| http://gigaom.com |
2017 |
| http://socialcommercetoday.com |
1152 |
| http://www.capitalstockholm.se |
609 |
| http://www.kylekutter.com |
503 |
| http://sajilai.blogspot.com |
356 |
| http://www.hardknoxlife.com |
346 |
| http://off-the-record.de |
291 |
| http://ft.akra.de |
263 |
| http://marketingmanagementblog.com |
246 |
| http://www.web2expo.com |
214 |
| http://paper.li |
213 |
| http://www.ansto.de |
208 |
| http://www.meapeteciacontarte.com |
169 |
| url_unknown |
124 |
| http://mktcreatesvalue.wordpress.com |
111 |
| http://netzwerker.net |
109 |
| http://www.frontiering.com.au |
107 |
| http://watchingism.blogspot.com |
103 |
| http://edoam.tumblr.com |
100 |
| http://www.hijodelmedio.com |
92 |
| http://sajilai.blogspot.co.uk |
80 |
| http://pimpammarket.com |
74 |
| http://mktcreatesvalue.com |
68 |
| http://blog.basschutte.nl |
62 |
| http://juanandres.milleiro.com |
57 |
| http://scottpurdie.com |
50 |
| http://watchingism.blogspot.co.uk |
48 |
| http://serve4impact.com |
46 |
| http://www.liveworld.com |
40 |
| http://feeds2.feedburner.com |
39 |
| http://www.joshualyman.com |
39 |
| http://michaelbatistich.com |
37 |
| http://matildalindblom.tumblr.com |
35 |
| http://heinz.typepad.com |
34 |
| http://translate.googleusercontent.com |
33 |
| http://static.slideshare.net |
29 |
| http://j-reference.blogspot.com |
28 |
| http://w3.ibm.com |
26 |
| http://inkwash.posterous.com |
26 |
| http://blog.tweetalicious.com |
25 |
| http://www.litmanlive.me |
24 |
| http://contentconnectsus.posterous.com |
23 |
| http://otter.popmultimedia.com |
23 |
| http://www.zoharurian.com |
23 |
| http://twitter.com |
22 |
| http://epsilon-mobile.blogspot.com |
20 |
| http://ipcarrier.blogspot.com |
20 |
| http://namesake.com |
20 |
| http://dodrum.blogspot.com |
19 |
| http://posterous.com |
18 |
| http://dubclicks.com |
17 |
while your core premise makes sense - the web is being rebuilt around people, i dont buy into your maths and question the REAL decision making impact that technology will have:
1. messages often dont get out beyond your 10 strongest ties i.e. because i bought puma or addidas doesnt mean my strongest ties will recommend them or that they even bought that brand. the impact here is no different from traditional Word of mouth and offline social networks
2. there is always a time delay, just because i am choosing to go to fiji on holiday (which may have been impacted by my strongest ties) it doesnt mean that they will send it out to their network etc.. if i had a good trip it will be something they remember and tell others - but again this is just normal word of mouth, so no technology benefit there
3, there is an inherent information value i.e some people i trust more about certain info than others, in fact - some people i trust more than anybody else and might not ask any other close ties for information
there are really three issues that i see 1. does technology make word of mouth more effective as a sales tool and more measurable than it currently is (i.e. are we just measuring wom better but we havent actually impacted behavior in a significant way)
2. what is the timing impact of social media WOM (i.e. yes, 236 people may be impacted - but over a period of 3 years when they make that specific purchasing decision)
3, WOM is not a contrived event (which most social media unfortunately is) by making sharing/inviting people to join us easier (like a facebook event or a livingsocial coupon) what technology is doing is just simplifying the communication layer but in no way actually 'socialising' anything. i could have sent a letter, picked up the phone or used a variety of other technologies... 2 years ago