0
Role of UTC Research in InformingPolicymakers B. Starr McMullen Professor of Economics Oregon State University
Two levels of research•Helping with specific policies at local/statelevel•Contributing to the “state of the art” that canb...
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:A Critical Factor In Making InformedPolicy Decisions
TWO EXAMPLES
Example 1: RUFTF LegislativeMandate “To develop a design for revenue  collection for Oregon roads and  highways that will...
Motivation   Vehicle Mile Fee Recommendation from    state RUFTF was meeting opposition    based on hypothesized    equit...
Techniques For Assessing The Socio-economic Effects Of Vehicle MileageFees (ODOT And OTREC), 2009B. Starr McMullen & Lei Z...
Results   Revenue neutral tax increases increases    regressivity very slight/insignificant---not    anywhere near impact...
Oregon HB 2328            Introduced in the current (2011) State    t            Legislature           Requires persons...
Example 2: GHG Mandates10    The Oregon State legislature:      GHG   levels 10% below 1990 levels (2020) and 75% below ...
2010-2011 OTREC Research   ” The Relationship Between VMT    and Economic Activity”   Provide analytical results to poli...
Study Scope Test for Causation (Granger Causality Tests) Examine How Determinants of VMT differ  between Urban Areas dep...
Conclusions:    UTC Research Projects ProvideInformation To Help PolicymakersMake Informed Decisions    UTC Projects Tend ...
Role of UTC Research in Informing Policymakers
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Role of UTC Research in Informing Policymakers

318

Published on

Published in: Technology, Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
318
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Role of UTC Research in Informing Policymakers"

  1. 1. Role of UTC Research in InformingPolicymakers B. Starr McMullen Professor of Economics Oregon State University
  2. 2. Two levels of research•Helping with specific policies at local/statelevel•Contributing to the “state of the art” that canbe more generally applied
  3. 3. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS:A Critical Factor In Making InformedPolicy Decisions
  4. 4. TWO EXAMPLES
  5. 5. Example 1: RUFTF LegislativeMandate “To develop a design for revenue collection for Oregon roads and highways that will replace the current system for revenue collection” VMT Fee Suggested
  6. 6. Motivation Vehicle Mile Fee Recommendation from state RUFTF was meeting opposition based on hypothesized equity/distributional considerations
  7. 7. Techniques For Assessing The Socio-economic Effects Of Vehicle MileageFees (ODOT And OTREC), 2009B. Starr McMullen & Lei Zhang)
  8. 8. Results Revenue neutral tax increases increases regressivity very slight/insignificant---not anywhere near impact of higher gasoline prices or higher fuel taxes. No negative impact on rural versus urban areas (actually rural areas benefit slightly).
  9. 9. Oregon HB 2328  Introduced in the current (2011) State t Legislature  Requires persons operating electric motor vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric motor vehicles to pay vehicle road usage charge.  Recommended for passage, has not yet come to vote
  10. 10. Example 2: GHG Mandates10 The Oregon State legislature:  GHG levels 10% below 1990 levels (2020) and 75% below 1990 levels (2050). Washington State legislature:  Reduce per capita VMT 25% below 1990 levels (2035) (Winkelman 2009). Federal Surface Transportation Policy and Planning Act of 2009:  Annuallyreduce national per Transportation GHG  capita VMT, increase public reduction  transportation usage, intercity Vehicle Fuel Efficienc  passenger rail services, and non-motorized transportation Fuel y Vehicle Carbon Miles (Commerce Committee 2009). Content Traveled
  11. 11. 2010-2011 OTREC Research ” The Relationship Between VMT and Economic Activity” Provide analytical results to policymakers to help forecast the effect that metropolitan GHG/VMT reduction policies will have on the local economy.
  12. 12. Study Scope Test for Causation (Granger Causality Tests) Examine How Determinants of VMT differ between Urban Areas depending on UA characteristics such as availability of transit, industry structure, urban density, etc. Results should help make informed policy choices for GHG reduction that may differ between UAs.
  13. 13. Conclusions: UTC Research Projects ProvideInformation To Help PolicymakersMake Informed Decisions UTC Projects Tend To ProduceResults That Contribute To The BodyOf Knowledge In The Field.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×