Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Unit 2 Human Development and Capability

on

  • 644 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
644
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
634
Embed Views
10

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0

1 Embed 10

http://future-of-development.wikispaces.com 10

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Unit 2 Human Development and Capability Unit 2 Human Development and Capability Presentation Transcript

    • Today’s program
      Discuss the importance of value judgments in debates about the meaning and choices in Development
      Discuss Assignment: The Story of Stuff, part 1
      And part 2 in class (if we have time)
      Form group of 3 and brainstorm over a future development dilemma that you want to use for your change agents project
    • “The word development has many meanings as there are listeners*”
      * cited by Alkire and Deneulin, 2009
      What do you understand by the word ‘development’?
      The more we reflect on it, we discover that the term is ambiguous and value-laden
    • Regardless of any particular framework, many would view development as follow:
      Development as a multi-dimensional and multi-sectoral process, involving social, economicand political change aimed at improving people’s lives. Development processes use and manage natural resources to satisfy human needs and improve people’s quality of life.
      Those who hold these views, may still range from Marxist to Neoclassical Ideologies
    • Different views of what is development:
      Two examples:
      A country is considered developed because its inhabitants command higher incomes per capita and because investment and employment rates are higher than in other regions
      Economic growth and productive investments are considered indicators of development here
    • Different views of what is development (2):
      In an other view concerns for people’s health and education are important key indicators of the development of a country
      In this example health and education are as key indicators on the foreground of what development means
    • “Limitations to the GDP”, extracted from a speech given by Robert Kennedy on January the 4th, 1968:
      “ (….) The GDP of the US is the largest in the world. Truly we have a great gross national product, almost 800 billion dollars, but can that be the criterion by which we judge this country? Is it enough? For the gross national product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and jails for the people who break them. It counts Whitman's rifle and Speck's knife and television programs, which glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children. And the gross national product, the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, the joy of their play. It is indifferent to the decency of our factories and the safety of our streets alike. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither wit nor courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our duty to our country. It measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile (…).”
      Trackback:http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/20thcentury/68-01kennedy-speech.html
    • Legitimating development on 3 levels of analysis:
      Development legitimately involves different kinds of analyses:
      Normative approach: development debates and policies are normative or ethical. Based on value judgments in that they clarify how groups ought to behave in order to create improvements
      Not value-free, but instead ideological
      Herein lies the rationale/motivation behind choices and actions in terms of policies,
    • Legitimating development on 3 levels of analysis (2):
      Positive approach (empirically based): It requires learning from the past and analyzing existing data. This approach refers to the empirical study of development: data studies, hypothesis testing, and other kinds of description and analysis
      E.g.
      http://www.censo2010.aw/images/stories/results/percentage%20of%20population%20with%20diploma%20after%20primary%20education%20by%20country%20of%20birth.pdf
    • Legitimating development on 3 levels of analysis (3):
      Development is predictive: analysis must be able to predict how a situation could change over time in certain ways
      E.g. by applying techniques of scenario planning and trends analysis
      Although different in approach, normative, positive and predictive approaches are all interconnected
    • Normative, positive and predictive approach to development are all interconnected
      One needs to have a positive (empirical) and predictive analysis in order to make any normative assessments and vice versa
      Yet normative analysis is fundamental and in some ways prior to predictive and empirical analysis.
      Let’s look at an example: defining poverty
    • E.g. different definitions of poverty may influence how we measure poverty and the actions we take in terms of policies*
      “ Definitions of Poverty
      A variety of ways to define urban poverty are available, each with their own strengths and deficiencies:
      income-based definitions: This approach seeks to specify a level of income per capita in a household below which the basic needs of the family cannot be satisfied. It shares the difficulties of the next class of definitions of imposing an official's or observer's view of necessities. It does not acknowledge variation in costs of similar goods for different consumers. The vital importance of non-market household production and non-monetarized exchanges in poor families is not counted.
      basic needs approaches: A set of minimal conditions of life, usually involving the quality of the dwelling place, degree of crowding, nutritional adequacy and water supply are specified and the proportion of the population lacking these conditions is used to estimate the degree of poverty. The advantage of this approach is that different conditions can be specified appropriate to different settings. However, this reduces comparability of estimates in different sites. Similarly, it does not take into account the willingness of people to accept various tradeoffs deliberately (e.g., a lower quality dwelling for reduced transportation time and expense to work)
      participatory definitions: In this approach, respondents from communities are themselves invited to identify their perceptions of their needs, priorities and requirements for minimal secure livelihood. Some sacrifice of comparability of estimates in different communities or at different times is traded for better information on the identified demands of the individuals themselves. At times such analyses supplement and reinforce the more quantitative measures; at other times they reveal a very different experienced reality. A study in Rajasthan, India, identified 32 conditions which individuals felt necessary for a satisfactory minimal lifestyle. Comparison of interview results over a decade revealed that despite reductions in income of the residents, and little change in living conditions of the kind generally surveyed in basic needs estimates, significant improvements had occurred in experienced quality of life.”
      *UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund
    • The normative approach of development affects choices and actions
      Normative approaches to development are central to the shaping of policies, but not enough to create it
      Normative approaches affect policy decisions (some examples):
      They shape the data we collect
      They influence our analysis
      They give certain topics greater or less political salience
      They feed or hinder social movements
      They are ethical and philosophical credible and CONTESTED!
      They influence the trade-offs we make in terms of development
    • Bottom-line
      Ideas about what development should be, matter.
      Different ways of understanding what development should improve lead to different policies and consequences.
      Conflicts of values and interests are common on the level of trade-offs and choices and actions to be taken:
      E.g. how will the policy decision affect economical progress?versus
      how will the policy affect people’s quality of life?
    • Assignment: The Story of Stuff, part 1
      www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLBE5QAYXp8
    • Assignment, part 1
      Let’s take a look at your reflections after studying the video
    • Assignment, part 2
      Read the following article that was a reaction on the story of stuff:
      http://www.nytimes.com/learning/teachers/featured_articles/20090515friday.html
      What do you think of the different reactions the documentary got?
    • Reactions to the article
    • Reactions to the article
    • Change agents project
      Form groups of 3
      Brainstorm on possible themes for your change agents project