Collaborate For Inclusion

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Collaborate For Inclusion - Presentation Transcript

    1. Collaborate for Inclusion Elizabeth Gray-King Gray-King & Gray Ltd GKG Collective
    2. Why inclusion? – The Carrot
      • Why Inclusion?
        • Power not disempowerment
        • Engagement in societies
        • Embedded transformation
      • Why Collaboration?
        • Less isolation
        • Stronger results
        • Model of community
    3. Why inclusion? – The big stick
      • White Paper, Strong and prosperous communities – Duty by April 2009
      • Duty to ensure people have greater opportunities to have their say
        • aspiration is to embed a culture of engagement and empowerment
        • By information provision, consultation and involvement across all LA functions
    4. A group passionate about inclusion
      • The GKG Collective
        • “ We’re the GKG Collective, gathering around the achievable vision of inclusion, involvement and engagement.”
    5. NEP
      • National Empowerment Partnership
        • Government partnership to share good practice about involvement at local, regional and national levels
        • In first few operational months of longer initiatives
        • Needed quick appraisal to move forward
    6. NEP Eval Collaborative inclusion
      • Created a multi method plan of data collection
        • Interviews
        • Survey Monkey questionnaire
        • Teleconference
        • Learning Exchange
        • NEPeval website
    7. Key collaborations
      • Teleconference
      • NEP eval web 2 website
      • Learning Exchange
    8. Teleconference
      • From initial findings, slide design of core questions
      • Booked telephone conferences, with each participant looking at the same set of slides
      • Teleconference host recorded conversations
      • Linked people across the country
      • “ The most involved I have ever felt!!!”
    9. One of the questions: There are some fairly strong feelings about using NI4 as an indicator: “ The potential for interpretation makes it (NI4) utterly invalid. It depends on what side of bed you got out of ….. I don’t think its going to drive any real work on community empowerment, it will drive a whole marketing campaign to get people to think they have influence ” You need a combination of different types of approaches. There is a lot of discussion about NI 4 which is one measure of perception and its probably the best proxy. Measuring is definitely difficult. There are two further questions – what are the proportion of decisions that are influenced by local people and secondly whether that is a better decision or not . Question: How can the different views on evaluation been accommodated in the partnership?
    10. NEP Eval Website
      • Web 2 format
        • upload easily from
          • Flickr
          • Scribd
          • Slideshow
          • YouTube
        • Comment easily in real time
        • Prototype for evaluation updates, learning exchanges, good practice
    11. http://nepeval.net
    12. Learning Exchange
      • “ The power is in the analysis”
      • Started with group ground rules:
        • On post its – what could get in the way of a constructive group environment today? Cluster and turn into positive principles
      • Moved to milling around data sources
      • Subject analysis
      • Finished with Opinion Lines
    13. Other Examples
      • The Big Boost
        • Trained Award winners to collect own data
        • On – line survey
        • Participation at BB events
        • Interviews
        • Learning Exchange
      • Where Next
        • Started with Associates
        • Then moved to Trustees and staff facilitated exchange
    14. ICT Collaboration
      • Communities of interest as well as geography
      • Involvement at appropriate levels
      • No replacement for tangible relationships
      • Immediate input/updates in real time
      • Potential to gather evidence easily (event, photos, upload – done!)
    15. Collaborative inclusion
      • Those affected by decisions/information/services help design them and then
        • Use
        • Champion
        • change

    + Simon BerrySimon Berry, 2 years ago

    custom

    602 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 602
      • 584 on SlideShare
      • 18 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 17 views on http://collaborate2008.ruralnet.org.uk
    • 1 views on http://www.michatek.pl

    more

    All embeds
    • 17 views on http://collaborate2008.ruralnet.org.uk
    • 1 views on http://www.michatek.pl

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events