Osimo crossover md
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Osimo crossover md

on

  • 883 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
883
Views on SlideShare
882
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Osimo crossover md Osimo crossover md Presentation Transcript

  • More  sustainable  public  policies  :  can   policy-­‐making  2.0  help?   INSITE  MEETING   David  Osimo,  Tech4i2.com   www.crossover-­‐eu.net     #pm20  
  • KEY  CHALLENGES  OF  SUSTAINABLE  POLICIES    Gain  a  shared  understanding  and  describe  the  problems   at  stake    Design  crea>ve  solu>ons    Make  sure  they  are  recognized  and  implemented  by   government    Make  people  understand  the  long-­‐term  implica>ons  of   their  behaviour    Make  people  actually  change  their  behaviour    Fund  sustainability  ini>a>ves    Monitor  the  environmental  performance  of  countries    Evaluate  the  impact  of  policies  
  •  DISTANT  CAUSES  AND  EFFECTS  AND  SHORTERMISM  
  • WHAT  IS  POLICY-­‐MAKING  2.0  TOOLS   VALUES    Open  data     Open  up  to  external    Social  networks  and   contribu>ons  earlier  in  the   crowdsourcing   process    Visualisa>on     Enable  peer-­‐to-­‐peer   collabora>on  between    Simula>on  and  modeling   par>cipants    Serious  gaming     Design  for  unexpected   ques>ons/contribu>ons   (Raw  data,  open  ques>ons)     Be  very  clear  and  usable   when  you  ask  for  help     Account  for  real  humans   not  simplified  abstract   en>>es  
  • Uservoice, Etherpad ideascale Forum, Co-ment.com blogs, Policy twitter Brainstorming Drafting tools solutions proposals Revising Open proposals Policy Google Discussion tasks moderator Policy design Social Ensure networks Set priorities Buy-inCollaborat Identify Agenda Policy Impleme Collaborativ ive problems setting cycle ntation Challenge e actionvisualizati .gov on Monitor Induce Collect evaluation behavioural evidenceEvidencechal change Persuasive lenge.com technologies Monitor Anallyze data Collect execution feedback Open data Open Data Participatr visualization y sensing
  • SHARED  UNDERSTANDING:  OPEN  DATA   VISUALIZATION  http://stateofworkingamerica.org/who-gains/#/?start=2000&end=2008
  • CREATIVE  SOLUTIONS:  THE  CASE  OF  IDEARIO  FOR  CAGLIARI  
  • Tool: commentable documentOPEN  POLICY  REVIEW:  COMMENTNEELIE.EU  
  • BEHAVIOURAL  CHANGE  THROUGH  SIMULATION  
  • BEHAVIOURAL  CHANGE  THROUGH  GREEN  APPS  
  • MAKING  IT  HAPPEN  THROUGH  CROWDFUNDING  
  • POLICY  EVALUATION:  TRACKING  THE  PERFORMANCE  OF  COUNTRIES  
  • KEY  QUESTIONS    Are  these  the  problems  that  need  to  be  addressed?    Are  these  solu>ons  sufficient  to  solve  the  problems?    What  else  is  needed?  
  • YOUR  QUESTIONS?  Further  informa>on:    Visit  www.crossover-­‐project.eu    Post  ques>ons/needs  on  h_p://crossover.uservoice.com        Share  experiences  on  the  Policy-­‐Making  2.0  group  on   Linkedin  h_p://egov20.wordpress.com      @osimod  David.osimo@tech4i2.com  
  • BACKUP  
  • IT’S  NOT  ABOUT  “TOTAL  CITIZENSHIP”   • Producing 100% attention data • Commenting, 10% reviewing, curating • Producing 1% content/ services Source: IPTS estimation based on Eurostat, IPSOS-MORI, Forrester
  • WE  SHOULD  DESIGN  GOV  2.0  FOR  BART,  NOT  ONLY  FOR  LISA   Hat tip: Carter and Dance, Nytimes.com 1 7
  • VIEWS  FROM  THE  FIELD    “There  are  more  smart  people  outside  government  than  within   it”  (Bill  Joy)    “the  coolest  thing  to  do  with  your  data  will  be  thought  of  by   someone  else”  (Rufus  Pollock)    “A  problem  shared  is  a  problem  halved  ...and  a  pressure  group   created”  (Paul  Hodgkin  –  Pa>entOpinion.com)    “it’s  about  pressure  points,  chinks  in  the  armour  where   improvements  might  be  possible,  whether  with  the  consent  of   government  or  not”  (Tom  Steinberg,  Mysociety.org)    “many  par>cipants  in  the  process  dilute  the  effect  of  bad  apples  or   unconstruc>ve  par>cipants”  (Beth  Noveck,  Peertopatent.org)   1 8
  • HOW  TO  DO  IT:  INNOVATION  WITHOUT  PERMISSION      A_ract  and  build  internal  competences    Ask  for  help  in  the  Open  Source  community    Copy  and  use  ready-­‐made  tools    Valorize  risk-­‐taking  internally    Not  completely  bo_om-­‐up:  a  design  approach    Permanent  beta,  con>nuous  strive  for  usability    Start  experimen>ng!