Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Regulatory Reform Proposal Comparison

399

Published on

A side-by-side comparison of the original regulatory reform proposal to the bi-partisan Senate banking committee proposal.

A side-by-side comparison of the original regulatory reform proposal to the bi-partisan Senate banking committee proposal.

Published in: Economy & Finance
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
399
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. REGULATORY REFORM UPDATE Comparison of the Original Regulatory Reform Proposal to the Dodd Compromise Proposal
  • 2. SUPERVISION <ul><li>Original Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Federal Reserve would be advised by a council of regulators and would take responsibility for those institutions who, either by size or business activity, pose a systemic risk. </li></ul></ul>
  • 3. SUPERVISION <ul><li>Dodd Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Federal Reserve would retain supervisory jurisdiction over those banks with more than $50 Billion in assets. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>With regard to so-called “bubbles”, a systemic risk council would have authority to deal with such issues. </li></ul></ul>
  • 4. RESOLUTION AUTHORITY <ul><li>Original Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Federal Reserve would be empowered to seize and wind down a failing institution that presents a “systemic risk”. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The financial industry would bear the cost of such government intervention. </li></ul></ul>
  • 5. RESOLUTION AUTHORITY <ul><li>Dodd Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A $50 Billion “upfront” fee would be assessed on the financial industry. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The fee would be used to cover the cost of any necessary liquidations of financial companies. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Government led liquidations would be subject to review by a bankruptcy judge. </li></ul></ul>
  • 6. INVESTOR PROTECTION <ul><li>Original Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Shareholders would be given a non-binding vote regarding executive compensation. </li></ul></ul>
  • 7. INVESTOR PROTECTION <ul><li>Dodd Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Includes more substantive proposals for investor protection. </li></ul></ul>
  • 8. CONSUMER PROTECTION <ul><li>Original Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Would create a consumer protection agency with authority over all credit providers. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Would require all lenders to offer standardized mortgages to borrowers. </li></ul></ul>
  • 9. CONSUMER PROTECTION <ul><li>Dodd Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Would establish a new consumer protection authority located within the Federal Reserve. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>An independent chairman would head the authority. </li></ul></ul>
  • 10. DERIVATIVES <ul><li>Original Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Derivative contracts would be standardized. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Contracts would be processed through central clearing houses. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Transactions would occur on electronic exchanges. </li></ul></ul>
  • 11. DERIVATIVES <ul><li>Dodd Proposal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Unresolved. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Bi-partisan debate still ongoing with regard to who/what entities would be excluded and the mandatory nature of exchange trading for derivative contracts. </li></ul></ul>

×