Liber Cybsoc

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Liber Cybsoc - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Application of the Viable System Model to the Design of Personal Learning Environments Prof. Oleg Liber Institute for Educational Cybernetics University of Bolton
    2. The Crisis in Schools
      • Schools fail most children
      • Many children hate school
        • In the last academic year 696,328 pupils (23 per cent) truanted or were absent without permission, on average for 15 half days
      • “ 20 th Century’s biggest failed experiment”
        • Lord Young of Dartington
    3. The Crisis in HE
      • Certification over learning
      • Vocational dominance
      • Student as consumer, worker, product…?
      • Strategic learning vs deep learning
    4. What is learning?
      • “ Learning” means different things to different people.
      • Learning as a quantitative increase in knowledge. Learning is acquiring information or “knowing a lot” 
      • Learning as memorising. Learning is storing information that can be reproduced.
      • Learning as acquiring facts, skills and methods that can be retained and used as necessary .
      • Learning as making sense or abstracting meaning. Learning involves relating parts of the subject matter to each other and to the real world.
      • Learning as interpreting and understanding reality in a different way. Learning involves comprehending the world by re-interpreting knowledge. (Saljo 1979)
    5. Changes in HE: Political concerns
      • Knowledge economy
      • Globalisation
      • Widening Participation: from 6% to 40+% in 40 years
        • HE and employability
      • Universities as businesses
        • Student fees
        • Student as consumer, worker, product…?
        • Vocationalism
        • Demands of RAE
        • Research vs business facing
      • Dearing to Leitch
    6. Pedagogic concerns
      • Widening participation means:
        • Larger cohorts
        • Working students
        • Demand for increasing variety
        • New curricular demands
      • Curricular and organisational response
        • New forms of access
        • New courses
    7. What’s the problem?
      • Curriculum?
        • Relevance
      • Teaching quality/pedagogy?
        • Boring lessons/lectures?
        • Content vs high level skills
        • Lack of engaging activities
      • Respect?
        • In authority or an authority?
      • The structure of education?
        • Sausage machine
      • How can technology help?
    8. Villemard postcard from 1910 depicting education in the year 2000; Bibliothèque National de France
    9. The Viable System Model
      • The  Viable Systems Model , or  VSM  is a model of the organisational structure of any viable or autonomous system.
      • A viable system is any system organised in such a way as to meet the demands of surviving in the changing environment
      • Diagnosis and Design.
        • Structural or interpretive modes
      VSM overview VSM application
    10. V e >> V s >> V m Viable System Model (VSM) Environment System Mgt
    11. Env. System Mgt V e >> V S >> V m Viable System Model (VSM)
    12. Recursion in the Education System State The State Education State Dept Programme State Institution Dept. State HE Institution State Education HE
    13. Env. System Mgt
    14. Environ- ment Organization Mgt.
    15. Environ- ment Organization 4: INTELLIGENCE 3: OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT 5: IDENTITY
    16. Environ- ment Organization 4: INTELLIGENCE 3: OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT 5: IDENTITY
    17. Environ- ment MA A MB B Rules & Resource bargain 2: coordination 3*: monitoring 4: INTELLIGENCE 3: OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT 5: IDENTITY
    18. Three Four Five 3. Control 5. Policy 4. Strategy The Full Viable System Model
    19. Env. Learners Teaching V e >> V l >> V t The Simple VSM
    20. How the Education System attenuates variety: knowledge
      • Implied stability of knowledge
      • Knowledge divided into academic subjects
      • Institutions into subject based departments
      • Subjects into courses
      • Courses have linear curricula
      • Curricula into lessons
    21. How the Education System attenuates complexity: people
      • People have to study subjects
      • People follow courses
      • People are grouped by ‘ability’
      • People attend lessons
      • People learn content
      • People are tested on content before they can move to the next course
    22. Systemic implications
      • What?
        • Syllabuses require transmission
        • Courses require timetables
        • People are partitioned by lessons
      • Why?
        • It simplifies matters
        • It works (so far)
        • It is the way it has always been
    23. Pedagogic limitations
      • People have unique histories, aptitudes and desires
      • People have different learning approaches
      • People have different time availability
      • Designed for transmission of pre-defined content
      • Difficult to organise
        • Individualised learning
        • Small group learning
        • Problem based learning
    24. The costs of traditional education
      • Difficult to develop process skills
      • Team skills, problem solving skills, creative skills, conversational and social skills
      • Overspecialisation
      • No space for polymaths
    25. Technology
      • Technology of traditional education
        • Lecture theatres, timetabling systems, blackboards, books…
      • Modern communication technology
        • Forums, blogs, wikis, synchronous chat, aggregation, computer scheduling…
      • “… timetables and fixed classroom periods make it difficult to implement effective learning strategies… Human understanding cannot be be conveniently squeezed into fixed time intervals.” (p166)
      • Gordon Pask (1982) Microman. London, Century
    26. KE Learners Teaching V e >> V l >> V t Old Education New Education The VSM and Education
    27. First exploration 1996-9
      • VSM to model teaching
      • Identify key amplification/attenuation
      • Propose technological interventions
      • JISC funding
    28. Simplified VSM Learners Knowledge sub-domain Learning negotiation Teacher monitoring co-ordination Self-organization adaptation Knowledge Domain
    29. Students on a course Delivery Development Steering Negotiation Co-ordination Monitoring Self-organisation Env.
    30. Proposed criteria
      • How are the ‘rules of the course’ expressed and made evident to the student?
      • How can a module be structured sequentially and / or hierarchically over time? What facilities are there to organise learners in a variety of ways in the module (whole group, small groups, individuals)?
      • What facilities are there to monitor how well learning is progressing on the module?
      • What can learners do on their own, outside of the purview of the teacher? 
      • To what extent is it possible for the teacher to adapt the module structure once teaching is underway?
      • Britain & Liber (1999) A Framework for pedagogical evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments. JISC Report http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/VLE%20Full%20Report%2006.doc
    31. Technology change, 2000-2005
      • Universal VLE adoption
      • Market leaders emerge
        • Dangers of monopoly
      • No support for self-organisation
      • Modelled on classroom
    32. Technology change, 2005-
      • Web of text to web of software services
      • Web 2.0, social software
        • Blogs, wikis, aggregation, sharing, social
        • Access to information
      • University technology ghetto?
        • Lecturers explore personal technologies
    33. Second exploration 2005
      • The VSM and Personal Learning
      • Start with the whole person as a viable system
      • Identify where new technological interventions can help amplify
      • Join up fragments
    34. Multiple learning contexts Course 1 Course 2 Course 3 Our Student
    35. Joining up the fragments
    36. Student on many courses Self-delivery Self- Development Self-steering Negotiation Co-ordination Monitoring Self-organisation Env.
    37. Self management
      • Negotiating Learning:
        • Commitments to different activities
      • Coordinating courses:
        • Managing time, scheduling, resources, materials, colleagues, reading, activities, making overall sense
      • Monitoring:
        • Am I making progress on each course as I expected? - reflection
      • Self-organised collaboration
        • Finding synergy between courses activities
      • Development:
        • New courses? New materials? New colleagues? Where next? PDP
      Env. Delivery Development Steering
    38. University VLE University VLE Provider VLE Personal technology Social networks Web Knowledge
    39. University Serv-ices University Serv-ices University Serv-ices Social networks Web Knowledge Personal technology Serv-ices Personal technology
    40. Bolton University and LearnDirect are providers of formal education: the others here are social software
    41. Outcomes
      • PLE report
        • http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ple
      • Special edition of Interactive Learning Environments journal
      • Many conference presentations
      • Influence national personalisation agenda
        • DIUS, DCSF, HEFCE, JISC
      • Influence technology development
        • E.g. TENCompetence project (EU, 10m )
    42. Challenge for institutions
      • What is their purpose given modern information environment?
      • Re-think education – all recursions
      • Make lifelong learning real
      • Promote and facilitate self-organised learning
      • Institutional inversion (Illich)
    43. “ We are plagued by misconceptions about learning that stem from thinking that schooling is synonymous with education” (p162) Gordon Pask (1982) Microman. London, Century The daunting challenge of achieving a sustainable society in the coming decades demands a wholesale and urgent reorientation of educational vision and practice. Sterling, S. (2004). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bath. Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/sterling.htm .
    44.  
    45. Three Four Five 3. Delivery 5. Policy 4. Adaptation The Full Viable System Model 2. coordination 1. Learners Teaching 3*. monitoring Learning negotiation

    + olegliberolegliber, 2 years ago

    custom

    263 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Invited presentation by Prof Oleg Liber at the UK C more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 263
      • 263 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories