Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Why Quality of Care Should Matter to You: FCA Enforcement in 2013 and Beyond

122
views

Published on

Navigant Managing Director Kevin Cornish examines the government’s theory of FCA liability in quality of care cases against hospitals and individual physicians.

Navigant Managing Director Kevin Cornish examines the government’s theory of FCA liability in quality of care cases against hospitals and individual physicians.

Published in: Business

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
122
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Why Quality of Care Should Matter to You: FCA Enforcement in 2013 and BeyondAHLA Physicians and Physician Organizations Law Institute February 11-12, 2013 Speakers: Kevin Cornish, Navigant George B. Breen, Epstein Becker & Green PC Jeffrey Dickstein, US Department of Justice
  • 2. The False Claims Act Was Inspired By Poor Quality“For sugar, it often got sand; for coffee, rye; for leather,something no better than brown paper; for soundhorses and mules, spavined beasts and dying donkeys;and for serviceable muskets and pistols, theexperimental failures of sanguine inventors or the ruseof shops and foreign armories.”United States ex rel. Newsham v. Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., Inc.,722 F. Supp. 607, 609 (N.D. Cal. 1989) (quoting 1 F. Shannon, TheOrganization and Administration of the Union Army, 1861-1865, at5456 (1965) (quoting Tomes, Fortunes of War, 29 Harpers MonthlyMag. 228 (1864))).
  • 3. Quality of Care Matters• Patients Deserve It• Payor’s Expect It• Professional Standards Require It
  • 4. Government Increasingly Focuses On It• QA Requirements• Hospital Acquired Condition Penalties• Registry/Outcome Reporting Requirements• Quality Based Incentive Payments• Quality of Care Demonstration Projects
  • 5. And It’s Here…New York City Ties Doctors’ Income to Quality of CareIn a bold experiment in performance pay, complaints from patients at New York City’s public hospitals and othermeasures of their care — like how long before they are discharged and how they fare afterward — will be reflected indoctors’ paychecks under a plan being negotiated by the physicians and their hospitals.The proposal represents a broad national push away from the traditional model of rewarding doctors for the volume ofservices they order, a system that has been criticized for promoting unnecessary treatment. In the wake of changes laidout in the Affordable Care Act, public and private hospitals are already preparing to have their income tied partly topatient outcomes and cost containment, but the city’s plan extends that financial incentive to the front line, the doctorsdirectly responsible for treatment. It also shows how the new law could change longstanding relationships, giving morepower to some of the poorest and most vulnerable patients over doctors who run their care.“I would expect that we’re going to see this become more and more prevalent in compensation arrangements,” said AlanAviles, president of the city’s Health and Hospitals Corporation, which runs the city’s 11 public hospitals and is thecountry’s largest public health system, handling more than 1 million emergency room visits a year.
  • 6. Laws and Regulations Require It• Medicaid requires services that “are within accepted professional standards of practice.”Georgia Medicaid Program Part I; section 106(k).*Varies by State
  • 7. Laws and Regulations Require It• TRICARE regulations require that “professional services be provided in accordance with good medical practice and established standards of quality.”32 C.F.R. §§ 199.4(c)(1)
  • 8. Laws and Regulations Require It• Medicare regulations state “no payment may be made … for any … items or services … which … are not reasonable ….”42 U.S.C. § 1395y(a)(1)(A)*Query: reasonable to do it or do it reasonably?(Reasonable question, right?)
  • 9. Laws and Regulations Require It• Providers may only submit claims that are “of a quality which meet professionally recognized standards of health care.” In addition each claim must be supported by evidence that it is medically necessary and of the appropriate quality.42 U.S.C. 1320c-5(a)(2)
  • 10. DOJ Enforces It• Reasonable and Necessary cases• Worthless Services cases• Quality of Care cases
  • 11. You’re Judged By the Company You Keep• Physicians Are Making Medical Determinations, Not DOJ• DOJ Is Retaining Top Medical Experts• Juries Ultimately Decide
  • 12. What’s Happening Now• Long Term Care Facilities• Angioplasties/Stents• Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators• Radiology• Vascular Surgery
  • 13. Occasional Poor Quality Does Not A Good Fraud Case Make• 1X= Instance• 2X= Occurrences• 3X = Trend• 4X = Pattern• 5X = AgendaNot exactly….
  • 14. Enforcement Trends Reflect It• More Cases Filed• More Inquiries• More Referrals• More Investigations• More Prosecutors and Agents• Bigger Budgets
  • 15. Poor Quality Isn’t Hard to Find• Adverse Incidents• Claims Data/Spikes• Registry Data*• Whistleblowers
  • 16. Many Providers In The Crosshairs• Individual Physicians• Physician Groups• Long Term Care Facilities• Hospitals• Systems
  • 17. Poor Quality DefenseTrying to defend a Quality of Carecase by claiming it’s onlymalpractice…
  • 18. What providers and hospitals cando proactively, to try to stave offthis enforcement effort and howcompliance programs should beadapted to address this risk area.
  • 19. Historic Fraud and Abuse Detection and Enforcement Methods are changingThe historic trend of state andfederal focus of fraud, waste andabuse efforts on technical, coding,billing, bundling, etc. is fading asthe future of such efforts.
  • 20. Future of Fraud Detection and Enforcement is Intersection of Data Mining and Quality• Quality = Medical Necessity= FCA• Intersection of use of multi agency data sets to identify outliers• Suspicion of outlier patterns as a foundation for improper medical necessity.• Onus is on provider to substantiate outlier pattern• Data mining as support of qui tam relator claims
  • 21. Medical Necessity is the New Front Line of Fraud, Waste and Abuse InvestigationsWhat is definition of medical necessity?Who is accountable for the medical decisions of physicians?What is basis for companies to evaluate and/or challenge medicaldecisions of medical staff?How can/should companies self assess medical necessity activity?Can there co-exist medically necessary services that are not covered byMedicare?Other examples of Medical Necessity and Quality Fraud risks Conditions of Participation Contractor/vendors Licensing and credentialing Diagnostics
  • 22. What is definition of medical necessity?Wikipedia- Medical necessity is a United States legal doctrine, related to activitieswhich may be justified as reasonable, necessary, and/or appropriate, based onevidence-based clinical standards of care.SSA Sec. 1801- Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize any Federal officeror employee to exercise any supervision or control over the practice of medicine orthe manner in which medical services are provided,… or to exercise any supervision orcontrol over the administration or operation of any such institution, agency, or person.42 U.S.C. § 1395 “items and services reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis ortreatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed bodymember” Primarily defines what Medicare will and will not pay for (coverage) Most “rules” for medical necessity are really coverage guidelines and are not found in in Medicare statue and regulations but contractor manuals NCDs, LMRPs, LCDs etc.
  • 23. Who is accountable for the medical decisions of physicians?The PhysicianThe Provider CompanyThe Provider ExecutivesChief’s of MedicineQuality CommitteesPlan of Care or Standards Committees
  • 24. What is basis for companies to evaluate and/or challenge medical decisions of medical staff?• Peer Review Committees• Standards of Care Committees• Difficulty starts and stops with an unclear understanding and translation into every day medical, clinical, documentation and revenue cycle work flows of payer based coverage rules and their intersection with accepted standards of care• Change the “not my problem” paradigm• Is it just about the $$$?
  • 25. Examples of Medical Necessity Investigations• Cardiac Stents• Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators• Inpatient v. outpatient• Kypho and Vertebroplasty• Pacemakers• Angioplasty
  • 26. How can/should companies self assess medical necessity activity?• Proactive tracking and trending – Local, regional and national – If an outlier, medical case documentation and hospital documents should proactively support outlier status• Company determination of appropriate standards of care• Commonly accepted, defined and used markers for demonstration of medical necessity• Development of process to proactively know circumstances when medically necessary care diverges from payer coverage guidelines
  • 27. Can there co-exist medically necessary services that are not covered by Medicare?Medical Necessity = or ≠ CoverageCoverage = or ≠ Medical Necessity
  • 28. Other examples of Medical Necessity and Quality Fraud risksConditions of Participation- NF• Protect and promote the rights of each resident• The facility must care for its residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of each resident’s quality of life• Facility must conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident’s functional capacity• Each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychological well-being• Must have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychological well being..• Must provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets the daily nutritional and special dietary needs of each resident• A physician must personally approve, in writing a recommendation that an individual be admitted to a facility. – The facility must ensure that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician
  • 29. Other examples of Medical Necessity and Quality Fraud risks for ProvidersContractor/vendorsLicensing and credentialingDiagnostics