Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Networked Innovation And Collaboration
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Networked Innovation And Collaboration

2,036

Published on

The presentation discusses the orchestration of networked innovation and collaboration. It discussed some backgrounds and contains slides from the workshop's participants' attempt at answering the …

The presentation discusses the orchestration of networked innovation and collaboration. It discussed some backgrounds and contains slides from the workshop's participants' attempt at answering the question of how to innovate with web 2.0 tools

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,036
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
39
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Orchestrating Networked Innovation and Collaboration Peter B. Sloep JTELWS, Innsbruck 2010 Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 2. Session plan • 11.30 - 11.45 Introductory remarks by me • 11.45 - 12.30 Collaborative creativity by you • 12.30 - 12.50 Reporting back by you • 12.50 - 13.00 Conclusions Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 3. Collaborative innovation Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 4. Why? • Knowledge economy, EU Lisbon objectives, staying competitive: new products and services • New ways of sharing knowledge (learning from each other) but also of being creative • Need for Networked Learning but also for Networked Innovation Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 5. Community-based Innovation • Distributed, online • Workflow: support from pedagogic patterns and creativity techniques • Context-sensitive recommendations to users • idSpace -project Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 6. Compose groups preparatory phase Select Create pedagogic project scenario Choose Provide user creativity Store profile technique info Select project Create problem statement Individually Cluster generate individual ideas ideas creative phase Set SMART Create goals common ground Collaboratively generate ideas Evaluate Formulate Publish Close project ideas solution(s) results evaluation phase Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 7. Networked Innovation • How do the collaborating communities emerge from a larger network? • Need for focus on Open Innovation processes within the network as a whole • Need for mechanism to ‘herd’ people into communities, even if only ad hoc and temporarily Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 8. authentication Open Profile Domain model authorisation news Twitter profiling LinkenIn sharing AHT community slideshare generic service tagging delicious runs social network online s.n. on platform problem def ideation * * person service innovation serv. * coalition form. solution feedb. competence LLL service peer support charting navig support Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 9. Imagine ... large networks of people who have active, online social lives, keep profiling data on social network sites, share documents on slideshare, tag websites via del.ico.us, collaborate online using Google docs, etc. Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 10. Problem statements • How could these people be made to collaborate on open innovation projects? - What software services would they need (existing ones, new ones)? list of services - How would these have to be ‘mashed up’, orchestrated into an environment? list of constraints Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 11. Getting to work 1. Grasp the problem, rephrase if needed 2. Decide on how you want to solve it (goal) 3. Freely collect ideas 4. Evaluate ideas, give feasibility ranking 5. Formulate your solution Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 12. Collaboration & reporting back • 4 groups of about 8 people discuss - each group 5 slides, 1 per step, by way of report, put on usb stick • 20 min. reporting = 5 minutes per group • 10 general evaluation Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 13. Problem statements • How could these people be made to collaborate on open innovation projects? - What software services would they need (existing ones, new ones)? list of services - How would these have to be ‘mashed up’, orchestrated into an environment? list of constraints Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 14. Results of group brainstorms Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 15. Group 1 Citizen & Media Participation Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 16. Problem • Citizens should be able to participate more directly in government, and media should play a more direct role in helping citizens engage in government Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 17. Goal • Connect media, citizens and government Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 18. Ideas • Connect media stories to open community discussion to generate ideas for action • Connect community discussion to opportunities for direct engagement with government through e- petitions • Connect results of action to opportunities for policy analysis • Implement monitoring of enforcement of action Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 19. Feasibility • Add open discussion spaces to news stories (or aggregations of stories) - feasible, already implemented e.g. http:// www.worldpress.org • Enable open discussion to focus into action - challenges e.g. validity of participation, voting systems, critical mass required. Could move into FB or existing large network • Connecting to e-petitions - feasible, e.g. http:// petitions.number10.gov.uk/ • Enabling policy analysis - feasible, e.g. http:// writetoreply.org/ • Monitoring and enforcement - feasible, e.g. http:// www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/ Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 20. Solution • Identify the existing services and develop solution to make explicit connections between them • E.g. share on twitter, on facebook already a demo for this Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 21. Group  2 Problem How  to  promote  collabora/on  and   coopera/on  on  elgg  social  networking   func/onality Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 22. Goal • To  provide  the  proper  tools  to  the   elgg  community  that  will  help  them   work  together  be>er Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 23. Ideas •  Improve  real  /me  communica/on  (web   conferencing,  immersive  spaces  (3d  space  within   elgg  as  a  plugin) •File  repository  and  versioning  system  (SVN) •  Mailing  lists  and  group  mails •Provide  debugging  tools  (Bugzilla) •Virtual  workspace  sharing •Project  management  tools  (Tasks,  Timelines,   Milestones)  (wiki) •Collabora/ve  argumenta/on  tools   •Reputa/on  management  tool Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 24. Feasibility  ranking  of  ideas importance  scale: (least  important  1  –  5  crucial) implementa/on  scale: (easy    A  –  E  hard) •  Improve  real  /me  communica/on   •Online  chaUng  2  A •Persistent  web  conferencing    4  B •Immersive  spaces  (3D)  5  E   •File  repository  and  versioning  system  (SVN)  5  D •  Mailing  lists  and  group  mails  5  A •Provide  debugging  tools  (Bugzilla)  3  B Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 25. Feasibility  ranking  of  ideas importance  scale: (least  important  1  –  5  crucial) implementa/on  scale: (easy    A  –  E  hard) •  Virtual  workspace  sharing  1  C •Project  management  tools  (Tasks,  Timelines,  Milestones)  (wiki)   5  B   •Collabora/ve  argumenta/on  tools    2  D •Reputa/on  management  tool  2  C Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 26. Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 27. Collaborative Creativity Session group 3 Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 28. 1.Problem statement get people to work together for a first meeting for paper writing on future projects Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 29. 2.Goal setting Goal: collective paper writing Constraints: collaboration professionals distributed able to connect people time Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 30. 3.Idea generation email flashmeeting Google wave Physical meeting: ! time planning ! location planning Task Management: ! responsibility Calendar sharing Status notifier (distributedness) ! time zone awareness Translation tool (Google Wavelet Rosy) Collaboration platform: ! process things fluently ! mash-ups Doodle polls Graphic representation of the progress Mind map of initial ideas of the article Voting mechanism several cycles to get agreement for agenda Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 31. 4.Evaluation Aggregated votes (goal, feasibility) Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 32. 5.Accepted Solutions email flashmeeting Google wave time planning Task Management: responsibility Collaboration platform: process things fluently mash-ups Voting mechanism Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 33. JTEL WINTERSCHOOL 2010 Collaboration on open innovation projects group 4 Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 34. PROBLEM STATEMENT • which services can be mashed up to support collaborative innovation projects in social networks? Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 35. GOAL • offer person & artefact awareness to support the innovation process Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 36. • self-reporting (kind of blog / form) • automatically analyze artefacts • (automatic) user profiles • recommender system • easy contact ways • links 2 all the objects • innovation area • location based services IDEAS • open access • search engines • visualisations • augmented reality • storage space for things Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 37. FEASIBILITY RANKING • self-reporting (kind of blog / form) **~ • automatically analyze artefacts ****# • (automatic) user profiles *****# ***~ • recommender systems (if you know what to recommend) ****#~ • easy contact ways ***** #~ • links 2 all the objects **** # • innovation area • location based services ****#~ • open access --> accessibility ****# **~ • search engines (already taken) • visualisations ****# **~ ~technical feasibility • augmented reality #added value for users • storage space for things ***** Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 38. SOLUTION APPROACH • money from CELSTEC • volunteers (categorized) whose artefacts you can analyze and bother with ideas • offer added value to anyone Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 39. group 5 Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 40. Problem • How do we entice people to want to engage in open innovation and how can we convince them of the value of collaborating to do this? • How do we provide opportunities for that collaborative environment to grow? • How do we establish authentic shared goals? • How technologies can be used to make it easier for people to collaborate? Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 41. Goal • Establishing ways to motivate people to establish shared goals (once they have shared goals they will be motivated) N.B.: we will not be focusing on technology Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 42. Establishing f2f Multiple Shared/ Trust meetings Communication common Interests [in other people and Channels services] no stress Interested in Respect Learning [LLL] Invitation Ownership volunteering Friend of Friend Personal Need Information sharing Recognition Protocols/ Rules Commitment & enterprise Caring/ Clarity of Purpose human Touch Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 43. Evaluate Pre-conditions Instruments • Trust • Low stress • Information sharing • Confidence • Personal Needs • Communication • Interest in learning channels • Recognition and respect • Commitment & • Protocol enterprise • Recognition and respect Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 44. Solution • We need activities.... • ... and we still haven’t got there yet! It takes time :-) Thursday, February 4, 2010
  • 45. The present work was carried out as part of the idSpace project on Tooling and Training for collaborative product innovation http://idspace-project.org It is funded in part by the European Commission FP7- IST-2007-1-41, project number 216799 Partners are ounl, aau, ucy, ems, link mv, uprc, uni hildesheim, morph, sas Thursday, February 4, 2010

×