• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
SydStart 2011 Autumn Jim Brander Interactive Engineering
 

SydStart 2011 Autumn Jim Brander Interactive Engineering

on

  • 477 views

Semantic data analysis.

Semantic data analysis.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
477
Views on SlideShare
477
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    SydStart 2011 Autumn Jim Brander Interactive Engineering SydStart 2011 Autumn Jim Brander Interactive Engineering Presentation Transcript

    • Automated Semantic Analysis Doing something very hard but very useful Interactive Engineering Pty Ltd
    • 6 Pieces People can handle no more than six pieces of information in play at once – more than that and they chunk them (and crash them)
    • Text as Machinery
      • The goal is to have documents treated as just another piece of machinery. Then we can have tools to tell us about:
        • Things that are broken, not connected, or assembled the wrong way
        • A component not working properly
        • Something missing – not logically complete
        • Confusion from too many pieces in play
      • This is much easier to do on a realised working structure
      • because the structure does most of the work
      3.2.4.3 Chapter 1, Space System Description. This chapter shall describe the space system and supporting facilities in sufficient detail to afford the reader a single source document of general system information. A brief narrative shall describe the purpose, main features and leading particulars for the space system as described below. Illustrations that clarify a particular system or reduce the verbiage necessary for explanation shall be included. 3.2.4.3.1 Description of the satellite. The description shall be of sufficient detail to provide an understanding of the purpose and function of the subsystems, their relation to overall system operation, and such additional information as to enable the crew member to understand subsystem functions peculiar to the satellite. Subsequent paragraphs shall describe in greater detail subsystems peculiar to that satellite. Such information shall include a general discussion of each major subsystem.
    • Self Extensible Active Structure We need to build a machine which uses an initial structure to read text, extends its structure as it does so, then uses that extended structure to read more of the text – the way a person does, but no program can
    • Its Knowledge Is Active Turning Circle “contains” the turn relation of the vehicle It looks like the FPS has a value for Turning Radius, when Turning Diameter was meant
    • Lots of Uses
      • Requirements Analysis
      • Trading using text rationale
      • eDiscovery and eLearning
      • Semantic Search
    • Semantic Searching Sets propagate through the structure – the structure “works” A query structure is created using free text, and it is then matched to the structure built from the specification. These aren’t two different structures – the query structure is anchored in the structure built from the text to be searched, so common points are found during building of the query.
    • This Is Cognitive Using Semantics means doing everything differently – no short cuts, no “quick and dirty” analysis, no crummy programs, no pipelining into separate pieces – this is cognitive – it all happens together! The benefit – we transcend our human six pieces limit and extend our reach We make something of value in the world – and hope the world pays us for it