Save A Leg, Save A Life”™ Wound Care on Wheels, LLC

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Save A Leg, Save A Life”™ Wound Care on Wheels, LLC - Presentation Transcript

    1. Desmond P. Bell, Jr., DPM CWS, FACCWS “ Save A Leg, Save A Life” ™ Foundation Wound Care on Wheels, LLC Jacksonville, Florida
    2. “ Save A Leg, Save A Life” Wound Summit  “Save A Leg, Save A Life”™ Foundation  Annual Conference and General Membership Meeting  Orlando, October 8-10 www.SaveALegSaveALife.com
    3. “How to Perform the Ideal Toe and Transmetatarsal Amputation” Converting Less…. into More
    4. Survival Rates After Amputation: “Our Daily Motivation”  After 1 major lower-extremity amputation – 3-year survival rate is 50% – 5-year survival rate is 40%  Contralateral amputation – 42% of patients within 1 to 3 years after first amputation – 56% of patients within 3 to 5 years after first amputation American Diabetes Association. Diabetes 1996 Vital Statistics.
    5. “Setting Up for Success”  Consider: Vascular Status Infection Extent of Infection
    6. “Setting Up for Success” Consider: Level, Degree and Quality of Viable Tissue Ambulatory Status of Patient Acute vs. Chronic Progression Short Term Solution vs. Long Term Function
    7. Digital Amputation  Evaluate extent of viable tissue when planning incision  Attempt to preserve as much viable soft tissue as possible
    8. Digital Amputation Incision Guide
    9. Digital Amputation  Carry incision to bone  May be easier to disarticulate vs. resect portion of phalanx (situation dictates degree of bony resection)  Consider partial toe resection that will create buttress to help reduce shifting of digits
    10. Digital Amputation
    11. Digital Amputation Hallux
    12. Long Term Sequelae of Digital Amputation  Amputation of lesser digits generally results in minimal disturbance in gait  Amputation of hallux results in an apropulsive gait  Extensor and flexors of hallux are resected, results in hammertoe contractures or adducting of digits to “fill in” deficit created by amputated digit  Increased metatarsal pressures, especially at submet 2 after hallux amputation
    13. The Less Than Ideal Digital Amputation  Although the circumstances may vary, surgical principles remain consistent when performing digital amputations to respective levels
    14. The Less Than Ideal Digital Amputation Gas in tissue necessitating wider resection
    15. The Ideal Result Both cases utilized NPWT, living skin substitutes and Offloading with Soft Total Contact Cast
    16. Any Similarities to the Patients on the Previous Slides, Whether Real or Implied is Purely Coincidental…..
    17. Transmetatarsal Amputation  TMA Provides: Better option than Below Knee Amputation Creates a Better Functioning Foot when greater than 2 toes have previously been amputated *DO NOT LEAVE A FOOT WITH 1 or 2 TOES!
    18. Poorly Functioning Feet Remnants of toes do not provide “stability”, only greater imbalance. Increased focal pressure at stump sites may cause recurrent breakdown!
    19. Transmetatarsal Amputation Technique  Carry incision directly to bone  Plantar incision should bisect metatarsal heads on a parabola  Dorsal incision should be more proximal to met heads, also on a parabola (ensures creation of Plantar flap)  Plantar flap must be longer to allow closure with less tension  Plantar skin was designed for weight bearing!
    20. Transmetatarsal Amputation Technique  Preserve Tibialis Anterior and Peroneus Brevis to prevent Equinus or Equinovarus deformity  Preserve as much viable soft tissue as possible as to prevent focal proximity of bone underlying skin  De-bulk as needed, including resection proximally and under tension of tendon remnants
    21. Transmetatarsal Amputation Incision Guide Taylor Bell’s Foot
    22. Bisect Metatarsal Heads for Plantar Incision
    23. Creating the Plantar Flap
    24. Carry Incision to Bone
    25. Bevel and Create Parabola  Resect metatarsals proximally on angle to reduce areas of focal pressure  Resect soft tissue attachments working distally, on underside of detached metatarsals
    26. Initial Check of Flap De-bulk soft tissue and resect additional bone proximally, if needed Checking to ensure closure with minimal tension and areas of focal pressure, both plantarly and along incision
    27. Initial Check of Flap
    28. Closure and Final Appearance
    29. Transmetatarsal Parabola  Bony resection of metatarsals at mid- shaft or more proximal  Create a Parabola
    30. Reducing Focal Pressure by Proper Beveling of Metatarsals  Resect metatarsals on angle from Distal-Superior to Proximal-Inferior in order to bevel, thus reducing focal pressure  May also bevel and round the 1st medially and the 5th laterally
    31. Closure to Healing 3.0 vicryl for Subcutaneous tissue 3.0 nylon for Skin Remove drain or packing after 1-2 days Reinforce incision with Steri-strips
    32. Final Result
    33. When Does 3 Not Equal 3? “Form Fits Function”
    34. More Proximal Level  Consider a more proximal level amputation if enough viable tissue is present and adequate perfusion is observed  Lisfranc’s or Chopart’s amputations should be considered before proceeding to BKA
    35. Proof That Sometimes Less Can Be More Patient now ambulatory with AFO (Ankle Foot Orthosis) and Extra Depth Shoes
    36. Tendo Achilles Lengthening?  What causes breakdown and re-ulceration after TMA? Equinus is one consideration, and calcification of achilles tendon may cause equinus and exacerbate the plantaflexed position Individual Plantarflexed Metatarsals may also be a cause of focal pressure New bone callus at resection sites; Wolf’s Law; new focal areas of pressure (greater in the ambulatory patient) Resection of bone distal to surgical neck of metatarsal increased incidence of Hypertrophic Bone Formation by 4 x, so resect metatarsals more proximally Do not perform TAL if patient is not highly ambulatory
    37. “Toes Are Overrated!”
    38. “ Save A Leg, Save A Life” Wound Summit  “Save A Leg, Save A Life”™ Foundation  Annual Conference and General Membership Meeting  Orlando, October 8-10 www.SaveALegSaveALife.com
    39. THANK YOU !!!
    40. Additional References  Gregory JL, Peters V, Harkless L. Amputations in the Foot. Comprehensive Textbook of Foot Surgery. Mc Glamry ED, Banks AS, Downey MS, Editors. 2nd Edition. Williams and Wilkins. 1992. 1390-1408.  Anthony T, et al. Transmetatarsal Amputation: Factors Predicting Need for Amputation Revision and Post Procedure Ambulatory Status. Association of VA Surgeons Conference. Cincinnati, OH. May 9-11, 2006  Rezyleman A. Essential Pointers on Doing Partial Foot Amputations. Podiatry Today.  Salonga C and Blume P. A Guide to Transmetatarsal Amputations in Patients with Diabetes. July, 2006.  Steinberg JS, Morgan J, Guerra JD. Hypertrophic Bone Formation: Be Prepared for this Unpredictable Complication in Diabetic Foot Amputations. Podiatry Management. Nov/Dec. 2006. 113-120.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + New Cardiovascular HorizonsNew Cardiovascular Horizons Nominate

    custom

    334 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presented by Desmond P. Bell, Jr., DPM at New Cardi more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 334
      • 334 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 6
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories