• Save
DAPA programmes: Using logic models (truncated version)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


DAPA programmes: Using logic models (truncated version)



This presentation was originally going to be given at the CABE Design and Planning Advice directorate away day on 23 March 2010 but there wasn't time. It sets out to briefly explain what logic models ...

This presentation was originally going to be given at the CABE Design and Planning Advice directorate away day on 23 March 2010 but there wasn't time. It sets out to briefly explain what logic models are, what they look like and how we can use them to enhance planning, management and evaluation in DAPA. (This is a truncated version - missing a worked example and consideration of how key messages relate to the CABE logic model template)



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 19

http://technicallyabitcurious.wordpress.com 19



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Apple Keynote

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • <br />
  • <br />
  • Logic models come in as many sizes and shapes as the programmes they represent <br /> <br /> Although, at their heart they all have the five basic components of: <br /> Inputs: the things we invest in a programme or bring to bear on a situation. The materials that the organisation or programme takes in and then processes to produce the results desired by the organisation <br /> Activities: Processes are used by the organisation or programme to manipulate and arrange items to produce the results desired by the organisation or programme. Logic models are usually only concerned with the major recurring processes associated with producing the results desired by the organisation or programme <br /> Outputs: Outputs are usually the tangible results of the major processes in the organization. They are usually accounted for by their number <br /> Outcomes: Outcomes are the (hopefully positive) impacts on those people whom the organization wanted to benefit with its programs. Outcomes are usually specified in terms of: <br /> a) learning, including enhancements to knowledge, understanding/perceptions/attitudes, and behaviors <br /> b) skills (behaviors to accomplish results, or capabilities) <br /> c) conditions (increased security, stability, pride, etc.) <br /> It&apos;s often to specify outcomes in terms of short-term, intermediate and long-term <br /> Impact: Can be seen as Outcome in the longer term (7 - 10 years) <br /> <br />
  • <br />
  • Saying that you crawl before you walk before you run is a descriptive logic model; Saying that you crawl, and crawling develops the gross-motor skills and body control capabilities that make it possible to walk; you walk, and walking develops the balance, further gross-motor skills, and body control needed to run .... moves the model from programme logic to programme theory <br />
  • <br />
  • Avoid linear thinking by starting from the desired outcome and working back ... rather than strictly following the left to right orthodoxy of inputs to outcome ... Paul McCawley, University of Idaho, suggests asking the following sorts of questions: <br /> 1. What is the current situation that we intend to impact? <br /> 2. What will it look like when we achieve the desired situation or outcome? <br /> 3. What behaviours need to change for that outcome to be achieved? <br /> 4. What knowledge or skills do people need before the behaviour will change? <br /> 5. What activities need to be performed to cause the necessary learning? <br /> 6. What resources will be required to achieve the desired outcome? <br /> <br />
  • Key sources: <br /> - W.K.Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide, Updated 2004 <br /> http://www.wkkf.org/knowledge-center/Resources-Page.aspx [Accessed 20/03/10] <br /> - Utilization-Focused Evaluation, 4th Edition, Michael Quinn Patton, Sage 2008 <br /> - Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 3rd Edition, John Biggs and Catherine Tang, SRHE/OU 2007 <br /> - The Logic Model for program planning and evaluation, Paul F. McCawley, Associate director, University of Idaho Extension. Downloaded from http://www.uidaho.edu/extension/LogicModel.pdf [Accessed 20/03/10] <br /> - Paper outlining approach to Logic model used by the Center for Youth and Communities at the Heller School for Social Policy and <br /> Management, Brandeis Universities. Downloaded from <br /> http://www.service-learningpartnership.org/site/DocServer/Tool_2_Logic_Models.pdf?docID=2282 [Accessed 20/02/10] <br /> - University of Winsconsin Extension Program development and evaluation pages (information, templates and link to an online course) <br /> http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html [Accessed 20/03/10] <br /> - United Way: Outcome measurement resource network <br /> i. Program outcome model http://www.liveunited.org/Outcomes/Resources/MPO/model.cfm [Accessed 20/03/10] <br /> ii. Measuring program outcomes: a practical approach, 1996 http://www.liveunited.org/Outcomes/Resources/MPO/ [Accessed 20/03/10] <br /> <br /> <br />

DAPA programmes: Using logic models (truncated version) Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Using logic diagrams to aid critical reflection Paul Ducker, DAPA Day, 23 March 2010
  • 2. What is a logic model? “If you don’t know where you’re going, how are you gonna’ know when you get there?” Yogi Berra, Former major league baseball player and manager • a logic model is a picture of how you believe your programme will work • it lays out what the programme is expected to achieve, based on an identified chain of events • it helps create shared understanding • it enables you to anticipate the data and resources you will need to achieve success
  • 3. What do they look like?
  • 5. How are they used? “Most of the value in a logic model is in the process of creating, validating and modifying the model....” W.K.Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook (1998) • during design and planning to help develop and communicate programme strategy • during programme implementation and management to focus energy • throughout development and delivery to ensure evaluation and strategic reporting are embedded and encourage reflection and learning.
  • 6. Including assumptions • A logic model only has to be logical and sequential • It becomes more powerful when you say why you expect the desired change to happen • Adding the causal mechanism moves the model from programme logic to programme theory
  • 7. “A logic model brings program concepts and dreams to life” W.K.Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide “These models help build a common understanding between managers and evaluation ... such agreement is a pre-requisite for evaluation work that is likely to be useful to management. [These models] display the key events (inputs, activities, outcomes) that could be monitored and the assumed causal linkages that could be tested in evaluations of the program” Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Haltry and K.E Newcomer quoted in W.K.Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide “The idea that evaluation should include conceptualising and testing a program’s theory of change emerged in the 1970s as part of a more general concern about assessing a program’s readiness for evaluation........ evaluability assessment was the evaluator’s version of foreplay: getting the program ready for the act itself - the act being evaluation” Micheal Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation
  • 8. Limits of logic (criticisms of logic models) • Over simplifying complex problems clear how model relates to wider environment) (include assumptions, be • Encourages narrow, linear thinking based on past experience (start with need and desired outcomes, and then work back to activities) • All very well but .... (start from the premise that evaluation is about helping focus effort on the right things, not just be about reporting on progress to funders, otherwise it is not worth the effort)
  • 9. The end Good luck