Presentation Mdep221

353 views

Published on

A Final Presentation by MDEP 221 QRC Group at Queen's University

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
353
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Presentation Mdep221

  1. 1. 80 DALY WASTE REDUCTION INITIATIVE QUEEN’S RECYCLING GROUP 2009
  2. 2. OUTLINE <ul><li>Introduction </li></ul><ul><li>Our Commitment to 80 Daly </li></ul><ul><li>Group Organization </li></ul><ul><li>Theoretical Framework </li></ul><ul><li>Approach </li></ul><ul><li>Key Players Outside The Community </li></ul><ul><li>Implementation of Signage </li></ul><ul><li>Community Swap Meet </li></ul><ul><li>Recycling Fair </li></ul><ul><li>School Presentation Project </li></ul><ul><li>Reflections </li></ul><ul><li>Conclusion </li></ul>
  3. 3. INTRODUCTION
  4. 4. OUR COMMITMENT TO 80 DALY <ul><li>Working with the needs and goals of the community. </li></ul><ul><li>Developing a waste reduction program through the instigation of the blue and grey box program. </li></ul><ul><li>Allowing the housing corporation to redirect resources currently spent on waste removal to something that can directly benefit the community. </li></ul>
  5. 5. If the tenants decrease our disposal cost by $4000 we will match the amount resulting in $8000 going towards a play structure.
  6. 6. GROUP ORGANIZATION <ul><li>The group focused on 5 key points throughout the project </li></ul><ul><li>COMMUNICATION - Members corresponded through email, phone and weekly meetings </li></ul><ul><li>ACCOUNTABILITY – Members were held to produce their individual sections on time and of high quality </li></ul><ul><li>RESPONSIBILITY – Tasks divided evenly, all members to participate in all aspects of the project </li></ul><ul><li>DECISION MAKING – Group consensus were employed, Non- Hierarchical </li></ul><ul><li>TIME MANAGEMENT – Group worked efficiently and effectively to complete deliverables on time </li></ul>
  7. 7. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK <ul><li>FEMINIST STANDPOINT EPISTEMOLOGY </li></ul><ul><ul><li>‘ situated knowledge’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Take into consideration the </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>perspective of all players involved </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Allow the members of 80 Daly </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>to have a voice in the project </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Requires us to think and act outside </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>of our own personal paradigms </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. APPROACH <ul><li>Implementation of Signage </li></ul><ul><li>Community Swap Meet & Recycling Fair </li></ul><ul><li>School Presentation Project </li></ul>
  9. 9. KEY PLAYERS OUTSIDE THE COMMUNITY
  10. 10. IMPLEMENTATION OF SIGNAGE
  11. 11. COMMUNITY SWAP MEET & RECYCLING FAIR
  12. 12. SWAP MEET
  13. 13. BIN AND RECYCLING INFORMATION PICK -UP
  14. 14. RECYCLING FAIR KiDz zOnE
  15. 15. SCHOOL PRESENTATION PROJECT <ul><li>Our reasons on deciding to engage the children </li></ul><ul><li>Rideau Heights Elementary </li></ul><ul><li>Correspondence with Brigid Steel </li></ul><ul><li>Derek Ochej's Help </li></ul><ul><li>The presentation </li></ul><ul><li>April 22 nd </li></ul><ul><li>Ethics </li></ul>
  16. 16. REFLECTIONS
  17. 17. CONCLUSION AND QUESTIONS

×