Tb ihomeless final


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Headline:
    Click on current headline to add new headline
    Leave headlines white.
    You may increase the point size. If you do, make sure it is consistent throughout your presentation.
    Body Text:
    Click on box to add new body text.
    Leave text as the customized yellow found in your
    Font Colour menu.
    Bullet points should line up (on the left margin) with start of headline.
  • Notes from Stephen Hwang:
    History of TBI was defined as answering “yes” to the question “Have you ever had an injury to the head which knocked you out or at least left you dazed, confused, or disoriented?”
    Mild TBI was defined as head injury resulting in no loss of consciousness or loss of consciousness ≤ 30 minutes
    Moderate/Severe TBI was defined as head injury resulting in loss of consciousness > 30 minutes.
  • Financial incentive 22.8 days average to sign ISP
    44.0 days average to sign ISP
  • So, I’d like to begin by walking you through the types of communication problems we see, and how they manifest themselves in interactions with others.
  • I realize that I may be stating the obvious….but in order to understand why communication breaks down, we need to understand the underlying components.
    There are 2 sides to communication; sending a message and receiving a message, and each has their own specific components
  • Give examples of how these processes are used…
    It is easy to see how breakdowns occur, especially in individuals with brain injury
  • Tb ihomeless final

    1. 1. Diagnosis and Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury Angela Colantonio, PhD, OT Reg. (Ont.) Carolyn Lemsky, PhD, C. Psych. Catherine Wiseman Hakes, PhD Candidate, Reg. CASLPO
    2. 2. Diagnosis & Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury  March is National Brain Injury Awareness Month  Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a serious public health problem  TBI: It’s not just an injury
    3. 3. Presenters Angela Colantonio, PhD, OT Hakes, Reg.  Saunderson Family Chair in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Research, Professor at University of Toronto  Leads an internationally recognized program of research on ABI Carolyn Lemsky, PhD, C. Psych.  Clinical Director at Community Head Injury Resource Services of Toronto  Director of the Substance Use and Brain Injury (SUBI) Bridging Project Catherine WisemanM.Sc. Reg. CASLPO  Registered Speech Pathologist and a doctoral candidate, University of Toronto  Specializes in the assessment and treatment of children & adults with cognitive communication impairments secondary to TBI
    4. 4. Goals of the Session 1. Prevalence and history of TBI among the homeless population 2. Clinical manifestations of TBI 3. Screening tools for TBI 4. Treating TBI and co-morbidities (e.g., substance abuse) 5. Communicating with someone with TBI
    5. 5. Improvement in Quality of Life in Adults with ABI ABI in the Population Intervention Studies Providers Consumers / Caregivers Students, Trainees, Visiting scholars Aging with TBI Knowledge Transfer Gender Issues Collaborative links: - Local - Provincial - National - International
    6. 6. Acquired Brain Injury TRAUMATIC NON-TRAUMATIC  Open        Closed Anoxia Aneurysms Brain Tumors Encephalitis Meningitis Metabolic Encephalopathy  Stroke with Cognitive Disabilities
    7. 7. Brain Injury isis the leading cause of death Brain Injury a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. and disability worldwide. Injuries the brain are among most likely to Injuries toto thebrain are among thethe most likely result in death and permanent disability to result in death and permanent disability International Brain Injury Association International Brain Injury Association
    8. 8. Extent of TBI TBI is more common than breast cancer, spinal cord injury, HIV/AIDS and multiple sclerosis combined Estimated prevalence, 2% of population
    9. 9. Definition of TBI An alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force…” Brain Injury Association of America
    10. 10. The effect of TBI on the health of the homeless (Hwang, Colantonio et al, 2008) Number of Injuries over Lifetime 40  Have you ever had an injury to the head which knocked you out or at least left you dazed, confused, or disoriented? Yes: 53% (of 904 participants) % of All* Respondents (N=475) 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 Number of Injuries Severity of Worst TBI % of All* Respondents 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mild ModSevere Unknown Severity of Injury 5+
    11. 11. TBI in the Homeless Population Age at Time of First TBI (Any Severity): Mean (SD): 18 years (13 Years)  70% prior to first episode of homelessness
    12. 12.  Persons with a history of TBI compared to persons without a history had significantly higher levels of: – Seizures – Mental health problems – Alcohol problems – Drug abuse problems The risk of these conditions increased significantly with severity of injury
    13. 13. Diagnosis  History of TBI  Length of unconsciousness, post traumatic amnesia  Physical examination  Imaging: CT, MRI  Neuropsychology
    14. 14. Measuring Severity/Level of Consciousness Glasgow Coma Scale:  Eye Opening (1-4)  Best Motor Response (1-6)  Verbal Response (1-5) Scoring:  Mild 13-15  Moderate 9-12  Severe <12
    15. 15. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine definition of mTBI A traumatically induced physiological disruption of brain function, as manifested by at least one of the following: 1. Any loss of consciousness; 2. Any loss of memory for events immediately before or after the accident; 3. Any alteration in mental state at the time of the accident (e.g. feeling dazed, disoriented, or confused); and 4. Focal neurological deficit(s) that may or may not be transient; but where the severity of the injury does not exceed the following:  Loss of consciousness of approximately 30 min or less;  After 30 minutes, an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13-15; and  Posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) not greater than 24 hrs. Katy, et al. (1993)
    16. 16. Consequences of TBI Cognition: concentration, memory, judgment, communication, sleep. Movement abilities: strength, coordination, balance, fatigue. Sensation: tactile sensation, vision, hearing, headaches. Emotion: instability, impulsivity, mood. Community integration: impacts family, work, economic/ social wellbeing
    17. 17. Clinical Sequelae     Highly variable presentation depending on area of the brain affected TBI survivors described like “snowflakes” e.g., frontal lobe damage can affect social behaviour Occipital lobe damage may affect vision
    18. 18. Women and TBI Impact on reproductive health, women with TBI vs. women without TBI:  68% of women 5-10 years post TBI reported their cycles were irregular after injury  46% experienced amenorrhea  No significant differences in conception but more post partum difficulties  Significantly more mental health issues Colantonio et al., 2010
    19. 19. SCREENING TOOLS Survey Questions to Identify Traumatic Brain Injuries
    20. 20. Background of Surveys to Identify TBI Many surveys exist. Some examples are:  Ohio State University TBI Identification Method  Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire  HELPS Brain Injury Screening Tool
    21. 21. Ohio State University TBI Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) Inter-rater reliability and predictive validity have both proved acceptable when tested in a substance abuse population: – IR (r=0.849-0.951) – Intra-class correlation coefficient all above 0.80, with 6/7 above 0.90 Bogner J, Corrigan JD. (2009). Reliability and predictive validity of the Ohio State University TBI identification method with prisoners. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 24:279-291. Corrigan JD, Bogner J. (2007). Initial reliability and validity of the Ohio State University TBI identification method. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 22:318-329.
    22. 22. Definition of Brain Injury in Context of the Survey  Self-identification of an injury to the head (Questions 1-5) PLUS  An Affirmative Answer to one of 6-8  Confirmation of head injury and loss of consciousness or episode of blacking out
    23. 23. Neuropsychological Evaluation   Typically involves many hours of testing Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Cognition (RBANS) is a short test
    24. 24. Treatment  Referral for further evaluation and treatment  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation  Wide range of treatments with emerging evidence  Follow up for disability support services/payments
    25. 25. CMHA Kelowna and Brain Trust Canada partnership: ABI Outreach Services  Aims to secure residential settlement  ABI Outreach Worker provides the knowledge required to maintain a productive lifestyle, including budgeting, dealing with mental health problems, drug addiction and other physical issues.  ABI Tenant Support Worker assists in providing access to non-emergency medical support, basic needs such as nutritious food, and support with coping skills, personal health practices, etc.
    26. 26. Research Based Theatre  Based on focus groups with consumers, family members and health care providers  Translated key elements on experience of TBI and experiences with providers  AFTER THE CRASH www.ruckusensemble.com
    27. 27. Carolyn Lemsky, PhD, C. Psych. Models of ABI Intervention
    28. 28. Overview  Models of community-based care for ABI  Cognitive compensation (adapting substance use/mental health interventions)  Principles for working with people living with acquired brain injury
    29. 29. Integration of substance use and mental health intervention in the continuum of Rehabilitation care Time of Injury ER Acute Care Acute Rehab Post-Acute Rehab CommunityBased Supports mild ----or---- Follow-up moderate Clinic Education of Staff/Patient/Family Psycho-educational materials Referral to appropriate programming Severe Active treatment Education Harm Reduction Case management
    30. 30. Supporting people with ABI in the community
    31. 31. Whatever it Takes 1. No two people with brain injury are alike 2. Skills are more likely to generalize when taught in the environment where they will be used. 3. Environments are easier to change than people. 4. Community integration should be holistic. 5. Life is a place-and-train venture. Willer and Corrigan (1994)
    32. 32. …Cont’d 6. Natural supports last longer than professionals. 7. Interventions must not do more harm than good. 8. Service delivery systems present many of the barriers to community integration 9. Respect for the individual is paramount. 10. Needs of the individuals last a lifetime, so should their resources.
    33. 33. Case Example Tom’s goal: Get a job Problems Observed:    Poor hygiene Limited compensation for memory impairment Socially inappropriate behaviour
    34. 34. Learn and then Place… Get a Job
    35. 35. Place and Learn Keep Job Maintain Change
    36. 36. Good morning, Tom. Your shower is getting warm…
    37. 37. Hey Tom, Good morning, your shower is getting warm…
    38. 38. “In the absence of meaningful, chosen life activities, all interventions are doomed to failure” Ylvisaker, 1998
    39. 39. Restorative Compensatory Environmental Behavioural
    40. 40. Restorative Therapy activities designed to promote return of function:   Attention training Aphasia therapies
    41. 41. Compensatory Learning a way to get around the existing impairment:    Memory books, notes, alarms Meta-cognitive strategies (planning) Routines
    42. 42. Environmental  Reminder signs  Locks  Staff member provides a cue  Routine that is driven by others in the environment
    43. 43. Behavioural Using behavioural strategies to train a skill:     Modeling Rehearsal Chaining Errorless learning
    44. 44. Program Modifications     Smaller sessions Simplified materials Flexible programming (breaks/shortened sessions) Integrating rehabilitation workers into treatment
    45. 45. Why some clients don’t compensate     Lack of awareness Feeling that compensating means ‘giving up’ on progress Stigma and shame Impaired cognition
    46. 46. What does the literature say about treatment of substance abuse after ABI?
    47. 47. Simplified Program Model Brain injury Mild Severe Community Based Mild CHIRS - Based Psycho-educational Approach Psycho-educational CAMH – Based Severe CHIRS Support Case Management CHIRS –Based CAMH support Harm reduction Intensive Case Management Adapted from Corrigan (2004)
    48. 48. From the literature… ABI-Specific Treatment Models Common Characteristics:  Engagement in meaningful activity (incompatible with substance use and addresses mood/behaviour)  Skills training  Treatment may begin before insight/readiness to change
    49. 49. Case Management Models   Access to substance abuse services/mental Health Services ABI consultation   Adapt treatment plans   Explain Neuro-cognitive Impairment Trouble-shoot Assist with access to other support services
    50. 50. Case Management Outcomes (Heinemann, Corrigan, & Moore, 2004) Compares 2 intensive Case management programs with typical care offered at a major rehab centre:  No changes in substance use at 9 months follow-up  Earlier referral was associated with better outcomes  No differences in community integration  Small changes in health-related QOL  Life satisfaction /family satisfaction improved
    51. 51. Motivational Interviewing   Main Goal: To produce an internal drive to change, using non-confrontational techniques Main Method: Evidence of the negative consequences of the behaviour are elicited from the client, so that the client sees and accepts the advantages of change
    52. 52. Structured Motivational Interviewing Cox, Heinemann et al. (2003): Outcome after 12 sessions of Motivational Interviewing – follow-up (mean = 9 months)  Improved Motivational Structure  Reduced negative affect  Reduced substance use
    53. 53. Ohio Valley TBI Network Model Consumer and professional education  Intensive Case Management  Consultation to Substance Abuse Services  www.ohiovalley.org
    54. 54. Corrigan Review (2005)    Treatment is likely to be protracted Successful programs will address engagement in treatment Early intervention is important
    55. 55. Findings 90% N=195 (138, male; 57 female) Mean age = 36.6 (range = 18 to 72) Mean time since injury = 8.0 (range = 3 weeks to 55 years) 83% 80% 74% 70% Attn. Control 60% 50% 45% 45% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% % Complete ISP In 30 days Motivational Interview Barrier Reduction Financial Incentive
    56. 56. 6-Month Follow-up Data    By 6-months over 30% had terminated therapy 90% 50% improvement over control for Barrier Reduction and Financial Incentives 60% Brief phone intervention makes a big difference 84% 79% 80% 70% 66% Attn. Control 53% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Still in treatment or successfully terminated Motivational Interview Barrier Reduction Financial Incentive
    57. 57. Why did these interventions work?     Financial incentive participants stated that the reward was not what made a difference in attending appointments Reminders to address memory issues Transportation support to address planning/financial issues Learning by ‘rule’ not by consequence
    58. 58. Barriers to Care  Behaviour resulting from the cognitive impairment that appears uncooperative or unmotivated  Difficulty recalling information learned  Difficulty generalizing  Difficulty predicting and managing behaviour
    59. 59. 5 Principles for Working with ABI clients       Pace communications (one concept at a time) Repeat important concepts Illustrate using concrete examples Memory Aids for use in session and outside Environmental modifications (including the involvement of caregivers) Re-direction sometimes necessary to move client to problem-solve or address tangential speech
    60. 60. Communication Problems Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury A Guide for Working with Homeless Persons Catherine Wiseman-Hakes Ph.D. Candidate, Reg. CASLPO Speech Language Pathologist
    61. 61. Communication After Brain Injury • Communication difficulties are common • Some more obvious, and some are not! • Subtle (but highly debilitating) communication issues can be misconstrued by a communication partner reflection of poor attitude, disinterest, disrespect, or even substance use.
    62. 62. Communication: Why all the Hype??? • What exactly is communication? • We know when we’ve been involved in a successful communication interaction • AND we all know what it is like to be part of an unsuccessful communication interaction • SO, what exactly is involved?
    63. 63. Components of Communication: Expression • Successful communication involves an exchange by 2 or more individuals where a message or intent by 1 person is expressed clearly, and received and understood successfully by the communication partner(s) • This involves speech (or other non-verbal alternative system) which is the motor act of forming sounds • The content is the language • This is augmented by the equally important non verbal communication behaviours such as body language, eye contact and tone of voice, known as pragmatics
    64. 64. Pragmatic Communication Personality changes following TBI involving egocentric thinking with loss of social sensitivity may result in a selfcentered style of communication that is lacking empathic interaction with a conversational partner.
    65. 65. Pragmatic Communication • Personality changes following TBI involving egocentric thinking with loss of social sensitivity may result in a self-centered style of communication that is lacking empathic interaction with a conversational partner • Behavioral changes may also affect communication. Decreased initiation may result in sparse, uninformative interactions whereas impulsivity may result in verbose, tangential communication that is marred by inappropriate remarks.
    66. 66. Components of Communication: Receiving the Message • Successful communication involves an exchange by 2 or more individuals where a message or intent expressed by 1 person is received and understood clearly • This involves hearing, and understanding (comprehension) • Understanding is required at all of the levels of expression; understanding the speech, understanding the content, both explicit and implied, and understanding the non verbal communication behaviours.
    67. 67. Cognition and Communication Underlying successful communication are a number of key cognitive abilities. These include:  Attention to the speaker,  working memory,  long term memory, and  information processing (this involves the speed, amount and complexity of the information being presented).
    68. 68. Communication Problems Associated with TBI • Slow speed of information processing: this is a hallmark of brain injury • May have motor speech problems, called dysarthria, difficulty forming the words • May have hearing problems, and or problems picking out speech from other background noise • Often slow to initiate, slow to understand, difficulty with implied messages, and difficulty thinking of quick and coherent response • Often have word finding difficulties.
    69. 69. Communication Problems Associated with TBI • Most people with brain injury dread  and shy away from  multi-person conversations, noisy environments, and conversations with people they don’t know • Many canNOT block out extraneous stimuli; attention is effortful and hard to sustain over time • Easily fatigued • Easily overwhelmed by too much information (like someone following a conversation in a language they are just learning...just give up and tune out).
    70. 70. Communication Problems Associated with TBI: Frontal Lobe Injuries • May be impulsive in their responses, may be emotionally labile; difficulty monitoring context • In contrast, they may appear flat, disinterested with reduced affect, limited facial and vocal expression • They may not hear you, they may not understand (or they think they understand, but get it completely wrong) • Problems reading body language, tone of voice and facial expression • If they have motor speech problems they may sound like they are under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
    71. 71. Consequences of Communication Problems after TBI • The consequences of pragmatic communication impairments in people with TBI can be devastating. Social communication serves to connect people to their families, friends, and coworkers • Many people with TBI report reduced social contacts and rate social isolation and loneliness as their most frequent complaint. MacLennan et al 2002: The prevalence of pragmatic communication impairments in traumatic brain injury. http://www.premier-outlook.com/winter_2002/prevelance_pragmatic_communication.html
    72. 72. How to modify your communication to facilitate a successful interaction • If you are having trouble understanding their speech, assure them you ARE interested in what they have to say, ask them to repeat, maybe use a pen and paper • DON’T misinterpret a slow response and or flat affect for lack of interest or disrespect • Speak calmly and respectfully • Whenever possible, have a conversation in a quieter environment (make sure there is no TV, radio playing etc….)
    73. 73. Screening Tools for Communication Problems • Latrobe Communication Questionnaire (Douglas, J.) • Pragmatic Communication Scale (Erlich and Sipes) • Pragmatic Rating Scale (MacLennan et. al.)  
    74. 74. Thank You!
    75. 75. Questions & Answers Angela Colantonio, PhD, OT Hakes,   Saunderson Family Chair in Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Research, Professor at University of Toronto Leads an internationally recognized program of research on ABI Carolyn Lemsky, PhD, C. Psych.  Clinical Director at Community Head Injury Resource Services of Toronto  Director of the Substance Use and Brain Injury (SUBI) Bridging Project Catherine WisemanM.Sc. Reg. CASLPO  Registered Speech Pathologist and a doctoral candidate, University of Toronto  Specializes in the assessment and treatment of children & adults with cognitive communication impairments secondary to TBI
    76. 76. http://www.abiebr.com/edumodules/edumodules.html
    77. 77. Thank you for your participation! • Upon exiting you will be prompted to complete a short online survey. Please take a minute to complete the survey to evaluate this webinar production.