Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
calentamiento global
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

calentamiento global

66,955

Published on

calentamiento global, cambio climático

calentamiento global, cambio climático

Published in: Education, News & Politics
5 Comments
9 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Thankyou! Very good presentation.
    http://www.solarshedlight.info
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Al leer lo q el primer estupido escribio pense que no habia persona más hija de puta en todo el planeta hasta q lei lo que el imbecil de walter foral liebsh escribio hay q ser ignorante estupido y mal nacido para pensar tantes estupideces pedaso de idiota el calentamiento global si existe y el neomarxismo como le llamas estupido no quiere la globalizacion sino todo lo contrario estupido maldito hablas monton de huevadas almenos el primero sabe q existe en cambio vos eres un tremendo hijo de puta q te inventas palabras loco mal nacido
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Here’s some current information that I believe will enlighten the serious minded attempting to grapple with the complexities of global warming science.

    There is no doubt that the United Nations IPCC’s version of global warming is winning the public relations battle. The proof is that our governments are now implementing public policy intended to reduce the rise of the earth’s temperature.

    For those who are paying serious attention however, it is increasingly difficult to comprehend how they can justify discounting the growing chorus of dissenting views and agreeing with VP Gore that dissenters are corrupt quacks.

    Here are two current examples:

    UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
    http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2158072e-802a-23ad-45f0-274616db87e6
    If all these guys are quacks, then Donald Duck deserves new respect.

    Then there’s this report that challenges the validity of IPCC’s climate models:
    http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm

    The study’s conclusion is worthy of serious consideration:
    “Even if temperature had risen above natural variability, the recent solar Grand Maximum may have been chiefly responsible. Even if the sun were not chiefly to blame for the past half-century’s warming, the IPCC has not demonstrated that, since CO2 occupies only one-ten-thousandth part more of the atmosphere that it did in 1750, it has contributed more than a small fraction of the warming. Even if carbon dioxide were chiefly responsible for the warming that ceased in 1998 and may not resume until 2015, the distinctive, projected fingerprint of anthropogenic “greenhouse-gas” warming is entirely absent from the observed record. Even if the fingerprint were present, computer models are long proven to be inherently incapable of providing projections of the future state of the climate that are sound enough for policymaking. Even if per impossibilethe models could ever become reliable, the present paper demonstrates that it is not at all likely that the world will warm as much as the IPCC imagines. Even if the world were to warm that much, the overwhelming majority of the scientific, peer-reviewed literature does not predict that catastrophe would ensue. Even if catastrophe might ensue, even the most drastic proposals to mitigate future climate change by reducing emissions of carbon dioxide would make very little difference to the climate. Even if mitigation were likely to be effective, it would do more harm than good: already millions face starvation as the dash for biofuels takes agricultural land out of essential food production: a warning that taking precautions, “just in case”, can do untold harm unless there is a sound, scientific basis for them. Finally, even if mitigation might do more good than harm, adaptation as (and if) necessary would be far more cost-effective and less likely to be harmful.
    In short, we must get the science right, or we shall get the policy wrong. If the concluding equation in this analysis (Eqn. 30) is correct, the IPCC’s estimates of climate sensitivity must have been very much exaggerated. There may, therefore, be a good reason why, contrary to the projections of the models on which the IPCC relies, temperatures have not risen for a decade and have been falling since the phase-transition in global temperature trends that occurred in late 2001. Perhaps real-world climate sensitivity is very much below the IPCC’s estimates. Perhaps, therefore, there is no “climate crisis” at all. At present, then, in policy terms there is no case for doing anything. The correct policy approach to a non-problem is to have the courage to do nothing.”

    While the global warming alarmists have done a masterful public relations job in promoting their agenda, they are losing badly in the areas of science, logic and common sense.

    Dennis
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • El calentamiento global NO EXISTE, si tuvieramos un poco de mente e imaginacion, veriamos que ni las heces de las vacas ni los humos de los millones de automoviles son lo suficientemente energeticos como para producir cambios en el clima y su deterioro gradual, frente, principalmente, a los cambios solares anuales y energia cosmica, y a las gigantescas masas de aguas del planeta que se movilizan desde las profundidades del mar a heladisimas temperaturas en direccion a la superficie, regulando si no inmediatamente, sino por decadas o siglos, las presiones atmosfericas y temperaturas del aire.

    Si todos puedieran SOSTENER QUE TODO ES PARTE DEL NEOMARXISMO PARA INSTAURAR LA GLOBALIZACION DE MANO DE LA MASONERIA-JUDAISTA, quedariamos satisfechos y no asustados, temerosos como es lo que ELLOS DESEAN, para controlarnos como hoy lo hacen.

    Walter Foral Liebsch

    Austria

    foralliebsch@yahoo.com
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • A tecnologia mundial da FFI

    Saudações...

    A nossa empresa funciona
    em 3 modelos de vendas :

    1 - Vendas corporativas
    2 - Comércio eletrônico
    3 - Vendas diretas

    Que empresa ou pessoa gostaria de ter esses benefícios em seus negócios?

    1-Economia de combustível entre 15 a 20% (ou mais);
    2-Diminuição dos gases poluentes em até 75%;
    3-Aumento da vida útil do motor.

    Você quer distribuir esse produto Eraldo? quanto você acha que lucraria?


    http://www.goear.com/listen.php?v=1f1c419
    gravação 05-06-08 com Douglas - IFT

    http://www.goear.com/listen.php?v=67fa92
    gravação tambem sobre treinamento IFT

    www.eraldonaz.com/ffi
    +55 48 3623-3812
    +55 48 9109-2112
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
66,955
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
25
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1,414
Comments
5
Likes
9
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Transcript

    • 1. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 2. GEI Diagrama de flujo: Emisiones Globales Gases Invernadero
    • 3. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 4.  
    • 5. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 6. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 7. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 8. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 9. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 10. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 11. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 12. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 13. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 14. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 15. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 16. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 17. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 18. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Cambios grosor medio de los glaciares Cambio acumulado del grosor de los glaciares
    • 19. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Elevación del nivel del mar
    • 20. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Proyecciones de elevación del nivel del mar según diferentes escenarios
    • 21. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 22. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 23. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 24. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 25. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 26. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Calentamiento Global: el riesgo oculto para la salud
    • 27. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Lohachara, la primera isla habitada desaparecida diciembre 2006
    • 28. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 29. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 30. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 31. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Necesidades básicas de electricidad
    • 32. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad 60 w 12 w
    • 33. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad Secadora eficiente
    • 34. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad
    • 35. Calentamiento global, al borde de la sostenibilidad <ul><li>Territorio necesario para abastecer de elctricidad a: </li></ul><ul><li>Alemania </li></ul><ul><li>Unión Europea </li></ul><ul><li>Mundo </li></ul><ul><li>Con tecnología solar térmica </li></ul>

    ×