• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
E2 quality assurance ocasi performance management 2012
 

E2 quality assurance ocasi performance management 2012

on

  • 786 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
786
Views on SlideShare
705
Embed Views
81

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0

1 Embed 81

http://pdconference.ocasi.org 81

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • About CIT Partners 211 Launch – June 2002 Very successful – quarter of a million calls National vision

E2 quality assurance ocasi performance management 2012 E2 quality assurance ocasi performance management 2012 Presentation Transcript

  • Welcome to the Session on Quality Assurance,Program Evaluation and Performance Managementin Settlement Services – OCASI Conference June 2012Faed HendryManager – Training and OutreachFindhelp Information Services543 Richmond Street West Suite 125Toronto, Ontariofhendry@findhelp.ca416-392-4544
  • Session Learning Objectives  To identify and apply resources and tools to effectively enable settlement services to evaluate the quality of both their services and staff.  To briefly discuss the Modernized Approach to Settlement work and how to measure outcomes.  To identify strategies for performance management including setting objectives, assessing progress and providing on-going coaching and feedback.
  • What is all of this? Accountability Quality Assurance Evaluation ProgramModernized Client Satisfaction Service LevelsApproach Logic Models Metrics SMART Objectives Standards Key Performance Indicators C o a c h in g Outcome Measurement Performance Management
  • What we Know The Settlement Program is an outcome-based program. The logic model identifies both: outcomes to achieve, and settlement activities (streams) to achieve outcomes. Results in terms of outcomes, outputs, and financial resources will be gathered and monitored to ensure activities continue to achieve expected results and link services to specific settlement outcomes.
  • …using a suite of services that can From a suite of programs… … to a single program… be combined to achieve results The Settlement Program An outcome-based programLanguage Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) Needs Assessment and Referrals A. Orientation – Newcomers make informed decisions about their settlement and understand life in Canada Information & Awareness Services B. Language/Skills – Newcomers have language/skills needed to function in Canada Language Learning & Skills DevelopmentImmigrant Settlement and Adaptation Program C. Labour Market Access – Newcomers obtain the required (ISAP) assistance to find employment commensurate with their skills and Employment-Related Services education D. Welcoming Communities – Newcomers receive help to establish Community Connections social and professional networks so they are engaged and feel welcomed in their communities Support Services E. Policy and Program Development - To ensure effective delivery and achieve comparable settlement outcomes across Canada Host Program (Host)
  • The Modernized Approach The Modernized Approach is outcome-based aimed at supporting newcomers in their settlement by providing:  the information they need to better understand life in Canada and make informed decisions about their settlement experience;  language training so they have the language skills to function in Canada;  the required assistance to find employment that corresponds with their skills and education; and  the help to establish networks and contacts so they are engaged and feel welcomed in their communities.
  • What is a Customer Service Culture?• A customer service culture in a settlement agency exists where services are planned and delivered in ways that maximize positive impressions and outcomes for clients• Customer satisfaction is a measure of the degree to which a product or a service meets the customer’s expectation.• It involves responding promptly and accurately to client requests in such a way that each client feels valued, respected, and understood.• A settlement service should be conceived and executed from the outside-in – not inside-out approach.
  • Customer service culture exists where: • staff care to know what results they produce • those results relate to client expectations • A strong customer service culture should be reflected in your mission, vision, values, strategic plan, policies and procedures, performance management system and your training and orientation
  • Five Drivers of Satisfaction The five “drivers of satisfaction” are the elements that most strongly influence citizens’ perceptions of service quality across the many services provided by government and SPO’s including settlement agencies. 3) Timeliness 4) Knowledge/Competence 5) Courtesy/Comfort 6) Fairness 7) Outcome
  • Mission, Vision and Values in a Customer Service Culture • Client service cultures exist where organizational mission, vision, values and systems support behaviours that improve their capability to serve clients. Effective organizations identify and develop clear, concise work values that inform and impact every aspect of their organization. • All agencies have a mission, vision and values and a charter of expectations, all of which contribute to its organizational culture
  • What’s Yours? Write down your organizations mission statement? Write down your organizations values?
  • Examples Our Mission We provide learning and training opportunities for immigrants and refugees to access and fully participate in the workplace and wider community. Our Vision We envision a Canada where every immigrant succeeds. Values Cultural Diversity, Integrity, Compassion, Solidarity
  • So what now? How well are your settlement staff performing? How do you know if your staff are performing well? How do you measure outcomes? How do you evaluate the knowledge, skills and attitudes of your settlement workers? What systems do you have in place to assess performance?
  • Examples of Outcomes for Settlement Programs Clients have timely, useful and accurate information needed to make informed settlement decisions Clients understand life in Canada including laws, rights, responsibilities and how to access community resources Clients have the official language skills needed to function in Canadian society Clients have knowledge of the Canadian work environment and are connected to local labour markets Clients have the skills to find and apply for employment Clients are connected to the broader community and social networks
  • Examples of Possible Indicators % of clients who report that they received information which helped them learn more about Canadian laws, community resources, life and culture. % of clients who report that they have the language ability and skills needed to participate socially, culturally and economically in Canada. % of clients should report that they are connected to local labour markets, have knowledge of the Canadian workplace, and have the skills to find and apply for employment % of clients who report that they feel connected to the broader community and social networks
  • Quality Assurance A system of procedures, checks, audits and corrective actions that are undertaken to ensure that an organization’s products and services meet the expectations and needs of the people they serve. For information and referral programs, quality assurance relates to compliance with the Standards for Professional Information and Referral.
  • Program Evaluation The systematic process of reviewing services provided by an organization in relation to its objectives and standards to assess how well the program is working, and to identify ways to improve overall operation of the individual I&R or settlement service. Program evaluations may conducted by experts external to the program, either inside or outside the agency, or by program managers.
  • Performance Management Performance management is the process of creating a work environment or setting in which people are enabled to perform to the best of their abilities. The Performance Management process provides employees and managers with the tools and support to plan, manage and evaluate performance.
  • Discussion Working in small groups with staff from different organizations, discuss what systems you have in place at your settlement agency to monitor: • Quality Assurance • Program Evaluation • Performance Management
  • Performance ManagementBefore you embark on the development of an effective performance management system, you should take a moment to consider whether or not your organization has HR management practices in place to support the performance management process. These include: * Well designed jobs and written job descriptions * Effective supervision * Comprehensive employee orientation and training * A positive and supportive work environment
  • An Effective Performance Management System will:  Be job specific, covering a broad range of jobs in the organization  Align with your organization’s strategic direction and culture  Be practical and easy to understand and use  Provide an accurate picture of each employee’s performance  Include a collaborative process for setting goals and reviewing performance based on two-way communication between the employee and manager
  • An Effective Performance Management System will: Monitor and measure results (what) and behaviors (how) Provide constructive and continuous feedback on performance Provide training and development opportunities for improving performance Establish clear communication between managers and employees about what they are expected to accomplish
  • Critical Considerations  Effective performance management system requires dedicated time and resources.  It is critical that you communicate the purpose and the steps in the performance management process to employees before it is implemented.  Management support to act upon the outcomes of the performance management process is also necessary to ensure that good performance is recognized and inadequate performance is effectively handled.
  • Performance Management and Program Integrity
  • Step 1: Plan The planning phase is a collaborative effort involving both managers and employees during which they will:  Identify, clarify and agree upon expectations.  Agree upon how results will be measured  Agree on monitoring process  Document the plan
  • Setting Objectives and Measurements Often the most difficult part of the planning phase is finding appropriate and clear language to describe the performance objectives and measures or indicators of success. Settlement Program Managers need to ensure that the objectives are a good representation of the full range of duties carried out by settlement workers.
  • Objectives should be SMART  Specific  Measurable  Attainable  Realistic  Time-Bound
  • SMART ObjectivesSpecific – Be clear and unambiguous, avoid general statements, focus on specific accomplishments that you want to achieve and focus on end result.Measurable – Agree on how objective will measuredAchievable – Does the employee have the necessary skills, abilities, tools and resources?Relevant – Does the goal move the organization towards the vision/mission?Timely – When do results need to be achieved?
  • Exercise: Writing SMART Objectives Please break up into small groups, 2 to 4 people. Please discuss and write down a couple of SMART objectives for some of your specific programs. Examples: Increase the number of JSW by 25% in 2012 with a satisfaction rate of 90%. To answer 85% of our calls within 30 seconds and achieve an abandonment rate of less than 10% in the month of June.
  • Set Goals and Define Expectations • Goals must be determined before expectations can be set and expectations have to be set before a settlement worker can be held accountable for meeting them. • In performance management terms, the expectation is the minimal acceptable performance level and a goal is some point beyond the expectation that the manager and the settlement worker have agreed to target. • These goals should be defined with corporate and business unit objectives in mind and then be defined down to the individual behaviours that you want to see demonstrated by the settlement worker.
  • Guidelines for Defining Performance Measures Quantity (how many clients served, number of JSW workshops) Quality (accuracy or error rate, level of client satisfaction) Timeliness (completion dates, time spent) Cost (how are finances affected by work performed) Behaviours (do behaviours reflect organizational values)
  • What are Performance Expectations? Performance Expectations = Results + Actions & Behaviours  What goods and services should the settlement workers job produce?  What impact should the work have on the organization?  How do you expect settlement staff to act with clients, colleagues, and supervisors?  What are the organizational values the employee must demonstrate?
  • Performance Dimensions Performance dimensions are the range of behaviours employees must exhibit to successfully meet or exceed job expectations and help answer the question: “How does someone act and/or behave when s/he does the job well?” Examples include: • Customer Service Orientation • Teamwork • Valuing Diversity • Assessment and Problem-Solving Abilities • Interpersonal Skills • Fostering a Safe and Secure Environment
  • What is a valid measure of good client service? If the measure used only considers the number of clients served (i.e. quantity), then the quality of service or how well it was done is not captured. To assess quality of information provided, the supervisor could do spot checks to listen to or look at the information that the employee provides to clients. The supervisor would then assess accuracy and completeness of the information.
  • Step 2: Monitor For a performance management system to be effective, employee progress and performance must be continuously monitored.  Assess progress towards meeting performance objectives  Identify any barriers that may prevent the employee from accomplishing performance objectives and what needs to be done to overcome them  Share feedback on progress relative to the goals
  • Effective Monitoring Monitoring includes coaching settlement staff to address concerns and issues related to performance. The main purpose of constructive feedback is to help people understand where they stand in relation to expected and/or productive job and workplace behaviour. Feedback should be provided frequently and not just at performance appraisal time.
  • Performance Coaching • Performance coaching is a role and expectation of the Settlement Program Manager. • Coaching is a process that enables learning and development to occur and thus performance to improve. It should be done with all settlement workers, not just the ones that may be struggling or require additional support. • Performance coaching involves setting clear expectations for the settlement worker.
  • Some Suggestions for Providing Feedback • Effective feedback always focuses on a specific behaviour, not on a person or their intentions. • Successful feedback describes actions or behaviour that the individual can do something about. • Use a soft entry • The best feedback is straightforward and simple • Effective feedback needs to be well-timed • Reach agreement about what the individual will do to change his or her behaviour
  • Step 3: Review The performance assessment or appraisal meeting is an opportunity to review, summarize and highlight the employee’s performance over the course of the review period. Self-assessment is a standard part of most performance appraisals. Managers should review their performance management notes and documentation generated throughout the year in order to more effectively assess the employee’s performance.
  • Important – An Appeal ProcessEven with a well-designed and implemented performance management process, there may be situations when an employee has a serious difference of opinion with the manager about his or her performance assessment. A procedure for the employee to discuss disagreement with the process should be established. This can include: Step Review System Peer Review System Ombudsperson
  • Common Errors and Rating Bias When a person evaluates someone else, his or her evaluation reflects both the person being assessed and the evaluators built in biases. Managers should be aware of their possible evaluation biases, so they can try to eliminate them from the assessment process. Common biases may include:  Halo  Horns  Central Tendency  Leniency bias / Strictness bias  Same-as-me
  • Questions? Thank you for attending this session! Faed Hendry Manager – Training and Outreach Findhelp Information Services 543 Richmond Street West Ste 125 Toronto, Ontario M5V 1Y6 416-392-4544 fhendry@findhelp.ca Enjoy the rest of the Conference!