ORIC Module Design

  • 735 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
735
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. ORIC – Open Educational Resources for the Inclusive Curriculum http://www.oric.brad.ac.uk1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0
  • 2.  workshop activity 1;  constructive alignment;  workshop activity 2;  aims & learning outcomes;  levelness;  workshop activity 3;  review.2 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 3. Sir Ken Robinson on education and creativity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U3 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 4.  individually – choose one teaching sequence, or individual session that you have helped to plan & design;  in 2s & 3s – explain to each other & discuss the steps that you went through in the planning/design process (be honest!);  be prepared to feed back.4 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 5.  theory/approach developed by John Biggs;  all components in the learning/teaching system should support each other – should be aligned;  “When there is alignment between what we want, how we teach and how we assess, teaching is likely to be much more effective than when there is not.” (Biggs, 1999: 26)5 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 6. In constructively aligned teaching:  Devise & state intended learning outcomes;  Learning & teaching methods are chosen to allow learners to construct meaning in a way which will realise these outcomes;  Assessment tasks address the outcomes.6 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 7. “CA makes the students themselves do the real work; the teacher simply arranges things so that it is more likely that they will.” (Biggs, 1999:27)7 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 8. In 2s and 3s, each talk through the following:  take one intended learning outcome from a module that you are involved with;  what learning/teaching activities have been put in place to enable this outcome to be achieved?  how are your students assessed to see if they have achieved this outcome?8 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 9. Aims  aspirational – the overall purpose that is being worked towards;  not necessarily directly assessible.9 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 10. Learning Outcomes (LOs)  intended and unintended.  intended: succinct statements of the learning requirement that a student should possess, and importantly should have demonstrated, upon completion of a particular learning sequence.10 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 11.  LOs normally expressed as verbs (e.g. analyse, synthesise, describe) that learners have to enact in relation to a particular knowledge base or situation;  some suggest LOs should be written in the future tense (e.g., …will be able to…);  others recommend emphasising what learners will have done to achieve the outcome (e.g., …will have…; or …will have demonstrated…).11 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 12. Programme Aim: to instil in participants a reflective and innovative approach to their practice that they will take with them throughout their teaching careers. Programme LO: participants will be able to describe, interpret, evaluate, and reflect on their own teaching practice in a theoretically coherent manner.12 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 13. Scholarship Module LO: participants will be able to consider the implications of the evidence [of variation in student learning] gathered… in terms of developing a basis for reflective practice and personal actionable theory. Reflection Module LO: participants will be able to reflect on and document their own professional teaching practice …13 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 14.  From the Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development: http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/res ources/writing_learning_outcomes.html14 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 15.  thinking about LOs in a qualitative rather than a quantitative sense;  can relate to level of study (e.g. QAA & institutional level descriptors);  can relate to level of achievement (e.g. what is a 3rd or a 1st);  two widely used taxonomies in HE: Bloom & SOLO.15 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 16.  Bloom organises educational objectives into three domains: ◦ Cognitive; ◦ Affective; ◦ Psychomotor.16 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 17.  Know: e.g. define, describe, identify, list, state, measure.  Comprehend: express, discuss, clarify, recognise, report, summarise.  Apply: interpret, practice, operate, employ.  Analyse: experiment, distinguish, debate, categorise, infer, relate.  Synthesise: integrate, develop, design, create, organise, formulate.  Evaluate: judge, revise, value, rate, question, defend.17 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 18.  Prestructural – misses point, doesn‟t understand question  Unistructural: can identify one relevant element in response to a question: identify, name.  Multistructural: can identify multiple relevant elements in a response to a question: describe, list, combine, enumerate.18 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 19.  Relational - integrated response, addresses the question, ties things together: compare, contrast, explain, analyse, relate.  Extended abstract - goes beyond what has been given, applies to new or different domains, reconceptualises: theorise, generalise, hypothesise, reflect.19 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 20. 20
  • 21.  In the same 2s & 3s briefly examine your own practice in terms of: ◦ constructive alignment; ◦ levelness.21 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 22.  in planning learning, teaching & assessment we should see how these activities support each other;  constructive alignment is one way of conceptualising this;  being explicit about the relationship between teaching, learning & assessment makes it more visible (& more coherent?) to learners;  but concerns about instrumentality of outcomes-based approach.22 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 23.  Select module to focus on for assignment, bring the module descriptor and any other relevant learning materials to the next learning set and be prepared to discuss it.  You will be asked to identify factors that contribute to inclusive curriculum design in your own discipline.23 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
  • 24. Biggs, J (2004) Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 2nd edition, Buckingham: SRHE/ Open University Press. D‟Andrea, V (2003) „Organizing teaching and learning: outcomes-based planning‟, in Fry, H et al. (eds) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, London: RoutledgeFalmer, pp 26-41. Moon, Jennifer (2002) The Module and Programme Development Handbook, London: Kogan Page.24 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/