+
GLIT 6756
Literacy & Inquiry:
Becoming Critically
Informed Consumers of
Peer Reviewed Published
Research
Colin Lankshear...
+
Research as systematic inquiry
p. 29 of your textbook
+
Relationship of Research Logic to the
Evaluation Template
 Context of study (purpose, question,
problem area, relevant ...
+
Tasks for today
 Forming work groups (teams) & sending
names and email addresses to Michele &
Colin
 Kitting up (key r...
+
Forming work groups
 Ideally 4-6 members
 Likely to share some common
interest to help with article
selection
 Likely...
+
Kitting up
Using Google Drive to write
collaboratively (http://drive.google.com )
Using the internet to communicate
be...
+
Using Google Drive
+
Google Docs
+
Google Docs (cont.)
+
Google Docs (cont.)
Title your
document here
+
Google docs (cont.)
Share your Google Doc with
Colin and Michele:
colin.lankshear@gmail.com
micheleknobel@gmail.com
+
Using Scholar Google as a meta-
search engine
Select “Scholar
Preferences”
+
Scholar Google (cont.)
+
Scholar Google (cont.)
1.
2.
3.
4.
+
Scholar Google (cont.)
+
Finding a focus article
The article must be relevant to literacy studies.
The article must be a peer-reviewed and form...
+
Course website
& additional resources
https://sites.google.com/site/recentms
vupages/mississauga-fall-2013
There are sev...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Consumer slideshow1

46

Published on

Seminar resource for a course (withiin a Masters program in Education) that focuses on how to critically evaluate peer reviewed published articles based on qualitative empirical research.

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
46
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Consumer slideshow1

  1. 1. + GLIT 6756 Literacy & Inquiry: Becoming Critically Informed Consumers of Peer Reviewed Published Research Colin Lankshear c.lankshear@yahoo.com
  2. 2. + Research as systematic inquiry p. 29 of your textbook
  3. 3. + Relationship of Research Logic to the Evaluation Template  Context of study (purpose, question, problem area, relevant other research)  Framework (theory and concepts)  Design and methodology  The evaluative template (Appendix 1 in your syllabus)
  4. 4. + Tasks for today  Forming work groups (teams) & sending names and email addresses to Michele & Colin  Kitting up (key resources for the semester)  Becoming familiar with the evaluative template  Locating a literacy-related peer reviewed research-based paper to critique (that all members of a group can “relate to”)
  5. 5. + Forming work groups  Ideally 4-6 members  Likely to share some common interest to help with article selection  Likely to be able to work together online and offline and contribute equally to the final analytic paper
  6. 6. + Kitting up Using Google Drive to write collaboratively (http://drive.google.com ) Using the internet to communicate between meetings (e.g., Google+ Hangout, Skype, or messenger/chat, blog, Twitter, email, Delicious or Pinterest) Resources for finding a suitable article (e.g., http://scholar.google.com ; MSVU online article archives)
  7. 7. + Using Google Drive
  8. 8. + Google Docs
  9. 9. + Google Docs (cont.)
  10. 10. + Google Docs (cont.) Title your document here
  11. 11. + Google docs (cont.) Share your Google Doc with Colin and Michele: colin.lankshear@gmail.com micheleknobel@gmail.com
  12. 12. + Using Scholar Google as a meta- search engine Select “Scholar Preferences”
  13. 13. + Scholar Google (cont.)
  14. 14. + Scholar Google (cont.) 1. 2. 3. 4.
  15. 15. + Scholar Google (cont.)
  16. 16. + Finding a focus article The article must be relevant to literacy studies. The article must be a peer-reviewed and formally published research article. Ideally published within the past 5 years. You need to be truly interested in the focus of the article. Focus must be good and “meaty” The focus of your article needs to have a prior history of research (i.e., be part of a research area or field) Your final paper must engage with debates, present an argument, and include critique (your group needs to take a theorised position and you’ll be reading well beyond your focus article)
  17. 17. + Course website & additional resources https://sites.google.com/site/recentms vupages/mississauga-fall-2013 There are several examples of final papers posted here.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×