MIPO Model

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    MIPO Model - Presentation Transcript

    1. MIPO MODEL - A FRAMEWORK TO HELP THE INTEGRATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION
      PAULA PERES
      Public presentation of the PhD thesis
      06 -07- 2009
      PEDRO PIMENTA
      University of Minho
    2. Agenda
      2
      Scope and Study Justification
      Research Process
      Case Study Results
      Action-Research Results: Application of mipoModel
      Perception on the mipo Model Applicability
      Future Work
    3. Scope and Study Justification
      3
      BOLONHA PROCESS
    4. Scope and Study Justification
      4
      Research Questions
      How to integrate web technologies in the teaching-learning process of systems and technology subjects in the Portuguese higher education context?
      Which features should be taken into account when designing a strategy mediated by the webtechnologies, in a systems and technology unit, in the Portuguese higher education?
    5. Scope and Study Justification
      5
      Hypothesis
      The general addie model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) may be used to give support to the planning of the integration of web technologies, in the context of ictsubjects.
      The design of a strategic online instruction has high cognitive results whenever it involves students actively and it is aligned with both the objectives and the evaluation defined to the subject.
      ADDIE
    6. Research Process
      6
      Research Process
      Case study
      Action-research
      Data Collected
      Questionnaires
      Interviews
      Direct observation
      Documentation Analysis
    7. Research Process
      7
      Análise
      2005-06
      Análise
      1st Semester 2006-07
      Análise
      2nd Semester 2006-07
      Análise
      1st Semester 2007-08
      Análise
      2nd Semester 2007-08
      Literature Review
      Research methodologies study
      Design of the MIPO I model
      1st Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO I
      2nd Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO II
      3rd Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO III
      4th Cycle AR – Application of the MIPO by 4 teachers
      Construction of the interview I guide
      Construction of the Questionnaires II
      3rd cycle of AR
      Execution of interview I
      Construction of the interview II guide
      Execution of interview II
      Application of the Questionnaire II
      4th cycle AR
      Dossier with results
      Construction of the questionnaires I
      1st cycle AR dossier
      Application of the Questionnaires I
      2nd cycle of AR dossier
      MIPO III = MIPO Model
      MIPO I Model
      MIPO II Model
      MIPO III Model
      Writing of the final thesis version
    8. CASE STUDY
      MAIN RESULTS
      QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS
    9. Questionnaire I – Case study
      9
      Yes
      No
      Questionnaire I
      Answers
      (Universe 192 teachers)
      No
      Yes
      Valid
      Answers
      No
      Yes
      web platforms use
    10. Questionnaire I – Case study
      10
      Questionnaire I Results
    11. Interview I – Case Study
      11
      Results of the 16 semi-structured Interviews
      Individual activities
      Participative activities
    12. Main Conclusions – Case Study
      12
      Main conclusion of the case study
      Lack of planning in online activities according to the objectives
      Parallelism with the iscapexperience related to the adoption of the web technologies
      Use of traditional process on the online environment
      Teacher continues to produce contents
      Case studyresults
    13. DEVELOPMENT
      ANALYSIS
      DESIGN
      IMPLEMENTATION
      EVALUATION
      Learning Environment
      Instruction
      Support Documentation
      Unit
      Model
      Integration Model by Objectives
      ACTION-RESEARCH
      THE MODEL OF INTEGRATION BY OBJECTIVES
    14. Learning Environment Analysis
      14
      Name of Unit
      Course
      School Year
      Grade
      Context
      Class Environment
      Begin Data
      End Data
      Duration
      +
      Frequency
      Number of Students
      MIPO
      Learners’ Features
      Age (in average)
      Analysis
      Internet Access
      Module I
      Module II
      Module N
      Instruction Needs
      Global
      Soft Skills
      SS1 – Learn to Learn
      SS2 – Information processing and management
      SS3 – Deduction and analytical skills
      SS4 – Decision making skills
      SS5 – Communication skills, language skills
      SS6 – Teamwork, team based learning and teaching
      SS7 – Creative thinking and problem solving skills
      SS8 – Management and leadership, strategic thinking
      SS9 – Self-management and self-development
      SOFTSKILLS
      (EU)
      e-Contents
      E-Repositories
      Prerequisites
      Web Technologies
    15. Instruction Design
      15
      BLOOM’S
      TAXONOMY
      Knowledge
      Comprehension
      Application
      Analysis
      Synthesis
      Evaluation
      Objective
      Practical/Discursive
      Nature of questions
      Learning Objectives Specification
      Type
      Learning Evaluation
      Formative/Sumative
      Design
      +
      Mode
      Face-to-Face/Online
      Sequence of Contents
      MIPO
      Motivation
      Influence Features
      Learning Strategies
      Activity Theory
      Behaviorism
      Cognitivism
      Constructivism
      Socio-Constructivism
      Learning Theories
      Objectives
      b-Strategy
      Pedagogical
      Social
      Management
      Technical
      PedagogicalModels
      Subject/Community
      b-Task
      b-Activity
      Title
      Individual
      Participative
      Description
      Tools
      Cognitive
      Social
      e-Contents
      Phases
      Interactive
      Affective
      Interactive
      Cohesive
      Share
      Disagreement
      Negotiation
      Agreement
      Division of Labor
      Rules
      Results
    16. M I P O – b-strategies Learning Repository
      16
      Critical Analysis
      COGNITIVE OBJECTIVES
      Teamwork
      SOFT SKILLS
      Reality Simulation
      CLASSIFICATION
      Socio-constructivism
      PEDAGOGICAL MODELS
      Students
      SUBJECT
      COMMUNITY
      Search
    17. M I P O – b-strategies Learning Repository
      16
      Critical Analysis
      COGNITIVE OBJECTIVES
      Teamwork
      SOFT SKILLS
      Reality Simulation
      CLASSIFICATION
      Socio-constructivism
      PEDAGOGICAL MODELS
      Students
      SUBJECT
      COMMUNITY
      +
      +
      +
      Search
      +
      +
      TITLE
      NATURE OF QUESTIONS
      TYPE
      DESCRIPTION
      WEB TOOLS
      Elements of Usability
      Discursive
      Interactive
      Students should be able to evaluate an interface usability
      WIKI
      +
      +
      +
      +
      +
      E-CONTENTS
      PHASES
      DIVISION OF LABOR
      RULES
      RESULTS
      Torneira de difícil uso:
      http://www.youtube.com
      /watch?v=xdoc4LaTu_Q
      T – Social, pedagogical, managerial and technical
      S – participation with comments
      Criticize the programs with respect
      Set of screens and relating usability analysis
      F1 – Students watch the video
      F2 – Discussion of the video
      F3 – Selection of the best program in terms of usability
    18. Documentation Support Development
      17
      Lesson Plans
      Face-to-Face
      Online
      +
      DEVELOPMENT
      MIPO
      e-Contents and Documents
      Hardware
      Software
    19. Unit Implementation
      18
      Delivery
      +
      Implementation
      MIPO
      Support
    20. Evaluation
      19
      Model of Integrationby Objectives
      -
      +
      +
      +
      +
      +
      Análise
      ANALYSIS
      Análise
      DESIGN
      Análise
      DEVELOPMENT
      Análise
      IMPLEMENTATION
      Análise
      EVALUATION
      Sumative
      Evaluation
      MIPO
      Do theb-tasksandb-activitiescoveralllearning objectives (bothspecificandsoftskills)?
      Are thereactivitieswhich are notcoveringanyofthe objectives defined?
      Do studentshaveallthenecessaryinformation?
      Does theevaluationaddressalllearning objectives defined?
      Formative
    21. MIPO
      PERCEPTION AND FUTURE WORK
    22. MIPO – Teachers Perception
      21
      Results of Interview II
      High Applicability
      Easy Implementation
      The lack of imagination to create activities
      It is not easy to design a good activity
      It is necessary to spend a lot of time in order to learn new programs (moodle, hotpatatoes, exelearning)
      We depend on the appropriate internet connection
      It is a good guide
      It promotes student motivation
      It promotes learning
      It facilitates the re-use of ideas and materials
    23. MIPO - Results
      22
      Answer to the Hypothesis
      Usage and facility offered by the ADDIE model regarding the planning of the integration of web technologies process, in the ICT unit context
      Benefits to the learning of the alignment between the objectives and evaluation defined to the unit
    24. MIPO– Future Work
      23
      Extend the study to other areas of knowledge
      Increase the database of learning b-strategies
      Vision – Results of the speech promoted by paol
      Responses
      Universe
      Tools
      Applicability
      Interest
    25. MIPO – Conclusions
      24
      Macro Vision
      What to do?
      When to do?
      DEVELOPMENT
      ANALYSIS
      DESIGN
      IMPLEMENTATION
      EVALUATION
      Instruction Models
      Web Technologies
      Learning Environment
      Instruction
      Support Documentation
      Unit
      Model
      Kemp et. al.
      B-Learning
      MIPO
      MIPO Model
      B-Strategy
      Micro Vision
      How to do?
    26. MIPO MODEL - A FRAMEWORK TO HELP THE INTEGRATION OF WEB TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION
      PAULA PERES
      Public presentation of the PhD thesis
      06 -07- 2009
      PEDRO PIMENTA
      University of Minho

    + Paula PeresPaula Peres, 3 months ago

    custom

    163 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 163
      • 163 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories