how many of you agree that
some of your best donors,
were the first donors?
brands online can be built
by referrals and supported
by traditional marketing
SIGNS UP AND SEES WHAT DONATIONS ACHIEVED
SIGNS UP AND SEES WHAT DONATIONS ACHIEVED
SO REFERS AND CREATES CONTENT FOR THEM TO
SEE
SIGNS UP AND SEES WHAT DONATIONS ACHIEVED
SO REFERS AND CREATES CONTENT FOR THEM TO
SEE
WHO IS A STRANGER, ALSO SEES IT SO ALSO
SIGNS UP…
YOU SHOULD AIM TO
BE A TRIBAL BRAND
A brand that I buy
because I don’t know of
any other choices
A market leading brand
that I buy because I trust
it will fill my basic
requirements
A brand that feeds my self-
identity, my self-esteem as
well as meets my basic
requirements
relationships with brands
CO-CREATIVE CO-CREATIVE CO-CREATIVE
I create I create I create
Level of Involvement
the content the content the content
INTERACTIVE INTERACTIVE CO-CREATIVE
I control I control I create
the content the content the content
PASSIVE CO-CREATIVE
I absorb I create
the content the content
Level of Creativity
the fuss is because web 2.0
allows you to create a place
for passionate supporters to
meet, and to recruit others
web 2.0 is still about
supporter relationships
suspect
prospect
supporter
donor
regular giver
what do you need?
data
speed
segments
WYE
data
speed
segments
What’s Your Excuse
the fuss about web 2.0 is
the rise of technologies
that allow supporter relationships
to be managed in new ways
Overview of what web2.0 offers charities. Rather t more
Overview of what web2.0 offers charities. Rather than hype it up, the presentation talks about pitfalls of asuming that younger audience = great, or that the passion people have of new technology necessarily means that you are being left behind if you haven't started using them at your not for profit.
re-iterates some basics of fundraising and explains why web 2.0 supports the same principles.
Presented 17 July Melbourne FIA Special Interests Group. less
0 comments
Post a comment