Sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301

The SONEX Workgroup: Providing an overview ofdeposit usecase scenarios to JISCdepo projectsPablo de Castro, Carlos III University Madridpcastro@db.uc3m.es

Ongoing projects at JISC Deposit Call (source: JICdepo blog planet)Deposit Projects Meeting, Birmingham, Mar 1st – DepositMO, JISCDura, RePosit

Measuring success of strategies to promote deposit Measuring success for particular deposit strategies: much harder than getting a general picture Specific questions should be asked to repository managers, such as: - was any given automated deposit strategy used for content ingest purposes? - could an approximate amount of items thus ingested be estimated as a percentage of total item input? http://www.rsp.ac.uk/grow/measuring-success/

http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/

SONEX are…As of Nov09 the workgroup coordinator Pablode Castro changed affiliation from SpanishNational Research Council (CSIC) to CarlosIII University Madrid, and Richard Jones(Symplectic Ltd) became a member of thegroup in Apr10 replacing Jim Downing.

How it all started:Institutional Repositories Workshop (IRW’09)

http://repinf.pbworks.com/Repository-handshake

The SONEX paper:deposit-related interoperability in a nutshell http://hdl.handle.net/10016/9257

SONEX: not a coding project

SONEX usecase-based interop analysis

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit OA-RJ workflow PEER workflow

SONEX usecase scenario I: publisher-driven deposit

SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration (from: “KE CRIS-OAR [publication metadata] interoperability project” presentation, CRIS2010 Aalborg, Denmark, June 2-5, 2010)

SONEX usecase scenario II: CRIS/IR integration

SONEX usecase scenario III: Funder-mandated deposit

SONEX usecase scenario IV:Deposit via personal software

(Potential) SONEX usecase scenario V:are IRs a proper target for research data & datasets?

Widening deposit use-case analysis: beyond research papers First Task is ‘Re-thinking the Use-Case Actors’ to establish Use Case Scenarios and to pose question of relevance of Institutional Repository (see DISC-UK DataShare Project): Research Data (then learning materials) [a first cut]1. (Individual/Group) Originator/Researcher 1. Via the PI (Award Holder) 2. Where there is no PI2. Depositor (not originator) – mediated deposit 1. Where agent reports to PI 2. Where agent does not3. Institutional/Departmental4. Libraries (or other long-lasting organisations)5. Repository/Archive/Database Manager6. Publisher7. etc

Some questions on research data management Are IRs a proper target for research data deposit? Could Sword deal with data transfer? Available workforce for dealing with data management: is it big enough? Trained enough? Research data file sizes: should deposit by reference be considered instead/besides binary data transfer? At what point along the publication lifecycle should dataset deposit take place?

‘A summary of ongoing deposit-related projects’, http://bit.ly/c6OCi5

SONEX current tasksWidening deposit use-case analysis in cooperation withselected projects at JISC Deposit call: further use-casescenarios, more digital object types (beyond researchpapers)Analysis on research datamanagement from JISCMRDenvironmentProviding support to selected projects atJISC Deposit callCooperating along Sword v2 definitionGathering information on new & ongoingdeposit-related projects and initiatives,http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/2010/05/summary-of-ongoing-deposit-related_9901.htmlDissemination of initiative for potentialintnl cooperation: OpenAIRE, DL.org

Thank youMore info on Sonex: http://sonexworkgroup.blogspot.com/Pablo de Castro, Carlos III University Madrid, pcastro@db.uc3m.es

Sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301

by Pablo de Castro on Mar 02, 2011

Accessibility

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

Sonex deposit meeting_ws_20110301 — Presentation Transcript