Consumer slideshow1
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Consumer slideshow1

  • 78 views
Uploaded on

Seminar resource for a course (withiin a Masters program in Education) that focuses on how to critically evaluate peer reviewed published articles based on qualitative empirical research.

Seminar resource for a course (withiin a Masters program in Education) that focuses on how to critically evaluate peer reviewed published articles based on qualitative empirical research.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
78
On Slideshare
78
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. + GLIT 6756 Literacy & Inquiry: Becoming Critically Informed Consumers of Peer Reviewed Published Research Colin Lankshear c.lankshear@yahoo.com
  • 2. + Research as systematic inquiry p. 29 of your textbook
  • 3. + Relationship of Research Logic to the Evaluation Template  Context of study (purpose, question, problem area, relevant other research)  Framework (theory and concepts)  Design and methodology  The evaluative template (Appendix 1 in your syllabus)
  • 4. + Tasks for today  Forming work groups (teams) & sending names and email addresses to Michele & Colin  Kitting up (key resources for the semester)  Becoming familiar with the evaluative template  Locating a literacy-related peer reviewed research-based paper to critique (that all members of a group can “relate to”)
  • 5. + Forming work groups  Ideally 4-6 members  Likely to share some common interest to help with article selection  Likely to be able to work together online and offline and contribute equally to the final analytic paper
  • 6. + Kitting up Using Google Drive to write collaboratively (http://drive.google.com ) Using the internet to communicate between meetings (e.g., Google+ Hangout, Skype, or messenger/chat, blog, Twitter, email, Delicious or Pinterest) Resources for finding a suitable article (e.g., http://scholar.google.com ; MSVU online article archives)
  • 7. + Using Google Drive
  • 8. + Google Docs
  • 9. + Google Docs (cont.)
  • 10. + Google Docs (cont.) Title your document here
  • 11. + Google docs (cont.) Share your Google Doc with Colin and Michele: colin.lankshear@gmail.com micheleknobel@gmail.com
  • 12. + Using Scholar Google as a meta- search engine Select “Scholar Preferences”
  • 13. + Scholar Google (cont.)
  • 14. + Scholar Google (cont.) 1. 2. 3. 4.
  • 15. + Scholar Google (cont.)
  • 16. + Finding a focus article The article must be relevant to literacy studies. The article must be a peer-reviewed and formally published research article. Ideally published within the past 5 years. You need to be truly interested in the focus of the article. Focus must be good and “meaty” The focus of your article needs to have a prior history of research (i.e., be part of a research area or field) Your final paper must engage with debates, present an argument, and include critique (your group needs to take a theorised position and you’ll be reading well beyond your focus article)
  • 17. + Course website & additional resources https://sites.google.com/site/recentms vupages/mississauga-fall-2013 There are several examples of final papers posted here.