社会网络理论与sns网站

  • 1,484 views
Uploaded on

社会网络理论与sns网站

社会网络理论与sns网站

More in: Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,484
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
2

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. SNS
  • 2. oooo “ ”o
  • 3. oo 1.4o
  • 4. SNSpp SNSp SNSp
  • 5. ü 1ü 2ü 3ü 4ü 5ü 6ü 7ü 8 CSSN
  • 6. 1
  • 7. 1Roger Brownü "Social structure becomes actually visible in an anthill; the movements and contacts one sees are not random but patterned. We should also be able to see structure in the life of an American community if we had a sufficiently remote vantage point, a point from which persons would appear to be small moving dots. . . . We should see that these dots do not randomly approach one another, that some are usually together, some meet often, some never. . . . If one could get far enough away from it human life would become pure pattern."
  • 8. 2ooo
  • 9. 3ü - -üü
  • 10. 4üüüüü wellman,1988
  • 11. 5p op op o op /p Freeman o Whitte Lin Burt
  • 12. 5o o 1 2o 3o 4 Van der 1993 o
  • 13. 6o www.arcp.cnoo 010-66019664
  • 14. 7o INSNA JSS JSNoo [ ] [ ]o
  • 15. 8 CSSNo CSSN Computer- Supported Social Networksoo
  • 16. SNSl 2.1 SNSl 2.2l 2.3 1l 2.4 2l 2.5l 2.6l 2.7
  • 17. 2.1 SNSu 1 = 6 6 http://blog.donews.com/ hidy/archive/2006/03/12/764695.aspxu 2 = + +…+ SNS http://atblog.org/blog/index.php/2006_04_17_172.html
  • 18. 2.2l Milgram, Stanley. 1967. “The Small World Problem.” Psychology Today 2:60–67.l 1967 Stanley Milgram (1933-1984) 5 6 1967 5 “ ”
  • 19. 2.2o Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2.o Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. djw24@columbia.edu Networks of coupled dynamical systems have been used to model biological oscillators, Josephson junction arrays, excitable media, neural networks, spatial games, genetic control networks and many other self-organizing systems. Ordinarily, the connection topology is assumed to be either completely regular or completely random. But many biological, technological and social networks lie somewhere between these two extremes. Here we explore simple models of networks that can be tuned through this middle ground: regular networks rewired to introduce increasing amounts of disorder. We find that these systems can be highly clustered, like regular lattices, yet have small characteristic path lengths, like random graphs. We call them small-world networks, by analogy with the small-world phenomenon (popularly known as six degrees of separation. The neural network of the worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the power grid of the western United States, and the collaboration graph of film actors are shown to be small-world networks. Models of dynamical systems with small-world coupling display enhanced signal-propagation speed, computational power, and synchronizability. In particular, infectious diseases spread more easily in small-world networks than in regular lattices.
  • 20. 2.2o AJS Volume 105, Number 2 (September 1999): 493–527 493o Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon1Duncan J. WattsSanta Fe InstituteThe small-world phenomenon formalized in this article as the coincidenceof high local clustering and short global separation, is shownto be a general feature of sparse, decentralized networks that areneither completely ordered nor completely random. Networks of thiskind have received little attention, yet they appear to be widespreadin the social and natural sciences, as is indicated here by three distinctexamples. Furthermore, small admixtures of randomness to anotherwise ordered network can have a dramatic impact on its dynamical,as well as structural, properties—a feature illustrated bya simple model of disease transmission.
  • 21. 2.3l 1
  • 22. 2.4l 2
  • 23. 2.5l & 2001 CSSNl & 2004
  • 24. 462 453 99 76 74 68 65 65 45 41 22. 22. 4.8 3.7 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.1 2.1 2.0 % 53 09 3 1 1 2 7 7 9 070.62% 3 297 23 120 96 90 70 69 60 36 40 1 16.6 12. 6.7 3.9 5.0 3.9 3.8 3.3 3.1 2.2 63.36% % 7 96 3 5 3 7 7 4 4 4
  • 25. 2.6l12 n n n3 1998& ,1999
  • 26. 2.7oo n — no n
  • 27. SNSØ 3.1 Google SNSØ 3.2Ø 3.3 SNSØ 3.4 SNSØ 3.5 SNS
  • 28. 3.1 Google SNSo Google +o SNS +
  • 29. 3.2ooo
  • 30. 3.3 SNSooo
  • 31. 3.4 SNS o … o n Web Ajax+XML+XSLT +JSP … n n
  • 32. 3.5 SNSo SNSo SNSo SNS n Google n SNS
  • 33. o [1] . [J]. ,2001,48(4): 42-48.o [2] , . [J]. ,2002(3): 56-58.o [3] , . : CSSN [J]. . . ,2003 (01):51-55.o [4] , , . [J]. ,2003(01).o [5] , , . [J]. ,2004(01).