IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary Dec 2011 Results - ICCA Pondicherry 31 Jan 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary Dec 2011 Results - ICCA Pondicherry 31 Jan 2012

on

  • 1,218 views

This is the Dec 2011 set of results from the IPv6 Matrix Project testing IPv6 connectivity of the World's 1 Million most popular Web Sites.

This is the Dec 2011 set of results from the IPv6 Matrix Project testing IPv6 connectivity of the World's 1 Million most popular Web Sites.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,218
Views on SlideShare
1,213
Embed Views
5

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
17
Comments
0

1 Embed 5

http://www.linkedin.com 5

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

IPv6 Matrix Exec Summary Dec 2011 Results - ICCA Pondicherry 31 Jan 2012 Presentation Transcript

  • 1. IPv6 Matrix Project Tracking IPv6 connectivity Worldwide http://www.ipv6matrix.org Dr. Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond – ocl@gih.com December 2011 Update for ICCA January 2012Page 1 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 2. We are running out of IP addresseshttp://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html When we reach this point, it will be too late since there will be no more “free” IPv4 addresses! Real time data collected September 2011Page 2 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 3. IPv6 Matrix Project ISOC England was awarded a Community Grants Programme award in November 2009 Design and implementation of an “IPv6 Crawler,” software on a computer that crawls through the DNS at regular intervals in order to detect and test: IPv6 DNS servers IPv6 compliant Web servers IPv6 compliant SMTP mailers IPv6 compliant NTP servers.Page 3 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 4. Project Rationale Today, more than 95% of Internet traffic is generated by a small number of data sources – i.e. the world’s busiest Web Sites Without IPv6 accessible content, IPv6 has no chance of being used - ever. Take the 1 Million most popular Web site list from alexa.com as a starting point for the domains to be tested. Add more domains later. Test them for IPv6 connectivity This is equivalent to testing about 6.3 million hosts worldwide Use GeoIP database to estimate real host locationPage 4 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 5. Project Teams London, UK: Project Management and support Hardware supply and installation Data Centre and IPv6 connectivity Nile University, Egypt: Software ProgrammingPage 5 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 6. Crawler (back end) Crawler Model Name (eth0) HP DL360p turtle.ipv6matrix.org ; crawler.ipv6matrix.org turtle.ipv6matrix.com ; crawler.ipv6matrix.com turtle.ipv6matrix.net ; crawler.ipv6matrix.net IPv4 address 212.124.204.162 / 100 Mb/s (eth0) / speed IPv6 address 2a00:19e8:20:1::a2 / 100 Mb/s (eth0) / speed Name (eth1) shell.ipv6matrix.org IPv4 address 194.33.63.250 / 1 Gb/s (GIH (eth1) / private address space) speed CPU 2 x Dual Core Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz RAM 4 Gb DDR2 SDRAM HD Storage 146 Gb hardware SATA 2-disk RAID (hot swappable) PSU 2 x hot-swappable redundant 535W. Operating CENTOS 5 Linux / updated SystemPage 6 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 7. Web Server (front end) Web Server Model Name (eth0) HP DL140 elephant.ipv6matrix.org ; www.ipv6matrix.org elephant.ipv6matrix.com ; www.ipv6matrix.com elephant.ipv6matrix.net ; www.ipv6matrix.net IPv4 address 212.124.204.170 / 100 Mb/s (eth0) / speed IPv6 address 2a00:19e8:20:1::aa / 100 Mb/s (eth0) / speed Name (eth1) tusk.ipv6matrix.org IPv4 address 194.33.63.251 / 1 Gb/s (GIH (eth1) / private address space) speed CPU 2 x Dual Core Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.40GHz RAM 4 Gb DDR2 SDRAM HD Storage 2 x 1 Tb fast SATA PSU Single 500W Operating System Ubuntu 4.4 Linux / updatedPage 7 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 8. Router Router Model CISCO 2811 Operating Advanced IP Services IOS System DRAM 64 Mb Ethernet Ports / 2 / 100 Mb/s speed Interface card / MN-16ESW 16 port / 100 speed Mb/sPage 8 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 9. Local NetworkPage 9 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 10. Software flowchartPage 10 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 11. Web Site StructurePage 11 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 12. www.ipv6matrix.org Web SitePage 12 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 13. What are we tracking? Host IPv6 penetration Using IPv4 Geo-location coordinates Includes generic TLD (gTLDs, .com, .net, .org) and country code ccTLDs Two types of information: Infrastructure: DNS + Web + E-mail + Time server (NTP) This tracks all of the infrastructure required to run IPv6 Web services Web sites only (actual content) This tracks the Web services themselves. Usually this percentage is lower than the figure for the infrastructurePage 13 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 14. What are we archiving? Everything that we are tracking on the previous page, plus: Testing of connectivity to the above services in case IPv6 addresses are advertised but no service runs on them Tracing of route from London Docklands to each one of these hosts both using IPv4 and IPv6 – and archiving all of this information in text format A lot more data, accessible from the Web site archive In April 2011, the size of this database in text format is approx 60Gb and continually increasing (the testing software runs 24/7)Page 14 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 15. Data Archives Selecting Data Archives provides a link to the detailed information Table. Click on “Search”, to go directly to the Top Level Domain, or scroll down to the desired Top Level Domain.Page 15 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 16. Data Archives Example Data in Data Archives (stop at date) Click on the “+” to the left of the Top Level Domain to gain access the sub-menu containing the dates of all the data runs, and so on, to reveal results. year-month-day__hour-min-secPage 16 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 17. Data Archives - results Click on the links to open a new window containing all of the detailed results formatted in a table.Page 17 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 18. Data Archives - results Basic IPv4/IPv6 connectivity table Domain penetration summary table Geographical IP database Type of IPv6 access (tunnels etc.) Trace path, hop count, MTU IPv4 & IPv6 Ping count IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse IPv4 and IPv6 SOA for Nameserver Service detection for SMTP, HTTP and HTTPs TLS detection for SMTPPage 18 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 19. Detailed Data for .AE Clicked on tcp80_WWW_ae: connection to http portPage 19 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 20. Using the filter Use the filter to select by Top Level Domain, or by type of service tested.Page 20 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 21. Results November-December 2011Page 21 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 22. Europe Data snapshot 1.56% 5.44% 2.02% 5.68%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure 6.86% 7.91%- DNS 4.47% 2.02% 5.58% 4.75% 2.13% 5.39%- Web 8.98% 2.86% 8.88% 5.48% 13.70% 0.88%- E-mail 2.29% 2.80% 4.06% 9.34% 6.44% 6.72% 4.00%- NTP 4.04% 3.53% 2.99% 2.71% 0.83% Low Sample 14.74% 10.92% Low accuracy 15.14% 11.83% 0.47% 0.60% 20.36% 9.97% 0.64% 0.58% 18.54%July 2011 9.82% 16.43% 10.72% 6.31% 16.26% 11.09%December 2011 6.14% 16.25% 16.66% 5.98% 2.69% 8.07% 2.41% 6.30% 2.67% 10.01% 2.33% 3.01% 4.34%Page 22 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 23. Europe Data snapshot 0.48% 2.50% 0.47% 2.60%IPv6 Host Penetration 0.26% Web only 0.51% 1.07% 0.94% 0.93% 0.99% 1.17% 0.94% 2.07% 0.64% 1.85% 1.68% 7.15% 2.19% 0.91% 0.71% 2.41% 1.68% 7.45% 0.86% 0.19% 0.19% 0.28% 2.47% 0.27% 0.95% Low Sample 0.87% 0.41% Low accuracy 1.00% 0.42% 0.32% 0.24% 26.58% 12.01% 0.32% 0.29% 26.70%July 2011 11.67% 12.48% 0.34%December 2011 8.16% 12.29% 0.48% 9.14% 4.08% 4.15% 0.77% 1.32% 3.71% 0.63% 0.85% 1.30% 4.00% 0.65% 1.71% 1.59%Page 23 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 24. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Moldova (*) 20.36% 18.54% -1.82% Switzerland 16.25% 16.66% 0.41% Slovakia 16.43% 16.26% -0.17% France 14.74% 15.14% 0.40% Finland 8.98% 13.70% 4.72% Ukraine 10.02% 11.83% 1.81% Slovenia 10.93% 11.33% 0.40% Poland 10.72% 11.09% 0.37% Czech Republic 8.07% 10.01% 1.94% Portugal 9.97% 9.82% -0.15% Netherlands 8.88% 9.34% 0.46% Denmark 6.86% 7.91% 1.05% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 7.66% 7.51% -0.15% Latvia 0.88% 6.72% 5.84% IPv6 Host Penetration Germany Austria 5.48% 5.98% 6.44% 6.30% 0.96% 0.32% Spain 6.31% 6.14% -0.17% Croatia 5.68% 5.83% 0.15% Norway 5.44% 5.68% 0.24% Infrastructure Estonia 5.58% 5.39% -0.19% Sweden 5.44% 4.75% -0.69% - DNS or Greece 3.91% 4.34% 0.43% Belgium 2.86% 4.06% 1.20% - Web or Lithuania 4.00% 4.04% 0.04% - E-mail or Macedonia 4.04% 3.33% -0.71% Luxembourg 3.21% 3.21% - NTP Serbia (*) 3.09% 3.06% -0.03% Ireland 2.29% 2.80% 0.51% United Kingdom 3.53% 2.71% -0.82% Italy 2.69% 2.67% -0.02% (*) Low Sample Hungary 2.41% 2.33% -0.08% Low accuracy Russia 2.02% 2.13% 0.11% Iceland 1.56% 2.02% 0.46% Belarus 2.99% 0.83% -2.16% Romania 0.60% 0.58% -0.02% Bulgaria 0.71% 0.50% -0.21%Page 24 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 25. Country WEB % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Moldova (*) 26.58% 23.70% -2.88% Slovakia 12.48% 12.29% -0.19% Portugal 12.01% 11.67% -0.34% Spain 8.16% 9.14% 0.98% Germany 7.15% 7.45% 0.30% Slovenia 3.96% 4.77% 0.81% Macedonia 5.43% 4.23% -1.20% Switzerland 4.08% 4.15% 0.07% Czech Republic 3.71% 4.00% 0.29% Norway 2.50% 2.60% 0.10% Belgium 1.85% 2.41% 0.56% Finland 2.07% 2.19% 0.12% Netherlands 1.68% 1.68% 0.00% Croatia 1.55% 1.63% 0.08% Greece 1.71% 1.59% -0.12% IPv6 Host Penetration Italy 1.32% 1.30% -0.02% Russia 0.94% 1.17% 0.23% France 0.87% 1.00% 0.13% Sweden 1.07% 0.99% -0.08% Web only Belarus 2.47% 0.95% -1.52% Estonia 0.93% 0.94% 0.01% Latvia 0.91% 0.86% -0.05% Austria 0.77% 0.85% 0.08% Ireland 0.64% 0.71% 0.07% Hungary 0.63% 0.65% 0.02% (*) Low Sample Denmark 0.26% 0.51% 0.25% Low accuracy Poland 0.34% 0.48% 0.14% Iceland 0.48% 0.47% -0.01% Ukraine 0.41% 0.42% 0.01% Romania 0.24% 0.29% 0.05% United Kingdom 0.28% 0.27% -0.01% Lithuania 0.19% 0.19% 0.00% Bulgaria 0.31% 0.16% -0.15% Bosnia and Herzegovina (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Serbia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Page 25 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 26. Europe Trends Many countries see a significant rise in infrastructure Likely to be caused by a main hosting provider, installing dual-stack Name-servers Slovakia & Portugal still leading with dual- stack Web sites Spain catching up. Country with largest number of dual stack Web sites in Europe: Germany IPv6 Day in June 2011 might have generated positive resultsPage 26 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 27. Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 2.02% 2.13% 15.89%Infrastructure 12.90%- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or 0.18% 1.69% 0.48% 0.20% 1.83%- NTP 0.50% 2.85% 0.30% 2.76% 0.22% 0.25% 0.54% 2.21% 1.87% 2.38% HK: 2.61% Low Sample 0.00% 2.21% 3.58% 0.00% 3.52% Low accuracy 0.65% 11.32% 1.92% 0.64% 11.94% 1.84% 3.03% 22.73%July 2011 3.12% 5.90% 22.73% 6.16% 1.23% 3.42% 0.10% 1.22% 4.22% 0.10% 3.80% 3.65%December 2011 3.47% 4.16% SG: 25.52% SG: 25.52%Page 27 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 28. Asia Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.94% 1.17% 4.29% 3.49% Web only 0.16% 0.23% 0.46% 0.15% 0.28% 0.38% 1.83% 0.30% 1.77% 0.14% 0.13% 0.14% 1.44% 0.48% 1.49% HK: 0.71% Low Sample 0.00% 0.38% 4.46% 0.00% 4.69% Low accuracy 0.69% 11.76% 3.70% 0.65% 11.21% 3.57% 3.03% 50.00%July 2011 3.12% 1.03% 50.00% 1.14% 1.23% 0.88% 0.11% 1.22% 1.24% 0.11% 0.99% 0.95%December 2011 0.91% 0.97% SG: 0.00% SG: 0.65%Page 28 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 29. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Singapore 25.52% 31.32% 5.80% Armenia (*) 15.89% 12.90% -2.99% Sri Lanka (*) 11.32% 11.94% 0.62% Indonesia 5.90% 6.16% 0.26% Malaysia 3.42% 4.22% 0.80% New Zealand 3.65% 4.16% 0.51% Philippines (*) 3.58% 3.52% -0.06% Australia 3.80% 3.47% -0.33% Oman (*) 3.03% 3.12% 0.09% IPv6 Host Penetration Saudi Arabia (*) 2.85% 2.76% -0.09% Hong Kong 2.61% Taiwan 2.21% 2.38% 0.17% Thailand 1.87% 2.21% 0.34% Infrastructure Russia 2.02% 2.13% 0.11% - DNS or Qatar (*) 1.92% 1.84% -0.08% - Web or Japan 1.69% 1.83% 0.14% Pakistan 1.23% 1.22% -0.01% - E-mail or United Arab Emirates (*) 0.65% 0.64% -0.01% - NTP India 0.22% 0.54% 0.32% Iran 0.48% 0.50% 0.02% South Korea 0.30% 0.25% -0.05% (*) Low Sample China 0.18% 0.20% 0.02% Low accuracy Vietnam (*) 0.10% 0.10% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Page 29 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 30. Country WEB % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Sri Lanka (*) 11.76% 11.21% -0.55% Philippines (*) 4.46% 4.69% 0.23% Qatar (*) 3.70% 3.57% -0.13% Armenia (*) 4.29% 3.49% -0.80% Oman (*) 3.03% 3.12% 0.09% Saudi Arabia (*) 1.83% 1.77% -0.06% Taiwan 1.44% 1.49% 0.05% Malaysia 0.88% 1.24% 0.36% Pakistan 1.23% 1.22% -0.01%IPv6 Host Penetration Russia 0.94% 1.17% 0.23% Indonesia 1.03% 1.14% 0.11% New Zealand 0.95% 0.97% 0.02% Australia 0.99% 0.91% -0.08% Hong Kong 0.71% 0.71% Web only United Arab Emirates (*) 0.69% 0.65% -0.04% Singapore 0.00% 0.65% 0.65% Thailand 0.48% 0.38% -0.10% Iran 0.46% 0.38% -0.08% (*) Low Sample Japan 0.23% 0.28% 0.05% Low accuracy China 0.16% 0.15% -0.01% India 0.14% 0.14% 0.00% South Korea 0.30% 0.13% -0.17% Vietnam (*) 0.11% 0.11% 0.00% Kuwait (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Page 30 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 31. Asia Trends Singapore still leading by far in infrastructure but trailing in dual-stack Web Site content China results abnormally very low – content not dual stacked or IPv6 behind firewall? India also low both in infrastructure and most popular Web sites with dual stack Less reliability of results due to smaller sample size in many countries of the regionPage 31 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 32. Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 36.24% 36.61%Infrastructure- DNS or- Web or- E-mail or- NTP 16.67% 9.52% 6.64% 7.42% Low Sample 10.20% Low accuracy 10.20%July 2011December 2011 0.84% 0.96%Page 32 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 33. Africa Data snapshotIPv6 Host Penetration 0.00% 0.00% Web only 10.00% 10.00% 2.63% 2.78% Low Sample 14.29% Low accuracy 14.29%July 2011December 2011 0.33% 0.41%Page 33 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 34. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Tunisia (*) 36.24% 36.61% 0.37% IPv6 Host Penetration Tanzania (*) 10.20% 10.20% 0.00% Senegal (*) 16.67% 9.52% -7.15% Infrastructure Kenya (*) 6.64% 7.42% 0.78% - DNS or South Africa 0.84% 0.96% 0.12% - Web or - E-mail or - NTP The small number of hosts tested make the results for most of Africa appear higher than they really are (*) Low Sample Low accuracyPage 34 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 35. Country WEB % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Tanzania (*) 14.29% 14.29% 0.00% IPv6 Host Penetration Senegal (*) 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% Kenya (*) 2.63% 2.78% 0.15% South Africa 0.33% 0.41% 0.08% Web only Tunisia (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% (*) Low Sample The small number of hosts tested make the results Low accuracy for most of Africa appear higher than they really arePage 35 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 36. Africa Trends Very few countries with IPv6 connectivity Dual Stack Islands starting to appear Can be compared with the growth of Internet connectivity in the ninetiesPage 36 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 37. Compare Historical data on African Internet Connectivity June 1994 May 1997 Source: Internetology - http://www.nsrc.org/codes/bymap/ntlgy/ntlgy.htmPage 37 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 38. North/South America 2.22% 2.42%IPv6 Host PenetrationInfrastructure 4.79% 3.12% 5.81% 3.57%- DNS or PR: 6.25% PR: 7.14%- Web or 0.56% 4.27%- E-mail or 0.53% 4.05%- NTP 100.00% 100.00% Low Sample 0.84% 1.93% 0.93% 2.32% Low accuracy 2.45% 3.70%July 2011 0.30% 0.30% 0.00% 5.33%December 2011 2.63% 0.48% 5.41% 0.49% 0.56% 0.57%Page 38 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 39. North/South America 0.34% 0.54%IPv6 Host Penetration Web only 0.26% 0.19% PR: 6.25% PR: 7.14% 0.97% 1.79% 0.86% 1.85% 0.00% 0.00% Low Sample 0.23% 1.34% 0.29% 1.36% Low accuracy 1.80%July 2011 6.38% 0.31% 0.31% 0.49% 5.11%December 2011 0.00% 0.24% 2.68% 2.44% 0.54% 0.56%Page 39 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 40. Country DNS+WEB+E-mail+NTP % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Guatemala (*) 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% Puerto Rico (*) 6.25% 7.24% 0.99% United States 4.79% 5.81% 1.02% Uruguay (*) 5.33% 5.41% 0.08% Venezuela (*) 4.27% 4.05% -0.22% Ecuador (*) 2.45% 3.70% 1.25% IPv6 Host Penetration Cuba (*) 3.12% 3.57% 0.45% Peru (*) 0.00% 2.63% 2.63% Canada 2.22% 2.42% 0.20% Infrastructure Brasil 1.93% 2.32% 0.39% - DNS or Panama (*) 0.84% 0.93% 0.09% - Web or Chile 0.56% 0.57% 0.01% - E-mail or Mexico 0.56% 0.53% -0.03% - NTP Argentina 0.48% 0.49% 0.01% Colombia (*) 0.30% 0.30% 0.00% (*) Low Sample Low accuracy For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 40 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 41. Country WEB % change July 2011 Dec 2011 Puerto Rico (*) 6.25% 7.14% 0.89% Ecuador (*) 1.80% 6.38% 4.58% Uruguay (*) 2.68% 2.68% 0.00% Peru (*) 0.00% 2.44% 2.44% Venezuela (*) 1.79% 1.85% 0.06% Brasil 1.34% 1.36% 0.02% IPv6 Host Penetration Mexico 0.97% 0.86% -0.11% Chile 0.54% 0.56% 0.02% Canada 0.34% 0.54% 0.20% Web only Colombia (*) 0.31% 0.31% 0.00% Panama (*) 0.23% 0.29% 0.06% Argentina 0.28% 0.24% -0.04% United States 0.26% 0.19% -0.07% (*) Low Sample Guatemala (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Low accuracy Cuba (*) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% For (*) the small number of hosts tested make the results in many countries appear higher than they really arePage 41 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 42. America Trends USA leads in infrastructure but low on dual Stack Web site. Results of IPv6 Day on infrastructure itself? Brazil leading in Latin America Low percentage of IPv6 Web Sites across the region shows little impact of IPv6 day (June 8) Elsewhere, data based on low number of Web sites, needs to be taken in moderation (the restricted number of hosting providers can make figures jump several percentage points)Page 42 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 43. Worldwide Trends We are seeing a slow growth in dual stack IPv4-IPv6 implementation The June 8th IPv6 Day appears to have had more impact in several European Countries than elsewhere A decrease in percentage in some countries, points to unstable peering agreements (the IPv6 network is less closely meshed than the IPv4 network) Bearing in mind the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Registry has run out of IPv4 addresses, it is alarming to see so few Web sites up and running IPv6 in that region, especially in countries where Internet growth is high, such as in India.Page 43 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 44. Problems / Possible Errors Lots of errors in the DNS – commas, no A, no AAAA record, looping MX, etc. Firewalls and security software: Blocking of network segments detecting denial of service attack (DoS) by error: • Unusual UDP traffic. Trace-path / ping, SMTP, HTTP, Secure HTTP, NTP port testing. Internet snapshot from one location only Less accurate results with small input data size (small number of domains tested) Disputed accuracy of Geographical IP databasePage 44 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 45. Example: fake IPv6 AAAA record Country specific results? /P2 These “ipv6” addresses are AAAA records which pretend to denote an IPv6 address, (examples from the report / finding but are actually IPv4 addresses. errors etc.) There are plenty of examples of such mis- configuration in the DNS. Worse problems are caused by commas in domain names, ie. www.domain,com as well as IP addresses returning localhost 127.0.0.1 or ::1 etc. Comma! Perform a search for ipv6 field starting with ::ffffPage 45 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 46. Machine readable output Command directly to SQL databasehttp://www.ipv6matrix.org:4444/getTable?crawl=2010-07-18_12-24-48&tld=com&table=WWW_com It is therefore possible to use an entirely new user interface with the back end databasePage 46 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 47. Future work / funding required Add more domains to be tested Add more features to be tested Current front end Web Pages are only an example of possible analysis Develop new data visualisation Perform further analysis Perform historical/time analysis from archives Develop an engine to write automated reports Duplicate Crawler to other regionsPage 47 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 48. World IPv6 Launch Major Internet service providers (ISPs), home networking equipment manufacturers, and web companies around the world are coming together to permanently enable IPv6 for their products and services. Target: 6 June 2012 http://www.worldipv6launch.orgPage 48 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org
  • 49. Thank you Contact: ISOC England – contact@isoc-e.org CTM InternationalPage 49 IPv6 Matrix Project - http://www.ipv6matrix.org