The north face apparel company v south butt 2010
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

The north face apparel company v south butt 2010

on

  • 13,158 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
13,158
Views on SlideShare
13,158
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
7
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

The north face apparel company v south butt 2010 The north face apparel company v south butt 2010 Presentation Transcript

  • The North Face Apparel Company v. The South Butt and Others What is Trademark Infringement? This project is a collaborative effort of Street Law, Inc. and Constitutional Rights Foundation. Educating to Protect Intellectual Property (ePIP) is funded by grant 2009-BE-BX-0001 from the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the United States Department of Justice.
  • Do you own any North Face apparel?
  • Do you own any South Butt apparel? View slide
  • The North Face
    • North Face is a mountaineering equipment and apparel company. The owners named their original store “the North Face” – evoking a mountain’s north face, generally considered the most difficult face to climb.
    • Key points about The North Face:
    • During the last four decades, THE NORTH FACE ® mark and a stylized silhouette of Yosemite’s Half Dome peak have become famous trademarks uniquely associated with The North Face and its quality goods.
    • The North Face tagline is “Never Stop Exploring.”
    View slide
  • The South Butt
    • The South Butt, LLC, founded by college freshman Jimmy Winkleman, is a “parody apparel company which served to spoof its biological and directional counterpart, The North Face.”
    • Key points about The South Butt:
    • Winkleman maintains that he was tired of seeing all his classmates spend money on the exact same jackets and vests so he started the parodic company to get people thinking about alternatives.
    • The South Butt tagline is “Never Stop Relaxing.”
  • The North Face said:
    • South Butt is marketing apparel that “directly and unabashedly” infringes on The North Face’s famous trademarks-including replicating The North Face’s trade dress in its Denali jacket.
  • The South Butt said:
    • It’s parody. The founder of South Butt, Jimmy Winkleman said he was tired of seeing all his classmates spend their money on the exact same jackets and vests. He started the company to get people thinking about alternatives.
  • The Lawsuit
    • The North Face sued The South Butt for trademark infringement and requested a permanent injunction to stop further customer product confusion.
  • Your Roles
    • You will participate in one of three groups:
    • an “expert” group to prepare to be the judge
    • an “expert” group to prepare to represent the plaintiff—The North Face Apparel Corporation
    • an “expert” group to prepare to represent the defendant—The South Butt
  • The Hearing Process
    • Plaintiff’s counsel makes arguments 2 minutes
    • Judge may ask questions 1 minute
    • Defense counsel makes arguments 2 minutes
    • Judge may ask questions 1 minute
    • Plaintiff’s counsel rebuts 30 seconds
    • Defense attorney rebuts 30 seconds
    • Judge makes decision 2 minutes
  • Trademark Infringement
    • Trademark infringement means that there has been some use of the trademark by someone other than the owner in a manner that is likely to cause consumers to be confused as to the source, or origin of the product or service to which that mark is applied.
  • Factors that help a judge or court determine whether trademark infringement has occurred
    • The strength of the mark of original user
    • The relatedness of the goods
    • The similarity of the marks
    • Evidence of actual confusion
    • Sophistication of purchasers
    • The defendant's intent
  • What is parody?
    • A parody can be a writing, music, and/or design that imitates something in a satirical, comic or amusing way. In a trademark infringement case, parody is a defense to infringement.
  • Factors that a court may consider when determining whether or not the offending use of a trademark constitutes parody
    • do the products compete?
    • do retail and advertising channels overlap?
    • do the customers overlap?
    • is the parody portraying unlawful or offensive material?
    • Is the owner’s trademark famous?
    • Is there only enough similarity to bring the senior owner’s trademark to mind?
    • is the parody adequately distinguished from the original to avoid confusion?
    • Is there any First Amendment speech involved?
  • The Hearing
    • After you have prepared, you will be placed into mini court groups. Each group should have 1-2 plaintiffs, 1-2 defendants, and 1-2 judges.
    • Begin your hearing. Judges are in charge and should direct the procedures and keep time. The hearing should take about 10 minutes.
  • The Decision
    • Judges should take a few minutes to consult and to formulate your opinions.
    • The judge from each group should announce her/his opinion with supporting rationale to the whole class.
  • What do you think?
    • How do you think this case should be decided? Why?