"Power Pulse Spray" Technique in DVT: Part 2

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    "Power Pulse Spray" Technique in DVT: Part 2 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Angiojet in the “PP-Spray” mode
    2. Tight Proximal Iliac Lesion
    3. Kissing BES’s From the left brachial And right femoral approach
    4. Kissing BES’s From the left brachial And right femoral approach
    5. Aortic PTA/BES
    6. Aorto-Bi-Iliac PTA/Stenting
    7. Massive IVC thrombus post IVC filter • 63 year old male presents with SOB and chest pain (from Texas!) • History of PE, 2 DVT’s, and IVC filter placement (1999) • V/Q scan “high probability” for Pulmonary Embolus
    8. Greenfield IVC Filter in Place
    9. Large IVC Thrombus Above Filter Greenfield Filter
    10. Optease IVC Filter Placed Above Thrombus Via Jugular Approach Greenfield Filter
    11. Angiojet “P-PS” Technique
    12. Angiojet “P-PS” Technique
    13. Angiojet P-PS (UK)
    14. IVC Filter Post “P-PS” (30 min) No residual thrombus
    15. Gooseneck Snare Removal of IVC Filter
    16. Gooseneck Snare Removal of IVC Filter
    17. Removal of IVC Filter
    18. Removal of IVC Filter
    19. Removal of IVC Filter
    20. Removal of IVC Filter
    21. Removal of IVC Filter
    22. Removal of IVC Filter
    23. After Before 30 Min P-PS
    24. AngioJet AngioJet
    25. Acute Iliofemoral DVT • A 56 y/o male presented with a 3-day hx of acute onset of right leg swelling and pain following a 8-hour transatlantic flight • PMHx – HTN, hyperlipidemia, carpal tunnel syndrome • Med: aspirin, simvastatin • CT abdomen – right ileofemoral DVT
    26. OPTEASE™ Filter – One kit – 6F – Self Centering – Dual basket filtration – Placement from IJ, femoral, brachial approach – retrieval from femoral vein
    27. Placed patient in prone position and examination of right popliteal vein
    28. Introducer sheath placement in popliteal vein under ultrasound guidance
    29. Initial Venogram
    30. Initial Venogram
    31. First Venogram post – PPS (30 minutes)
    32. Left Iliac Vein Stenosis Wallstent placement and post-stenting balloon angioplasty
    33. Completion venogram
    34. Completion venogram
    35. Pre - thrombectomy
    36. Post – thrombectomy 4 days later • Procedural time – 2 hours • No ICU stay
    37. Angiojet Chronic clot, underlying venous stenosis
    38. Lytic + AngioJet, followed by balloon angioplasty venous stenosis.
    39. Before – left arm After – left arm
    40. Before After
    41. NOVEMBER 1-4, 2006 Micheal Debakey, MD
    42. 2 nd November 1-4, 2006
    43. ALI Will!!
    44. The “Power-Pulse Spray” Technique Conclusion: • Amputations are not benign!! • The “P-PS” works for DVT too! • “P-PS” allows rapid revascularization Total procedure time: Overall mean=74 min! “Treat the ischemic limb like the ischemic LAD” Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Allie, Hebert, Walker, et. Al.
    45. The “Power-Pulse Spray” Technique Conclusion: ALI is just that! ACUTE!! therefore we…. “Must take the bull by the horns” or Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Allie, Hebert, Walker, et. Al.
    46. The “Power-Pulse Spray” Technique Conclusion: • ALI is not benign! Death! True Limb Salvage! • The “P-PS” works for DVT too! • “P-PS” allows rapid revascularization… Total procedure time: Overall mean = 74 min! “Treat the ischemic limb like the ischemic LAD” Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Allie, Hebert, Walker, et. Al.
    47. Post Plaque Excision
    48. Pre Post
    49. H-4 • I.D.- 72-year-old male with severe right leg limb threatening ischemia. • PMHX- s/p CABG and failed femoral to popliteal bypass grafts, 2 yrs. s/p right SFA PTA/stent and 1 yr. s/p reintervention of the same SFA. • P/E- diminished bilateral femoral pulses with ischemic changes to the right foot • Labs- creatinine 1.8 mg/dL with hyperglycemia
    50. H-6 • I.D.- 64-year-old male with severe limb threatening ischemia of the left leg. • PMHX- CABG, bilateral femoral to popliteal bypass grafts, CEA, CVA, HBP and no GSV • P/E- bilateral 2+ femoral pulses with absent distal pulses, left foot ischemic changes • Misc- Bilateral ABI = 0.40 with DU bilateral mild iliac with disease and bilateral 100% SFA occlusions with diminished IPA flow.
    51. After Before
    52. Before After
    53. Proximal Infusion Port
    54. Distal Infusion Port
    55. After 12-Hr Lytic Infusion
    56. After 18 hrs. lysis
    57. 100% SFA Occlusion Post PTA/Stent x2
    58. Silverhawk Atherectomy Device
    59. Silverhawk Atherectomy Device Open “Cutter”
    60. Post 4 Quadrant Atherectomy
    61. International Rinspiration in AMI Registry Marco De Carlo, MD, PhD on behalf of the registry investigators
    62. Rinspiration (Rinsing while aspirating) Impact of Rinspiration Motivates thrombus Aspirates from a distance Assists in lysis FDA cleared for coronary and peripheral vessels
    63. Investigators,Institutions Investigators Monitors and Labs Marco De Carlo MD, PhD University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Eberhard Grube MD Heart Center Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany John G. Webb MD St. Paul’s, Vancouver, BC Anna S. Petronio MD, PhD University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy Jaap N. Hamburger MD, PhD University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Luc Bilodeau, MD, PhD Montreal Heart, Montreal, QC Vlad Dzavik, MD Toronto General, Toronto, ON ST Resolution Core Lab Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, PhD Duke Clinical Research Institute - Durham, NC Angiographic Core Lab John Mancini, MD CardiABC - Vancouver, BC Data Monitors Canada Valerie Willetts & Associates. Inc Vancouver, BC Germany MPS GmbH – Braunfels, Germany Italy MPS GmbH – Braunfels, Germany
    64. Rinspiration Registry Design One protocol – 3 Countries, 6 Centers and 17 physicians International Rinspiration Registry in AMI n=111 pts to date Roll-ins n= 9 Canada Germany Italy n=38 n=22 n=51 Montreal Heart Siegburg University of St. Paul’s Heart Center Pisa Toronto General Enrollees Vancouver General n = 102 Inclusion Criteria Primary Endpoint ↑ ST 2mm, 2 cont. leads or LBBB Pain < 12 hours ST Resolution @ 60 min. n = 93
    65. Rinspiration Registry Overview Baseline Characteristics Intra Procedural # of Patients 102 Device Delivery (%) 97% Age 61 ± 11 yrs Device Success (%) 97% LAD (%) 47% Procedure Success (%) 98% Peak ST 4.3 ± 2.6 mm Rinspiration Alone ↑ Flow Onset to Cath Lab 4.8 ± 3.5 hr (%) 70% Init. TIMI 0/I Flow Procedure Time 51 min (%) 60% Filter wire (%) 39% Diabetes (%) 13% Stenting (%) 98% Prior MI (%) 6% Other DP/Thrombectomy 0%
    66. Validity of Surrogate Marker Complete Resolution (>70% STR) CADILLAC All <=70% >70% (n=700) p-value Patients STR STR Death and Re-MI 30-Days 3.6% 6.2% 2.0% 0.001 1-Year 6.5% 9.4% 4.8% 0.02 EMERALD <30% 30%-70% >70% p-value Death (%) STR STR STR 7 Months 8.7% 7.0% 0.0% 0.0001
    67. Primary Endpoint: 24-Hour Holter Monitor Rinspiration Registry in AMI Rates of Complete (>70%) ST Resolution 100% Prim ary End Point % Pts. with Complete STR 90% 81% 83% 80% 78% 79% 80% 73% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30 60 90 120 180 240 (n=94) (n=93) (n=94) (n=94) (n=92) (n=92) Time After Last Contrast (min)
    68. Primary Endpoint: % STR at 60 minutes Rinspiration Registry in AMI 100% Rates of Complete (>70%) STR @ 60 min. % Pts. with Complete STR 90% 94% 80% 83% 80% 70% 67% 60% 64% 50% 40% All LAD Non-LAD < 6 Hours >= 6 Hours (n=93) (n=45) (n=48) (n=71) (n=21) Time from Sym. Onset By Vessel
    69. Primary Endpoint: % STR at 60 minutes Rinspiration Registry in AMI 100% Rates of Complete (>70%) STR @ 60 min. % Pts. with Complete STR 90% 94% 80% 80% 82% 70% 77% 60% 64% 50% 40% All LAD Non-LAD Rinsp. Rinsp. + (n=93) (n=45) (n=48) Alone FW (n=39) (n=54) By Vessel FilterWire
    70. Death and Reinfarction at 30- Days 10% Rinspiration Registry in AMI 30–Day Death and Reinfarction % Patients [No device related events] 5% 3% 2% 1% 0% Death Reinfarction Composite
    71. Unmatched ST Segment Resolution % Patients with ST Resolution 90%- Rinspiration 80.9 80%- Rinspiration Rinspiration EMERALD 73.4 79.6 69.7 70%- AngioJet- Diver CE- EMERALD EMERALD AiMI REMEDIA 62.6 66.8 60.0 60%- 58.0 50%- 30 60 90 TIME (minutes after PCI) Citations REMEDIA: JACC 2005;46:371-376 EMERALD: JAMA. 2005;293:1063-1072 Rinspiration Registry (n=88) AngioJet-AiMI: TCT 2004
    72. PROCEDURAL TIME min 80 AMI Trial Procedural Time (minutes) 70 76 60 Rinspiration is Fast 60 50 54 53 51 49 40 45 39 30 20 Angiojet (n=240) X-Sizer (n=100) Export (n=252) All Controls Rinspiration Control (n=240) Control (n=101) Control (n=249) (n=590) (n=102)
    73. Historical Comparison Rinspiration and Composite EMERALD (Tx + Control) 100% Rates of Complete (>70%) ST Resolution % Pts. with Complete STR Prim ary End Point 90% 81% 83% 80% 78% 79% 80% 73% 70% 74.1% 73.2% 72.3% 69.7% 60% 66.8% 62.6% 50% 40% 30 60 90 120 180 240 (p=.015) Time After Last Contrast (min)
    74. Historical Comparison - Kerberos and Combined EMERALD (Tx + Control) EMERAL Population Rinspiration Odds Ratio p-value D 0.61 All pts. 62.6% 73% 0.046 [0.37-0.99] 0.34 LAD 34.1% 60% 0.0013 [0.18-0.67] 0.59 Non-LAD 80.5% 86% 0.25 [0.24-1.46] 0.45 < 6 Hours 62.6% 79% 0.008 [0.25-0.82]
    75. The “Power-Pulse Spray” Technique Conclusion: ALI is just that! ACUTE!! therefore we…. “Must take the bull by the horns” or Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Allie, Hebert, Walker, et. Al.
    76. ALI Will!!
    77. Subacute Limb Ischemia • Needs revascularization within 2-3 weeks • Usually occurs in the iliofemeral vessels • Usually have a history of PVD---- with previous procedures!!
    78. Total Occlusion of the Abdominal Aorta
    79. Brachial Artery Access
    80. Balloon Inflation in Abdominal Aorta
    81. Kissing Balloon Inflations
    82. Post PTA Result
    83. Bilateral Balloon Expandable Stents (Iliac Artery)
    84. Balloon Expandable Stent (Distal Aorta)
    85. 2 Year Follow-up Angiogram
    86. PTA/Stent of the Abdominal Aorta
    87. Bilateral External Iliac Occlusion
    88. Long Sheath Via Lt Brachial Artery
    89. Long Sheath Via Lt Brachial Artery
    90. Guidewire Across Total Occlusion
    91. Balloon Inflation
    92. Post PTA/Self Expanding Stent
    93. Limb Salvage Via Brachial Approach Before After
    94. Limb Salvage Via Brachial Approach Before After
    95. TASC D
    96. TASC D
    97. 2.5 Laser Probe
    98. After laser-stent
    99. Occluded SFA
    100. 4F Glidecath
    101. 2.3 mm Laser .018 V-18 Wire
    102. Following Laser & PTA
    103. Before After Laser & PTA
    104. Anterior Peroneal Tibial 80-90% >90% Stenosis Stenosis
    105. 0.9 mm Laser .014 Coronary Wire
    106. 2.5 Coronary 3.0 Coronary Balloon Balloon
    107. Following Laser & PTA
    108. Before After Laser Laser PTA PTA
    109. Subacute Occlusion Of the distal anastamosis
    110. Post Laser
    111. Polar cath PTA “cryotherapy”
    112. Polar cath inflation
    113. BEFORE Post Laser-Polar Cath PTA
    114. Open Cutter Fox Hollow Silverhawk Atherectomy Device Nosecone
    115. Plaque excision CFA-Proximal Anastamois
    116. Total Tissue Collected: 252 mg
    117. PTA only of The distal anastamosis
    118. 6 Fr. Sheath is totally occlusive
    119. 2.3 mm Eximer Laser thromboablation
    120. Post Laser- PTA-stent
    121. Subacute Limb Ischemia • Needs revascularization within days-weeks (1-2) • High AMPUTATION rate otherwise!! • Excellent Variety Endovascular “tools”! • Excellent Limb Salvage rates!!
    122. Miam 2 0 i, 0 5
    123. Miami Intercontinental Hotel
    124. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • Rutherford Classification 4, 5, 6 • ~ 100% require amputation in 12 months “without revascularization” • ~ 220-240,000 amputations/yr USA/Europe • ~ 4-30% 30-day perioperative mortality! • ~ 8-37% 30-day perioperative morbidity! “>8,000 amputations/month!”
    125. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • < 50% of all amputees achieve mobility • < 50% of amputees are alive at 3-4 years • 1/4 all diabetics will face CLI • ~ $10-20 billion yearly costs (USA only) • “Shockingly” primary amputations (PA) are “still the most common CLI treatment”
    126. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • In 2000-2001, 67% of USA CLI pts had primary amputation as initial treatment ** • “More shockingly” 50% PA are performed without angiography or a simple ABI!! • Despite > 85-90% 12-mo limb salvage rates reported with revascularization ** Strategic Health Resources
    127. Glidewire Across Total
    128. Glidewire Across Total
    129. Proximal Infusion Port
    130. Distal Infusion Port
    131. After Lytic Infusion
    132. After Stent Placement
    133. The Possis® GuardDOG® Occlusion System is the industry’s first 0.035” guidewire with a CO2 filled occlusion balloon for peripheral interventions
    134. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): Presentation Goals: Awareness of CLI !! Referral … (Podiatry-WC-FP-IM-Endo-Renal-etc) Diagnosis - CTA … Revascularization Tools … Multidiciplinary Treatments – Cases … “MULTIDISCIPLINARY CLI TOOL-BOX”
    135. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): Allie DE, Walker CM, et al Critical Limb Ischemia: A Global Epidemic Eur Interv 2005 (1):75-84 US 2.5 million N = 417 Diagnosis CLI Treatment Pathway - Initial Treatment & and Consultants Spectranetics Grant
    136. Diagnostic Evaluation Prior to First Key Procedure # Patients Percent of Patients Receiving with Lesion Total # Patients in Lesion Assessment Before First Key Procedure Assessment Pathway Group First Key Procedure Amputation 138 281 49% Bypass 67 96 70% PTA 33 40 83% Total 238 417 57% Less than 1/2 (49%) of the patients that eventually received a primary amputation had any diagnostic evaluation prior to their amputation! “Not even a simple ABI!”
    137. Diagnostic Evaluation Detail % of # # Patients Assessed Pathway Assessment Patients with Lesion with Type of Total # % of Group Type [1] Assessment Assessment Patients Total Amputation First Amputation First Amputation First ABI Angiography 98 45 138 138 71% 33% 281 281 35% 16% Amputation First Pathway MRA 3 138 2% 281 1% ABI = 35% Amputation First Other 74 138 54% 281 26% Bypass First ABI 48 67 72% 96 50% Angiography = 16% !! Bypass First Bypass First Angiography MRA 42 1 67 67 63% 1% 96 96 44% 1% Bypass First Other 44 67 66% 96 46% PTA First ABI 25 33 76% 40 63% PTA First Angiography 16 33 48% 40 40% PTA First MRA 1 33 3% 40 3% PTA First Other 19 33 58% 40 48%
    138. Healthcare Consultants % Patients Having a Visit Average # Provider Category # Patients [1] Visits Home Health Care 162 53% 20 Internal Medicine 120 39% 9 Radiology 118 39% 6 DME/Prosthetics/Supplies 100 33% 4 Independent Lab 96 31% 5 Other Nephrology Cardiology = 26% 95 87 31% 29% 3 21 CV Surgery = 21% Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease 78 26% 7 General Surgery 72 24% 5 Laboratory 70 23% 5 Family/General Practice 65 21% 5 Emergency Medicine 64 21% 2 Cardiovascular/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery 63 21% 3 Ambulance/Transportation 63 21% 5 Pathology 58 19% 5 Podiatry 58 19% 4 Anesthesiology 54 18% 3 ER 49 16% 2 Surgery 43 14% 2 Orthopedics/Orthopedic Surgery 33 11% 4 Infectious Diseases 33 11% 8 [1] Percentages are based on the 305 patients (of 417 in study population) who had provider visit after the first episode of care for a PTA, Bypass Graft, or Amputation. Inpatient and Outpatient hospital visits are not included in this analysis.
    139. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • Within 1 year of diagnosis of CLI … 50 - 60 % - major amputation! 25 - 30% - dead! • Amputation rate per 100,000 persons years has increased from 19 to 30 since 1985 …. • 140 per 100,000 persons years in > 85 years “> 4-5 fold increase in the elderly”
    140. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • Within 18-mo of successful limb salvage … 1/3 require “re-salvage” reintervention 1/3 require contralateral CLI intervention “Bilateral Disease” • Within 18-mo of unilateral limb loss … 1/3 will lose the contralateral limb !!
    141. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): • < 50% of all amputees achieve mobility • < 50% of amputees are alive at 3-4 years • ~ $10-20 billion yearly costs (USA only) • Multiple reports of > 85-90% 12-24 mo. LS rates – Surgical &Endovascular Therapy.
    142. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): Diabetes (DM): • 5 - 6% worldwide population (200 million) • Increase worldwide is an Amputation Worldwide there to 330 million by 2020 • 21 million US diabetics 30 Seconds !! In a Diabetic every !! • DM in the US increase by 60% by 2020 • In 2002 82,000 US DM underwent Amput.
    143. Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU): • 15 – 25% of all DM - - DFU !! • ¼ DM (21 million US) DFUAmputation Worldwide there is an in their lifetime • #1 cause of hospitalization Seconds !! In a Diabetic every 30 in DM • 70% all US amputations – DM patient • 85% all DM amputations – preceded - DFU
    144. FIVE P’s of ALI Pain Pallor Pulseless Parasthetics Paralytic
    145. Combination Therapy (Chemical Thrombolysis & Mechanical Thrombectomy) • Concept : “Power-Pulse Spray Tech.” To maximize and combine the advantages and minimize the risks and disadvantages of both Chemical Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy. “Novel Device and Pharmaceutical Combination”
    146. Combination Therapy (Chemical Thrombolysis & Mechanical Thrombectomy) • Goals: A. Rapid revascularization (minutes) B. Minimize exposure to systemic lysis (Decrease bleeding complications) C. Decrease embolic risk D. Improve clinical outcomes
    147. Subacute RT Iliac Artery Occlusion
    148. Post P-PS 20-30 min (UK)
    149. Post PTA/Stent 30 min
    150. 30 Day Result
    151. Pre Post
    152. Subacute Lt Iliac Occlusion
    153. Angiojet Glidewire Across Occlusion
    154. Angiojet
    155. Following P-PS/UK (20-30 min)
    156. Post Bilateral Iliac PTA/Stent (40 minutes)
    157. Post Before “P-PS” PTA, & Stent
    158. 4 Month Follow-up Post P-PS & PTA
    159. Graft Marker
    160. Graft Profunda SFA
    161. P-PS/UK Proximal Graft
    162. P-PS/UK Distal Graft Graft Marker
    163. P-PS/UK Popliteal
    164. Post P-PS (45 min)
    165. Post P-PS (45 min)
    166. Post P-PS (45 min) Note Residual “Flap”
    167. Self Expanding Stent Across Distal Anastamosis
    168. “Flap” Successfully “Tacked-up”
    169. CIS “Power-Pulse Spray” Protocol (Angiojet-UK/TNK/TPA) 1. Cross occlusion-thrombus with .035 glidewire 2. Set-up 6 Fr. Possis Xpeedior Device (normal) 3. Pump out 12 ml of NS prime 4. Exchange NS bag for UK 1,000,000 units, TNK 10-20 mg or TPA 10 mg in 50cc NS 5. Lytic prime catheter (12 ml activated) 6. Reset Infused Volume meter to Zero 7. Add stopcock to “outflow port” of Angiojet 8. Close The Stopcock
    170. CIS “Power-Pulse Spray”Protocol (Angiojet-UK/TNK/TPA) 9. 1 pedal tap = 1 pump stroke = 0.6ml lytic solution 10. Advance Angiojet catheter slowly at 1.0 mm - 2.0 mm increments 11. 1 pedal pump/pulse per advanced increment 12. Advance antegrade until occlusion - thrombus crossed 13. Repeat “P-PS” retrograde and remove catheter 14. The Infused Volume meter will calculate total solution. (Convertible to total lytic dose) 15. Lytic to “Lyse” for 20-30 min in PAD and 30-40 min in DVT 16. OPEN STOPCOCK
    171. CIS “Power-Pulse Spray” Protocol (Angiojet-UK/TNK/TPA) 17. Exchange lytic bag with saline bag 18. Evacuate 12 ml lytic residual (OUTSIDE the patient) 19. Reintroduce Angiojet catheter in “Thrombectomy Mode” 20. Make a single antegrade and retrograde pass with Angiojet 21. Obtain post Thrombectomy Angiogram 22. Further treatment at discretion of clinician “Treat the Lesion” (PTA/Stent)
    172. Angiojet in the Non “PP-S” mode
    173. Before After
    174. The “Power-Pulse Spray” Technique Conclusion: • Amputations are not benign!! • The “P-PS” works for DVT too! • CIS “P-PS” allows rapid revascularization Total procedure time: Overall mean=74 min! “Treat the ischemic limb like the ischemic LAD” Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Allie, Hebert, Walker, et. Al.
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + New Cardiovascular HorizonsNew Cardiovascular Horizons Nominate

    custom

    161 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation by David Allie, MD at New Cardiovascul more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 161
      • 161 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories