Membrane technology

  • 3,391 views
Uploaded on

A compilation about membrane technology

A compilation about membrane technology

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
3,391
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
5

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY Paulus Hartanto
  • 2. Membrane Filtration Technology
  • 3. Filtration Spectrum
  • 4. Cross Flow Filtration
  • 5. Dead End Filtration
  • 6. Application of membrane processes inwater environment
  • 7. Factors affecting membrane performance
  • 8. What is membrane ?
  • 9. Conventional vs Membrane Filtration
  • 10. Classification of membrane processes
  • 11. Phases divided by membrane
  • 12. Some membrane processes and drivingforces
  • 13. More common membrane processes
  • 14. Flux range & trans-membrane pressure inpressure driven membrane
  • 15. Membrane distillation vs Osmotic distillation
  • 16. Historical development of membranes
  • 17. Classification of filter (membrane)
  • 18. Depth filter vs screen filter
  • 19. Depth filter
  • 20. Screen filter
  • 21. Advantages of screen filter
  • 22. Absolute vs Nominal rating
  • 23. Microporous vs Asymmetric
  • 24. Membrane classification (poresize) Organic macromolecules Colloids Organic compounds Bacteria Viruses Dissolved saltsPollens Yeasts100 µm 10 µm 1 µm 0.1 µm 0.01 µm 0. 1 nm 0. 1 nm RO Redhair visible to globule Smallest Polio microorganisms virus NF naked eye UF Nanofiltration MF Ultrafiltration Microfiltration
  • 25. Membrane classification (pressure range)
  • 26. Rejection Capabilities UF vs MF
  • 27. Process combinations
  • 28. Membrane classification (driving force) • Vacuum (Submerged Membranes) – Compatible with higher solid concentration – Can be used for retrofit – High energy demand with air scouring – Noise & evaporation concerns
  • 29. Membrane classification (driving force)• Pressure (Canister Membranes) – More compact design – Cannot handle high solid concentration (> 100 NTU) for a substantial period of time
  • 30. Membrane classification (configuration)• Open feed channel configuration : Tubular Hollow-Fiber• Narrow feed channel configuration Spiral (Flat sheet)
  • 31. Membrane classification (configuration)• Flat Sheet (Spiral-wound) Mostly used in Reverse Osmosis & Nanofiltration
  • 32. Membrane classification (configuration) • Tubular Membranes (OD > 3 mm) Mostly used in Industrial MF
  • 33. Membrane classification (configuration) • Hollow Fiber Membranes (ID < 1.5 mm) Mostly used in MF & UF
  • 34. Membrane classification(Location of membrane)• Inside-out Membranes Raw Water Filtered Water• Outside-In Membranes
  • 35. Membranes Applications• Filtration: Low-Pressure membranes (MF/UF) for turbidity & pathogen removal• Organic Removal: Nanofiltration (NF) for NOM removal• Inland Brackish Desalination: RO or NF• Seawater Desalination: RO or 2-stage NF• Membrane Bioreactor: MF/UF MBR
  • 36. Membrane vs Sand • Membrane filtration mechanism – Sieving/Straining • Sand filtration mechanism – Interception, collision, electrostatic attraction – Straining only happens in cake filtration
  • 37. Finished water comparison Conventional MembranesTurbidity 0.05 ~ 0.3 < 0.1Virus removal 2 log > 4 logInfluent quality change Affected Not affectedWater chemistry Affected Not affectedchangeOperating conditions Affected Not affectedchange
  • 38. Performance comparison Conventional MembranesHigh feed turbidity Shorter run time Higher pressure (if turbidity is excessive for a long duration)High feed TOC Not affected Higher pressure, need freq. chemical cleaningHigh FeCl3 dose Shorter run time FeCl3 not requiredLow feed temp. Not affected Higher pressure or lower outputCapacity increase Shorter run time Higher pressure, need freq. chemical cleaning
  • 39. Typical Membrane Filtration Cycle • Filtration (15 ~ 50 minutes) • Backwash (20 sec ~ 2 min) (No rinsing, surface wash, or filter-to-waste) Special Operation/Maintenance • Chemical Cleaning • Membrane Repair
  • 40. Membrane Fouling (performance)
  • 41. Fouling is part of membranes• All membranes are subject to fouling, no exception• Fouling is acceptable as long as it is reversible and manageable (i.e., can be removed in a reasonable fashion)
  • 42. Potential Fouling Material Natural Organic Matter• NOM with high SUVA• TOC > 4 mg/L would be a concern• Organic fouling is “sticky” and difficult to clean• Organic may serve as “cement” to bind other particulates and form a strong cake layer• Caustic cleaning (e.g. NaOH) and strong oxidant (e.g. H2O2) are effective for NOM fouling cleaning
  • 43. Potential Fouling MaterialParticulate/Colloids • Inorganic particles alone would not cause much fouling • Inorganic particle cake layer could be easily removed by backwash • Excessive turbidity could clog membrane fiber lumens • Inorganic particles mixed with NOM could cause substantial fouling • Organic colloids could cause significant fouling and could be difficult to clean
  • 44. Potential Fouling MaterialInorganic Material • Precipitation of Ca, Mn, Mg, Fe, and Al could cause significant fouling • Fine inorganic colloids (< 0.05 µm) could clog membrane pores and cause fouling • Prefer a negative Langelier Index • Acid, EDTA, SBS cleaning could be effective for inorganic fouling Langelier Index = Actual pH – Saturation pH Saturation pH = 2.18 - log[Ca+2] - log[HCO3-] L.I. > 0 : Oversaturated (tend to precipitate) L.I. < 0 : Undersaturated (tend to dissolve more)
  • 45. Potential Fouling MaterialSynthetic Polymers• Polymers used for coagulant/filter aids & backwash water treatment• Presence of polymers in feed water could cause dramatic fouling, and sometimes irreversible• Free residual polymer is worse than particle- associated polymer• Cationic polymers are worst• Some polymers can be easily cleaned with chlorine and therefore are consider compatible with membranes
  • 46. Fouling MitigationPretreatment • Reduce TOC level (< 4 mg/L) • Reduce Turbidity (< 5 NTU) • Reduce Hardness (< 150 mg/L) • Avoid substantial change in water chemistry, such as pH and other pretreatment chemicals • Prevent Oil and Polymers from entering the feed water
  • 47. Fouling MitigationOperation • Use crossflow if turbidity is high (For Inside- out membranes) • Bleed a portion of the concentrate to avoid solid buildup • Operate at a lower flux (lower TMP) • Enhance pretreatment
  • 48. Fouling MitigationCleaning Strategy 1. Frequent BW (shorter filtration cycle) 2. Longer BW duration 3. Higher BW pressure 4. Add cleaning chemicals in BW water 5. Frequent chemical cleaning
  • 49. Membrane CleaningMembrane Fouling Mechanisms • Organic & Inorganic • Particulate & Soluble • Various Mechanisms – Surface & Pore – Adsorption, precipitation, coagulation
  • 50. Membrane Cleaning • Hydraulic Cleaning (10~30 minutes) – Water/Air Backwash – Air Scouring – Water Flushing • Chemical Cleaning (1~8 weeks) – Free Chlorine (Sodium Hypochlorite) – Acid/Base – Other strong oxidants, such as H2O2 – Reducing agent, such as SBS – Chelating chemicals, such as EDTA – Proprietary Chemicals (surfactants)
  • 51. Summary of Fouling Material & Cleaning Chemicals Cleaning Chemical For Fouling Material NaOCl Biological; NOM; Synthetic polymers Acids (HCl, H2SO4, Citric Acid) Inorganic deposits NaOH NOM Sodium bi-sulfite (SBS) Reducible metals (Fe, Mn) H2O2 NOM EDTA Metals
  • 52. Membrane IntegrityMembrane failure is rarely catastrophic – less seriousthan microbial penetration of rapid sand filter beds. Membrane Integrity• Membranes fail incrementally – one fiber at a time.• Statistically, individual fiber breaks are insignificant to the overall microbial water quality.
  • 53. Membrane Integrity Monitoring • On-Line Turbidity Monitoring – 0.08 NTU 95% of the time, 0.1 NTU max. • On-Line Particle Count – Baseline establishment (< 50 particles/mL) – Sensitivity: Number of fiber breakage? • Pressure Holding Test • Virus Seeding Test (UF)
  • 54. The Secret of Membranes… Fouling Index Cleaning High Production Water Quality High Recovery• Finding the balance point between Fouling-Enhancers and Fouling Reducers is the KEY!
  • 55. Take Away Points• Membranes Offers a Wide Range of Applications• Membrane is a Mature Technology• A Successful Membrane Operation Depends on – The Selection of an Appropriate System – Optimized Operating Conditions/Protocols that Yield Manageable Membrane Fouling – Experience Design Engineer
  • 56. The End