0
IPv6 Matrix Project          Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide          http://www.ipv6matrix.org          Dr. Olivier ...
IPv6 Matrix Project             ISOC England was awarded a Community             Grants Programme award in November       ...
Project Rationale             Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated             by a small number of data ...
Project Teams             London, UK:                   Project Management and support                   Hardware supply a...
www.ipv6matrix.org Web SitePage 5   IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
What are we tracking?             Host IPv6 penetration               Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates               In...
What are we archiving?             Everything that we are tracking on the previous page,             plus:             Tes...
Europe Data snapshot                                          2.20%        3.20%                                          ...
Europe Data snapshot                                          0.00%        0.84%                                          ...
Country                      DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP     % change                                                              ...
Country                      WEB                     % change                                                             ...
Europe Trends              France with large rise in infrastructure                    Likely to be caused by a main hosti...
Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration                              0.20%                                                ...
Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration                              0.06%                                                ...
Country                       DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change                                                                 ...
Country                       WEB                     % change                                                            ...
Asia Trends              Singapore leading by far in              infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack              W...
Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration                            36.63%                                               ...
Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration                            0.00%                                                ...
Country                          DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP     % change                                                          ...
Country                            WEB                     % change                                                       ...
Africa Trends              Very few countries with IPv6              connectivity              Dual Stack Islands starting...
Compare Historical data on              African Internet Connectivity              June 1994                              ...
North/South America                                                        0.98%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure       ...
North/South America                                                   0.21%IPv6 Host Penetration Web only                 ...
Country                 DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP    % change                                                                    ...
Country                 WEB                     % change                                                                  ...
America Trends              North America trailing behind Europe              Elsewhere, data based on low number         ...
Worldwide Trends              We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6              implementation             ...
Future work / funding required              Add more domains to be tested              Add more features to be tested     ...
Thank you                    Contact: ISOC England – contact@isoc-e.org                                                   ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

World IPv6 Day IPv6Matrix Results Presentation

3,708

Published on

Presentation distributed for World IPv6 Day, on 8 June 2011.

This contains results for IPv6 dual stack Web sites in April 2011 and compares them with results collected in September 2010.

Published in: Technology
1 Comment
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Now that APNIC has distributed all remaining IPv4 addresses, will this result in a significant increase in IPv6 takeip in Asia-Pacific?
    With RIPE expected to release all remaining IPv4 addresses by the end of 2011, will 2012 be the year Europe 'gets' IPv6?
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,708
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
83
Comments
1
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "World IPv6 Day IPv6Matrix Results Presentation"

  1. 1. IPv6 Matrix Project Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide http://www.ipv6matrix.org Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – ocl@gih.com APRIL 2011 Update / World IPv6 Day Version / 8 June 2011Page 1 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  2. 2. IPv6 Matrix Project ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009 Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test: IPv6 DNS servers IPv6 compliant Web servers IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers IPv6 compliant NTP servers.Page 2 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  3. 3. Project Rationale Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever. Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later. Test them for IPv6 connectivity This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide Use GeoIP database to estimate real host locationPage 3 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  4. 4. Project Teams London, UK: Project Management and support Hardware supply and installation Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity Nile University, Egypt: Software ProgrammingPage 4 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  5. 5. www.ipv6matrix.org Web SitePage 5 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  6. 6. What are we tracking? Host IPv6 penetration Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs Two types of information: Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP) This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services Web sites only (actual content) This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructurePage 6 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  7. 7. What are we archiving? Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus: Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive In April 2011, the size of this database in text format is approx 60Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)Page 7 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  8. 8. Europe Data snapshot 2.20% 3.20% 1.29% 4.88%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure Europe Map + figures 6.68% 9.00%- DNS 1.47% 4.29%- Web (Web+NTP / WEB only) 3.56% 2.03% 0.20% 1.69% 3.91% 1.49% 4.39% 0.74% 8.33% 0.41%- E-mail 1.91% 1.39% 1.47% 7.91% 1.38% 0.59% 4.34%- NTP 4.05% 1.34% 3.40% 2.59% 3.94% Low Sample 2.39% 0.63% Low accuracy 13.91% 1.81% 0.23% 0.56% 13.42% 4.23% 0.39% 0.69% 18.91%Sept 2010 3.77% 6.57% 1.12% 0.67% 8.38% 1.65%April 2011 0.93% 10.74% 11.95% 2.32% 2.80% 3.48% 1.74% 5.25% 2.84% 6.36% 2.01% 1.34% 3.01%Page 8 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  9. 9. Europe Data snapshot 0.00% 0.84% 0.48% 2.25%IPv6 Host Penetration Europe Map + figures 0.26% Web only 0.21% 0.80% 0.64% (Web+NTP / WEB only) 0.98% 0.47% 0.06% 0.08% 0.62% 0.24% 0.64% 0.99% 0.74% 1.69% 0.12% 0.30% 0.59% 1.46% 0.27% 0.41% 0.09% 0.14% 0.14% 2.79% 0.20% 3.21% Low Sample 0.41% 0.10% Low accuracy 0.74% 0.16% 0.35% 0.11% 16.38% 2.29% 0.50% 0.39% 24.68%Sept 2010 1.37% 10.10% 0.11%April 2011 0.42% 11.53% 0.23% 0.42% 4.01% 4.13% 0.43% 1.55% 1.73% 0.30% 0.64% 1.33% 3.15% 0.48% 0.55% 1.28%Page 9 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  10. 10. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 Moldova (*) 13.42% 18.91% 5.49% France 2.39% 13.91% 11.52% Switzerland 10.74% 11.95% 1.21% Denmark 6.68% 9.00% 2.32% Slovakia 6.57% 8.38% 1.81% Finland 2.03% 8.33% 6.30% Netherlands 4.39% 7.91% 3.52% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.73% 7.73% Slovenia 6.52% 6.52% Czech Republic 3.48% 6.36% 2.88% Croatia 6.36% 6.36% Austria 2.32% 5.25% 2.93% IPv6 Host Penetration Norway 3.20% 4.88% 1.68% Lithuania 4.34% 4.05% -0.29% Belarus 3.40% 3.94% 0.54% Estonia 4.29% 3.91% -0.38% Portugal 4.23% 3.77% -0.46% Infrastructure Sweden Greece 1.47% 1.34% 3.56% 3.01% 2.09% 1.67% - DNS or Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.92% 2.92% Italy 2.80% 2.84% 0.04% - Web or Serbia (*) 2.61% 2.61% United Kingdom 1.34% 2.59% 1.25% - E-mail or Hungary 1.74% 2.01% 0.27% Ukraine 0.63% 1.81% 1.18% - NTP Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49% Poland 1.12% 1.65% 0.53% Belgium 1.49% 1.47% -0.02% Ireland 1.91% 1.39% -0.52% (*) Low Sample Germany 0.74% 1.38% 0.64% Low accuracy Iceland Spain 2.20% 0.67% 1.29% 0.93% -0.91% 0.26% Romania 0.56% 0.69% 0.13% Latvia 0.41% 0.59% 0.18% Bulgaria 0.10% 0.46% 0.36%Page 10 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  11. 11. Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-2011 Moldova (*) 16.38% 24.68% 8.30% Slovakia 10.10% 11.53% 1.43% Switzerland 4.01% 4.13% 0.12% Belarus 2.79% 3.21% 0.42% Czech Republic 1.73% 3.15% 1.42% Norway 0.84% 2.25% 1.41% Republic of Macedonia (*) 2.11% 2.11% Finland 0.47% 1.69% 1.22% Croatia 1.53% 1.53% Netherlands 0.99% 1.46% 0.47% Portugal 2.29% 1.37% -0.92% Italy 1.55% 1.33% -0.22% Slovenia 1.28% 1.28% Greece 0.55% 1.28% 0.73% Sweden 0.80% 0.98% 0.18% IPv6 Host Penetration France 0.41% 0.74% 0.33% Austria 0.43% 0.64% 0.21% Estonia 0.64% 0.62% -0.02% Belgium 0.64% 0.59% -0.05% Hungary 0.30% 0.48% 0.18% Web only Iceland 0.00% 0.48% 0.48% Spain 0.42% 0.42% 0.00% Lithuania 0.12% 0.41% 0.29% Romania 0.11% 0.39% 0.28% Ireland 0.24% 0.30% 0.06% Germany 0.74% 0.27% -0.47% (*) Low Sample Bulgaria 0.10% 0.26% 0.16% Poland 0.11% 0.23% 0.12% Low accuracy Denmark 0.26% 0.21% -0.05% United Kingdom 0.14% 0.20% 0.06% Ukraine 0.10% 0.16% 0.06% Latvia 0.09% 0.14% 0.05% Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00% Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.00%Page 11 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  12. 12. Europe Trends France with large rise in infrastructure Likely to be caused by a main hosting provider, ovh.net, installing dual-stack Name-servers Slovakia and Switzerland leading with dual-stack Web sitesPage 12 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  13. 13. Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.20% 1.69% 7.38%Infrastructure 10.64%- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or 0.09% 1.31% 0.39% 0.11% 1.49%- NTP 0.42% 1.50% 0.25% 1.39% 0.20% 0.24% 0.24% 1.18% 1.46% 2.16% Low Sample 1.01% 1.36% 2.78% 0.00% 3.42% Low accuracy 0.65% 8.59% 0.89% 0.65% 8.54% 1.95% 3.03% 25.00%Sept 2010 2.94% 3.16% 23.81% 5.40% 0.56% 1.89% 0.09% 0.56% 3.50% 0.09% 1.52% 2.52%April 2011 2.81% 3.24% SG: 32.24%Page 13 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  14. 14. Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.06% 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% Web only 0.11% 0.15% 0.48% 0.12% 0.17% 0.38% 1.58% 0.09% 1.23% 0.18% 0.03% 0.29% 1.03% 0.87% 1.39% Low Sample 0.00% 1.01% 3.09% 0.00% 3.88% Low accuracy 0.14% 1.94% 0.00% 0.68% 1.89% 3.70% 3.03% 50.00%Sept 2010 2.94% 0.52% 50.00% 0.61% 0.56% 0.51% 0.00% 0.56% 0.55% 5.26% 0.11% 0.42%April 2011 0.18% 0.77% SG: 0.00%Page 14 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  15. 15. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-11 apr-11 Singapore 0.00% 32.24% 32.24% Armenia (*) 7.38% 10.64% 3.26% Sri Lanka (*) 8.59% 8.54% -0.05% Indonesia 3.16% 5.40% 2.24% Malaysia 1.89% 3.50% 1.61% Philippines (*) 2.78% 3.42% 0.64% New Zealand 2.52% 3.24% 0.72% Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09% Australia 1.52% 2.81% 1.29% Hong Kong n/a 2.37% IPv6 Host Penetration Taiwan 1.18% 2.16% 0.98% Qatar (*) 0.89% 1.95% 1.06% Russia 0.20% 1.69% 1.49% Infrastructure Japan 1.31% 1.49% 0.18% Saudi Arabia (*) 1.50% 1.39% -0.11% - DNS or Thailand 1.46% 1.36% -0.10% - Web or United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.65% 0.00% - E-mail or Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00% - NTP Iran 0.39% 0.42% 0.03% South Korea 0.25% 0.24% -0.01% India 0.20% 0.24% 0.04% (*) Low Sample China 0.09% 0.11% 0.02% Low accuracy Vietnam (*) 0.09% 0.09% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 1.01% 0.00% -1.01%Page 15 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  16. 16. Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 Vietnam (*) 0.00% 5.26% 5.26% Philippines (*) 3.09% 3.88% 0.79% Qatar (*) 0.00% 3.70% 3.70% Oman (*) 3.03% 2.94% -0.09% Sri Lanka (*) 1.94% 1.89% -0.05% Taiwan 1.03% 1.39% 0.36% Saudi Arabia (*) 1.58% 1.23% -0.35% Thailand 0.87% 1.01% 0.14% New Zealand 0.42% 0.77% 0.35% United Arab Emirates (*) 0.14% 0.68% 0.54%IPv6 Host Penetration Hong Kong n/a 0.67% Indonesia 0.52% 0.61% 0.09% Pakistan 0.56% 0.56% 0.00% Malaysia 0.51% 0.55% 0.04% Web only Iran 0.48% 0.38% -0.10% India 0.18% 0.29% 0.11% Australia 0.11% 0.18% 0.07% Japan 0.15% 0.17% 0.02% (*) Low Sample China 0.11% 0.12% 0.01% Low accuracy Russia 0.06% 0.08% 0.02% South Korea 0.09% 0.03% -0.06% Singapore 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Armenia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Page 16 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  17. 17. Asia Trends Singapore leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content China results abnormally very low – content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall? Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the regionPage 17 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  18. 18. Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 36.63% 35.62%Infrastructure- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or- NTP 8.82% 8.82% 5.56% 7.87% Low Sample 8.33% Low accuracy 8.51%Sept 2010April 2011 0.79% 0.81%Page 18 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  19. 19. Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.00% 0.00% Web only 0.00% 0.00% 1.85% 2.44% Low Sample 14.29% Low accuracy 14.29%Sept 2010April 2011 0.34% 0.29%Page 19 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  20. 20. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 IPv6 Host Penetration Tunisia (*) 36.63% 35.62% -1.01% Senegal (*) 8.82% 8.82% 0.00% Tanzania (*) 8.33% 8.51% 0.18% Infrastructure Kenya (*) 5.56% 7.87% 2.31% - DNS or South Africa 0.79% 0.81% 0.02% - Web or - E-mail or - NTP The small number of hosts tested make the results for most of Africa appear higher than they really are (*) Low Sample Low accuracyPage 20 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  21. 21. Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 IPv6 Host Penetration Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00% Kenya (*) 1.85% 2.44% 0.59% South Africa 0.34% 0.29% -0.05% Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Senegal (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Web only (*) Low Sample The small number of hosts tested make the results Low accuracy for most of Africa appear higher than they really arePage 21 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  22. 22. Africa Trends Very few countries with IPv6 connectivity Dual Stack Islands starting to appear Can be compared with the growth of Internet connectivity in the ninetiesPage 22 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  23. 23. Compare Historical data on African Internet Connectivity June 1994 May 1997 Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htmPage 23 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  24. 24. North/South America 0.98%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure 1.40% 2.81%- DNS or PR: 3.51%- Web or- E-mail or 0.37% 6.09%- NTP 6.00% Low Sample 1.52% 0.23% Low accuracy 1.95% 0.29% 8.30%April 2011 0.32%Page 24 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  25. 25. North/South America 0.21%IPv6 Host Penetration Web only 0.24% PR: 6.67% 0.61% 2.26% 3.23% Low Sample 1.31% 0.23% Low accuracy 1.80% 25%April 2011 0.28%Page 25 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  26. 26. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change sept-10 apr-11 Uruguay (*) 8.30% 8.30% Venezuela (*) 6.09% 6.09% Guatemala (*) 6.00% 6.00% Puerto Rico (*) 3.51% 3.51% IPv6 Host Penetration Cuba (*) 2.81% 2.81% Ecuador (*) 1.95% 1.95% Brasil 1.52% 1.52% Infrastructure United States 1.40% 1.40% Canada 0.98% 0.98% - DNS or Mexico 0.37% 0.37% - Web or Chile 0.32% 0.32% - E-mail or Colombia (*) 0.29% 0.29% - NTP Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23% (*) Low Sample Low accuracy For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 26 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  27. 27. Country WEB % change sept-10 apr-11 Uruguay (*) 25.00% 25.00% Puerto Rico (*) 6.67% 6.67% Guatemala (*) 3.23% 3.23% Venezuela (*) 2.26% 2.26% IPv6 Host Penetration Ecuador (*) 1.80% 1.80% Brasil 1.31% 1.31% Mexico 0.61% 0.61% Chile 0.28% 0.28% Web only United States 0.24% 0.24% Costa Rica (*) 0.23% 0.23% Canada 0.21% 0.21% Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00% (*) Low Sample Colombia (*) 0.00% 0.00% Low accuracy For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 27 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  28. 28. America Trends North America trailing behind Europe Elsewhere, data based on low number of Web sites, needs to be taken in moderation (the restricted number of hosting providers can make figures jump several percentage points)Page 28 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  29. 29. Worldwide Trends We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation The figures are still very small There is a small decrease in percentage in some countries, which would point to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network) Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region.Page 29 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  30. 30. Future work / funding required Add more domains to be tested Add more features to be tested Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis Develop new data visualisation Perform further analysis Perform historical/time analysis from archives Develop an engine to write automated reports Duplicate Crawler to other regionsPage 30 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  31. 31. Thank you Contact: ISOC England – contact@isoc-e.org CTM InternationalPage 31 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×