MIPO MODEL - A FRAMEWORK TO HELP THE INTEGRATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION PAULA PERES Public presentation of the PhD thesis 06 -07- 2009 PEDRO PIMENTA University of Minho
Agenda 2 Scope and Study Justification Research Process Case Study Results Action-Research Results: Application of mipoModel Perception on the mipo Model Applicability Future Work
Scope and Study Justification 3 BOLONHA PROCESS
Scope and Study Justification 4 Research Questions How to integrate web technologies in the teaching-learning process of systems and technology subjects in the Portuguese higher education context? Which features should be taken into account when designing a strategy mediated by the webtechnologies, in a systems and technology unit, in the Portuguese higher education?
Scope and Study Justification 5 Hypothesis The general addie model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) may be used to give support to the planning of the integration of web technologies, in the context of ictsubjects. The design of a strategic online instruction has high cognitive results whenever it involves students actively and it is aligned with both the objectives and the evaluation defined to the subject. ADDIE
Research Process 6 Research Process Case study Action-research Data Collected Questionnaires Interviews Direct observation Documentation Analysis
Research Process 7 Análise 2005-06 Análise 1st Semester 2006-07 Análise 2nd Semester 2006-07 Análise 1st Semester 2007-08 Análise 2nd Semester 2007-08 Literature Review Research methodologies study Design of the MIPO I model 1st Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO I 2nd Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO II 3rd Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO III 4th Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO by 4 teachers Construction of the interview I guide Construction of the Questionnaires II 3rd cycle of AR Execution of interview I Construction of the interview II guide Execution of interview II Application of the Questionnaire II 4th cycle AR Dossier with results Construction of the questionnaires I 1st cycle AR dossier Application of the Questionnaires I 2nd cycle of AR dossier MIPO III = MIPO Model MIPO I Model MIPO II Model MIPO III Model Writing of the final thesis version
CASE STUDY MAIN RESULTS QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS
Questionnaire I – Case study 9 Yes No Questionnaire I Answers (Universe 192 teachers) No Yes Valid Answers No Yes web platforms use
Questionnaire I – Case study 10 Questionnaire I Results
Interview I – Case Study 11 Results of the 16 semi-structured Interviews Individual activities Participative activities
Main Conclusions – Case Study 12 Main conclusion of the case study Lack of planning in online activities according to the objectives Parallelism with the iscapexperience related to the adoption of the web technologies Use of traditional process on the online environment Teacher continues to produce contents Case studyresults
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION Learning Environment Instruction Support Documentation Unit Model Integration Model by Objectives ACTION-RESEARCH THE MODEL OF INTEGRATION BY OBJECTIVES
Learning Environment Analysis 14 Name of Unit Course School Year Grade Context Class Environment Begin Data End Data Duration + Frequency Number of Students MIPO Learners’ Features Age (in average) Analysis Internet Access Module I Module II Module N Instruction Needs Global Soft Skills SS1 – Learn to Learn SS2 – Information processing and management SS3 – Deduction and analytical skills SS4 – Decision making skills SS5 – Communication skills, language skills SS6 – Teamwork, team based learning and teaching SS7 – Creative thinking and problem solving skills SS8 – Management and leadership, strategic thinking SS9 – Self-management and self-development SOFTSKILLS (EU) e-Contents E-Repositories Prerequisites Web Technologies
Instruction Design 15 BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation Objective Practical/Discursive Nature of questions Learning Objectives Specification Type Learning Evaluation Formative/Sumative Design + Mode Face-to-Face/Online Sequence of Contents MIPO Motivation Influence Features Learning Strategies Activity Theory Behaviorism Cognitivism Constructivism Socio-Constructivism Learning Theories Objectives b-Strategy Pedagogical Social Management Technical PedagogicalModels Subject/Community b-Task b-Activity Title Individual Participative Description Tools Cognitive Social e-Contents Phases Interactive Affective Interactive Cohesive Share Disagreement Negotiation Agreement Division of Labor Rules Results
M I P O – b-strategies Learning Repository 16 Critical Analysis COGNITIVE OBJECTIVES Teamwork SOFT SKILLS Reality Simulation CLASSIFICATION Socio-constructivism PEDAGOGICAL MODELS Students SUBJECT COMMUNITY Search
M I P O – b-strategies Learning Repository 16 Critical Analysis COGNITIVE OBJECTIVES Teamwork SOFT SKILLS Reality Simulation CLASSIFICATION Socio-constructivism PEDAGOGICAL MODELS Students SUBJECT COMMUNITY + + + Search + + TITLE NATURE OF QUESTIONS TYPE DESCRIPTION WEB TOOLS Elements of Usability Discursive Interactive Students should be able to evaluate an interface usability WIKI + + + + + E-CONTENTS PHASES DIVISION OF LABOR RULES RESULTS Torneira de difícil uso: http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=xdoc4LaTu_Q T – Social, pedagogical, managerial and technical S – participation with comments Criticize the programs with respect Set of screens and relating usability analysis F1 – Students watch the video F2 – Discussion of the video F3 – Selection of the best program in terms of usability
Documentation Support Development 17 Lesson Plans Face-to-Face Online + DEVELOPMENT MIPO e-Contents and Documents Hardware Software
Unit Implementation 18 Delivery + Implementation MIPO Support
Evaluation 19 Model of Integrationby Objectives - + + + + + Análise ANALYSIS Análise DESIGN Análise DEVELOPMENT Análise IMPLEMENTATION Análise EVALUATION Sumative Evaluation MIPO Do theb-tasksandb-activitiescoveralllearning objectives (bothspecificandsoftskills)? Are thereactivitieswhich are notcoveringanyofthe objectives defined? Do studentshaveallthenecessaryinformation? Does theevaluationaddressalllearning objectives defined? Formative
MIPO PERCEPTION AND FUTURE WORK
MIPO – Teachers Perception 21 Results of Interview II High Applicability Easy Implementation The lack of imagination to create activities It is not easy to design a good activity It is necessary to spend a lot of time in order to learn new programs (moodle, hotpatatoes, exelearning) We depend on the appropriate internet connection It is a good guide It promotes student motivation It promotes learning It facilitates the re-use of ideas and materials
MIPO - Results 22 Answer to the Hypothesis Usage and facility offered by the ADDIE model regarding the planning of the integration of web technologies process, in the ICT unit context Benefits to the learning of the alignment between the objectives and evaluation defined to the unit
MIPO– Future Work 23 Extend the study to other areas of knowledge Increase the database of learning b-strategies Vision – Results of the speech promoted by paol Responses Universe Tools Applicability Interest
MIPO – Conclusions 24 Macro Vision What to do? When to do? DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION Instruction Models Web Technologies Learning Environment Instruction Support Documentation Unit Model Kemp et. al. B-Learning MIPO MIPO Model B-Strategy Micro Vision How to do?
MIPO MODEL - A FRAMEWORK TO HELP THE INTEGRATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION PAULA PERES Public presentation of the PhD thesis 06 -07- 2009 PEDRO PIMENTA University of Minho
0 comments
Post a comment