Predicting SH3 Protein-protein interactions

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Predicting SH3 Protein-protein interactions - Presentation Transcript

    1. Predicting SH3 Protein-protein interactions structures, comparative genomics, disorder prediction
    2. Peptide recognition modules A lot of known protein domains recognize and bind small linear peptides. Examples: SH3, SH2, WW, PDZ domains, etc These domains can be viewed like lego blocks that can be “used” by evolution to confer target specificity to whole proteins. These domains seem to be very important in signal transduction pathways. SH3 domain of FYN
    3. Peptide recognition modules Each domain type binds a general protein “motif”, that can be characterised experimentally (for example with phage display) These motifs are small and degenerate, therefore very abundant in the proteomes
    4. Peptide recognition modules Each specific SH3 domain as a particular instance of the more general motif. Only a fraction of the motifs found in the proteome are relevant targets of the domains. Can we use secondary structure and comparative genomics to find which are the relevant targets ?
    5. Idea for a method Look for conservation of the target binding motif ignoring all parts of the target protein that are not suitable for binding Alignment of protein orthologs 2) Map the pattern in all S. cerevisiae proteins 4)Conserved motifs are considered relevant 3) Remove patterns outside “disorder” regions Predictor: disEMBL 1) Get pattern from the literature
    6. What genomes to use ? To close to S. cerevisiae we will find everything conserved, even the non relevant. In species that diverged a long time ago the binding motif will have diverged. Best guess: C. glabrata K. lactis C. albicans D. hansenii Y. lipolytica
    7. Scoring a method Known Negative Interactions (N) Known Positive Interactions (P) Universe of possible interactions Predicted Interactions False Positives (FP) True Positives (TP) Accuracy = TP/(TP+FP) (Probability of picking a true interaction) Coverage = TP/P (How much of the known positives does the method recover)
    8. “ Gold” Sets of Positives and Negatives
      • If two proteins are never in the same compartment then they should not interact (Negatives)
      • A protein interaction that was shown by two-hybrid of the isolated domain and by co-immunoprecipitation experiment is positive.
    9. Conservation only Conservation and secondary structure filter >80% Accuracy <25% Coverage Conserved in 4 of the 5 genomes used
    10. So far:
      • Conservation and secondary structure information can be combined to obtain very accurate prediction of target sites for SH3 domains.
      • The coverage is very low, probably because we are looking for very conserved motifs and also because the phage display experiments were not exhaustive.
    11. Going back to the question: What genomes to use ? Is there an optimal time of divergence for species to include in the comparative genomics study ? Best results obtained from around 400My to 950My
    12. Looking at all possible combinations of four genomes we could determine that some genomes are significantly more informative than others. Increasing divergence time from S. cerevisiae
    13. The original guess was not bad
      • There is an optimal time of divergence for species to include.
      • Some species are more informative than others. It is important to carefully chose the species when looking for conservation of target motifs.
    14. Predicting new interactions Look for conservation of target motifs in four of the genomes: C. glabrata , K.lactis , C. albicans , D. hansenii , Y. lipolytica ,N. crassa and S.pombe Red = some experimental evidence found Thin lines = not some compartment

    + pedrobeltraopedrobeltrao, 4 years ago

    custom

    2025 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Based on Beltrao & Serrano PLoS Comp Bio 2005

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2025
      • 2024 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://pbeltrao.blogspot.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories