3. BORDA METHOD
Single-winner election method
Voters rank candidates in order of
preference
Each candidate is given a certain number of
points corresponding to the position in
which he or she is ranked by each voter
Once votes are counted, the candidate with
the most points wins
Called consensus-based electoral system
because not chosen by majority
4. HISTORY OF BORDA METHOD
Named for 18th-century French mathematician &
political scientist Jean-Charles de Borda
Devised the system in 1770
Used throughout the world by various private
organizations and competitions
Used for:
Election of two ethnic minority members of the
National Assembly of Slovenia
To select presidential election candidates in Kiribati
To elect members of the Parliament of Nauru
5. INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING
Method of preferential voting
Ranked choice voting
Voters choose rank of candidates in order of preference
instead of just voting for one person
Person with lowest number votes dropped and the people
vote again and again until there is only 1 person left
Forces voters to vote more strategically
Used to elect President of India and Ireland
Used to elect leaders for the Labor Party in the United
Kingdom
7. HISTORY OF INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING
1850 – Thomas Hare invents the Single
Transferable Vote (STV) that is to elect several
minority winners representing the people who
elected them through ranked voting
1870 - America W.R. Ware professor at MIT makes
changes to the STV system and develops the
Instant Runoff Voting system
Goal of the IRV is to produce a single majority winner
1893 – A modified version of Instant Runoff Voting
used in a governmental election in Queensland,
Australia
Different because all candidates except the top two
were eliminated
8. APPROVAL METHOD
Each voter can approve of as many options as he
or she wishes
The winner is the candidate with the most votes
Each candidate is treated as a separate question
“Do you approve of this candidate”
Don’t just vote for top choice
Say if you would be okay with each candidate
9. APPROVAL VOTING EXAMPLE
First period high school physical education class has decided to take a
vote to determine which activity they will take up next in PE. Their
choices are aerobics (A), badminton (B), football (F), or softball (S).
The winning activity will be determined using Approval Voting.
Suppose the following summarizes the responses of the classs
12 students vote for Aerobics and Badminton
5 students vote for Badminton, Football, and Softball
10 students vote for Football and Badminton
13 students vote for Softball and Badminton
The activity with the most votes wins.
10. PAIRWISE COMPARISON
Compare each possible match
If there are four candidates, then you will compare:
1 v 2
1 v 3
1 v 4
2 v 3
2 v 4
3 v 4
The candidate with the most “wins” is the winner
11. PAIRWISE COMPARISON EXAMPLE
For instance, in a 4 candidate election, suppose
candidate A beats candidates B and D head-to-head,
candidate B beats candidate D and ties candidate C
head-to-head, candidate C beats candidate A and ties
candidate B head-to-head, and candidate D beats
candidate C head-to-head. Candidate A would get 2
points(1 each for beating B and D), candidate B would
get 1.5 points (1 point for beating D and half a point for
the tie with C), candidate C would get 1.5 points(1 point
for beating A and half a point for the tie with B),
and candidate D would get 1 point (for beating C). Since
candidate A has the highest point total,candidate A is the
winner by the Method of Pairwise Comparisons.
12. PLURALITY VOTING SYSTEM
Single winner voting
system
Used to elect executive
officers or to elect
members of a legislative
assembly
Used in multi-member
constituencies in what is
referred to as an
exhaustive counting
system where one
member is elected at a
time and the process is
repeated until the number
of vacancies is filled.
Editor's Notes
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2f/Plurality_ballot.svg/220px-Plurality_ballot.svg.pngWhy plurality might not be fair