Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness  in new teachers for nyu
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Developing teacher quality and effectiveness in new teachers for nyu

1,475

Published on

Mary Diez's presentation from the February 24 Education Policy Breakfast at NYU's Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development

Mary Diez's presentation from the February 24 Education Policy Breakfast at NYU's Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development

Published in: Education
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,475
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
65
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The other two areTechnology—investing in and assuming that the wonders of the digital world will carry the day vs.. instructionFragmented strategies –vs. integrated or systemic strategies
  • Transcript

    • 1. Developing Teacher Quality andEffectiveness in New Teachers MARY E. DIEZ, PH.D. DEAN, SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ALVERNO COLLEGE
    • 2. Assumptions A vision of teaching guides descriptions of quality practice Teacher quality and effectiveness builds developmentally over the professional life span Effectiveness is best measured using multiple sources of data
    • 3. How clear are we on the vision of teaching and teacher quality? Black box story  Institution with excellent results on standardized test scores of the students of their graduates  Explanation: Success comes from  admitting students after they’ve completed the content major  having a 5 year program  teachers graduating with a master’s degree
    • 4. How clear are we on the vision of teaching and teacher quality? Alverno story  Institution consistently identified as producing strong teachers who persist in the profession (85% still teaching after 5 years, a great percentage in urban schools) and have a positive impact on learners and school cultures  Studies: Zeichner for NCTAF, US D.O.E., Levine, Edutopia  Explanation: Success comes from  being clear about outcomes (grounded in the work of teaching)  using performance assessments that come ever closer to the performance of the outcomes  implementing a pedagogically developmental curriculum  using feedback and self assessment across the program
    • 5. A vision of teaching guides descriptions of quality practice What are expectations for high quality, effective beginning practice? InTASC Standards 2011  Changes from 1992 standards  Four categories of standards  The Learner and Learning  Content and Application of Content  Instructional Practice  Professional Responsibility
    • 6. Sample standards The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision making.
    • 7. How do we build for beginning teacher quality and effectiveness? What are developmental paths for high quality, effective beginning practice? (Change Magazine article) Three metaphors for current teacher preparation  Survivor  Emphasis on dynamic personality traits/focus on practice,  Armchair Tourist  Emphasis on prior academic achievement/focus on theory  Expeditionary Learning  Emphasis on development—both academics and dispositions/ integrated approach to theory and practice
    • 8. How do we build for ongoing development of teacher quality and effectiveness? InTASC developmental rubrics to guide professional development  Following principles for good professional development  Accompanied by suggestions for the kinds of experiences that can help teachers develop across the professional lifespan  Enhanced by videos of practice – classroom, teacher team meeting, teacher reflection
    • 9. And… And…Using data from multiple The teacher uses and/or designs The teacher uses formativetypes of assessments, the a variety of classroom formative classroom assessments toteacher draws conclusions assessments, matching the maximize the development ofabout student progress method with the type of knowledge, critical thinking, andtoward learning objectives learning objectives. S/he problem solving skills embedded inand uses this analysis to provides students with multiple learning objectives.inform instruction to meet ways to demonstratelearner needs. performance using The teacher works individually and contemporary tools and with colleagues to gatherS/he keeps digital and/or resources. additional data needed to betterother records to support understand what is affectinghis/her analysis and The teacher uses data to guide learner progress and to advocatereporting of learner the design of differentiated for necessary change. S/he worksprogress. learning experiences. with colleagues to analyze progress against standards and expand theThe teacher participates in S/he works with colleagues to range of supports for students withcollegial conversations to analyze performance across varied instructional needs.improve individual and groups of learners and engagescollective instructional in joint development of S/he joins with others to usepractice based on the strategies for improving assessment information toassessment data. instruction and support. evaluate the effectiveness of curriculum and instruction.
    • 10. How do we build for ongoing development of teacher quality and effectiveness? Lessons from the MET study  If most teachers are not reaching the kind of teaching practice described by the upper levels of the measures Two of Fullan’s ―Wrong Drivers‖  Accountability–using test results and teacher appraisal to reward or punish teachers and schools vs. capacity building  Individual teacher and leadership quality—promoting individual vs. group solutions Fullan’s Criteria for Effective Drivers  Foster intrinsic motivation of teachers and students  Engage educators and students in continuous improvement of instruction and learning  Inspire collective team work  Affect all teachers and students
    • 11. How do we best measure teacher quality and effectiveness? For readiness to enter practice  Current practice varies widely  No clear best practice in measurement Teacher Performance Assessment Consortium Model  Embedded signature assessments  Teacher Performance Assessment  Validity/reliability studies show strong evidence of trustworthiness
    • 12. How do we best measure teacher quality and effectiveness? What combination for initial practice?  Value added scores of students  TPA  Teacher observations, documentation, reflections  Other data (InTASC suggestions): Observations or records of team meetings, planning documents, samples of student work For advanced practice  Value added scores of students  National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Assessments  Teacher observations, documentation, reflections  Other data (see InTASC suggestions)
    • 13. Areas of controversy Selection as the primary determiner of quality: Are good teachers born or developed?  Current research  Implications for policy and practice Appropriateness of measures of learning: Do standardized tests tell the whole story?  Implications for policy and practice Conceptualization of teaching as simple or complex: what is quality teaching?  Implications for policy regarding evaluation tools
    • 14. Relook at central question How do we develop teacher quality and effectiveness in new teachers?  Who should teach and how best recruit them into teaching?  What are expectations for high quality, effective beginning practice?  What are developmental paths to readiness for high quality, effective beginning practice?  What are supports for continuing development in teaching quality?
    • 15. Resources Diez, M.E., Athanasiou, N., & Pointer Mace, D. (2010). Expeditionary learning: The Alverno College teacher education model. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, November/December 2010, 18-24. Edutopia. (2007). Ten leading schools silence the critics: Innovative teacher prep. www.edschools.org/teacher_report.htm Fullan, M. (2011) Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Centre for Strategic Education. Gathering Feedback for Teaching (2011). MET Project Policy and Practice Brief. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards: A Resource for State Dialogue. Washington, D.C. : Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, D.C.: The Education Schools Project. Zeichner, K. (2000). Ability-based teacher education: Elementary teacher education at Alverno College. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation in the undergraduate years. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and the National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.

    ×