• Save
ODS smuggling criminal enforcement
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

ODS smuggling criminal enforcement

on

  • 1,406 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,406
Views on SlideShare
1,405
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://gcbb.gaston.edu 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Goldmine of informationA pleasure to work with
  • Sequel to Operation Cool Breeze in the mid-nineties, which focused on CFC-12.
  • The virtually universal acceptance of the need for controlling Ozone Depleting Substances is a substantial factor in securing support for enforcement activities.
  • BUT note it does not reflect trades (deal with claims of CBI).Full Phase-Out schedule is in 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart A, Appendix H and Class II ODS Phase-Out is in 40 CFR 82.16Developed countries’ phase-out schedule:2004: 35%2010: 75%2015: 90%2020: 99.5%2030: BAN!
  • The separation line between dark and light gray are where the incentive to smuggle grows.
  • As the program and phase-out progress, the smuggling becomes exponentially more economically beneficial for the crook! A financial incentive for fraud.
  • Legitimate industry groups have huge incentives to rid themselves of the violators: cheap and/or sub-quality products undercut their business, reputation, and profit.
  • Manufacturer/representative and end users are very hard to prosecute. We intend to get everyone else!
  • This importer is an actual Barber Shop!***Take a shot and hope for a “clueless” inspectorCreated a “WALL” hiding HCFC-22 behind other permissible merchandise in the containerDeclare as 134a, have first few rows legitimate product, rest is 22 in made up boxes, go so far as to paint boxesShipping the merchandise claiming it to be “US Goods Returned” that are otherwise unrestricted and avoid duties (3.7%), less scrutiny
  • Five (5) entries declared as R-134 & paying 3.7% duty rate. Between 11-2007 & 09-2008If declared value is $166,630.00 3.7% equals $6,165.31 in duties. $6165.31 x 5 = $30,825.00 Our concern was we had intelligence R-22 was in these prior shipments but we wanted to inspect a shipment being importedAll cylinders were placed back into the containers and Two containers were released pending a controlled delivery!During the Surveillance we also witnessed Distributor(s) arriving within the hour to pick up what we believed was the refrigerant just imported. This led to a controlled delivery of previously seized R-22 to the Distributor (Marcone). Required a lot of cooperation/information sharing among several agencies!
  • View with a long-lens of CFC shipment being unloaded within target business.
  • 545/Import Contrary to LawFirst ClauseProhibition against fraudulently or knowingly importing or bringing into the United States, any merchandise contrary to lawSecond ClauseSimilar prohibition against receiving, concealing, buying, selling, or in any manner facilitating the transportation, concealment, or sale of such merchandise after importation, knowing the same to have been imported or brought into the United States contrary to law
  • Tell story about sentencing hearing and hearing before
  • Give HAImporting virgin product claiming it to be used or reclaimed
  • A tremendous amount of effort, research, aggressive advocacy and creativity has gone into the operation, but with good results.That represents approximately .01% of the entire nation’s production and consumption out of a single port and a limited number of cases. - 2010: US has approximately 50,000 MT (=50,000,000 kg) (1MT=1,000kg) - Capturing 1 hundredth of the of the nation’s total legitimate amount out of 1 port might not seem significant, but…
  • Re 3 – Program versus OECA letter to initiate formal seizureRe 4 – Where? Who pays?Re 5 – Auction (Who warrants? Who keeps the money?) Destruction (Who pays?)
  • Grand Jury issues, even with MLAT
  • Big issue with the international manufacture/supply chain. Article 5 countries get Clean Development Mechanism credits (CDMs) and then have a perverse incentive to create large quantities of HCFC-22, often sub-quality, with the black market being a willing buyer (little regard for quality). Projects aimed at promoting sustainable development and increasing the spread of clean technologies are issued with credits. These credits (known as ‘Certified Emissions Reductions’ or ‘CERs’) can then bought and sold, providing the system with a financial incentive. The creation of carbon credits from the destruction of the potent greenhouse gas (GHG) trifluoromethane (HFC23) has been one of the most controversial issues during the early life of the Kyoto Protocol’s CDM. A by-product of the manufacture of the refrigerant HCFC22, many view HFC23 destruction projects as a cheap money-maker for a small number of industrial sites in a handful of developing countries that provided little discernible sustainable development benefit to those countries.The controversy centres around the inclusion of refrigerant-producing factories that generate the powerful greenhouse gas HFC 23 as a by-product. Many of these factories are in China, where investors can get CDM credits for destroying HFC 23, a relatively cheap process."HFC 23 emitters can earn almost twice as much from the CDM credits as they can from selling refrigerant gases - by any measure a major distortion of the market," writes Michael Wara of Stanford University, US, in the journal Nature.

ODS smuggling criminal enforcement ODS smuggling criminal enforcement Presentation Transcript

  • ODS Smuggling
    Criminal Enforcement
  • EPA Criminal Investigation Division
    Sworn Federal Law Enforcement Officers
    47 Field Offices in 38 States
    Nationally over 180 Special Agents working over 750 cases
  • Track all allowances, trades, petitions and transactions
    First line of defense (and attack) in ensuring compliance with the CAA
    EPA Office of Stratospheric Protection Division
  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Commercial Fraud Groups
    Customs and Border Protection
    Department of Homeland Security
  • Environmental Harm
    Economic Harm
    Inherent dangers involved in imports
    Deterence
    Promote respect for the law
    Why build a criminal case? Why Share?
  • Operation Catch-22
  • Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer was signed on September 16, 1987
    The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer
    All 196 UN recognized nations have signed the Montreal Protocol
    International Agreement
  • Montreal Protocol is implemented by Title VI (42 USC 7671-7671q) of the CAA and its regulations (40 CFR Part 82)
    The CAA provisions have required the United States to meet or exceed the Protocol deadlines for ending reliance on the most damaging ozone depleting substances
    The Clean Air Act
  • Common Names:
    Chlorodifluoromethane
    HCFC-22
    R-22
    Packaging
    30 lb. Green Cylinder
    Common Uses
    Residential heat pump
    & air conditioning systems
    Class II Ozone-Depleting Substance Is The Current Enforcement Focus
  • First major milestone was the reduction of US consumption of ODSs by 35% below the baseline cap by January 1, 2004
    To meet that commitment, EPA issued baseline allowances for the production and importation of HCFC-22. 100% of the consumption and production allowances went to specific companies
    Effective January 21, 2003, the import of bulk quantities of HCFC-22 was limited to those holding unexpended consumption allowances
    Allowance holders listed at 40 CFR 82.19
    United States Phase-Out
  • EPA granted allowances for domestic production and import of all bulk HCFCs for 2010-2014
    For 2010, the allocation for HCFC-22 was 20% less than actual domestic market demand
    Doctrine of unintended consequences:
    Intended to promote recovery and reuse
    But also increased smuggling and cheating
    Not a new lesson – CFC-12 Tax Fiasco
    And So The Black Market Grows…
  • Total Projected R-22 Servicing Demand and EPA’s 2010-2014 Allocations of HCFC-22
  • 2010: No production or import of HCFC-142b and 22 in equipment, except for items manufactured before January 1, 2010
    And no further manufacture, sale, or distribution of new equipment with HCFC-22
    2015:No production or import of any HCFCs, except for use as refrigerants in equipment manufactured before January 1, 2010
    2020:No production or import of HCFC-142b and HCFC-22
    2030:No production or import of any HCFCs
    Additional Details of U.S. Phase-Out
  • EPA SPD
    Internal databases
    ICE Entry Inspections
    ICE Review of Suspicious Entry Paperwork
    Industry Groups
    Intelligence Data
    Anonymous Tips (competitors, former employees, freight forwarders)
    International Information Sharing
    Information Sharing isEssential to Success
  • Operation Catch-22
    Importers
    Manufacturers In China
    Freight Forwarders/Brokers/Facilitators
    (Amador Hernandez)
    Distributors
    Individual Buyers/
    End Users
  • Operation Catch-22Goodfellas Branch
  • R-22 declared as R-134, was hidden behind R-134 cylinders & placed within R-134 boxes.
    CBP forms and invoicing all said R-134.
    A “Wall” had been created to conceal the prohibited R-22
    First time R-22 cylinders discovered placed within R-134 boxes.
    Goodfellas
  • Modus Operandi was to divert shipments through “less” suspicious transit lanes and source countries
    ie, China – Caribbean - United States
    Inspectors knew to crawl thru the container to the back because of Goodfellas experience
    There was R-22 from about the fifth row to the nose of the 6 meter container
    Operation Catch-22Kroy Corporation Branch
  • Possible Charges:
    18 USC 545 (smuggling)
    18 USC 542 (falsified entry paperwork)
    42 USC 7413 (CAA)
    18 USC 371 (conspiracy)
    18 USC 1001 (false statements)
    18 USC 1341/1343 (Mail/wire fraud)
    Money Laundering
    RICO and Criminal Enterprise
    Charging Decisions
  • United States v. Kroy Corporation & James Garrido
    09-20913-CR-Seitz (plea11/20/09; sent 2/11/10)
    Charged with 3 counts 18 USC 545
    418,654 kg/FMV $3,930,541
    Garrido
    30 months imprisonment
    $40,000 criminal fine joint & several with Kroy Corporation
    $1,356,160.00 criminal forfeiture of “proceeds” joint & several with Kroy Corporation
    Kroy Corporation
    5 years probation
    $40,000 criminal fine joint & several with Garrido
    $1,356,160.00 criminal forfeiture of “proceeds” joint & several with Garrido
    Criminal Case Results
  • United States v. Amador Hernandez
    10-20065-CR-Cooke (plea 2/5/10; sent 4/21/10)
    1 count 18 USC 542
    (82,852 KG or 5,116 Cylinders)
    Have agreement for joint recommendation for a split sentence of a five month term of imprisonment followed by five month home detention
    Judge, SUA SPONTE, varied!
    $15,000 criminal fine
    Three years probation with special condition of six months home detention
    Criminal Case Results Con’t
  • United States v. Mar-Cone Appliance Parts Co.
    10-20081-CR-GOLD (plea & sent 3/19/10)
    Charged with 1 count 18 USC 545
    100,898 kg/FMV $843,291.70
    Sentence
    $500,000 criminal fine
    $190,534.70 criminal forfeiture of “proceeds”
    $400,000 community service***
    ECP
    Criminal Case Results Con’t.
  • United States v. John Correa, Abdiel Falcon, Charles Nova and BlasdimirUrena
    2010-20719-CR-Altonaga (plea 10/20/10)
    John Correa: 5 years probation with a special condition of 5 months home detention; $3,000 criminal fine, requirement that he reimburse CBP $2,240.65 for storage and handling and $1,950.00 for destruction of contaminated product; and 100 hours of community service.
    Abdiel Falcon: 1 year probation with a special condition of 3 months home detention; $2,000 criminal fine; and 100 hours of community service.
    Charles Nova: 1 year probation with a special condition of 3 months home detention; $2,000 criminal fine, requirement that he reimburse CBP $2,240.65 for storage and handling and $1,950.00 for destruction of contaminated product; and 100 hours of community service.
    BlasdimirUrena: 5 years probation with a special condition of 7 months home detention; $3,000 criminal fine, requirement that he reimburse CBP $2,240.65 for storage and handling and $1,950.00 for destruction of contaminated product; and 100 hours of community service.
    Criminal Case Results Con't
  • The Duck Theory!
    It just doesn’t make sense for a
    company in another country to pay
    to reclaim and ship across the world,
    or to ship used product to pay to reclaim
    in the US.
    Under the current regulations, is this the perfect crime?
    Badges of Fraud
  • 40 CFR 82.152
    “reclaim” refrigerant means to reprocess refrigerant to all of the specifications in appendix A to 40 CFR part 82, subpart F (based on ARI Standard 700-1995, Specification for Fluorocarbons and Other Refrigerants) that are applicable to that refrigerant meets these specifications using the analytical methodology prescribed in section 5 of appendix A of 40 CFR part 82, subpart F.
    The Regs…
  • Import of used/reclaimed refrigerant through the petition system
    “Functionally virgin” product being imported without allowances
    Current status of restrictions in the EU and possible incentives for producers to import “used” product without scrutiny
    Use “wrong” classification to avoid suspicion and scrutiny
    Used???
  • United States v. HARP USA, Inc., February 11, 2011
    Pled guilty to making false statements in Petition to allow entry of “reclaimed” R-22
    Fact Pattern
    Forfeiture of $206,140 in proceeds and payment of equal fine; 5 years probation; $25,000 community service payment ; implement an ECP; pay costs and fees
    Recent Case Result
  • Freight Forwarders
    Shell companies of importers set up in other countries to do import but run in US
    Sales representatives of manufacturers (China) – conspiracy
    Looking into schemes to buy US mfg R-22 that is exported and immediately re-imported (with allowances) but as US Goods Return to avoid duties and other charges
    Other Targets and Future Possibilities
  • We have successfully prosecuted importers, individuals completing the entry paperwork (freight forwarders and shipping coordinators), and a large scale domestic distributor.
    We have taken off the market approximately 542,631 kg of illegally imported merchandise
    Another approximate 500,000 kg under investigation excluding used and pre-charged amounts.
    Thus far…
  • 1. Arrival in U.S. Port
    2. Administrative 30-day hold
    3. Formal detention
    4. Storage
    5. Final disposition
    Process Upon [Attempted] Entry
  • UNEP
    Ozone Secretariat
    Regional Office for Latin America & Caribbean (ROLAC)
    Several countries want to work together either informally or through the use of MLATs to combat this smuggling problem.
    International Coordination
  • There is a perverse incentive for mass production of HCFC-22 simply to generate its by-product, HFC-23
    Extremely valuable carbon credits can be secured through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) system
    The inclusion of refrigerant producing factories gives investors CDM credits for the destruction of the HCF-23 (an inexpensive process) effectively providing “permission” to pollute
    The U.S. press is relentless in assessing our work as it relates to THIS issue
    Relationship to Kyoto Protocoland Global Warming
  • http://ozone.unep.org/Data_Reporting/Data_Access
    ODS Production Rates
  • February 28, 2011
    EPA approves HFO-1234yf as alternative to CFC-134a in autos and light trucks
    99.7% lower global warming potential and substantially reduced Ozone Depleting Potential
    Technology As A Solution
  • How can we help
    your programs?