Brief Look at Association vs causation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Brief Look at Association vs causation

on

  • 822 views

A very brief summary of causation vs. association, causal pathways, the Bradford Hill Criteria, and Pyramid of Clinical Evidence.

A very brief summary of causation vs. association, causal pathways, the Bradford Hill Criteria, and Pyramid of Clinical Evidence.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
822
Views on SlideShare
822
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
22
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Cross-sectional Studies considered 2.3 by the OBGYN journal I looked at, but it is not technically a “Clinical” study.Double check to see if this is the same pyramid of evidence you see used in Epi.

Brief Look at Association vs causation Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Association vs. Causation Patrick B. Barlow PhD Candidate in Evaluation, Statistics, & Measurement The University of Tennessee This and many other lecture materials are available at www.slideshare.net/pbbarlow1
  • 2. In this Presentation… Section I: Association vs. Causation, what does it look like?  Conceptually speaking  Casual Pathways Section II: Methods for judging strength of causal relationship  Bradford Hill Criteria  Pyramid of Clinical Evidence
  • 3. Some Terms Association Causation Causal Pathway Interaction / Effect Modification Confounding / Mediation
  • 4. Association vs. Causation Conceptually Speaking Association  Correlation  Regression  Odds / Relative Risk Causation  Influence  Effect  Confounding  Explanation  Dependence  Intervention  Likelihood  Randomization  Conditional  Attribution Adapted From: Joffe et al. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 2012
  • 5. Association vs. Causation Conceptually Speaking Association  Two observed variables that are jointly distributed  Can be strong, weak, positive, or negative. Causation  “A causal relationship is one that has a mechanism that by its operation makes a difference” (Joffe et al., 2012).  For example:
  • 6. Causal Pathways When in doubt, draw it out! Causal Pathways  Visual depictions of the proposed links between a given exposure(s) and the outcome of interest. They help researchers understand the mechanisms at work in a complex disease process. Exposure ? Outcome
  • 7. Types of Causal Pathways Simple (Direct) Confounding (Mediation) Effect Modification (Moderation) Exposure Exposure Exposure ? ? Outcome Confounder ? Outcome Effect Moderator ? Outcome
  • 8. Types of Causal Pathways Simple (Direct) Confounding (Mediation) Effect Modification (Moderation) Diet Diet Diet ? ? CAD Smoking Hx ? CAD Activity Level ? CAD Examples adapted from CTSPedia.com
  • 9. Methods for Judging Strength of Causal Relationship Bradford Hill Criteria Pyramid of Clinical Evidence
  • 10. The Bradford Hill Criteria  Provides researchers with seven criteria for assessing strength of evidence.  Strength of association (i.e. effect size)  Consistency (i.e. reliability)  Specificity  Temporal relationship  Biological gradient  Plausibility  Coherence  Experiment (reversibility)  Analogy (consideration of alternate explanations)
  • 11. The Bradford Hill Criteria a closer look…  Strength of association (i.e. effect size)  Is the magnitude of the association both statistically and clinically meaningful?  Consistency (i.e. reliability)  Can these results be reproduced? Do they coincide with existing research on the same phenomenon?  Specificity  Association is specific when the exposure is associated with only one disease  Temporal relationship  Does the exposure (cause) precede the outcome (effect)?
  • 12. The Bradford Hill Criteria a closer look…  Biological gradient  Dose-response relationship can be established  Biological Plausibility  Is the association coherent with the current body of biologic knowledge?  Coherence  Is the association plausible given what we already know about the disease or disorder?  Experimental evidence  Has this association been shown in a randomized experimental trial?  Analogy (consideration of alternate explanations)  Have all other plausible alternative explanations been considered and ruled out? “The third variable issue”
  • 13. Strength of Evidence & Study Design Which criteria are difficult to satisfy with…  Case – Control studies?  Cross – Sectional studies?  Cohort – Studies?
  • 14. Pyramid of Clinical Evidence Systematic Reviews & Meta-analyses Cross-Sectional Studies: Level “2.3” Evidence Summaries RCT Cohort Studies Level 1 Evidence Level 2 Evidence Case Control Studies Level 3 Evidence Case Series Case Reports Ideas, Editorials, Opinions Animal research In vitro (‘test tube’) research
  • 15. So, when reading an article… Whenever digging into a new controversy or research area, it is helpful to use methods for judging the strength of the relationship being discussed.  What type of study design are the using? (Pyramid of evidence)  How strong is the evidence? (Bradford Hill Criteria)  What is the clinical vs. statistical significance being presented?