Scale Language Proposed Changes

  • 159 views
Uploaded on

Faculty Meeting at New Trier High School to discuss proposed changes to the merit system due to the new evaluation requirements.

Faculty Meeting at New Trier High School to discuss proposed changes to the merit system due to the new evaluation requirements.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
159
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Side Letter Committee Mike Baeb, Jason Dane, Tim Dohrer, Jaylyn Hermann, Linda Knier, Mary Lappan,Paul Sally, Steve Viktora, Linda Yonke, Ed Zwirner U P D A T E: Scale Language
  • 2. TIMING
  • 3. Current Contract Scale Review10864 82 40 Scale IV Scale V Years until Review
  • 4. Proposed Changes Scale Review76543 6 6210 Scale IV Scale V Years until Review
  • 5. Current Contract IV V October AprilNovember
  • 6. Proposed Changes IV V October MarchNovember AprilDecember
  • 7. REVIEW BOARDS
  • 8. Current Contract IV V2 Faculty = elected 2 Faculty = elected1 Chair = appointed 1 Chair = appointed (Administrator) (Dept Chair or Dept Coord)
  • 9. Proposed Changes IV & V 2 Faculty = elected (Scale V, only)1 Faculty Chair (DC) = appointed (by Super + Assoc Pres) 1 Principal = appointed WN & NF representation on each board
  • 10. EVIDENCE & DOCUMENTS
  • 11. Current Contract PEC Hearings IV VPrimary Supervisor writes Primary Supervisor writes Candidate also writes
  • 12. Proposed Changes PEC Hearings IV VPrimary Supervisor writes Primary Supervisor writes Candidate also writes Candidate also writes
  • 13. Current Contract Scale Review IV V C.V., C.V.,Primary Supervisor’s letter, Primary Supervisor’s letter, 1-2 Colleagues’ letter(s) 1-2 Colleagues’ letter(s) Annual / 4-yr Self-Reflection, Annual Admin Conference
  • 14. Proposed Changes Scale Review IV & V C.V. (every other year) Primary Supervisor’s letter (req’d) 1-2 Colleagues’ letter(s) Every Other Year / 6-yr Self-Reflection,V, only: Admin Conference (every other year)
  • 15. NOTIFICATIONS
  • 16. Current Contract IV VForm letter of rec Personalized letter of rec
  • 17. Proposed Changes IV & VPersonalized letter of recommendation
  • 18. ELIGIBILITY for IV
  • 19. Current Contract IV V[HIRED] 8+ years of experience = 2nd year @ NTHS[HIRED] 6-7 years of experience = 3rd year @ NTHS All others = 8th year @ NTHS
  • 20. Proposed Changes IV V[HIRED] 6+ years of experience = 2nd year @ NTHS[HIRED] 6-7 years of experience = 3rd year @ NTHS All others = 8th year @ NTHS
  • 21. ALIGNMENT with EVALUATION PLAN EVALUATIONS (new)
  • 22. Proposed Changes EVALUATIONS IV & V Review Year => Summative Evaluation Scale Placement or Retention => “EXCELLENT” Scale Placement or Retention => streamlined evalNO Scale Placement or Retention => regular Summative
  • 23. ALIGNMENT with EVALUATION PLAN RATINGS (new)
  • 24. Proposed Changes RATINGS IV & V“UNSATISFACTORY” => Scale Review (after remediation) “NEEDS IMPROVEMENT” => Scale Review (after PDP) “PROFICIENT” (2/3) => Scale Review No ratings given to Review Board
  • 25. “Excellent” ratings do not guarantee Scale Renewal / Movement
  • 26. Professional Agreement Committee (PAC) Mike Baeb, Spiro Bolos, Jaylyn Hermann, Mary Lappan, John Miller, Judy Macnab, Jay Rosenberg, Randy Zamin, Ed ZwirnerQ & A in SDR: Tuesday & Wednesday
  • 27. Ratification Vote: JANUARY