Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Reassignment committee meeting   - April 30, 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Reassignment committee meeting - April 30, 2012

2,481
views

Published on

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,481
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. STUDENT REASSIGNMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Media Center, Nash Central High School Monday, April 30, 2012 - 6:00 pm Call to Order……………………………………………………………………Victor Ward Roll Call………………………………………………………………………..Carina Bryant Approval of Minutes from the March 26, 2012 Meeting Committee Operating Procedure Scenario Review and Revision………………………………Mike Miller, OREd Report to School Board 5/21/12 Questions? Next Meeting Scenario Review and Revision (continued) Tuesday, May 29, 2012 6:00 pm 3
  • 2. Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools
  • 3. Jan-Aug 2012 Aug - 2012 Aug – Dec 2012 August 2013 Committee Committee Public Input/ Community Deliberations/ Recommendations Engagement ImplementationMonthly Reports to Presented to the the School Board School Board Board of Education Approval 5
  • 4. Board of Public Engagement Education Committee Chairs Technical SupportCommunity Feedback Committee ORED Staff 6
  • 5. Contiguous boundaries:  Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using satellite attendance areas.Respect neighborhoods:  Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified “developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.Proximity to schools:  While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their closest school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries. 7
  • 6. Modify feeder systems:  In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.Stay within enrollment capacities:  Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.Consider anticipated growth:  Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.Enrollment balance:  In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and economic populations at each middle and high school. 8
  • 7.  February 13 – Understanding the Optimization Process March 26 – Out of Capacity table and Scenario Data April 30 – Scenario Review and Revision May 29 – Scenario Review and Revision June 25 – Final Scenario Presentation 9
  • 8.  Transparent Lines of Communications Committee Meetings  Open to the public Website  Information posted immediately after each meeting E-mail/ Phone Line  An e-mail address to answer questions/ receive feedback etc has been established to ensure seamless communication and to make all information readily available to the public.  A phone line has been established for those with limited or no internet access to provide feedback to the committee.
  • 9. Mike Miller, OREd 11
  • 10. Nash-Rocky Mount Public SchoolsMichael Miller, Program ManagerOperations Research and Education Laboratory (OREd)Institute for Transportation Research and EducationCentennial CampusNorth Carolina State University
  • 11.  Optimal Scenarios  Optimal scenarios for each level: Elem, Mid, High  Scenario data presented at March 26 meeting  Optimal with respect to Proximity + Utilization  OREd scenario review  Planning segment level review of optimal scenarios  Multiple review criteria  Assignment changes to address geographic issues 13
  • 12. Optimal Attendance Zones SchoolMembership building Balance index forecast capacities allowance Optimization Algorithm Optimal Attendance Zones 14
  • 13. Scenario Review/Revision Cycle Optimal Attendance ZonesScenario Review Track Edits & Update School Data 15
  • 14. Assignment Change Considerations: Elem > Mid and Mid > High feeder pattern Contiguity Transportation issues Natural/man-made barriers Current assignment Capacity 16
  • 15. Assignment change fixestransportation issue, butmay impact other criteria.17
  • 16. 18
  • 17. 19
  • 18. CURRENT HIGH SCHOOL OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL 20
  • 19. OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL OPTIMAL HIGH SCHOOL - REVISED 21
  • 20. 9-12 Student Count 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern NashCURRENT 1232 1204 1130 1232PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 1145 1201 1416 1036 (See data tables in handouts.)
  • 21. Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of specialprograms such as IB. Utilization 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 107% 105% 81% 115% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 100% 104% 102% 97% Minority % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 67% 69% 84% 51% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 53% 62% 94% 53%
  • 22. Statistics based on residence (2011 geocode).Does not measure impact of specialprograms such as IB. Free/Reduced Lunch % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 67% 65% 72% 64% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 50% 59% 86% 67% Academic Proficiency % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nash Central Northern Nash Rocky Mount Southern Nash CURRENT 60% 61% 53% 63% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 71% 68% 42% 62%
  • 23.  Maximum Utilization: 104% Minimum Utilization: 97% Total Grade 9-12 students reassigned: 1356
  • 24. CURRENT MIDDLE SCHOOL OPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOL 26
  • 25. OPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OPTIMAL MIDDLE SCHOOL - REVISED 27
  • 26. 6-8 Student Count 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 NEW MS (RM HS Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash site)CURRENT 729 633 433 910 1099 0PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 661 639 445 705 695 659 (See data tables in handouts.)
  • 27. Target Middle School capacity = 750. Parker capacity = 557. Utilization 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% NEW MS (RM HS Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash site)CURRENT 88% 94% 78% 107% 129% 0%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 88% 85% 80% 94% 93% 88% Minority % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% NEW MS (RM HS Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash site)CURRENT 78% 67% 88% 59% 51% 0%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 61% 46% 92% 53% 57% 91%
  • 28. Free/Reduced Lunch % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% NEW MS (RM HS Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash site) CURRENT 73% 68% 78% 58% 64% 0% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 63% 50% 85% 55% 70% 82% Academic Proficiency % 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% NEW MS (RM HS Edwards Nash Central Parker Red Oak Southern Nash site)CURRENT 51% 54% 55% 69% 63% 0%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 57% 71% 47% 71% 61% 47%
  • 29.  Maximum Utilization: 94% Minimum Utilization: 85% Maximum MS > HS feeder: 3 (New Rocky Mount MS) Total Grade 6-8 students reassigned: 1618 (including 659 to New Rocky Mount MS)
  • 30. CURRENT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 32
  • 31. OPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPTIMAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - REVISED 33
  • 32. K-5 Student Count 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Red MB Winstea Baskervi Benven Cedar Middles Nashvill Oak/Sw Spring Willifor Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope d/Engle lle ue Grove ex e ift Hope d d wood CreekCURRENT 620 341 743 221 624 475 492 340 709 279 583 550 437 1081PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 620 399 640 214 514 511 477 340 686 304 706 520 575 989 (See data tables in handouts.)
  • 33. Utilization 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Red MB Winstea Baskervi Benven Cedar Middles Nashvill Oak/Sw Spring Willifor Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope d/Engle lle ue Grove ex e ift Hope d d wood Creek CURRENT 93% 80% 111% 99% 104% 83% 96% 81% 104% 90% 72% 101% 75% 95% PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 93% 93% 96% 96% 86% 89% 93% 81% 101% 98% 87% 96% 99% 87% Minority % 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Red MB Winstea Baskervi Benven Cedar Middles Nashvill Oak/Sw Spring Willifor Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope d/Engle lle ue Grove ex e ift Hope d d wood CreekCURRENT 65% 98% 74% 52% 31% 100% 78% 59% 49% 99% 44% 51% 97% 64%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 65% 99% 72% 49% 22% 99% 78% 59% 49% 98% 44% 51% 90% 66%
  • 34. Free/Reduced Lunch % 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Red MB Winstea Baskervi Benven Cedar Middles Nashvill Oak/Sw Spring Willifor Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope d/Engle lle ue Grove ex e ift Hope d d wood CreekCURRENT 71% 94% 68% 73% 47% 91% 70% 70% 52% 91% 46% 65% 92% 59%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 71% 94% 66% 71% 39% 90% 70% 70% 49% 92% 47% 65% 90% 62% Academic Proficiency % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Red MB Winstea Baskervi Benven Cedar Middles Nashvill Oak/Sw Spring Willifor Bailey Coopers Johnson Hubbar Pope d/Engle lle ue Grove ex e ift Hope d d wood CreekCURRENT 62% 45% 63% 73% 73% 38% 58% 61% 71% 35% 72% 60% 35% 61%PROX + UTIL - Rev. 1 62% 47% 65% 75% 78% 36% 58% 61% 70% 36% 72% 60% 38% 60%
  • 35.  Maximum Utilization: 101% Minimum Utilization: 81% Maximum MS > HS feeder: 4 (Benvenue ES) Total Grade K-5 students reassigned: 1045
  • 36.  Scenario Review Process  Planning Segment assignment change protocol Scenario - Revision 1  19 Planning Segments reassigned from optimal scenarios  Revision 1 scenario data + maps  Total Grade K-12 students reassigned: 4019 (including 659 to New Rocky Mount MS) 38
  • 37. February 13 – (4:00-5:30)* March 26 (6:00) April 30 (6:00)Tuesday, May 29 (6:00) June 25 (4:00–5:30)* August/ Sept - TBD
  • 38. QUESTIONS

×