World IPv6 Day IPv6Matrix Results Presentation

IPv6 Matrix Project Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide http://www.ipv6matrix.org Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – ocl@gih.com APRIL 2011 Update / World IPv6 Day Version / 8 June 2011Page 1 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

IPv6 Matrix Project ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009 Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test: IPv6 DNS servers IPv6 compliant Web servers IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers IPv6 compliant NTP servers.Page 2 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Project Rationale Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever. Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later. Test them for IPv6 connectivity This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide Use GeoIP database to estimate real host locationPage 3 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Project Teams London, UK: Project Management and support Hardware supply and installation Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity Nile University, Egypt: Software ProgrammingPage 4 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

www.ipv6matrix.org Web SitePage 5 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

What are we tracking? Host IPv6 penetration Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs Two types of information: Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP) This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services Web sites only (actual content) This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructurePage 6 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

What are we archiving? Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus: Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive In April 2011, the size of this database in text format is approx 60Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)Page 7 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Europe Data snapshot 2.20% 3.20% 1.29% 4.88%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure Europe Map + figures 6.68% 9.00%- DNS 1.47% 4.29%- Web (Web+NTP / WEB only) 3.56% 2.03% 0.20% 1.69% 3.91% 1.49% 4.39% 0.74% 8.33% 0.41%- E-mail 1.91% 1.39% 1.47% 7.91% 1.38% 0.59% 4.34%- NTP 4.05% 1.34% 3.40% 2.59% 3.94% Low Sample 2.39% 0.63% Low accuracy 13.91% 1.81% 0.23% 0.56% 13.42% 4.23% 0.39% 0.69% 18.91%Sept 2010 3.77% 6.57% 1.12% 0.67% 8.38% 1.65%April 2011 0.93% 10.74% 11.95% 2.32% 2.80% 3.48% 1.74% 5.25% 2.84% 6.36% 2.01% 1.34% 3.01%Page 8 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Europe Data snapshot 0.00% 0.84% 0.48% 2.25%IPv6 Host Penetration Europe Map + figures 0.26% Web only 0.21% 0.80% 0.64% (Web+NTP / WEB only) 0.98% 0.47% 0.06% 0.08% 0.62% 0.24% 0.64% 0.99% 0.74% 1.69% 0.12% 0.30% 0.59% 1.46% 0.27% 0.41% 0.09% 0.14% 0.14% 2.79% 0.20% 3.21% Low Sample 0.41% 0.10% Low accuracy 0.74% 0.16% 0.35% 0.11% 16.38% 2.29% 0.50% 0.39% 24.68%Sept 2010 1.37% 10.10% 0.11%April 2011 0.42% 11.53% 0.23% 0.42% 4.01% 4.13% 0.43% 1.55% 1.73% 0.30% 0.64% 1.33% 3.15% 0.48% 0.55% 1.28%Page 9 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 Moldova (*) 13.42% 18.91% 5.49% France 2.39% 13.91% 11.52% Switzerland 10.74% 11.95% 1.21% Denmark 6.68% 9.00% 2.32% Slovakia 6.57% 8.38% 1.81% Finland 2.03% 8.33% 6.30% Netherlands 4.39% 7.91% 3.52% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.73% 7.73% Slovenia 6.52% 6.52% Czech Republic 3.48% 6.36% 2.88% Croatia 6.36% 6.36% Austria 2.32% 5.25% 2.93% IPv6 Host Penetration Norway 3.20% 4.88% 1.68% Lithuania 4.34% 4.05% -0.29% Belarus 3.40% 3.94% 0.54% Estonia 4.29% 3.91% -0.38% Portugal 4.23% 3.77% -0.46% Infrastructure Sweden Greece 1.47% 1.34% 3.56% 3.01% 2.09% 1.67% - DNS or Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.92% 2.92% Italy 2.80% 2.84% 0.04% - Web or Serbia (*) 2.61% 2.61% United Kingdom 1.34% 2.59% 1.25% - E-mail or Hungary 1.74% 2.01% 0.27% Ukraine 0.63% 1.81% 1.18% - NTP Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49% Poland 1.12% 1.65% 0.53% Belgium 1.49% 1.47% -0.02% Ireland 1.91% 1.39% -0.52% (*) Low Sample Germany 0.74% 1.38% 0.64% Low accuracy Iceland Spain 2.20% 0.67% 1.29% 0.93% -0.91% 0.26% Romania 0.56% 0.69% 0.13% Latvia 0.41% 0.59% 0.18% Bulgaria 0.10% 0.46% 0.36%Page 10 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-2011 Moldova (*) 16.38% 24.68% 8.30% Slovakia 10.10% 11.53% 1.43% Switzerland 4.01% 4.13% 0.12% Belarus 2.79% 3.21% 0.42% Czech Republic 1.73% 3.15% 1.42% Norway 0.84% 2.25% 1.41% Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.11% 2.11% Finland 0.47% 1.69% 1.22% Croatia 1.53% 1.53% Netherlands 0.99% 1.46% 0.47% Portugal 2.29% 1.37% -0.92% Italy 1.55% 1.33% -0.22% Slovenia 1.28% 1.28% Greece 0.55% 1.28% 0.73% Sweden 0.80% 0.98% 0.18% IPv6 Host Penetration France 0.41% 0.74% 0.33% Austria 0.43% 0.64% 0.21% Estonia 0.64% 0.62% -0.02% Belgium 0.64% 0.59% -0.05% Hungary 0.30% 0.48% 0.18% Web only Iceland 0.00% 0.48% 0.48% Spain 0.42% 0.42% 0.00% Lithuania 0.12% 0.41% 0.29% Romania 0.11% 0.39% 0.28% Ireland 0.24% 0.30% 0.06% Germany 0.74% 0.27% -0.47% (*) Low Sample Bulgaria 0.10% 0.26% 0.16% Poland 0.11% 0.23% 0.12% Low accuracy Denmark 0.26% 0.21% -0.05% United Kingdom 0.14% 0.20% 0.06% Ukraine 0.10% 0.16% 0.06% Latvia 0.09% 0.14% 0.05% Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00% Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.00%Page 11 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Europe Trends France with large rise in infrastructure Likely to be caused by a main hosting provider, ovh.net, installing dual-stack Name-servers Slovakia and Switzerland leading with dual-stack Web sitesPage 12 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.20% 1.69% 7.38%Infrastructure 10.64%- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or 0.09% 1.31% 0.39% 0.11% 1.49%- NTP 0.42% 1.50% 0.25% 1.39% 0.20% 0.24% 0.24% 1.18% 1.46% 2.16% Low Sample 1.01% 1.36% 2.78% 0.00% 3.42% Low accuracy 0.65% 8.59% 0.89% 0.65% 8.54% 1.95% 3.03% 25.00%Sept 2010 2.94% 3.16% 23.81% 5.40% 0.56% 1.89% 0.09% 0.56% 3.50% 0.09% 1.52% 2.52%April 2011 2.81% 3.24% SG: 32.24%Page 13 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.06% 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% Web only 0.11% 0.15% 0.48% 0.12% 0.17% 0.38% 1.58% 0.09% 1.23% 0.18% 0.03% 0.29% 1.03% 0.87% 1.39% Low Sample 0.00% 1.01% 3.09% 0.00% 3.88% Low accuracy 0.14% 1.94% 0.00% 0.68% 1.89% 3.70% 3.03% 50.00%Sept 2010 2.94% 0.52% 50.00% 0.61% 0.56% 0.51% 0.00% 0.56% 0.55% 5.26% 0.11% 0.42%April 2011 0.18% 0.77% SG: 0.00%Page 14 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-11 apr-11 Singapore 0.00% 32.24% 32.24% Armenia (*) 7.38% 10.64% 3.26% Sri Lanka (*) 8.59% 8.54% -0.05% Indonesia 3.16% 5.40% 2.24% Malaysia 1.89% 3.50% 1.61% Philippines (*) 2.78% 3.42% 0.64% New Zealand 2.52% 3.24% 0.72% Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09% Australia 1.52% 2.81% 1.29% Hong Kong n/a 2.37% IPv6 Host Penetration Taiwan 1.18% 2.16% 0.98% Qatar (*) 0.89% 1.95% 1.06% Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49% Infrastructure Japan 1.31% 1.49% 0.18% Saudi Arabia (*) 1.50% 1.39% -0.11% - DNS or Thailand 1.46% 1.36% -0.10% - Web or United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.65% 0.00% - E-mail or Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00% - NTP Iran 0.39% 0.42% 0.03% South Korea 0.25% 0.24% -0.01% India 0.20% 0.24% 0.04% (*) Low Sample China 0.09% 0.11% 0.02% Low accuracy Vietnam (*) 0.09% 0.09% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 1.01% 0.00% -1.01%Page 15 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 Vietnam (*) 0.00% 5.26% 5.26% Philippines (*) 3.09% 3.88% 0.79% Qatar (*) 0.00% 3.70% 3.70% Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09% Sri Lanka (*) 1.94% 1.89% -0.05% Taiwan 1.03% 1.39% 0.36% Saudi Arabia (*) 1.58% 1.23% -0.35% Thailand 0.87% 1.01% 0.14% New Zealand 0.42% 0.77% 0.35% United Arab Emirates (*) 0.14% 0.68% 0.54%IPv6 Host Penetration Hong Kong n/a 0.67% Indonesia 0.52% 0.61% 0.09% Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00% Malaysia 0.51% 0.55% 0.04% Web only Iran 0.48% 0.38% -0.10% India 0.18% 0.29% 0.11% Australia 0.11% 0.18% 0.07% Japan 0.15% 0.17% 0.02% (*) Low Sample China 0.11% 0.12% 0.01% Low accuracy Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02% South Korea 0.09% 0.03% -0.06% Singapore 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Armenia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Page 16 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Asia Trends Singapore leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content China results abnormally very low – content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall? Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the regionPage 17 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 36.63% 35.62%Infrastructure- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or- NTP 8.82% 8.82% 5.56% 7.87% Low Sample 8.33% Low accuracy 8.51%Sept 2010April 2011 0.79% 0.81%Page 18 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.00% 0.00% Web only 0.00% 0.00% 1.85% 2.44% Low Sample 14.29% Low accuracy 14.29%Sept 2010April 2011 0.34% 0.29%Page 19 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 IPv6 Host Penetration Tunisia (*) 36.63% 35.62% -1.01% Senegal (*) 8.82% 8.82% 0.00% Tanzania (*) 8.33% 8.51% 0.18% Infrastructure Kenya (*) 5.56% 7.87% 2.31% - DNS or South Africa 0.79% 0.81% 0.02% - Web or - E-mail or - NTP The small number of hosts tested make the results for most of Africa appear higher than they really are (*) Low Sample Low accuracyPage 20 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 IPv6 Host Penetration Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00% Kenya (*) 1.85% 2.44% 0.59% South Africa 0.34% 0.29% -0.05% Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senegal (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Web only (*) Low Sample The small number of hosts tested make the results Low accuracy for most of Africa appear higher than they really arePage 21 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Africa Trends Very few countries with IPv6 connectivity Dual Stack Islands starting to appear Can be compared with the growth of Internet connectivity in the ninetiesPage 22 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Compare Historical data on African Internet Connectivity June 1994 May 1997 Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htmPage 23 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

North/South America 0.98%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure 1.40% 2.81%- DNS or PR: 3.51%- Web or- E-mail or 0.37% 6.09%- NTP 6.00% Low Sample 1.52% 0.23% Low accuracy 1.95% 0.29% 8.30%April 2011 0.32%Page 24 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

North/South America 0.21%IPv6 Host Penetration Web only 0.24% PR: 6.67% 0.61% 2.26% 3.23% Low Sample 1.31% 0.23% Low accuracy 1.80% 25%April 2011 0.28%Page 25 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 Uruguay (*) 8.30% 8.30% Venezuela (*) 6.09% 6.09% Guatemala (*) 6.00% 6.00% Puerto Rico (*) 3.51% 3.51% IPv6 Host Penetration Cuba (*) 2.81% 2.81% Ecuador (*) 1.95% 1.95% Brasil 1.52% 1.52% Infrastructure United States 1.40% 1.40% Canada 0.98% 0.98% - DNS or Mexico 0.37% 0.37% - Web or Chile 0.32% 0.32% - E-mail or Colombia (*) 0.29% 0.29% - NTP Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23% (*) Low Sample Low accuracy For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 26 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 Uruguay (*) 25.00% 25.00% Puerto Rico (*) 6.67% 6.67% Guatemala (*) 3.23% 3.23% Venezuela (*) 2.26% 2.26% IPv6 Host Penetration Ecuador (*) 1.80% 1.80% Brasil 1.31% 1.31% Mexico 0.61% 0.61% Chile 0.28% 0.28% Web only United States 0.24% 0.24% Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23% Canada 0.21% 0.21% Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00% (*) Low Sample Colombia (*) 0.00% 0.00% Low accuracy For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 27 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

America Trends North America trailing behind Europe Elsewhere, data based on low number of Web sites, needs to be taken in moderation (the restricted number of hosting providers can make figures jump several percentage points)Page 28 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Worldwide Trends We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation The figures are still very small There is a small decrease in percentage in some countries, which would point to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network) Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region.Page 29 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Future work / funding required Add more domains to be tested Add more features to be tested Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis Develop new data visualisation Perform further analysis Perform historical/time analysis from archives Develop an engine to write automated reports Duplicate Crawler to other regionsPage 30 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

Thank you Contact: ISOC England – contact@isoc-e.org CTM InternationalPage 31 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org

http://isocindiachennai.org	37
http://www.isocindiachennai.in	32
http://paper.li	1
http://www.slideshare.net	1

World IPv6 Day IPv6Matrix Results Presentation

by Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond on Jun 07, 2011

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

4 Embeds 71

Statistics

World IPv6 Day IPv6Matrix Results Presentation — Presentation Transcript