• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Guidance on all_in_costs_pr
 

Guidance on all_in_costs_pr

on

  • 353 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
353
Views on SlideShare
353
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Guidance on all_in_costs_pr Guidance on all_in_costs_pr Document Transcript

    • Location and date London, 27 June 2013 Publication of the World Gold Council’s Guidance Note on NonGAAP Metrics - All-In Sustaining Costs and All-In Costs The World Gold Council today publishes a Guidance Note on “all-in sustaining costs” and “all-in costs” metrics, which gold mining companies can use to report their costs as part of their overall reporting disclosure. The World Gold Council has worked closely with its member companies to develop these non-GAAP measures which are intended to provide further transparency into the costs associated with producing gold. It is expected that these new metrics, the “all-in sustaining cost” and the “all-in cost” will be helpful to investors, governments, local communities and other stakeholders in understanding the economics of gold mining. The “all-in sustaining costs” is an extension of existing “cash cost” metrics and incorporate costs related to sustaining production. The “all-in costs” includes additional costs which reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine. It is up to individual companies to determine how they report to the market and to decide whether their stakeholders will find these new metrics of value in understanding their businesses; it is expected that, since many companies report on a calendar year basis, they may choose to use these metrics from 1 January 2014. Terry Heymann, Director Responsible Gold, World Gold Council said: “These new metrics have been developed to help provide greater clarity and improve investor understanding. All companies involved in gold-mining, including those which are not Members of the World Gold Council, will be free to use these metrics. Individual companies have responsibility for their own reporting, but we expect that many will use these new metrics, providing further consistency for investors and other stakeholders.” The methodology for determining these costs can be found below and HERE ENDS For further information please contact: James Murray World Gold Council T +44 7595 271820 E james.murray@gold.org
    • Note to editors: World Gold Council The World Gold Council is the market development organisation for the gold industry. Working within the investment, jewellery and technology sectors, as well as engaging with governments and central banks, our purpose is to provide industry leadership, whilst stimulating and sustaining demand for gold. We develop gold-backed solutions, services and markets, based on true market insight. As a result, we create structural shifts in demand for gold across key market sectors. We provide insights into the international gold markets, helping people to better understand the wealth preservation qualities of gold and its role in meeting the social and environmental needs of society. Based in the UK, with operations in India, the Far East, Europe and the US, the World Gold Council is an association whose members include the world’s leading and most forward thinking gold mining companies.
    • GUIDANCE NOTE ON NON-GAAP METRICS – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS AND ALL-IN COSTS US $ / gold ounces sold On-Site Mining Costs (on a sales basis) On-Site General & Administrative costs Royalties & Production Taxes Realised Gains/Losses on Hedges due to operating costs Community Costs related to current operations Permitting Costs related to current operations rd 3 party smelting, refining and transport costs Non-Cash Remuneration (Site-Based) Stock-piles / product inventory write down Operational Stripping Costs By-Product Credits Sub-Total (Adjusted Operating Costs) Income Statement Income Statement Income Statement Income Statement (a) (b) (c) (d) Income Statement (e) Income Statement (f) Income Statement (g) Income Statement Income Statement Income Statement Income Statement (h) (i) (j) (k) Note: this will be a credit (l) = (a) + (b) + (c) + (d) + (e) + (f) + (g) + (h) + (i) + (j) + (k) Corporate General & Administrative costs (including share-based remuneration) Reclamation & remediation – accretion & amortisation (operating sites) Exploration and study costs (sustaining) Capital exploration (sustaining) Capitalised stripping & underground mine development (sustaining) Capital expenditure (sustaining) All-in Sustaining Costs Income Statement (m) Income Statement (n) Income Statement Cash Flow Cash Flow (o) (p) (q) Cash Flow (r) (s) = (l) + (m) + (n) + (o) + (p) + (q) + (r) Community Costs not related to current operations Permitting Costs not related to current operations Reclamation and remediation costs not related to current operations Exploration and study costs (non-sustaining) Capital exploration (non-sustaining) Capitalised stripping & underground mine development (non-sustaining) Capital expenditure (non-sustaining) Income Statement (t) Income Statement (u) Income Statement (v) Income Statement Cash Flow Cash Flow (w) (x) (y) Cash Flow (z) All-in Costs = (s) + (t) + (u) + (v) + (w) + (x) + (y) + (z) Notes: 1. All companies using this guidance are encouraged to disclose both their all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs and reconcile these metrics to their GAAP reporting. It is not expected that companies will disclose all individual cost items.
    • The use of the sub-total (adjusted operating costs) may be helpful for certain companies in providing reconciliation to historical metrics but it is not expected that all companies will provide disclosure at this level. The sub-total (adjusted operating costs) metric may not be directly comparable across companies, for example, because of differences between IFRS and US GAAP. 2. It is recognised that accretion related to asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) and amortisation of the ARO assets for reclamation and remediation do not reflect annual cash outflows but these accounting calculations are considered to be more representative of the periodic costs of reclamation and remediation. 3. Non-sustaining costs are those costs incurred at new operations and costs related to ‘major projects’ at existing operations where these projects will materially increase production. Companies need to publicly disclose those operations and ‘major projects’ which are considered nonsustaining. All other costs related to existing operations are considered sustaining. 4. Costs should be reported on the same basis as sales (i.e. if sales figures are reported on a consolidated basis, costs should be reported on a consolidated basis; if sales figures are reported on an attributable basis, costs should be reported on an attributable basis). 5. Costs Excluded The following costs are excluded from the guidance: • • • • • Income tax. Working capital (except for adjustments to inventory on a sales basis). All financing charges (including capitalised interest). Costs related to business combinations, asset acquisitions and asset disposals. Items needed to normalise earnings, for example impairments on non-current assets and onetime material severance charges. Costs related to any of the listed line-items used to calculate all-in costs in the above table should not be excluded.