Hung, Drawn and Cultural Quartered
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Hung, Drawn and Cultural Quartered

on

  • 521 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
521
Views on SlideShare
521
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Hung, Drawn and Cultural Quartered Hung, Drawn and Cultural Quartered Presentation Transcript

  • HUNG, DRAWN AND A critique of the culturalCULTURAL QUARTERED quarter development in the UK Oli Mould U n i ve r s i t y o f Salford
  •  The Cultural Quarter policy in the UK C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s dates back to the 1980s – with perhaps Shef field and Manchester’s Northern S h e f f i el d Quarter the first examples (Montgomery, 2007) Salford They have evolved from clusters of cultural and creative (economic) activity B r i s to l to meta-planned urban regeneration initiatives C r i t iq u e Identified at least 31 in the UK so far…
  •  They are based around (one, some or all) C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s of the following criteria  Flagship singular development S h e f f i el d  Boutique and/or chain retail  Leisure facilities  Collection of incubator spaces Salford B r i s to l C r i t iq u e
  •  They are planned by institutions using C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s templates defined by the level of redevelopment desired and the economic S h e f f i el d opportunities available Salford Intricate plans exist that ‘map’ out successful cultural quarters – they must include (Montgomery, 2007: 308) B r i s to l  Production (Creative arts)  Distribution (technological and infrastructural) C r i t iq u e  Consumption (food, retail and entertainment) Other categorizations have included the ‘engineered and the vernacular’ (Shorthose, 2004)
  •  Shef field’s Cultural Quarter once was an C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s industrial workshop area (cutlery, potteries and small -scale metal S h e f f i el d forgers) Salford A city -based CIQ ‘Area Action Plan’ was put in place in 1988 to use cultural activity to regenerate area B r i s to l The Workstation and other incubator C r i t iq u e spaces were set-up out of old dis-used industrial buildings
  •  March 1999 saw the opening of the C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s National Centre for Popular Music (£15m) S h e f f i el d Attempt to establish the Quarter as an ‘reassertion of the local in a global space Salford of cultural flows’ (Brown et al., 2000) B r i s to l After hoping to attract 400,000 visitors a year, it closed 15 months later after only attracting 104,000 C r i t iq u e
  •  Salford is home to MediaCityUK and the C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s surrounding Salford Quays area MediaCityUK houses the relocated BBC S h e f f i el d departments, IT V and a host of other independent T V production and post - production facilities (move started in 2011) Salford This CQ is owned by Peel Group and hence is a privatized, heavily -policed area B r i s to l Cultural or creative activity is strictly housed within corporatized agendas C r i t iq u e
  •  This large scale urban regenerative policy C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s (akin to other Media Cities) are internationally -focused S h e f f i el d Reliance on local creative community is Salford secondary B r i s to l Creating an enclave of elitism in a highly deprived part of the Northwest C r i t iq u e
  •  Bristol’s Stokes Croft is an area with no C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s ‘planning’ interventions as such, but high levels of creative activity S h e f f i el d Grass-roots cultural activity – active Salford engagement with homelessness & unemployed B r i s to l Its anti-hegemonic stance is considered an attraction for freelance creative workers C r i t iq u e
  •  Creation of a ‘buzz’ is critical C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s High student numbers and a reliance on S h e f f i el d night-time culture/economy Salford However, squatting, social unrest and crime are problems that emanate from B r i s to l such a policy C r i t iq u e Start of the gentrification process…?
  •  CQs are used as ingredients of a creative C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s city brand, but are limited in their usage of creativity S h e f f i el d Often, creativity & culture are used to justify or excuse existing urban Salford development schemes (Peck , 2005; Atkinson and Easthorpe, 2009) B r i s to l CQ templates devised by public -private ‘late’ capitalist agendas (private consultants etc.) C r i t iq u e They often enforce marginalization of sub- cultural activity (unless in a pastiche or sanitized manor) Restricts of ‘pop-up’ or ‘DIY urbanism (Deslandes, 2012), which the creative industries thrive upon
  •  Creativity requires a relaxation of C u l t ur a l Q u a r te r s planning laws, not a reinforcement of them S h e f f i el d Creativity and innovation (which are Salford important planned outcomes (Montgomery, 2007)) often stems from failure B r i s to l CQs in the UK are viewed as a way ‘out’ of C r i t iq u e economic stagnation… …but they have typified contemporary neo-liberal place-based policy interventions – and in so doing repel the every activities they claim to be crucial success factors