SAM HOUSTON STaR Chart Data<br />A Representation of Data and Process for Improvement<br />
Purpose and Intent<br />The Texas Campus STaR Chart is an assessment tool designed in response to the No Child Left Behind...
Purpose and Intent<br />The Texas Campus STaR Chart rates campuses on the following progress indicators:<br />Key Area I: ...
Purpose and Intent<br />Each campus is rated on 4 Levels of Progress:<br />Early Tech: Beginning stages of technology impl...
Purpose and Intent<br />In this presentation, I will present the summary for Sam Houston High School for four years, evalu...
Key Area Summary<br />School Year 2007 – 2008<br />Key Area I: 17 – Advanced Tech<br />Key Area II: 14 – Developing Tech<b...
Key Area Summary<br />School Year 2009 – 2010<br />Key Area I: 12 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area II: 12 – Developing Tech...
What the Data Shows<br />In all areas, beginning in the school year 2008 – 2009, there has been a decline in all areas.  <...
Key Area I: Teaching and Learning<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Patterns of Classroom Use<br />Frequency/Design of Ins...
Key Area I: Teaching and Learning<br />Declines were seen in all areas.  <br />This key area has remained low.  <br />This...
Key Area II: Educating Preparation and Development<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Content of Professional Development<b...
Key Area II: Educating Preparation and Development<br />Consistently low over the past 3 years.<br />Addresses the distric...
Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Leadership and Vision...
Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support<br />A slight drop in this area in the 2009 – 2010 scho...
Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology <br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Students per computers<br />Internet Access ...
Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology <br />This area has declined from its Advanced Tech rating in the 2008-2009 sch...
Solutions for Improvement <br />Money from the TIPS Grant will be used to order laptops for our campus.  <br />A technolog...
Resources<br />For more information on the Texas STaR Chart, please visit <br />http://starchart.esc12.net<br />For more i...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Sam Houston STaR Chart Data Analysis

259 views
221 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
259
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Sam Houston STaR Chart Data Analysis

  1. 1. SAM HOUSTON STaR Chart Data<br />A Representation of Data and Process for Improvement<br />
  2. 2. Purpose and Intent<br />The Texas Campus STaR Chart is an assessment tool designed in response to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. <br />As apart of the act, all eighth grade students will be proficient and technologically literate. <br />The STaR Chart is used to rate the resourcefulness of campuses and districts and is also a source of information for technology funding.<br />
  3. 3. Purpose and Intent<br />The Texas Campus STaR Chart rates campuses on the following progress indicators:<br />Key Area I: Teaching and Learning<br />Key Area II: Educator Preparation and Development<br />Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support<br />Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology<br />
  4. 4. Purpose and Intent<br />Each campus is rated on 4 Levels of Progress:<br />Early Tech: Beginning stages of technology implementation. Resources not adequate for technology integration. Training is minimal and there is not campus technology plan.<br />Developing Tech: Technology use is primarily carried out by the teacher. Resources are adequate but can be improved. Approximately 40% of educators meet standards.<br />Advanced Tech: Teacher as facilitator; Technology integration is visible and there is a full-time technology resource on campus.<br />Target Tech: All rooms are connected and the school is fully equipped. Teacher is a facilitator, mentor and co-learner. Technology in lessons is a common occurrence and there is a campus plan directed at student success.<br />
  5. 5. Purpose and Intent<br />In this presentation, I will present the summary for Sam Houston High School for four years, evaluate the classification areas and assess how we can improve. <br />
  6. 6. Key Area Summary<br />School Year 2007 – 2008<br />Key Area I: 17 – Advanced Tech<br />Key Area II: 14 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area III: 16 – Advanced Tech<br />Key Area IV: 14 – Developing Tech<br />School Year 2008 – 2009<br />Key Area I: 13 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area II: 12 – Developing Tech<br /> Key Area III: 16 – Advanced Tech<br />Key Area IV: 17 Developing Tech <br />
  7. 7. Key Area Summary<br />School Year 2009 – 2010<br />Key Area I: 12 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area II: 12 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area III: 12 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area IV: 13 – Developing Tech<br />School Year 2010 – 2011<br />Key Area I: 13 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area II: 12 – Developing Tech<br />Key Area III: 16 – Advanced Tech<br />Key Area IV: 13 – Developing Tech<br />
  8. 8. What the Data Shows<br />In all areas, beginning in the school year 2008 – 2009, there has been a decline in all areas. <br />In order to understand the significance, it is important to understand the differences within each key area and how the designation impacts our campus report.<br />Lets look at each Key Area.<br />
  9. 9. Key Area I: Teaching and Learning<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Patterns of Classroom Use<br />Frequency/Design of Instructional Setting Using Digital Content<br />Content Areas Connections<br />Technology Application (TA) TEKS Implementation<br />Student Mastery of Technology Applications (TA) TEKS<br />Online Learning<br />
  10. 10. Key Area I: Teaching and Learning<br />Declines were seen in all areas. <br />This key area has remained low. <br />This area focuses on the use of technology in the classroom by both teacher and student.<br />Teachers are expected to model technology and provide lessons that actively use technology.<br />
  11. 11. Key Area II: Educating Preparation and Development<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Content of Professional Development<br />Models of Professional Development<br />Capabilities of Educators<br />Access to Professional Development<br />Levels of Understanding and Patterns of Use<br />Professional Develo9pment for Online Learning<br />
  12. 12. Key Area II: Educating Preparation and Development<br />Consistently low over the past 3 years.<br />Addresses the district need to provide adequate training to teachers.<br />Professional development is a requirement; frequency and quality of training is tied to the success in this key area.<br />
  13. 13. Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support<br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Leadership and Vision<br />Planning<br />Instructional Support<br />Communication and Collaboration<br />Budget<br />Leadership and Support for Online Learning<br />
  14. 14. Key Area III: Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support<br />A slight drop in this area in the 2009 – 2010 school year (16 to 12).<br />Increased to the Advanced Tech rating for the 2010 – 2011 school year.<br />Campus leadership articulates the technology goals and vision for the campus. <br />New Tech Network will be introduced as a school within a school in the 2011 – 2012 school year.<br />
  15. 15. Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology <br />Rated on 6 focus areas:<br />Students per computers<br />Internet Access Connectivity Speed<br />Other Classroom Technology<br />Technical Support<br />Local Area Network/Wide Area Network<br />Distance Learning Capacity<br />
  16. 16. Key Area IV: Infrastructure for Technology <br />This area has declined from its Advanced Tech rating in the 2008-2009 school year to Developing Tech for the past two years.<br />Resources continue to be a problem on campus with the library and Go Center being the only viable resources for computer labs.<br />This need will be addressed in the 2011 – 2012 school year with all core teachers receiving laptops in their classroom.<br />
  17. 17. Solutions for Improvement <br />Money from the TIPS Grant will be used to order laptops for our campus. <br />A technology specialist has been hired to service our campus technology needs.<br />Campus has been rewired with technology upgrades.<br />Administration has continued to share the vision of the campus.<br />Provide adequate onsite professional development opportunities to assist teachers in integrating technology into the classroom.<br />Ensure that teachers and students are aware of the Technology Application (TA) TEKS and how to master them.<br />
  18. 18. Resources<br />For more information on the Texas STaR Chart, please visit <br />http://starchart.esc12.net<br />For more information on Texas’ Long Range Technology Plan, follow the link below:<br />http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=5082&menu_id=2147483665<br />

×