Clinical Audit Presentation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Clinical Audit Presentation - Presentation Transcript

    1. Clinical Audit SSU March 2008 Contact Session 1
    2. Introduction
      • What is clinical audit?
      • Audit versus research
      • The audit cycle
      • Five stages of clinical audit
      • Summary
    3. What is clinical audit?
      • “ The systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care, including the procedures used for diagnosis and treatment, the use of resources and the resulting outcome and quality of life for the patient”
      • Working for Patients 1989
    4. Reactions to audit?
      • Enthusiasm
      • Cynicism
      • Obligation
      • Doubt
      • Exhaustion
    5. What is clinical audit?
      • Clinical audit
      • is at the heart of
      • clinical governance and clinical effectiveness
    6. Audit:- are we doing the best thing in the best way?
      • Measures current practice against specific standards
      • Never experimental
      • Uses data in existence by virtue of practice
      • May require ethical approval
      • Aims to improve delivery of patient care
    7. Research:- What is the best thing to do/the best way to do it?
      • Provides sound basis for clinical audit
      • Involves experimental trials
      • Uses detailed and often sophisticated data collection
      • Needs ethical approval and registration
      • Aims to add to body of scientific knowledge
    8. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified
    9. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set
    10. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected)
    11. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement
    12. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes
    13. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes Re-audit
    14. The audit cycle Problem or objective identified Criteria agreed and standards set Audit (Data collected) Identify areas for improvement Make necessary changes Re-audit
    15. The audit cycle
    16. Five stages of clinical audit
    17. Stage 1: Preparing for audit
      • Selecting a topic
      • Defining the purpose
      • Planning
    18. Suitable topic
      • Determine which aspects of current work are to be considered
      • Describe and measure present performance
      • Develop explicit standards
      • Decide what needs to be changed
      • Negotiate change
      • Mobilise resources for change
      • Review and renew the process
    19. Selecting a topic
      • There seems little point in trying to audit a rare condition, with a cheap intervention with a fairly superficial outcome.
      • Which topic?
    20. Selecting a topic
      • High cost/volume/risk
      • Area of local clinical concern
        • Mis-diagnosing MI
        • Pre elective screen right tests right patient
      • Potential for improvement
      • National priority
      • Organisational priority
      • Evidence based
    21. Defining the purpose
      • The following series of verbs may be useful in defining the aims of an audit (Buttery, 1998):
      • to improve
      • to enhance
      • to increase
      • to change
      • to ensure
    22. Planning
      • Involve ALL the right people
      • Time and resources
      • Access the evidence
      • Methodology
      • Pilot
      • Report and Action
      • Re-audit
    23. Stage 2: Selecting criteria
      • Defining criteria
      • Sources of evidence
      • Appraising the evidence
    24. Defining criteria
      • Criteria:
      • are explicit statements that define what is being measured
      • represent elements of care that can be measured objectively.
    25. Sources of evidence
      • NeLH /Cochrane/WISH
      • NICE
      • Official Websites
      • NSFs
      • Local or regional guidelines/policy
      • Royal College or Professional Body
      • Recognised journals
    26. Appraising the evidence
      • Aim /objectives
      • Methodology
      • Results /conclusions
      • Applicable to your patient group
      • Bias/ causes for concern
    27. Stage 3: Measuring level of performance
      • Planning data collection
      • Methods of data collection
      • Handling data
    28. Planning data collection
      • Need to establish
      • the user group to be included, with any exceptions noted
      • the healthcare professionals involved in the users ’ care
      • the time period over which the criteria apply.
    29. Methods of data collection
      • Computer stored data
      • Case notes/Medical Records
      • Surveys
      • Questionnaires
      • Interviews
      • Focus Groups
      • Prospective recording of specific data
    30. Handling data
      • Health service professionals must be aware of the ethical implications of and their responsibilities under the Data Protection Act (1998) when collecting data and presenting results.
    31. Stage 4: Making improvements
      • Identifying barriers to change
      • Implementing change
      • External relationships
    32. Identifying barriers to change
      • Fear of change
      • Lack of understanding
      • Low morale
      • Poor communication
      • Culture
      • Pushing too hard
      • Consensus not gained
    33. Implementing Change
      • Discuss the results with those likely to be affected
      • Agree an Action Plan
      • Clearly define – who is doing what
      • Check progress
      • Produce report and disseminate
      • Share findings and changes in practice
    34. Stage 5: Sustaining improvement
      • Monitoring and evaluation
      • Re-audit
      • Maintaining and reinforcing improvement
    35. Monitoring and evaluation
      • Although improving performance is the primary goal of audit, sustaining that improvement is also essential. Indeed, any systematic approach to changing professional practice should include plans to:
      • monitor and evaluate the change
      • maintain and reinforce the change ( NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination, 1999 ).
    36. Re-audit
      • Close the loop
      • Review evidence
      • Measure effectiveness
      • Decide how often to re-audit
    37. The great coffee audit
      • A case study
    38. The great coffee audit
      • Problem
      • The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
    39. The great coffee audit
      • Problem
      • Criteria
      • The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
      • The coffee shall be hot and satisfying to the hard pressed docs
    40. The great coffee audit
      • Problem
      • Criteria
      • Standards
      • The doctors feel that their coffee isn’t hot enough after slogging through morning surgery
      • The coffee shall be hot and satisfying to the hard pressed docs
      • The coffee shall be served at a temperature of 85-90  C on 80% of occasions and there will be 90% satisfaction level expressed by the docs
    41. The great coffee audit
      • Methods
      • The junior receptionist shall check the temperature of the coffee daily for two weeks and circulate a questionnaire to the partners asking them to score a coffee satisfaction level between 1 and 10. The practice manager shall visit Tesco’s and interview the manager about the availability, costs, quality and sell-by dates of the coffee brands available
    42. The great coffee audit
      • Review
      • After a rather tense audit team meeting it was found that the coffee temperature fell below 37  C on at least 33% of occasions and reached the standard on only 10% of occasions. The doctors scored the coffee at an average 3/10 and two expressed it undrinkable. The practice manager reported the results of her Tesco’s visit.
    43. The great coffee audit
      • Change
      • It was agreed to replace the aged coffee maker ( after agreeing suitable redundancy terms for the senior receptionist) with a shiny new machine from Argos. As an additional ‘quality initiative’, cream cakes would be served after surgery. The coffee contract would be switched from the corner shop to Tesco PLC Trust
    44. The great coffee audit
      • Re-audit
      • For a further two weeks it was agreed to measure the coffee temperature and re-circulate the questionnaire. It was gratifying to find 100% correlation with agreed standards with the exception of one partner who didn’t like coffee anyway.
    45. The great coffee audit
      • Re-audit
      • Future
      • audit
      • For a further two weeks it was agreed to measure the coffee temperature and re-circulate the questionnaire. It was gratifying to find 100% correlation with agreed standards with the exception of one partner who didn’t like coffee anyway.
      • Cost implications of standard maintenance
      • Cholesterol assays for partners
    46. A word about clinical governance
      • “ A framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish”
      • A First Class Service 1998
    47. ‘Clinical Governance’
    48. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research
    49. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit
    50. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit Evidence based medicine
    51. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines
    52. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines
    53. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans
    54. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans
    55. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans Practice accreditation
    56. ‘Clinical Governance’ Research Practice development plans Postgraduate medical education Audit Evidence based medicine Dissemination of guidelines Personal development plans Practice accreditation Special interest groups
    57. ‘Clinical Governance’ Accountability
    58. Summary Audit
      • Defined clinical audit
      • Compared audit and research
      • The audit cycle.
      • Five stages of clinical audit
    59. Celebrate
      • Next contact session progress report from you
      • Final contact session
      • Share learning
      • Publicise results
      • Give credit where credit is due!
      • Work on the assignment and poster
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + John O'ConnorJohn O'Connor Nominate

    custom

    2122 views, 1 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    RDE SSU Year 4 Medical Students
    Clinical Audit in more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2122
      • 2114 on SlideShare
      • 8 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 115
    Most viewed embeds
    • 8 views on http://www.infovisionary.co.uk

    more

    All embeds
    • 8 views on http://www.infovisionary.co.uk

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories