Lumbar Disc Herniation Naneria Part 1

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + dr.s.bajpai dr.s.bajpai 3 years ago
    hello sir,sundeep here,i go through the whole slides of conservative management of disc,its a nice presentation and very helpful for students like .my mail address is dr.sundeep.bajpai@gmail.com

Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

Favorites, Groups & Events

Lumbar Disc Herniation Naneria Part 1 - Presentation Transcript

  1. Lumbar disc herniation Management of free fragments Part 1 Vinod Naneria Consultant orthopaedic surgeon Choithram Hospital & Research Centre Indore, India
    • A piece of nucleus pulposus with annulus fribrosus & fragments of cartilagenous end-plate, lying loose in the spinal canal.
    • It may migrate up or down a level or two, may migrate posterior to dura or perforate dura. Incidence - 9 to 15.5%
    Free fragment
  2. Types of Disk Disease Disk Bulge Disk bulges into anterior epidural space without any area of focal-ness or out-pouching Disk Herniation General term used to describe different degrees of 'eccentric out-pouching' of IV disk. Protrusion contained herniation or sub-ligamentous herniation Extrusion non-contained herniation, or trans-ligamentous herniation Sequestration free fragment
  3. Free Fragments Free Fragments
  4. Loose Fragments
  5. Literature – Free Fragment
    • Incidence - 9 to 15.5%
    • Composition – N.P. / A.F. + fragments of end plate
    • Lateral migration – cranial & caudal
    • Posterior migration – cauda equina – mimic tumour
    • Intra dural more than 60 cases reported-world literature
    • Roof disc : central disc extrusion : contained by P.L.L.
  6. Migration
    • Since it is impossible to predict on MRI, that a migrated fragment have some continuity with the parent disc or not - it should be considered as loose fragment.
    • There is a real possibility of migration of the fragment and increase in the neuro-deficit.
    • It is immaterial where the migration is.
    • Migration may progress in the initial phase of extrusion, it may migrate one or two level – up or down.
  7. Composition of extruded material
    • Nucleolus pulposus
    • Annulus fibrosus
    • Fragments of cartilage end plate .
  8. Pathophysiology of Absorption
    • The disc formation takes place before the immune system develops in the embryonic life.
    • The proteins in the nucleosus pulposus are foreign to immune system in adults.
    • The free fragment is treated as foreign protein and a reactive granuloma forms, which absorbs the free fragment.
  9. Absorption - Composition & Time
    • Nucleolus Puplposus
      • absorb by formation of granulation tissue possibly as an auto-immune reaction
      • 3 months
    • Annulus Fibrosus
      • absorb by granulation tissue by vascular invasion
      • 1 – 2 years
    • Hyline cartilage of end-plate
      • suppresses neo-vascularization
      • resistant to absorb
    • The amount of hyaline cartilage, should be predictable on the basis of imaging data.
    • Vertebral endplate marrow signal intensity changes are associated with fissures in the vertebral end-plate.
    • Signal intensity changes may be regarded as osteo­cartilaginous fracture signs similar to other skeletal manifestations.
  10. MRI – showing End-plate lesion, marrow signals Indicating a portion of end-plate avulsion in the extruded disc & Will take long time to absorbed or reduction in size. Early surgery may be contemplated.
  11. Fate of Free Fragment – Complete absorption
    • Sei A, Nakamura T et al 1994
    • Coevoet V et al t.d. 1997
    • Westmark RM et al c.d. 1997
    • Miller S et al 1998
    • Singh P, Singh AP. 1998
    • Morandi X et al 1999
    • Kobayashi N et al c.d. 2003
    More than 55% of absorption is clinically significant Follow up MRI – every 3 months for one year
  12. Spontaneous changes on MRI & Clinical Correlation - 42 cases treated conservatively. Takada & Takahashi
    • MRI changes Cases Excellent Good Poor
    • Disappearance 08 06 02 00
    • More  50% 29 11 18 00
    • No reduction 05 00 01 04
    50% involution in 3 – 6 months J.of Orthopaedic Surgery 2001, 9(1): 1–7
  13. Upward behind body
  14. Lateral Migration Case history – 2 - Monoradiculopathy L4 – L5 with loose fragment over L5 body EHL drop gr. 2 Complete relief 2 Yr FU
  15. Downward Migration
  16. Why conservative?
    • Stable neurological deficit & Presented late > than one week.
    • Bearable radicular pain with negative root stretching test (SLRT).
    • No bladder or bowel dysfunction.
    • Patient not willing for surgery but gave consent for surgery as & when needed. Kept under strict watchful supervision.
  17. R.K.- Absorption one month
    • A 25 M
    • Acute agonizing pain 5 days duration
    • Spinal flexion 50%, EHL lt weak gr3
    • No bladder – bowel dysfunction.
    • Pain minimal
    • MRI extruded disc at L5-S1 left
    • Repeat MRI after one month – extruded fragment (N.P.)absorbed completely.
  18. Jan 2 0 0 7 Feb 2 0 0 7
  19. Absorption within 3 months
    • R.J. – 55 male,
    • Backache sciatica rt., acute onset.
    • Rt. Ankle jerk absent.
    • MRI-June 07- extruded fragment L5-S1
    • Conservative
    • MRI – Aug 07- complete absorption
  20.  
  21. Complete absorption in three months.
  22. N.K.- Complete absorption one year
    • H/o backache sciatica 2005 – MRI degenerated discs at L4-L5, L5-S1.
    • Extruded disc in 2006 – with no neurological deficit.
    • Tx – conservatively with complete absorption of free fragment.
  23. 2 0 0 5 2006 2006
  24. 2006
  25. 2 0 0 7
  26. Case history – U.S.
    • 45 M,
    • Acute backache sciatica 15 days duration
    • Attended clinic as OPD patient.
    • L5 – S1 Rt. with loose fragment over L5 body
    • Measuring 2.4cm x 1.5cm
    • Full flexion spine and negative SLRT
    • Mild gr.4 weakness in EHL and Hypoasthesia in L5 distribution.
    • Tx conservatively
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  

+ Christian VeilletteChristian Veillette, 3 years ago

custom

1465 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

More info about this document

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Go to text version

  • Total Views 1465
    • 1465 on SlideShare
    • 0 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 0
  • Downloads 55
Most viewed embeds

more

All embeds

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories