Student Reassignment Committee Meeting - June 12,2012

835
-1

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
835
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Student Reassignment Committee Meeting - June 12,2012

  1. 1. STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Media Center, Nash Central High School Tuesday, June 12, 2012 - 6:00 pm Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller, OREd Report to School Board 6/25/12 Questions? Next Meeting Scenario Review and Revision (continued) Monday, June 25, 2012 4:00 pm 3
  2. 2. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
  3. 3. Jan-Aug 2012 Aug - 2012 Aug – Dec 2012 August 2013 Committee Committee Public Input/ Community Deliberations/ Recommendations Engagement ImplementationMonthly Reports to Presented to the the School Board School Board Board of Education Approval 5
  4. 4. Board of Public Engagement Education Committee Chairs Technical SupportCommunity Feedback Committee ORED Staff 6
  5. 5. Contiguous boundaries:  Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite attendance areas.Respect neighborhoods:  Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified “developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.Proximity to schools:  While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries. 7
  6. 6. Modify feeder systems:  In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.Stay within enrollment capacities:  Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.Consider anticipated growth:  Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.Enrollment balance:  In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and economic populations at each middle and high school. 8
  7. 7.  February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.) June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.) June 25 – Final Scenario Presentation 9
  8. 8.  Transparent Lines of Communications Committee Meetings  Open to the public Website  Information posted immediately after each meeting E-mail/ Phone Line  An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.  A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
  9. 9. Mike Miller, OREd 11
  10. 10.  Revisiting Optimal HS Scenario  Scenario HS 02  Lessen reassignment impact  Consider student balance metrics Guidance from BoE on Middle School feeders  Consider feeder patterns for 5 MS vs. 6 MS  Scenarios ready for June 25 meeting 12
  11. 11. Factors to Consider: Reassignment impact Student balance metrics Provide relief for Southern Nash HS Fill Rocky Mount HS Proximity System-wide HS utilization = 100% 13
  12. 12. Assignment Change Considerations: Current assignment Balance metrics Contiguity Transportation issues Natural/man-made barriers Capacity 14
  13. 13. 9-12 Student Count 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern NashCURRENT 1232 1204 1130 1232IMPACT + METRICS 1130 1233 1393 1042 (See data tables in handout.)
  14. 14. Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of specialprograms such as IB. Utilization 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 107% 105% 81% 115% IMPACT + METRICS 98% 107% 100% 98% Minority % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 67% 69% 84% 51% IMPACT + METRICS 66% 59% 87% 53%
  15. 15. Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of specialprograms such as IB. Free/Reduced Lunch % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 67% 65% 72% 64% IMPACT + METRICS 65% 57% 76% 67% Academic Proficiency % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 60% 61% 53% 63% IMPACT + METRICS 57% 69% 52% 62%
  16. 16.  Maximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently 105%) Minimum Utilization: 98% Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 745
  17. 17. CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1 19
  18. 18. 6-8 MSHigh School Middle School Utilization count capacityNorthern Red Oak 885 850 104% (currently 113%)Central Central 907 670 135% (currently 90%) Parker, Edwards,Rocky Mount 1066 2134 50% (currently 54%) * NEW *Southern Southern 946 850 111% (currently 127%) * RM MS calculations include current RMHS facility, capacity = 750
  19. 19.  Optimal High Scenario HS 02  Lessen reassignment impact  Consider student balance metrics Scenario HS 02 - Revision 1  Scenario data + map  Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 745 Middle Schools: Clean Feeders  Severe utilization imbalance between Central MS and Rocky Mount area MS 21
  20. 20.  July, August Meeting Dates Explore Middle School Feeder Options 22
  21. 21. February 13 – (4:00-5:30)* March 26 (6:00) April 30 (6:00) May 29 (6:00) June 12 (6:00)Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30)* July/August - TBD
  22. 22. QUESTIONS
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×