• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Chapter 7 review
 

Chapter 7 review

on

  • 2,671 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,671
Views on SlideShare
2,671
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
64
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Chapter 7 review Chapter 7 review Presentation Transcript

    • Chapter 7
      Blowing the Whistle
      McGraw-Hill
    • 7-2
      “The word whistleblower suggests that you’re a tattletale or that you’re somehow disloyal… But I wasn’t disloyal in the least bit. People were dying. I was loyal to a higher order of ethical responsibility.”
      Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, ‘The Insider’
    • What is Whistle-Blowing?
      Whistleblower
      An employee who discovers corporate misconduct and chooses to bring it to the attention of others.
      Internal Whistle-blowing
      When an employee discovers corporate misconduct and brings it to the attention of his supervisor, who then follows established procedures to address the misconduct within the organization.
      External Whistle-blowing
      When an employee discovers corporate misconduct and chooses to bring it to the attention of law enforcement agencies and/or the media.
      7-3
    • When is Whistle-Blowing Ethical?
      Ethical whistle-blowing must meet 5 conditions:
      1. When the company, through a product or decision, will cause serious and considerable harm to the public (as consumers or bystanders), or break existing laws, the employee should report the organization.
      2. When the employee identifies a serious threat of harm, he or she should report it and state his or her moral concern.
      3. When the employee’s immediate supervisor does not act, the employee should exhaust the internal procedures and chain of command to the board of directors.
      4. The employee must have documented evidence that is convincing to a reasonable, impartial observer that his or her view of the situation is accurate, and evidence that the firm’s practice, product or policy seriously threatens and puts in danger the public or product user.
      5. The employee must have valid reasons to believe that revealing the wrongdoing to the public will result in the changes necessary to remedy the situation.
      7-4
    • When is Whistle-Blowing Unethical?
      Whistle-blowing must be questioned if:
      Motivation is the opportunity for financial gain or media attention
      Employee is carrying out a vendetta against the company
      Key point – better be very sure of your facts and your evidence better be irrefutable before blowing the whistle
      7-5
    • Qui Tam Lawsuits
      A lawsuit brought on behalf of the federal government by a whistle-blower under the False Claims Act of 1863
      7-6
    • The Year of the Whistle-Blower 2002
      • SherronWatkins – Vice President of Enron
      • Coleen Rowley – FBI Staff Attorney
      • Cynthia Cooper – Internal Auditor at WorldCom
      7-7
    • The Duty to Respond
      Prior to 2002 – legal protection for whistle-blowers existed only through legislation that encouraged the moral behavior of employees who felt themselves compelled to speak out, without offering any safe-guards against retaliation
      The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989:
      Addressed the issue of retaliation against federal employees
      7-8
    • The Whistleblower Protection Act
      Imposed specific processing deadlines of complaints
      Guaranteed anonymity of the whistle-blower
      Required prompt payment of any portion of the settlement entitled to the whistle-blower
      7-9
    • The Duty to Respond
      Employees who prevail in whistle-blowing cases are entitled to damages, which may include:
      Reinstatement to the same seniority status
      Back pay
      Interest
      All compensatory damages to make the employee whole
      “Special damages”
      7-10
    • The Duty to Respond
      Mechanisms that employers need to put in place:
      A well-defined process to document how such complaints are handled
      An employee hotline to file such complaints
      A prompt and thorough investigation of all complaints
      A detailed report of all investigations
      7-11
    • Whistle Blowing As a Last Resort
      Becoming a whistle-blower and taking a story public should be last resort
      After blowing the whistle on fraud:
      90 percent were fired or demoted
      27 percent faced lawsuits
      26 percent had to seek psychiatric or physical care
      25 percent suffered alcohol abuse
      7-12
    • Whistle Blowing As a Last Resort
      17 percent lost their homes
      15 percent got divorced
      10 percent attempted suicide
      8 percent were bankrupted
      7-13