Fracture talus
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Fracture talus

on

  • 1,697 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,697
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
1,697
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
112
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Fracture talus Fracture talus Presentation Transcript

    •  In 1919, Anderson published a series of foot injuries sustained by aviators in World War I which he called Aviators Astralagus. He emphasized that the mechanism of injury was excessive dorsiflexion of the foot as pressure was applied to the rudder bar.
    •  In 1952, Wildenauer gave a complete description of the blood supply, which allowed for a better understanding of the complications of talus fractures. In 1970, Hawkins developed a classification of talus fractures, which provided guidelines for treatment as well as the prognosis of different fracture types
    •  The talus is divided into the head, neck, and body, and 2 processes, the posterior and the lateral. The talus is shaped like a truncated cone and is wider anteriorly than posteriorly,which creates greater ankle stability in dorsiflexion. The neck has approximately 15 ° to 20 ° of medial deviation and is the area most vulnerable to fractures.
    •  There are no musculotendinous attachments to the talus,the tendon of the flexor hallucis longus slides within the groove formed by the medial and lateral tubercles of the posterior process. Nearly 70% of the entire surface area is articular surface, which gives the talus a total of 7 articular surfaces. Because of the large amount of articular surface and the lack of any musculotendinous attachments, the talus is left with a tenuous blood supply.
    •  Posterior tibial Anterior tibial Peroneal
    •  calcaneal branches supplying the posterior process The artery to the tarsal canal supplying the head and neck and The deltoid branch supplying the neck and body
    •  Artery to the tarsal sinus , which is the anterolateral opening of the tarsal canal This artery has several aborations supplying the talar head and body before it forms an anastomotic vascular loop with the artery of the tarsal canal
    •  Several small branches joining the calcaneal branches. It also contributes to the anastomotic plexus of the tarsal sinus by way of the penetrating peroneal artery
    •  Within the tarsal canal and the tarsal sinus the critical anastomosis perforates the inferior neck to form primary source of blood supply to the body of the talus. In talar neck fractures with increasing displacement, the branches from the dorsalis pedis artery as well as artery of the tarsal canal and artery of the tarsal sinus can be disrupted.
    •  So the rate of osteonecrosis depends upon the degree of fracture displacement.
    •  Talar Neck fractures-Hyper dorsiflexion The neck of the talus impacts against the leading edge of distal tibia. Fracture of talar body-Axial Load Lateral and posteromedial processes-Low energy injuries. Can result from inversion and eversion mechanism.
    •  A high degree of suspicion is required for detection of the talar process fractures. These injuries can be difficult to appreciate on routine radiographs. In high energy talar fractures significant compromise of the soft tissue envelop is common.
    •  Association of dislocation with talar neck fracture is common. Emergency reduction of the dislocated talus is one of the key principles in the management of the fractures of the talus. An accurate assessment of the vascular and neurologic status of the foot is important.
    •  Plain Radiographic views- Standard Ap,Lateral and Mortise views. Canale and Kelly view of the foot- A view of the talar neck achieved by placing the foot plantigrade on the x ray film and angling the beam at 75degrees top the perpendicular. Pronation and internal rotation of the foot helps to visualise medial aspect of the neck.
    •  CT scans provoid better information than plain radiographs. MRI is useful for diagnosis of osteonecrosis
    •  Emergency reduction of the dislocated joints, urgent anatomic fracture reduction and stabilization, maintaining an intact vascular supply and soft tissue envelope provide the best probability of regaining an excellent functional result.
    • Hawkins Classification- Type I-Vertical Fractures without displacement. Type II-Displaced fractures with subluxation/dislocation of the subtalar joint Type III-displacement of body from both subtalar and ankle joint. Type IV-Similar to type III with dislocation of talar head from the talonavicular joint.
    •  Non operative Management- Only Type I fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Conformation of the anatomically maintained reduction should be done with CT scan. Non weight bearing in short leg cast for 8-12 weeks.
    •  Type II fractures-To flex the knee followed by plantar flexion of the foot. Type III fractures-Plantar flexion and varus positioning of foot Transverse steinman pin may be required to be passed through the calcaneus. Direct pressure on the talar fragment may be required to reduced fragments.
    •  Multiple attempts at closed reduction can increase the risk of complications Residual displacement of as little as 2 mm alter the contact characteristics of the sub talar joint. Displacement of the fragments can cause skin tenting and necrosis.
    •  Anteromedial Approach Lateral Approach Posterior Approach Combined Approaches
    •  Most commonly used approach. Fascilitate medial malleolar osteotomy if required. Medial malleolar osteotomy preserves the deltoid ligament and thereby protect the blood supply.
    •  This may lessen the chance of damage to the blood supply. Howerver exposure of the lateral surface of the talus and sub talar joint requires extra caution to avoid injury to blood vessel of the sinus tarsi. Facilitates visualization of subtalar joint. Facilitates placement of shoulder screw.
    •  The screws directed from posterior to anterior may facilitate placement of screws perpendicular to the fracture line and achieves compression lag screw. The risk of neurovascular compromise present.
    •  Used when severe comminution present. Caution to be taken to protect the tenuous blood supply to the talar body.
    •  Anterior to posterior screw fixation Posterior to anterior screw fixation Direct plate fixation
    • Advantages Disadvantages Direct visualisation of  Difficult to insert the fracture reduction perpendicular to fracture Avoidance of  Less strong as cartilage damage compared to posterior to anterior
    • Advantages Disadantages Stronger than anterior  Indirect visualisation of screw fixaion the fracture Easley inserted  Risk of iatrogenic nerve perpendicular to damage. fracture site
    • Advantages Disadvantages Strong fixation  Extensive soft tissue Useful to buttress dissection comminuted fragments  Risk of hardware prominence
    •  Can be used when closed reduction is successful Percutaneuos fixation can be used to fascitate early ROM.
    •  Infection and skin necrosis Osteonecrosis Malunion Post- traumatic arthritis
    •  Treatment is extremely challenging Avascular body of the talus acts as large sequestrum. Surgical debridement including talectomy may be required as treatment
    •  Type I- 0-13% Type II- 20-50% Type III- 80% Hawkin’s sign-Subchondral resorption of bone indication vascularity of the talar body. Bone scan and MRI-3 weeks after the injury.
    •  Patellar tendon bearing orthosis Primary triple arthrodeisis Total talectomy with tibia and calcaneal fusion Subtalar fusion Plantar fusion. Blair fusion.
    •  Dorsal displacement of the distal fragment and varus malunion are common. Results in limitation of the dorsiflexion and painful gait.
    •  46-69% Subtalar joint most commonly involved. Due to osteonecrosis, cartilage damage, immobilisation and malalingement. Treatment –Local analgesic infiltration, Arthrodesis of the involved joints.
    • Sneppen classification- Type I-Transcondral fractures Type II-sagittal,coronal and horizontal shearing fractures Type III-Fractures of the posterior tubercle. Type IV-Fractures of the lateral process Type V-Crush fractures
    •  ORIF with cortical screws. Excision of the small fragments. In highly selective cases primary artrodesis can be done. Weigh bearing is started after union of the fracture.
    •  By axial load applied to the talar head through navicular bone Principle of the treatment include maintenance of the alingemnt of the dorsomedial arch of the foot Preventing talonavicular joint incongruity and instability.
    •  Displaced fractures may be treated with ORIF with minifragment screws. Talonavicular arthritis is a common complication which is treated with longitudinal arch support with increased arch rigidity.
    • Hawkin’s classification- Nonarticular chip ractures Single large fragment involving the talofibular and subtalar articulations Communited fracture involving both articulations.
    •  Undisplaced and reduced fractures are treated with short leg cast immobilisation for 4-6 weeks. Dispalced fractures with large fragments are treated with ORIF with screw fixation.
    •  This fracture is associated with subtalar dislocations Excision of the ununited or mal united fragments seems to relive local irritation symptoms