Patient Management with Greater Tuberosity Fracture and Rotator Cuff Tear | Greater Denver Area
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Patient Management with Greater Tuberosity Fracture and Rotator Cuff Tear | Greater Denver Area

on

  • 13,791 views

Patients with hyperflexion/hyperabduction injury to the glenohumeral joint are at risk for isolated greater tuberosity fractures, which are often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. In this case report, we ...

Patients with hyperflexion/hyperabduction injury to the glenohumeral joint are at risk for isolated greater tuberosity fractures, which are often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. In this case report, we describe the clinical decision-making process that led to the diagnosis of an isolated greater tuberosity fracture and subsequent rotator cuff tear.
For more shoulder surgery and rotator cuff studies, visit Dr. Millett, Greater Denver Area http://drmillett.com/shoulder-studies

Statistics

Views

Total Views
13,791
Views on SlideShare
13,791
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
56
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Patient Management with Greater Tuberosity Fracture and Rotator Cuff Tear | Greater Denver Area Patient Management with Greater Tuberosity Fracture and Rotator Cuff Tear | Greater Denver Area Document Transcript

  • Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Official Publication of the Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy Sections of the American Physical Therapy Association I Please start my one-year subscription to the JOSPT. I Please renew my one-year subscription to the JOSPT. Management of a Patient With an Isolated Individual subscriptions are available to home addresses only. All subscriptions are payable in advance, and all rates include Greater Tuberosity Fracture and Rotator normal shipping charges. Subscriptions extend for 12 months, starting at the month they are entered or renewed (for example, CASE September 2002-August 2003). Single issues are generally available at $20 per copy in the United States and $25 per copy when mailed internationally. Cuff Tear USA International Agency Discount REPORT Institutional I $215.00 I $265.00 I $9.00 Individual I $135.00 I $185.00 StudentB. Wilcox III, PT, DPT 1 Reg I $75.00 I $125.00 Subscription Total: $________________ 2 Linda E. Arslanian, PT, DPT, MS Shipping/BillingMD, MSc 3 Peter J. Millett, Information Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Address _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Address Design: Case report. Study _____________________________________________________________________________________________ avulsion injury.43,44 The impaction Background: Patients with hyperflexion/hyperabduction injury to the glenohumeral joint are at risk injury is usually the result of a fall City _______________________________State/Province __________________Zip/Postal Code _____________________ for isolated greater tuberosity fractures, which are often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. In this case with forced hyperflexion or report, we describe the clinical decision-making process that led to the diagnosis of an isolated Phone _____________________________Fax____________________________Email _____________________________ hyperabduction of the shoulder. In greater tuberosity fracture and subsequent rotator cuff tear. Case Description: The patient was a 45-year-old male who sustained a shoulder injury as the comparison, an avulsion injury oc- Would youalike to receive JOSPTthe initiation of physicalrenewal he was diagnosed Yes an I curs result of fall while skiing. After email updates and therapy, notices? I with No in association with isolated greater tuberosity fracture. Little is known regarding the optimal management and overall glenohumeral dislocation and has prognosis of this type of fracture. Conservative nonoperative management and postoperative been found to occur in 15% to Paymenttherapy management are discussed. physical Information 30% of dislocations.43,44 Outcomes: With conservative nonoperative management, the patient was unable to regain Nonoperative treatment for a I high-level functional shoulder use. Suspicion JOSPT). Check enclosed (made payable to the of continued pathology of the greater tuberosity nondisplaced greater tuberosity dictated further diagnostic imaging, which led to surgical intervention. Upon completion of I postoperative rehabilitation, he was able to resume VISA Credit Card (circle one) MasterCard American Express fracture has been reported to in- full recreational activities. Discussion: It is recommended that sound clinical decision-making dictate the management and clude passive range of motion ongoing evaluation of traumatic shoulder injuries, especially when managing a patient with an (PROM) starting at 1 week Card Number ___________________________________Expiration Date _________________________________________ injury for which optimal treatment and prognosis is not well established. J Orthop Sports Phys postinjury, active range of motion Ther 2005;35:521-530. Signature ______________________________________Date __________________________________________________ (AROM) starting at 6 weeks Key Words: diagnostic imaging, physical therapy, shoulder rehabilitation postinjury, followed by gradually progressed strengthening once full 19 To order call, fax, email or mail to: PROM is reached. There is little roximal humeral fractures are quite common and the typeVA 22314-1436 to support this progres- 1111 North Fairfax Street, Suite 100, Alexandria, of evidence P fracture greatly dictates the appropriate plan of care. The sion timeline. Phone 877-766-3450 • Fax 703-836-2210 • Email: subscriptions@jospt.org classification of proximal humeral fractures has been estab- lished and accepted for over 30 years. Yet, there are few Thank you for subscribing! reports describing the management of isolated nondisplaced mm, Patients with greater tuberosity fractures displaced more than 5 greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus, which would be classified as nonoperatively, typically have less a type I fracture using Neer’s classification system.35 Most of the recent favorable outcomes than patients published work on proximal humeral fractures deals with the manage- who are managed with a surgical who are managed ment of 3- and 4-part fractures.3,6,10,22,33,40,42 There are typically 2 repair.31 Hence, surgical open re- mechanisms of injury for a greater tuberosity fracture: impaction or duction internal fixation is the treatment option of choice for dis- 1 Clinical Supervisor, Outpatient Services, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Brigham and Women’s placed fractures, unless the bony Hospital, Boston, MA; Fellow, Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and fragments are small enough that Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA. 2 Director, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA. their excision could be done in a 3 Assistant Professor of Orthopedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Associate Director, Harvard manner similar to a routine rota- Shoulder Service, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthope- tor cuff repair. There are no pub- dics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA. Address correspondence to Dr Reg B. Wilcox III, Department of Rehabilitation Services, Brigham and lished clinical series to date on Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: rwilcox@partners.org either open reduction internal Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 521
  • fixation and/or the excision of bony fragments. The closest type of fracture to a greater tuberosity fracture that is described in the literature is an isolated lesser tuberosity fracture. These types of fractures are also very rare and usually occur in association with posterior shoulder dislocation or in conjunction with a comminuted proximal humeral fracture.15 According to Ogawa et al38 in 1997, there were only 60 published cases of isolated lesser tuber- osity fractures. They reported on 10 lesser tuberosity fractures of their own and the previously reported 60 cases. These cases consisted of 52 acute cases and 18 chronic cases. The prevalence of chronic cases illus- trates the fact that lesser tuberosity fractures often are misdiagnosed or completely missed at the time of injury. This is also likely true with greater tuberosity fractures. In addition, it is important when diagnos- ing either greater or lesser tuberosity fractures to distinguish the fracture from a rupture of the corre- FIGURE 1. Initial radiograph, anterior-posterior view. No fracture sponding musculature.17 Both rotator cuff tears and identified. fractures can produce similar complaints of pain and weakness in abduction,41,51 making it difficult to distinguish these injuries based on history and physi- cal examination alone. Ogawa et al39 reported in 2003 that isolated greater tuberosity fractures con- tinue to be easily overlooked. They found that 59% (58/99) of patients with shoulder pathology seen in their clinic for second opinions had been misdiag- nosed by outside facilities and did have a greater tuberosity fracture. The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate the need for sound physical therapy clinical decision making in collaboration with the referring physician when treating a patient with an injury for which management and prognosis is not definitively estab- lished. CASE DESCRIPTION The patient was a 45-year-old, right-hand–dominant male who fell on his right shoulder while downhill skiing with his family (February 16, 2003), with a resultant hyperflexion injury. Initially he had some diffuse anterior shoulder pain. Over the course of a few days his pain got much worse and he noted that he was unable to raise his arm over his head. He was referred to physical therapy 16 days postinjury by an FIGURE 2. Initial radiograph, y-view of the scapula. No fracture orthopedic surgeon with a diagnosis of a ‘‘right identified. shoulder/cuff contusion’’ for evaluation and treat- ment of his shoulder. At the time of his physical The patient reported no previous trauma or major therapy examination (March 3, 2003), the radio- injury to his shoulder, but reported some history of graphs of his shoulder (A-P, lateral, and y-view of inconsistent bilateral shoulder pain (right worse than scapula) done 1 day postinjury had been reviewed by left) after playing tennis. This pain usually subsided a radiologist and the orthopedic surgeon and were after a day or so of rest. Prior to this injury, he determined to be negative (Figures 1 and 2). His regularly played tennis 2 days per week. only treatment intervention prior to this point was a The patient’s occupational role as a radiologist was course of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication partly clinical, academic, and administrative. He was (Celebrex; Pfizer, New York, NY) shortly after his able to continue working in a full capacity. The injury. patient had difficulty reaching for objects above 522 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005
  • shoulder height, donning/doffing his shirt and coat, movement and end feel. Posterior, anterior, lateral, and was not able to actively play with his children if and caudal glides were found to be normal in both the activity required right upper extremity use. He quantity of motion and end feel. Muscle performance was unable to play tennis. The patient’s major com- was assessed by manual muscle testing25; anterior, plaint at the time of his physical therapy evaluation middle, posterior deltoid, and subscapularis were all was intermittent achy pain: 5 on a 0-to-10 verbal 5/5. The supraspinatus was determined to be intact CASE analog pain-rating scale (0 representing no pain and by a negative empty can test,27 but painful with 10 representing worst pain experienced). This pain resistance during a supraspinatus test27 (6/10 pain on was located anteriorly near the bicipital groove and a verbal analog scale). Supraspinatus manual muscle occurred with active overhead motions. He reported testing was deferred at this time secondary to pain REPORT a slight ache at rest. His goal was to return to all with the supraspinatus test. Strength of the preinjury activities, including tennis. infraspinatus was 4–/5 by manual muscle testing and moderately painful (4/10 on a verbal analog scale). Initial Physical Therapy Examination Strength for other right upper extremity muscles was 5/5. These findings suggested an injury to the rotator This patient presented with mild anterior shoulder cuff. swelling appreciable to palpation and mild tenderness The presence of a painful resisted isometric con- of the supraspinatus tendon at its insertion onto the traction of his supraspinatus and palpable tenderness greater tuberosity of the humerus. No tenderness was at its insertion onto the greater tuberosity led to a noted upon palpation of the rest of the shoulder diagnosis of traumatic impingement syndrome of his girdle. Visual observation of standing posture indi- rotator cuff, primarily affecting the contractile tissue cated a mild forward head, protracted shoulders, and of the supraspinatus muscle tendon.8 See Table 2 for normal lumbar spine lordosis. Light touch, assessed this patient’s impairments and clinical goals. to rule out the possibility of a peripheral nerve It was postulated that this patient should progress injury, was intact for bilateral shoulder girdles and well with a treatment program that focused on upper extremities. reducing rotator cuff inflammation, regaining rotator All range of motion (ROM) measurements cuff strength, and restoring normal shoulder func- throughout the course of his therapy were taken in tion. The majority of patients with subacromial im- the same method by the treating physical therapist pingement can be successfully managed with (Table 1). To determine whether subacromial struc- conservative treatment.1 Recent studies have sug- tures were injured and potentially inflamed, both the gested that manual physical therapy techniques ap- Hawkins23 and Neer Impingement36 tests were con- plied by physical therapists, combined with supervised ducted and found to be positive. Due to the trau- exercise, are better than exercise alone for increasing matic nature of his injury, the sulcus,16 anterior strength, decreasing pain, and improving function in apprehension,27 and clunk27 tests were performed to patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.2,7 Ad- assess glenohumeral joint instability. Based on the 3 ditionally, a recent Cochrane review of all interven- tests being negative, the likelihood of this patient tions for shoulder disorders determined that exercise having shoulder instability was thought to be fairly was very effective in terms of short-term recovery in small. To screen for a possible acromioclavicular (AC) rotator cuff disease and had longer-term benefit with joint injury both palpation of the joint as well as an respect to function, as compared to ultrasound and AC sheer test9 were completed and were negative. laser therapy.20 Morrison et al34 in 1997 retrospec- Because his PROM was limited, glenohumeral joint tively looked at 616 patients who had subacro- play24,28 was assessed to determine accessory joint mial impingement syndrome managed with anti- TABLE 1. Right shoulder active and passive range of motion (AROM, PROM). Left shoulder AROM and PROM was 175° for flexion and abduction and 90° for internal and external rotation measured at 60° of abduction. (All measurements in degrees.) Postinjury Postsurgery 2 wk 7 wk 13 wk 1d 6 wk 14 wk † † † Flexion 130*, 170 170, 170 175, 175 n/a, 45 140, 174 175, 175 Abduction 100*, 140† 160, 170 175, 175 n/a, 45† 100, 125† 175, 175 Internal rotation 80, 80‡ 80, 80‡ 90, 90‡ n/a, 80†§ 80, 80†§ 90, 90‡ External rotation 80*, 80†‡ 90, 90‡ 90, 90‡ n/a, 0†§ 70, 80†§ 90, 90‡ Abbreviations: n/a, not applicable. *Pain. † Pain and empty end feel. ‡ Measured at 60° of shoulder abduction. § Measured at 30° of shoulder abduction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005 523
  • TABLE 2. Impairments and goals. Initial Impairments/ Initial Goals (March 3, 2003) to Updated Goals (March 12, 2003) to Functional Limitations Achieve in 4-6 wk Achieve in 16 wk Independent with home exercise program Independent with home exercise program Impaired AROM/PROM Full AROM all planes right shoulder Full AROM all planes right shoulder Weakness of rotator cuff due to pain All rotator cuff musculature 5/5 by MMT All rotator cuff musculature 5/5 by MMT inhibition Decreased functional activity (ADL) Able to raise right upper extremity over- Able to raise right upper extremity overhead head fully for all household ADL up to fully for all household ADL up to 10 times 10 times per h for 4 consecutive h with- per h for 2 consecutive h without pain or out pain or difficulty difficulty Decreased functional activity, recreational Able to return to modified tennis game (no Able to return to modified tennis game (no overhead serves) 2 times per wk without overhead serves) 2 times per wk without pain or difficulty pain or difficulty Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; AROM, active range of motion; MMT, manual muscle test; PROM, passive range of motion. inflammatory medication and a specific supervised is believed to assist in the reduction of abnormal physical therapy routine focusing on rotator cuff fibrous adhesions allowing scar tissue to be more strengthening. The average follow-up time was 27 mobile in subacute and chronic inflammatory condi- months and they reported that 18% of the patients tions by realigning soft tissue fibers. The effectiveness had a successful result, 67% had a satisfactory result, of TFM is based in theory on the changes in and 28% had no improvement and went on to have a mechanical properties that occur with hyperemia. subacromial decompression. It was also found that Most outcome reports on TFM are based on empiri- patients under the age of 20, and those 40 to 60 years cal data and there is no literature reporting outcomes of age, did the best with conservative management. of TFM in patients with any shoulder-related condi- Based on the literature and current presentation, it tions. Based on the knowledge of hypovascularity of was believed that this patient would do well with the rotator cuff and potential for improved blood conservative physical therapy management. flow with the use of TFM, one might speculate that TFM could be beneficial, particularly during the Initial Intervention remodeling phase of healing. Furthermore, it is conceivable that the mechanical effects of TFM might This patient’s initial plan of care included assist in proper alignment of type I collagen fibers. ultrasound to the supraspinatus tendon, transverse Ice helps to control pain, decrease swelling and friction massage, manual therapy techniques of muscle spasm, suppress inflammation, and decrease glenohumeral joint mobilization for pain relief, a metabolism.32 The analgesic effects occur after tissue home exercise program focusing on active assisted is cooled to between 10°C (50°F) and 16°C (60°F),37 ROM (AAROM), and ice. while the depth of cooling is unknown. Speer et al47 Therapeutic ultrasound (0.9 W/cm2 for 5 minutes reported decreased postoperative pain over the first continuous) was initially used over the insertion of 24 hours, with a better potential for sleep and less of the supraspinatus for the physiologic effects of pro- a need for pain medication in patients who used ice moting circulation, increasing membrane permeabil- postoperatively. ity, cavitation, and promotion of tendon This patient was seen 2 times per week for the first extensibility.32 In trying to promote circulation to the 9 days of therapy. His initial physical therapy program supraspinatus and knowing that there is a focused on the promotion of healing with the use of hypovascular zone of the supraspinatus (about 1.5 cm ultrasound and TFM, reduction of inflammation with from the greater tuberosity),12 the use of ultrasound ice and maximizing his ROM with an AAROM was selected. However, there is very little literature exercise program. Sets of 10 repetitions of grade II supporting the efficacy of ultrasound for the treat- lateral glenohumeral joint traction (short axis distrac- ment of either bursitis or tendonitis. Yet it is the tion) and50 caudal humeral glide (long axis distrac- authors’ opinion that empirical patient reports that tion)50 were done to assist in general pain relief and they feel better and are more flexible after a course reduction of glenohumeral hypomobility. The patient of ultrasound treatments has maintained the enthusi- performed AAROM with a cane for supine shoulder asm for this modality among physical therapists. flexion, abduction, and external rotation at 30° of The hypothesized role of transverse friction mas- shoulder abduction, and standing extension and in- sage (TFM) in the treatment of tendonitis/tendinosis ternal rotation behind his back. He avoided pain with is primarily based on Cyriax’s8 soft tissue work. TFM his ROM exercises and completed 10 slowly per- 524 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005
  • formed stretches for 20 seconds for each exercise 2 shoulder the treatment program focused on appropri- times per day, followed by 20 minutes of ice to his ate rest and maintaining ROM, with eventual regain- shoulder. ing of rotator cuff strength. Because the MRI established the absence of a rotator cuff tear, it was Updated Examination Findings felt that this patient’s outcome would most likely be better than that of a patient with a rotator cuff tear, CASE Because the patient demonstrated no significant as bone tissue typically heals much better than the changes in pain relief or function within the first 9 avascularized area of the rotator cuff. This prognosis days of therapy, an MRI was performed (March 12, was made assuming that the fracture site healed 2003), which revealed a nondisplaced complete without displacement. REPORT greater tuberosity fracture with associated This patient was then seen 1 time per week from subacromial bursitis (Figure 3). The greater tuberos- week 4 postinjury through week 7 postinjury. ity fragment measured approximately 0.7 × 0.3 cm. Ultrasound and TFM were discontinued based on his Rotator cuff tissues appeared normal. Consequently, new status. His revised physical therapy program still his diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment plan were focused on maximizing his ROM with an AAROM modified. exercise program. His AAROM program was the same as before his MRI; however, he was instructed to only Updated Intervention complete these exercises 1 time per day followed by 20 minutes of ice to his shoulder. Isometric exercises To assist with the modification of the patient’s were begun during week 5 and performed at 20° of treatment plan and prognosis, a review of the litera- shoulder abduction (to reduce the strain on his ture was performed. This patient was seen in early rotator cuff) for the biceps, triceps, anterior deltoid, 2003, before publication of the literature review on middle deltoid, posterior deltoid, and internal rota- greater tuberosity fractures by Green and Izzi.19 tors of the shoulder. He did not start any isometric Because there was little literature on greater tuberos- exercises for his external rotators and abductors ity fractures, the treating therapist also reviewed the because any attempt at an isometric contraction of literature on lesser tuberosity fractures. It was felt that these muscle groups resulted in both immediate and having a sound understanding of the management of residual pain. This was believed to be because he was a similar fracture type would assist in the clinical placing too much tension through the fracture site decision-making process. It has been reported that with each contraction. removal of lesser tuberosity fracture fragments leads At 7 weeks postinjury his AROM/PROM was much to poor outcomes because it does not allow for improved (Table 1). His physical therapy visits in- recover y of the muscular strength of the creased to 2 to 3 times per week at week 7 of therapy subscapularis muscle.26 It is reasonable to conclude that this experience would apply to greater tuberosity fractures and the supraspinatus/infraspinatus muscles as well. Ogawa et al38 reported that 3 out of 5 of 52 lesser-tuberosity cases that were treated acutely with open reduction internal fixation had excellent out- comes; yet there are no randomized controlled stud- ies to determine if patients would do just as well without surgical intervention. In the management of patients with chronic greater tuberosity fractures it has been reported that the first choice of interven- tion is conservative treatment, focusing on strength- ening the rotator cuff musculature while protecting the fracture site.38 Given the lack of literature dealing with conserva- tive management of greater tuberosity fractures and the diagnosis of a nondisplaced greater tuberosity fracture, the treating physical therapist, in collabora- tion with the orthopedic surgeon, agreed to manage this patient’s case similarly to that of a patient with a chronic rotator cuff tear/impingement. See the re- vised rehabilitation goals in Table 2. Treatment con- sisted of a gradual progression to ensure protection FIGURE 3. Initial coronal section MRI 4 weeks postinjury. The of the fracture site, while restoring shoulder function. fracture is indicated with arrows. There is no evidence of either a In anticipation of restoring normal function of the rotator cuff tear or bony avulsion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005 525
  • to gradually progress his strengthening program. specific activities at 41⁄2 half months postinjury. The Progressive resistance exercises of every muscle ex- program consisted of a gradually progressed regime cept his shoulder external rotators and abductors of 1 set of 10, progressed to 4 sets of 20 over the were begun at this point because he was pain free course of 3 weeks of each of the following activities: with daily activities, his PROM was nearly normal, and underhand tennis ball throw, overhead tennis ball he was able to complete near maximal isometric throw, forehand and backhand tennis strokes with contractions for all his shoulder musculature except and without racket in hand, and overhead serve his supraspinatus/infraspinatus. He began isotonic motion with and without racket in hand. This pro- internal rotation at 20° of abduction with resistance gram revealed a significant deficit in shoulder exter- band (Strechwell, Inc, Newtown, PA), bicep curls and nal rotation strength when his upper extremity was above 90° of shoulder abduction. With continued triceps extensions with 0.9-kg weights, and isometric scapular retractions. He was started on shoulder strengthening focusing on overhead activities, no gains were achieved. At 20 weeks postinjury, his external rotation and abduction isometric exercises at strength gains had plateaued: anterior, middle, poste- about 12 weeks postinjury because he had no pain with a resisted isometric contraction of either muscle. rior deltoid were all 5/5, subscapularis was 5/5, supraspinatus was 4–/5 (mildly inhibited by pain), At 13 weeks postinjury his AROM/PROM was normal teres minor/infraspinatus was 3–/5 (inhibited by pain (Table 1). At this time he progressed his abduction isometric exercises to isotonic abduction with his arm when tested at 90° of shoulder abduction); yet his external rotation resisted isometric test at 0° of in external rotation in the plane of the scapula (full shoulder abduction was pain free and strong. Any can supraspinatus raises) and his external rotator isometric exercises were progressed to performing attempt at overhead activity that required maximal external rotation ROM at or above 90° of abduction isotonic shoulder external rotation exercises in sidely- was painful. Otherwise he was pain free with all ing at 20° of shoulder abduction. He began all his activities. strengthening exercises with 10 repetitions of AROM Because he was still having difficulty producing a with no weight and progressed based on DeLorme’s principles of progressive resistance exercise.11 It was strong pain-free contraction of his supraspinatus noticed that with his abduction exercises in the plane muscle, his external rotator strength had declined of his scapula he was unable to avoid hiking his despite strengthening exercises, and he had pain with shoulder, even with verbal cueing and visual feedback overhead activities, the therapist and surgeon felt that from a mirror. His shoulder hiking was believed to be there was either a rotator cuff tear where it attached secondary to inappropriate recruitment of his to the greater tuberosity or the original fracture was supraspinatus muscle due to the prolonged period of displaced. A repeat MRI (July 22, 2003) was com- rest after his injur y. An auditor y and visual pleted that showed high T2 signal intensity in the biofeedback unit (Prometheus Group, Dover, NH) was used for 3 weeks (weeks 13 through 15). Biofeedback electrodes were placed on both his anterior and middle deltoid while he performed 2 to 3 sets of 10 repetitions of shoulder flexion and abduction in the plane of the scapula to assist him in reducing recruitment of the deltoid with these mo- tions. Over the course of 3 weeks he was able to completely eliminate his tendency to excessively hike his shoulder when he raised his arm over his head. He then progressed through his strengthening pro- gram so that he was completing 3 sets of 15 repeti- tions using 2.2 kg for bicep curls, 0.9 kg for shoulder external rotation sidelying at 20° of abduction, resis- tance band equivalent to 2.7 kg for internal rotation at 20° of shoulder abduction, and 0.9 kg with each of the following exercises: abduction in the plane of the scapula with his upper extremity in external rotation (full can supraspinatus raise), prone shoulder exten- sion at 20° of abduction, and prone horizontal abduction at both 90° and 120° of abduction at 17 weeks postinjury. FIGURE 4. Coronal section MRI 5 months postinjury. A full thick- The patient’s desire to return to high-level recre- ness supraspinatus tear, a bony avulsion of the greater tuberosity, ational tennis lead the therapist and patient to work and resolving greater tuberosity edema are present. The bony toward overhead shoulder strengthening and sport- avulsion is indicated with an arrow. 526 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005
  • Postsurgical Intervention The patient began pendulums and PROM exercises on postoperative day 1. During the first 5 postopera- tive weeks, PROM (flexion, abduction, extension, and internal and external rotation at multiple angles of CASE abduction) in available pain-free ROM was either conducted by a physical therapist or the patient’s wife, who was instructed how to perform PROM properly. Patient-performed ROM exercises were dis- REPORT couraged because EMG studies have shown that the rotator cuff is active with self-assisted ROM.13 He started an AAROM program during his fifth postop- erative week. These exercises were introduced to increase muscle activity and assist in restoring normal patterns of muscle contraction. His exercises for AAROM were performed with a cane for supine FIGURE 5. 3-D reconstructed CT scan 5 months postinjury. The flexion, abduction, and external rotation at 30° of bony avulsion is indicated with an arrow. shoulder abduction, and standing extension and in- ternal rotation behind his back. He avoided pain and distal supraspinatus tendon (most suggestive of a completed 10 repetitions for each exercise 2 times full-thickness tear), a bony avulsion of the greater per day, followed by 20 minutes of ice to his shoulder. tuberosity, and resolving greater tuberosity edema. By the sixth postoperative week he had no complaints The original fracture line was also seen (Figure 4). of pain except at end of available ROM. He began The question remained as to whether this bony AROM exercises during this sixth postoperative week, avulsion was a new fracture or one that was missed on performing supine flexion, abduction, and internal the original MRI. A 3-D reconstructed computed rotation, and sidelying external rotation, and stand- tomography (CT) (July 24, 2003) scan was per- ing and prone extension twice a day each for 10 formed, which supported the most recent MRI find- repetitions, followed by 20 minutes of ice. He was ings (Figure 5). seen in the clinic 1 to 2 times per week, with his in-clinic therapy from the sixth to eighth postopera- Surgical Intervention tive week consisting of gradually progressed glenohumeral joint mobilizations and contract-relax The patient’s desire to return to high-level recre- techniques48 to assist in maximizing his external ational tennis led him to elect to undergo surgery 51⁄2 rotation and flexion ROM. Sets of 10 repetitions of months after the initial injury (July 29, 2003). grades II and III lateral glenohumeral joint traction Arthroscopic assessment of his shoulder indicated (short-axis distraction)50 and caudal humeral glide dense hemorrhagic bursal adhesions in the (long-axis distraction)50 were done to assist in general subacromial space, significant inflammation of the pain relief and reduction of glenohumeral glenohumeral joint, mild labral fraying, mild rotator hypomobility. Contract-relax techniques for external interval synovitis, a supraspinatus tear, and no bony rotation and flexion were used in repetitions of 5, avulsion fragment. His surgical procedure consisted with 2 sets to assist with reducing antagonist of arthroscopic subacromial bursectomy and an glenohumeral muscle tightness of his internal rota- arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. tors and extensors, respectively. His ROM progressed as expected (Table 1). Postsurgical Physical Therapy Examination A scapular muscular and rotator cuff isometric program was initiated during his sixth postoperative On postoperative day 1 his pain was a 7 on a week. This consisted of standing and supine scapular 0-to-10 verbal analog scale and his surgical right retractions, internal rotation, external rotation, flex- upper extremity was supported in an UltraSling II (dj ion, abduction, and extension isometrics at 0° to 20° Orthopedics, Inc, Vista, CA). He was referred to of abduction. Each exercise was performed twice a physical therapy to begin pendulums and PROM day with 10 repetitions. He began isotonic rotator exercises. Upon examination his shoulder PROM was cuff strengthening at 8 weeks postoperatively. Internal limited due to pain (Table 1). He had no neurologi- rotation was started with resistance band at 0° of cal impairments and his cervical spine, elbow, and abduction, external rotation and abduction were wrist screen were normal. Table 3 provides the details initiated in sidelying with a 0.45-kg weight. Shoulder of his postoperative impairments and rehabilitation flexion with 0.45 kg was performed in supine up to goals. 180°. Once the patient was able to perform 3 sets of J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005 527
  • TABLE 3. Postoperative impairments and goals. Impairments/Functional Limitations Short-Term Goals Long-Term Goals to Achieve in 4-6 mo Independent with home exercise program Independent with home exercise program to to restore shoulder ROM (to achieve in 3 maintain good rotator cuff/shoulder visits) strength Impaired AROM/PROM Full PROM all planes right shoulder (to achieve in 4 wk); full AROM all planes right shoulder (to achieve in 8 wk) Weakness of rotator cuff due to postopera- Strong and pain-free resisted isometric of All rotator cuff musculature 5/5 by MMT tive status all rotator muscles in neutral position (to achieve in 10-12 wk) Decreased functional activity (ADL) Able to perform all activities of daily living Able to raise right upper extremity overhead with upper extremity below 90° of eleva- fully for all household ADL up to 10 times tion without difficulty (to achieve in 12 per h for 4 consecutive h without pain or wk) difficulty Decreased functional activity (recreational) Able to return to modified tennis game (no overhead serves) 2 times per wk without pain or difficulty Pain Postoperative pain resolved and no pain with full AROM of shoulder all planes (to achieve in 8 wk) Abbreviations: ADL, activities of daily living; AROM, active range of motion; MMT, manual muscle test; PROM, passive range of motion; ROM, range of motion. 10 repetitions of the exercise with 1.36 kg, the A sport-specific training program, as outlined ear- exercise was reduced back to 0.45 kg and performed lier, was initiated on his fourteenth postoperative with the patient’s trunk inclined 30° from the hori- week in conjunction with his progressive rotator cuff zontal. The same progression was followed at 30°, strengthening program. 45°, and 60° until the patient was able to complete full flexion in standing with 0.45 kg. Full can Outcomes supraspinatus raises were then introduced, starting with no weight and progressing until the patient By 14 weeks postsurgery the patient demonstrated normal ROM and strength (5/5) of his rotator cuff could perform 3 sets of 10 to 15 repetitions with 1.81 musculature, rhomboids, middle trapezius, lower kg. Both empty (internal rotation) and full can trapezius, latissimus dorsi, and serratus anterior. Re- shoulder elevation in the plane of the scapula have habilitation was continued with a home exercise been shown to be effective exercises for supraspinatus program 3 times per week. He returned for reassess- strengthening.49 However, MRI studies have shown ment 21 weeks postoperatively. His ROM was normal, that the subacromial space is reduced with the he was relatively pain free with overhead movements combination of abduction and internal rotation.18 (1/10 on a verbal analog scale), and he had started Because there is greater risk of impingement with hitting some tennis balls. shoulder elevation with internal rotation, the authors Hand-held dynamometry was used to provide a prefer having patients postoperatively start with sidely- more objective strength assessment of his rotator ing abduction to 45° to initially recruit the cuff.4,5,14,21,29,30,45 The shoulder external/internal ro- supraspinatus, followed by open-can supraspinatus tation isometric strength ratios at 90° of abduction exercises. The patient progressed through his with a modified Smidt46 protocol using a Microfet 2 strengthening program so that he was completing 3 hand-held dynamometer (Hogan Health Industries, sets of 15 repetitions using 2.27 kg for bicep curls, Draper, UT) were calculated from the average of 3 1.36 kg for external rotation sidelying at 20° of trials. Evaluation of his left shoulder (noninvolved) abduction, resistance band equivalent to 4.54 kg for demonstrated that his external rotators were 75% of internal rotation at 20° of abduction, and 1.81 kg the strength of his internal rotators, while on his with abduction in the plane of the scapula with his involved right shoulder (dominant), his external upper extremity in external rotation (full can rotators were only 56% of the strength of his internal supraspinatus raise), and 1.36 kg with each of the rotators. Because his external rotation strength was following exercises: prone shoulder extension at 20° proportionately weaker on the right, his home exer- of abduction, prone horizontal abduction at both 90°, cise program was modified and updated to emphasize and 120° of abduction at 17 weeks postinjury. his external rotators. He was instructed to continue 528 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005
  • with his external rotation resistive band exercises at CONCLUSION multiple angles of abduction (10°, 30°, and 60°), his sidelying external rotation ROM (at 0° and 20° of Physical therapists need to be aware that patients abduction) with 1.81 kg 2 to 3 times per week, but to with greater tuberosity fractures can present with now add a third set of each external rotation exer- similar symptoms as patients with rotator cuff injuries. cise, while cutting his internal rotation strengthening The possibility of a greater tuberosity fracture, often CASE program down to just 1 set of resistive band exercise not visible on radiographs, needs to be considered at 60° of abduction 3 times per week. He was when the progress of a patient with a traumatic injury formally discharged from physical therapy at that is not achieved in an expected time frame or if time (December 12, 2003); however, since then he worsening of symptoms occur. In these cases it is REPORT has contacted the primary author on multiple occa- recommended that timely diagnostic imaging be used sions and stated that he is back to playing tennis on a for both initial and ongoing evaluation. This particu- lar patient had the added complexity of having a regular basis without difficulty. small rotator cuff tear that subsequently developed after his initial injury. DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As it was the case for this patient, radiographs may not show a greater tuberosity fracture if not dis- The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Fal- placed.41 The early use of MRI allowed for an lano, PT, DPT, Phil Brucella, and Joseph Divincenzo accurate diagnosis of the fracture, which assisted the for their assistance in the care of this patient as well therapist and surgeon to structure a conservative as their support in compiling resources for the treatment plan that would allow for adequate healing. writing of this case report. The only nonimaging assessment that has been re- ported as clinically effective in identifying an isolated nondisplaced greater tuberosity fracture is the pres- ence of tenderness on the lateral wall of the greater REFERENCES tuberosity.39 One could argue that greater tuberosity tenderness could also be the result of inflammation 1. Arcuni SE. Rotator cuff pathology and subacromial of the cuff at its attachment, either from overuse or impingement. Nurse Pract. 2000;25:58, 61, 65-56 passim. as the result of a tear. The presence of adhesive 2. Bang MD, Deyle GD. Comparison of supervised exer- capsulitis, an anterior labral tear, glenohumeral ar- cise with and without manual physical therapy for thritis, as well as the presence of a tumor may also patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop cause tenderness in this area. Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30:126-137. Conservative management for this patient, focusing 3. Baux S. [Proximal 4-part humerus fractures treated by antegrade nailing with self-stabilizing screws: 31 cases]. on rest, maintenance of ROM, symptom-driven pro- Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004;90:88; gression of rotator cuff strengthening, and a gradual author reply 88. restoration of shoulder function, resulted in a good 4. Bohannon RW. Intertester reliability of hand-held initial outcome. The patient maintained full ROM, dynamometry: a concise summary of published re- had no pain at rest, and was able to complete all of search. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;88:899-902. 5. Bohannon RW. Test-retest reliability of hand-held his activities of daily living without difficulty. However, dynamometry during a single session of strength assess- the desire to return to high-level recreational tennis ment. Phys Ther. 1986;66:206-209. led the therapist and patient to work on overhead 6. Coleman SH, Craig EV. Hemiarthroplasty for complex shoulder and sport-specific activities. This program fractures of the proximal humerus: surgical technique revealed a significant deficit in external rotation and results with the Atlas trimodular prosthesis. Am J Orthop. 2002;31:11-17. strength above 90° of abduction. At that point the 7. Conroy DE, Hayes KW. The effect of joint mobilization question whether there was continued pathology was as a component of comprehensive treatment for primary raised. Follow-up imaging—both MRI and 3-D recon- shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys structive CT scan—demonstrated the presence of a Ther. 1998;28:3-14. greater tuberosity avulsion and a small cuff tear that 8. Cyriax J. Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine, Vol 1: Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions. 8th ed. London, UK: were believed to have hindered his ability to play Bailliere Tindall; 1982. tennis. Hence, surgical intervention was indicated. 9. Davies GJ, Gould JA, Larson RL. Functional examina- His postoperative course was straightforward and tion of the shoulder girdle. Phys Sportsmed. 1981;9:82- consistent with most arthroscopic rotator cuff proto- 104. cols. The overall outcome was positive because sound 10. Dawson FA. Four-part fracture dislocation of the proxi- mal humerus: an arthroscopic approach. Arthroscopy. clinical decision making and collaboration with the 2003;19:662-666. referring surgeon provided for an accurate diagnosis 11. De Lorme T, Watkins A. Progressive Resistance Exercise. with a timely and appropriate treatment plan. New York, NY: Appleton Centurer Crofts; 1951. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005 529
  • 12. Determe D, Rongieres M, Kany J, et al. Anatomic study 32. Michlovitz SL. Thermal Agents in Rehabilitation. Phila- of the tendinous rotator cuff of the shoulder. Surg delphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 1986. Radiol Anat. 1996;18:195-200. 33. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA. 13. Dockery ML, Wright TW, LaStayo PC. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proxi- Electromyography of the shoulder: an analysis of pas- mal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:569-577. sive modes of exercise. Orthopedics. 1998;21:1181- 34. Morrison DS, Frogameni AD, Woodworth P. Non- 1184. operative treatment of subacromial impingement syn- 14. Dvir Z. Grade 4 in manual muscle testing: the problem drome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:732-737. with submaximal strength assessment. Clin Rehabil. 35. Neer CS, 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;11:36-41. 1970;52:1077-1089. 15. Finkelstein JA, Waddell JP, O’Driscoll SW, Vincent G. 36. Neer CS, 2nd, Welsh RP. The shoulder in sports. Orthop Acute posterior fracture dislocations of the shoulder Clin North Am. 1977;8:583-591. treated with the Neer modification of the McLaughlin 37. O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, Schwartz E. Anterior shoulder procedure. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:190-193. instability. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:395-408. 16. Gerber C, Ganz R. Clinical assessment of instability of 38. Ogawa K, Takahashi M. Long-term outcome of isolated the shoulder. With special reference to anterior and lesser tuberosity fractures of the humerus. J Trauma. posterior drawer tests. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;42:955-959. 1984;66:551-556. 39. Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Ikegami H. Isolated fractures of 17. Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated rupture of the tendon of the greater tuberosity of the humerus: solutions to the subscapularis muscle. Clinical features in 16 cases. recognizing a frequently overlooked fracture. J Trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:389-394. 2003;54:713-717. 18. Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, Englmeier KH, 40. Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Subacromial space width changes Bigliani LU. Two-part and three-part fractures of the during abduction and rotation—a 3-D MR imaging proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:59-64. Trauma. 2003;17:319-325. 19. Green A, Izzi J, Jr. Isolated fractures of the greater 41. Patten RM, Mack LA, Wang KY, Lingel J. Nondisplaced tuberosity of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus: Surg. 2003;12:641-649. sonographic detection. Radiology. 1992;182:201-204. 20. Green S, Buchbinder R, Hetrick S. Physiotherapy inter- 42. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court- ventions for shoulder pain. Cochrane Database Syst Brown CM, Wakefield AE. Primary hemiarthroplasty for Rev. 2003;CD004258. treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint 21. Hamilton A, Balnave R, Adams R. Grip strength testing Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1215-1223. reliability. J Hand Ther. 1994;7:163-170. 43. Rowe CR. Prognosis in dislocations of the shoulder. 22. Handoll HH, Gibson JN, Madhok R. Interventions for J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-A:957-977. treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane 44. Rowe CR, Sakellarides HT. Factors related to recur- Database Syst Rev. 2003;CD000434. rences of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Clin 23. Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC. Impingement syndrome in Orthop. 1961;20:40-48. athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:151-158. 45. Schwartz S, Cohen ME, Herbison GJ, Shah A. Relation- 24. Kaltenborn FM. Mobilization of the Extremity Joints: ship between two measures of upper extremity strength: Examination and Basic Treatment Techniques. Oslo, manual muscle test compared to hand-held myometry. Norway: Olaf Norlis Bokhand; 1980. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1063-1068. 25. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Test- 46. Smidt GL. Muscle Strength Testing: A System Based On ing and Function. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; Mechanics. Iowa City, IA: Spark Instruments and Aca- 1993. demics; 1984. 26. LaBriola JH, Mohaghegh HA. Isolated avulsion fracture 47. Speer KP, Warren RF, Horowitz L. The efficacy of of the lesser tuberosity of the humerus. A case report cryotherapy in the postoperative shoulder. J Shoulder and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Elbow Surg. 1996;5:62-68. 1975;57:1011. 48. Sullivan PE, Markos PD. Clinical Decision Making in 27. Magee DJ. The shoulder. In: Biblis MM, ed. Orthopedic Therapeutic Exercise: Theory and Clinical Application. Physical Assessment. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1995. Co; 1992:90-142. 49. Takeda Y, Kashiwaguchi S, Endo K, Matsuura T, Sasa T. 28. Maitland GD. Peripheral Manipulation. London, UK: The most effective exercise for strengthening the Butterworths; 1977. supraspinatus muscle: evaluation by magnetic reso- 29. Malerba JL, Adam ML, Harris BA, Krebs DE. Reliability nance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:374-381. of dynamic and isometric testing of shoulder external 50. Wadsworth CT. Manual Examination and Treatment of and internal rotators. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. the Spine and Extremities. Baltimore, MD: Williams & 1993;18:543-552. Wilkins; 1988. 30. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. 51. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Jost B, Gerber C, Hodler J. MR Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength imaging for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff: high evaluations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984;9:222-226. prevalence of greater tuberosity fractures and 31. McLaughlin HL. Dislocation of the shoulder with tuber- subscapularis tendon tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. osity fracture. Surg Clin North Am. 1963;43:1615-1620. 1999;172:463-467. 530 J Orthop Sports Phys Ther • Volume 35 • Number 8 • August 2005