinions
      Opinions are based on personal taste.
      Some people carry opinions beyond the boundaries of good sense. They take the valid idea “Everyone has a right to his or her opinion” to the ridiculous extreme of “Everyone’s opinion is right.” These people are called politicians. This is a joke. Do not write this down.
    • Opinions—Expressions of taste and judgment
      Expressions of taste describe internal states and preferences.
      E.g., I like this…I like that…
      We may share a preference with others or find their preferences vulgar.
      Expressions of judgment are assertions about the truth of things or about the wisdom of a course of action.
      The fact that human judgment can be not only wrong but also ludicrous is the best reason to base your judgments on sufficient evidence, carefully interpreted, rather than on prejudice, whim, or blind faith. You also need to be quick to reconsider your judgments when new evidence challenges them.
    • Debating Moral Judgment
      Nowhere is modern thinking more muddled than over the question of whether moral issues are debatable.
      What are some current moral issues that divide our country? World?
      They are constantly changing. The ID vs. Evolution debate already feels a little stale. It was so 2003.
      How have moral issues changed throughout history? Would slavery even be thinkable today?
      Moral judgment represents a position on an issue that us measured against standards other than those of personal taste—standards that are rooted in values and beliefs of a culture.
    • The basis of Moral Judgment
      On what basis should moral judgment be made?
      Certainly not the majority view—that is too unreliable. Think about it: Nazis, slavery, genocide, etc…
      The most reliable basis for moral judgment, the basis that underlines most ethical systems, is the principle that people have rights existing independently of any government or culture.
    • The basis of Moral Judgment
      The most fundamental is the right to be treated with respect and left undisturbed as long as one does not infringe on other’s rights. Think “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
      Think of some recent compromises on moral issues our country has recently reached. Do you feel that these are satisfactory? Probably the most current issue is gays serving openly in the military. Dare we open this can of worms?
    • Homework for next time:
      After carefully reading two
      documents in the ITT Tech Virtual Library:
      • Shipman, Pat. “Being Stalked by Intelligent Design.” American Scientist 93,
      Issue 6 (2005): 500-502.
      • Hereen, Fred. “The Lynching of Bill Dembski.” American Spectator 33, Issue
      9 (2000): 44-50.
      Write a two to three page paper. The paper should be double-spaced in Times New
      Roman or Arial 12-point font, with 1-inch margins that addresses these questions:
      Can you identify which theory of life’s origin is “true”? By what basis do you
      make your decision?
      Should one theory or the other, or both, be taught in school? If so, should they
      both be examined in science class? If both, should one be taught as "true" and
      the other as a "theory"?
      Each of these articles has a detectible bias. Does that mean they are not
      written objectively? Are there facts that are left out? If so, what are they?
      Read for next time: Chapter 3, “Broaden Your Perspective,” pages 40-54 in The Art of Thinking.