ECEL 09 Research Presentation: Neil Glen: Peer Review in Art and Design

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    This is research in progress presented at the 8th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL09) at the University of Bari, Italy. Annotation as reference for Neil Glen delivering talk ©Neil Glen October 2009

    Art and Design uses group critique peer review, primarily in the studio spaces of the art school as authentication of work.

    Authentication conferred by approval of peer group through positioning of work on walls and in cabinets. The online physical world, secure space for experimentation.

    Many institutions use safe online spaces such as Blackboard

    CASPAR project formalised peer review in a text based environment but Art & Design deals more with the visual.

    Students naturally use online spaces such as Flickr, MySpace and discussion forums Use of spaces fall into two categories

    In art & design both activities are important Personal expression is important but validation of peers is also required Current space fall into one or other, Ning site on right is a community but with a focus on collaboration (wiki activity)

    Facebook is interesting because users meet offline and engage in a form of peer review online through comments and acquiring friends. Facebook page is a blog activity, promoting the owner of the profile.

    Facebook group is a still a blog activity, with the discussion group little used.

    Facebook homepage is interesting in the way, through highlights, it draws people in to comment and review. (this is old homepage, FB have now integrated ‘highlights’)

    To examine how students might use the space we built an online ‘walled garden’ We chose a newspaper layout as our students are graphics designer so would understand the nature of publication and the hierarchy of the printed page. Conscious decision not to use 3D space.

    The privacy aspect was dealt with by having a voluntary registration page requiring their university email address. Able to choose own username

    A comment system would record activity against items added.

    We created a team of student editors as moderators, added a live chat box

    The virtual space was displayed on communal spaces inside the art school

    Though a combination of data gathered by the Wordpress CMS and analytics software we tracked

    Not all registered users added content, not all left comments. More posts with fewer comments Fewer posts with more comments

    Pages added by staff containing the work of multiple students had greatest views, top item 10% of traffic

    But items added by staff least commented

    Some examples of students ‘flyposting’ their own blog sites, little comment

    Example of wiki activity

    Item which received most comments was peer review, multiple comments from multiple user over shorter period.

    Over five days was the most viewed item with 80% of traffic from outside university network. Students expressing values traditionally confined to the space of studio in an online environment

    Physical studio does this and when online space also does this the learning occurs in the hybrid space in between

    The online is not a substitute for the offline

    The link between the offline to the online space extends the learning experience beyond the studio based tutorial time

    The lack of pressure in the asynchronous online space takes the pressure off, many art & design students are dyslexic and have difficult with synchronous chat session

    Any questions please email me n.glen@bathspa.ac.uk

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    ECEL 09 Research Presentation: Neil Glen: Peer Review in Art and Design - Presentation Transcript

    1. A ‘Hybrid Space’ For Peer Review: Can Facebook Inspire New Ways of Thinking? Neil Glen Anthony Head Bath School of Art & Design, UK Stephen Thompson Cardiff School of Art & Design, UK
    2. Art & Design is evaluated through formative peer review
    3.  
    4.  
    5.  
    6.  
    7. Blog is about personal expression “ who I am” * *Steve Wheeler: Plymouth e-Learning Conference 2009 @pelc09 Blog & Wiki
    8. Blog is about personal expression “ who I am” * Wiki is about collaboration, common goal “ what I know” * *Steve Wheeler: Plymouth e-Learning Conference 2009 @pelc09 Blog & Wiki
    9. Social networking
    10. Facebook page
    11. Facebook group
    12. Facebook homepage
    13. • representation of the environment Building a 'walled garden'
    14. • representation of the environment • perception of security/privacy Building a 'walled garden'
    15. • representation of the environment • perception of security/privacy • register of popularity Building a 'walled garden'
    16. Build a 'walled garden'
    17.  
    18. We were able to • Establish when original items were added. • Examine content and ownership of items added to the space. • Establish the frequency of items. • Examine the ownership of comments relating to these items. • Establish period over which comments were made.
    19. 75 students registered to use the site. We found
    20. 75 students registered to use the site. 71 registered users were years 2 & 3 undergraduate students We found
    21. 75 students registered to use the site. 71 registered users were years 2 & 3 undergraduate students which represented 50% of that cohort. We found
    22. items with content from more than one student had more visits We found
    23. items by staff were the least commented on We found
    24. example of blog usage We found
    25. example of wiki usage We found
    26. the piece most commented on was an example of peer review... We found
    27. ...with 9 comments from unique users We found
    28. • strengthened by considered provision of a ‘walled garden’ Art & Design student engagement in formative peer review
    29. • strengthened by considered provision of a ‘walled garden’ • online is enhanced by external links offline Art & Design student engagement in formative peer review
    30. • strengthened by considered provision of a ‘walled garden’ • online is enhanced by external links offline • further developed by engaging them in ‘hybrid’ learning Art & Design student engagement in formative peer review
    31. • strengthened by considered provision of a ‘walled garden’ • online is enhanced by external links offline • further developed by engaging them in ‘hybrid’ learning • augmented by encouraging commitment of thoughts in writing Art & Design student engagement in formative peer review
    32. • strengthened by considered provision of a ‘walled garden’ • online is enhanced by external links offline • further developed by engaging them in ‘hybrid’ learning • augmented by encouraging commitment of thoughts in writing • maintain the values of the traditional student studio in education Art & Design student engagement in formative peer review
    33. Thank you Grazie

    + neilglenneilglen, 3 weeks ago

    custom

    90 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Presentation of paper on Peer review in Art and Des more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 90
      • 89 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://neilglen.wordpress.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://neilglen.wordpress.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories