“ The systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care, including the procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome and quality of life for the patient”
Working for Patients 1989
Reactions to audit?
Enthusiasm
Cynicism
Obligation
Doubt
Exhaustion
What is clinical audit?
Clinical audit
is at the heart of
clinical governance and clinical effectiveness
Audit:- are we doing the best thing in the best way?
Measures current practice against specific standards
Never experimental
Uses data in existence by virtue of practice
May require ethical approval
Aims to improve delivery of patient care
Research:- What is the best thing to do/the best way to do it?
Provides sound basis for clinical audit
Involves experimental trials
Uses detailed and often sophisticated data collection
Needs ethical approval and registration
Aims to add to body of scientific knowledge
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected)
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes Re-audit
The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes Re-audit
The audit cycle
Five stages of clinical audit
Stage 1: Preparing for audit
Selecting a topic
Defining the purpose
Planning
Suitable topic
Determine which aspects of current work are to be considered
Describe and measure present performance
Develop explicit standards
Decide what needs to be changed
Negotiate change
Mobilise resources for change
Review and renew the process
Selecting a topic
There seems little point in trying to audit a rare condition, with a cheap intervention with a fairly superficial outcome.
Which topic?
Selecting a topic
High cost/volume/risk
Area of local clinical concern
Mis-diagnosing MI
Pre elective screen right tests right patient
Potential for improvement
National priority
Organisational priority
Evidence based
Defining the purpose
The following series of verbs may be useful in defining the aims of an audit (Buttery, 1998):
to improve
to enhance
to increase
to change
to ensure
Planning
Involve ALL the right people
Time and resources
Access the evidence
Methodology
Pilot
Report and Action
Re-audit
Stage 2: Selecting criteria
Defining criteria
Sources of evidence
Appraising the evidence
Defining criteria
Criteria:
are explicit statements that define what is being measured
represent elements of care that can be measured objectively.
Sources of evidence
NeLH /Cochrane/WISH
NICE
Official Websites
NSFs
Local or regional guidelines/policy
Royal College or Professional Body
Recognised journals
Appraising the evidence
Aim /objectives
Methodology
Results /conclusions
Applicable to your patient group
Bias/ causes for concern
Stage 3: Measuring level of performance
Planning data collection
Methods of data collection
Handling data
Planning data collection
Need to establish
the user group to be included, with any exceptions noted
the healthcare professionals involved in the users ’ care
the time period over which the criteria apply.
Methods of data collection
Computer stored data
Case notes/Medical Records
Surveys
Questionnaires
Interviews
Focus Groups
Prospective recording of specific data
Handling data
Health service professionals must be aware of the ethical implications of and their responsibilities under the Data Protection Act (1998) when collecting data and presenting results.
Stage 4: Making improvements
Identifying barriers to change
Implementing change
External relationships
Identifying barriers to change
Fear of change
Lack of understanding
Low morale
Poor communication
Culture
Pushing too hard
Consensus not gained
Implementing Change
Discuss the results with those likely to be affected
Agree an Action Plan
Clearly define – who is doing what
Check progress
Produce report and disseminate
Share findings and changes in practice
Stage 5: Sustaining improvement
Monitoring and evaluation
Re-audit
Maintaining and reinforcing improvement
Monitoring and evaluation
Although improving performance is the primary goal of audit, sustaining that improvement is also essential. Indeed, any systematic approach to changing professional practice should include plans to:
monitor and evaluate the change
maintain and reinforce the change ( NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination, 1999 ).
Re-audit
Close the loop
Review evidence
Measure effectiveness
Decide how often to re-audit
The great coffee audit
A case study
The great coffee audit
Problem
The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
The great coffee audit
Problem
Criteria
The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
The coffee shall be hot and satisfying to the hard pressed docs
The great coffee audit
Problem
Criteria
Standards
The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
The coffee shall be hot and satisfying to the hard pressed docs
The coffee shall be served at a temperature of 85-90 C on 80% of occasions and there will be 90% satisfaction level expressed by the docs
The great coffee audit
Methods
The junior receptionist shall check the temperature of the coffee daily for two weeks and circulate a questionnaire to the partners asking them to score a coffee satisfaction level between 1 and 10. The practice manager shall visit Tesco’s and interview the manager about the availability, costs, quality and sell-by dates of the coffee brands available
The great coffee audit
Review
After a rather tense audit team meeting it was found that the coffee temperature fell below 37 C on at least 33% of occasions and reached the standard on only 10% of occasions. The doctors scored the coffee at an average 3/10 and two expressed it undrinkable. The practice manager reported the results of her Tesco’s visit.
The great coffee audit
Change
It was agreed to replace the aged coffee maker ( after agreeing suitable redundancy terms for the senior receptionist) with a shiny new machine from Argos. As an additional ‘quality initiative’, cream cakes would be served after surgery. The coffee contract would be switched from the corner shop to Tesco PLC Trust
The great coffee audit
Re-audit
For a further two weeks it was agreed to measure the coffee temperature and re-circulate the questionnaire. It was gratifying to find 100% correlation with agreed standards with the exception of one partner who didn’t like coffee anyway.
The great coffee audit
Re-audit
Future
audit
For a further two weeks it was agreed to measure the coffee temperature and re-circulate the questionnaire. It was gratifying to find 100% correlation with agreed standards with the exception of one partner who didn’t like coffee anyway.
Cost implications of standard maintenance
Cholesterol assays for partners
A word about clinical governance
“ A framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish”
A First Class Service 1998
‘Clinical Governance’
‘Clinical Governance’ Research
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit Evidence based medicine
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans Practice accreditation
‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans Practice accreditation Special interest groups
0 comments
Post a comment