Changing face of_cl_cs

140 views
120 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
140
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Changing face of_cl_cs

  1. 1. Jan SooHooNo 710 Action CommitteeLa Canada Flintridge  The Changing Face of Community Liaison Councils Metro’s definition of Community Liaison Council Roles and Responsibilities has been a work inprogress. The various descriptions and visual aids provided on the Metro website, the SR-710Facebook page, the emails distributed to CLC registrants and even the CLC Orientation Guidecontain conflicting information on the roles and responsibilities of the interested communitymembers volunteering to serve on CLCs.We were led to believe by Metro’s Michelle Smith that the CLC format was the agency’s answerto our demands for a true public participation process for this study. Most people agreed to servebecause they believed they would have the opportunity to influence the Alternatives Analysisprocess as stated on the Metro website. I certainly used that argument in recruiting my fellowcommunity members.However, one has only to follow the various published descriptions of these roles andresponsibilities to conclude that Metro has no sincere interest in feedback from the CLCsregarding alternatives, but also that it is sloppy in its advertising and promotion. Or, maybe it isjust so arrogant and secure in its mission that it doesn’t care that it is distributing conflictinginformation? A. From the Metro website The first description, and the one that most people read via the link they were referred to on the Metro website for registering to serve on a CLC (Still present on 5/2/12): • As a CLC participant, you will act as a liaison between the study team and your community by: • Sharing updates with others • Providing feedback to the study team • Helping shape improvements proposed for the study area • Gathering feedback received from others in your community • Recommending outreach activities and making suggestions to enhance the public participation program Note that the bullet item in red promises an active role in shaping proposed improvements (read “alternatives”). As a community organizer, this is the description to which I referred people who expressed an interest in registering to serve on my community’s CLC. This is what I believed the role of the CLC would be. B. From a post on the SR-710 Study Facebook page (posted April 24, 2012):  Join a Community Liaison Council! -Better understand the alternatives being considered -Tell us which alternatives you believe should further be evaluated -Help get your neighbors involved Note that the bullet item in red again promises an active role in shaping improvements.
  2. 2. C. From a link on the SR-710 Study Facebook page “Join A CLC” button (Copied on 5/2/12) The red ovals are my addition: Note the statements “Tell us which alternatives you believe should be further evaluated” and the appearance of the word “Advise” in the graphic.D. Also from a post (4/20/12) on the SR-710 Study Facebook page as a reply from Metro to a comment by Tom Williams SR - 710 Study We would like to clarify the role and expectations of Community Liaison Councils (CLCs). CLC participants help with outreach efforts by serving as ambassadors within their communities who inform and engage as many stakeholders as possible regarding the SR-710 Study. Note the very much diminished role of the CLCs as stated in this “clarification”. There is no mention of the CLCs helping shape the improvements, or telling them which alternatives should be further evaluated, or advising them. This description really asks the CLC members to do, as unpaid volunteers, the job that the Metro Outreach Team (paid consultants) were hired to do at a cost of $3.5 million!
  3. 3. E. As outlined in the ‘CLC roles and responsibilities’ document available on the SR-710 Study website (http://www.metro.net/projects/sr-710-conversations/community-liaison- council) CLC members:• recommend outreach activities & make suggestions to enhance the public participation program• gather feedback received from others in the community• share project updates with others in the community and provide feedback to the study teamAgain, there is no mention of the CLCs helping shape the improvements, or telling themwhich alternatives should be further evaluated, or advising them. Instead, this list againwould relegate the CLCs to the role of assisting the Metro Outreach Team with its job!F. From the email reminders I received 4/28/12 and 4/30/12:• Recommend outreach activities & make suggestions to enhance the public participation program• Gather feedback received from others in the community• Share project updates with others in the community and provide feedback to the study teamOnce again, there is no mention of the CLCs helping shape the improvements or tellingthem which alternatives should be further evaluated, or advising them. Instead, this listwould relegate the CLCs to the role of assisting the Metro Outreach Team with its job!
  4. 4. G. From the “Community Liaison Council Orientation Guide” distributed to all attendees at the 4/30/12 La Canada CLC meeting (It is my understanding that this was the only CLC at which this guide was distributed to attendees. It should be noted that the La Canada meeting was the last of 13 CLC meetings.) 5/3/12 Update: The Orientation Guide was just posted on Metro’s website. We are asked to remain current on the alternatives screening process and yet we have not been able to get any information on how the original 42 alternatives were chosen from the couple of hundred that were gleaned from the Scoping process. We are asked to remain current on the alternatives screening process and yet we have not received any details on how those 42 alternatives were narrowed to 11. Metro wants us to remain current on the alternatives screening process but when we ask why no alternatives for goods movement were included, we cannot get answers.
  5. 5. H. From the Open House display materials posted on the SR-710 website.(http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/route_710/images/Sr710openhousepresentation.pdf)Community Liaison Council (CLC)Stakeholders within a specific Study area community and may include local residents,business owners, community-based organizations, chambers of commerce, institutions, majoremployers among others. CLC members act as liaisons between the Study Team and theircommunity by sharing updates with others, providing feedback and recommending outreachactivities to enhance the public participation program over the course of the Study.Yet another description that makes it clear that CLC members will not have theopportunity to provide input on preferred alternatives. How could we, really, when wehave been given no technical materials to digest and then share with our communities?How could we, when the multitude of ideas for alternatives included in the Scoping Reportwere narrowed down to 42 and those 42 had already been narrowed down to roughly one-third that many by 3/28/12 (Reference Technical Memoranda titled “Alternatives forInitial Evaluation” and “Draft Results of Initial Evaluation” from M. Smith presented tothe Technical Advisory Committee on 3/28/12) – a full month prior to the first meeting ofany of the 13 CLCs?The outreach activity my community wants is the opportunity for a face-to-face publicforum, complete with questions and answers, with the decision-makers for this process. Whyisn’t this being provided? What is Metro hiding?I can only conclude that Metro’s intent for the CLC process is, at best, disingenuous and atworst, dishonest. But you should draw your own conclusions.

×