STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING              Media Center, Nash Central High School                 Monday, June 25...
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
Jan-Aug 2012         Aug - 2012         Aug – Dec 2012            August 2013    Committee           Committee        Publ...
Board of             Public Engagement            Education            Committee Chairs                               Tech...
Contiguous boundaries:   Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using    satellite attendance areas.R...
Modify feeder systems:   In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each    site,...
 February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data April 30 – Sce...
 Transparent Lines of Communications Committee Meetings   Open to the public Website   Information posted immediatel...
Mike Miller, OREd                    11
 Middle School Scenarios   Clean feeder to HS   Based on Scenario HS 02, Rev. 1   Parker as 6th grade center for RM sc...
   Free/Reduced Lunch – percentage of impacted population    eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch . Data supplied in aggreg...
   Metrics measure current student    demographics by residence.   Metrics are used as planning tool for    demographic ...
 IMPACT + FEEDER Maximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently 105%) Minimum Utilization: 98% Total Grade 9-12 students r...
CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL   HIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1                                                            16
6-8 Student Count               1200               1000               800               600                400            ...
Utilization                          140%                          120%                          100%                     ...
Free/Reduced Lunch %                            100%                             90%                             80%      ...
 Maximum Utilization: 111% (SNMS, currently 129%) Minimum Utilization: 50%           (Parker, MS 04 Rev.1, currently 78%...
CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL   MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 03, REV. 1                                                              ...
CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL   MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 04, REV. 1                                                              ...
K-5 Student Count                       1200                       1000                        800                        ...
Utilization                        120%                        100%                         80%                         60...
Free/Reduced Lunch %                      100%                       90%                       80%                       7...
 Maximum Utilization: 104% (Coopers, currently 104%) Minimum Utilization: 79% (Johnson, currently 83%) Total Grade K-5 ...
CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL   ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 01, REV.2                                                       ...
 Middle School Scenarios: Impact + Metrics   5 MS feeding 4 HS   Scenario MS 03, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center for ...
29
February 13 (4:00-5:30)     March 26 (6:00)      April 30 (6:00)      May 29 (6:00)      June 12 (6:00)Tuesday June 25 (4:...
QUESTIONS
Reassignment Committee Meeting   June 25, 2012
Reassignment Committee Meeting   June 25, 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Reassignment Committee Meeting June 25, 2012

672

Published on

Published in: Education, Spiritual
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
672
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Reassignment Committee Meeting June 25, 2012

  1. 1. STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Media Center, Nash Central High School Monday, June 25, 2012 - 4:00 pm Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant Approval of Minutes from the May 29, 2012 & June 12, 2012 Meetings Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller, OREd Report to School Board 8/6/12 Questions? Next Meeting Scenario Discussion July 17, 2012 6:00 pm 3
  2. 2. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
  3. 3. Jan-Aug 2012 Aug - 2012 Aug – Dec 2012 August 2013 Committee Committee Public Input/ Community Deliberations/ Recommendations Engagement ImplementationMonthly Reports to Presented to the the School Board School Board Board of Education Approval 5
  4. 4. Board of Public Engagement Education Committee Chairs Technical SupportCommunity Feedback Committee ORED Staff 6
  5. 5. Contiguous boundaries:  Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite attendance areas.Respect neighborhoods:  Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified “developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.Proximity to schools:  While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries. 7
  6. 6. Modify feeder systems:  In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.Stay within enrollment capacities:  Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.Consider anticipated growth:  Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.Enrollment balance:  In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and economic populations at each middle and high school. 8
  7. 7.  February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.) June 12 – Scenario Review and Revision (cont.) June 25 – Final (?) Scenario Presentation 9
  8. 8.  Transparent Lines of Communications Committee Meetings  Open to the public Website  Information posted immediately after each meeting E-mail/ Phone Line  An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.  A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
  9. 9. Mike Miller, OREd 11
  10. 10.  Middle School Scenarios  Clean feeder to HS  Based on Scenario HS 02, Rev. 1  Parker as 6th grade center for RM school(s)  2 options Elementary School Scenario  Minor adjustments to current zones  Informed by optimal scenario ES 01 (Proximity + Utilization)  Relief for Benvenue (currently at 111%) 12
  11. 11.  Free/Reduced Lunch – percentage of impacted population eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch . Data supplied in aggregate form by NRMPS, calculated across K-12. Academic Proficiency – percentage of impacted population scoring Proficient in both Reading and Math. Data supplied by NRMPS, calculated across grades 3-8. Minority – percentage of non-white impacted population . Data obtained from NCWISE download, calculated by level (E/M/H) Data represented in aggregate form only as percentage of school population. 13
  12. 12.  Metrics measure current student demographics by residence. Metrics are used as planning tool for demographic balance. Metrics are not intended as a forecast of future school demographics/performance. 14
  13. 13.  IMPACT + FEEDER Maximum Utilization: 107% (NNHS, currently 105%) Minimum Utilization: 98% Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 736
  14. 14. CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL SCENARIO HS 02 – REV. 1 16
  15. 15. 6-8 Student Count 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Southern NEW MS (RM Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Nash HS site)CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0IMPACT + METRICS (MS 448 614 483 885 946 428 03, Rev. 1)IMPACT + METRICS (MS 558 614 279 885 946 522 04, Rev. 1) (See data tables in handout.)
  16. 16. Utilization 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% NEW MS (RM Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash HS site)CURRENT 88% 94% 78% 107% 129% 0%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 60% 92% 87% 104% 111% 57%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 74% 92% 50% 104% 111% 70% Minority % 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% NEW MS (RM Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash HS site)CURRENT 78% 67% 88% 59% 51% 0%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 76% 50% 86% 56% 54% 96%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 80% 50% 89% 56% 54% 89%
  17. 17. Free/Reduced Lunch % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% NEW MS (RM Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash HS site) CURRENT 73% 68% 78% 58% 64% 0% IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 72% 54% 77% 57% 67% 86% IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 74% 54% 81% 57% 67% 81% Academic Proficiency % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% NEW MS (RM Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash HS site)CURRENT 51% 54% 55% 69% 63% 0%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 03, Rev. 1) 50% 68% 48% 69% 62% 46%IMPACT + METRICS (MS 04, Rev. 1) 46% 68% 50% 69% 62% 50%
  18. 18.  Maximum Utilization: 111% (SNMS, currently 129%) Minimum Utilization: 50% (Parker, MS 04 Rev.1, currently 78%) All clean feeder to High Schools except Edwards split to NCHS and RMHS Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned  MS 03, Rev. 1: 1093 (~ 350 to New MS)  MS 04, Rev. 1: 1221 (~ 510 to New MS)
  19. 19. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 03, REV. 1 21
  20. 20. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL SCENARIO MS 04, REV. 1 22
  21. 21. K-5 Student Count 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Red MB Winste Baskerv Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng ille ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd d lewood CreekCURRENT 620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 620 341 625 221 624 452 492 340 625 302 673 550 557 1073 (See data tables in handout.)
  22. 22. Utilization 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Red MB Winste Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd d lewood Creek CURRENT 93% 80% 111% 99% 104% 83% 96% 81% 104% 90% 72% 101% 75% 95% UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 93% 80% 94% 99% 104% 79% 96% 81% 92% 97% 83% 101% 96% 95% Minority % 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Red MB Winste Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd d lewood CreekCURRENT 65% 98% 74% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 49% 99% 44% 51% 97% 64%UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 65% 98% 71% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 50% 99% 43% 51% 97% 63%
  23. 23. Free/Reduced Lunch % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Red MB Winste Basker Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng ville ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd d lewood CreekCURRENT 71% 94% 68% 73% 47% 91% 70% 70% 52% 91% 46% 65% 92% 59%UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 71% 94% 65% 73% 47% 90% 70% 70% 53% 92% 46% 65% 92% 59% Academic Proficiency % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Red MB Winste Baskerv Benven Cedar Cooper Johnso Middle Nashvil Oak/S Spring Willifo Bailey Hubbar Pope ad/Eng ille ue Grove s n sex le wift Hope rd d lewood CreekCURRENT 62% 45% 63% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 71% 35% 72% 60% 35% 61%UTIL + IMPACT (ES 01, Rev. 2) 62% 45% 65% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 69% 35% 73% 60% 35% 62%
  24. 24.  Maximum Utilization: 104% (Coopers, currently 104%) Minimum Utilization: 79% (Johnson, currently 83%) Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363
  25. 25. CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCENARIO ES 01, REV.2 27
  26. 26.  Middle School Scenarios: Impact + Metrics  5 MS feeding 4 HS  Scenario MS 03, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center for New MS and Edwards  Scenario MS 04, Rev. 1: Parker – 6th grade center for New MS  Clean feeder to HS, except for Edwards  Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned: 1093 – 1221 Elementary School Scenario: Utilization + Impact  Optimal Scenario ES 01, Rev. 2  Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 363 28
  27. 27. 29
  28. 28. February 13 (4:00-5:30) March 26 (6:00) April 30 (6:00) May 29 (6:00) June 12 (6:00)Tuesday June 25 (4:00–5:30) July/August - TBD
  29. 29. QUESTIONS
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×