UCSC Talk
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

UCSC Talk

  • 2,166 views
Uploaded on

Slides used for my talk on privacy & surveillance for the 2012 Crown College core course at UC Santa Cruz. Slide 22 (the Andy Baio pepper spray compilation) was a video in the original, a still......

Slides used for my talk on privacy & surveillance for the 2012 Crown College core course at UC Santa Cruz. Slide 22 (the Andy Baio pepper spray compilation) was a video in the original, a still image here.

More in: Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
2,166
On Slideshare
2,151
From Embeds
15
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
8
Comments
2
Likes
1

Embeds 15

https://twitter.com 14
https://si0.twimg.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Title page\n
  • Why futurism/foresight matters. It’s not about predicting jet packs, it’s about understanding the implications of present-day choices, and how seemingly disparate forces combine.\n
  • I attended UCSC myself. Here’s the embarrassing proof.\n
  • First part of the talk: panopticon concept\n
  • Panopticon was Jeremy Bentham’s concept of a prison; the term now has a broader use.\n
  • The panopticon world is one where whatever we do is observable; in fact, one might assume that everything you do and say can be recorded.\n
  • The most important rule: the Internet never forgets. If something hits the net, it’s going to stick around for years.\n
  • The most important rule: the Internet never forgets. If something hits the net, it’s going to stick around for years.\n
  • The most important rule: the Internet never forgets. If something hits the net, it’s going to stick around for years.\n
  • Here’s an example -- my first public foray onto the Internet, USENET in this case, back in July of 1991.\n
  • Privacy and secrecy. Is there a difference?\n
  • It’s a complex question. Here’s a guy who made a name for himself putting pictures on Reddit of underage girls in skimpy outfits, as well as surreptitious photos of adult women in public (accidentally exposing themselves, or bending over, etc.). Gawker found out who he was, and outed (“doxxed”) him. Reddit admins and some users protested, claiming that he had a right of anonymity.\n
  • Those underage girl pictures, btw, largely came from Facebook.\n
  • And whatever you do with your privacy restrictions, remember that your friends -- and you may have many friends -- can repost and use whatever they can see of yours.\n
  • We’re becoming a digital reputation society.\n
  • And it’s one in which lying about ourselves may be the only tool we have left to control what people know about us.\n
  • Watching from above.\n
  • How we normally think of surveillance. Government in action.\n
  • But while the government may be powerful, it’s not the only observer. Corporate surveillance is increasingly common, and harder to control.\n
  • Including this because it’s my favorite image of surveillance.\n
  • Watching from below.\n
  • Cameraphones have become a remarkable tool of bottom-up observation. Millions of devices, each one as much a revolutionary symbol as the AK47 was in the 20th century.\n
  • A cameraphone can reshape an election.\n
  • And the abundance of cameraphones means that we can build narratives and versions of reality that take into account multiple perspectives.\n
  • Where things get even more complex.\n
  • It’s happening whether we like it or not. And it matters.\n
  • One example of the complexity.\n
  • Another example. And just because it’s going after a position you oppose, doesn’t mean that the same tool can’t be turned against the things you like.\n
  • The future!\n
  • Drones are ubiquitous, and getting cheaper.\n
  • AR glasses will allow us to have an always-on layer of info, including identifying people.\n
  • And our tools will inevitably need/have filters, which themselves can be used for reasons beyond ad-blocking.\n
  • \n

Transcript

  • 1. the participatory panopticon Jamais Cascio October 16, 2012
  • 2. panopticon
  • 3. THE INTERNET
  • 4. THE INTERNETNEVER
  • 5. THE INTERNETNEVERFORGETS
  • 6. privacy & secrecy
  • 7. /r/creepshots /r/chokeabitch /r/beatingwomen /r/jailbait/r/picsofdeadjailbait (and more, and worse)
  • 8. surveillance
  • 9. sousveillance
  • 10. Text Compilation created by Andy Baio, Waxy.org
  • 11. transparency
  • 12. Now we’re entering a new era when thevillage seems about to return. With oursenses and memories enhancedprodigiously by new prostheses,suddenly we can “know” the reputationsof millions, soon to be billions, of fellowEarth citizens. A tap of your VReyeglasses will identify any person,along with profiles and alerts, almost asif you had been gossiping about himand her for years.It’s seriously scary prospect and onethat is utterly unavoidable. The cities wegrew up in were semi-anonymous onlybecause they were primitive. Thevillage is returning. And with it serious,lifelong worry about that state of ourreputations. Kids who do not know thisare playing with fire. They had betterhope that the village will be a nice one.A village that shrugs a lot, and forgives. — David Brin, 2007
  • 13. looking ahead
  • 14. google project glass
  • 15. Jamais Cascio @cascioopenthefuture.com the participatory panopticon October 16, 2012